[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 398 KB, 1300x1500, nolinker.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10651790 No.10651790 [Reply] [Original]

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>> No.10651866
File: 628 KB, 600x600, 1518209605214.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10651866

>> No.10651922

>>10651790
>cyber-techno machinations
Pulled that right from your ass.
> I do a lot of security analyst programming type work
No, you don't.

This is one of the lamest Chainlink "buy my bags, I'm desperate" attempts I've ever seen.

>> No.10651946
File: 240 KB, 960x678, 1533689242339.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10651946

>> No.10652022

>>10651922
Dude it's copypasta.

>> No.10652461

>>10651790
this dude is right though

>> No.10652507

I've never invested in crypto but I'm tempted to buy LINK, should I do it?

>> No.10652810

>>10652507
no

>> No.10652825

>>10651922
he's FUDing. How dumb are you?

>> No.10652843

>>10652810
Why not?

>> No.10652893
File: 150 KB, 1024x1024, 1532024659378.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10652893

Chainlink will reach at least $1,000 in the near future. I appreciate the opportunity of Chainlink, and I plan to use my investment for the betterment of all. Chainlink will solve all of my financial problems. Chainlink will make my life better as well as the people I love. Chainlink will reach at least $1,000 in the near future. I will not sell my LINK to anyone who does not deserve it. Chainlink will become very valuable, and I am lucky to have gotten in so early. Most who have not purchased Chainlink will do so in the near future, and I hope they can become wealthy with me. Chainlink will reach at least $1,000 in the near future.

>> No.10653031
File: 209 KB, 630x630, 1519773495327.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10653031

>>10652893
based