OH NO NO NO NO NO

[Anonymous No.10627359]

[Anonymous No.10627375]

Im

[Anonymous No.10627377]

>>10627359
(((Montag)))

[Anonymous No.10627390]

>>10627359
>sell your bags, goy

[Anonymous No.10627403]

>>10627359
p-please sell, g-goy

[Anonymous No.10627404]

They don't know shit. The actual probability that it goes to zero is 100%

[Anonymous No.10627406]

>>10627359
"YALE" HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. A socialist spawn pool gtfo OP.

[Anonymous No.10627407]

>>10627359
>CNBC
>Yale
>(((Montag)))
Evrything checks friendo

[Anonymous No.10627424]

>>10627359
Not going to be worthless until we stop using it. Then bitcoin will always have value as a novelty. "Historically significant" blockchain.

[Anonymous No.10627429]

Holy shit. SELL

[Anonymous No.10627490]

Freaking bookworm wants to chew on our juicy apple.

[Anonymous No.10627601]

>>10627359
>yale
>economist
>shit some guy said

[Anonymous No.10627633]

>>10627429
how dumb are all of you fucks...assuming this Yale crackpot knows anything about anything (unsafe assumption), if the market is anywhere near efficient than the risk refelcted in the price and if BTC "makes it" it will appreciate hugely in value

[Anonymous No.10627808]

Dude markets are efficient, get the fuck in your in cubicle and work you piece of shit, trading is evil and even if you did trade and were successful, it doesn't provide any economic value like working in a factory or sending emails...I mean...Markets are NOT efficient, sell your worthless crypto right now you goyim scum!

[Anonymous No.10627830]

>>10627404
Wrong, there will always be a float price whether that be in a private transaction or on an exchange. Therefore, unless all bitcoins are lost, the price can literally not hit zero.

[Anonymous No.10627854]

>>10627601
Is this Wojill?

[Anonymous No.10627892]

[Anonymous No.10628323]

>>10627407
/thread

[Anonymous No.10628351]

Bitcoin will NEVER go back to ZERO

[Anonymous No.10628467]

>>10627359
>Ali
>Common mud name
Trusting a literal mudnigger article.

[Anonymous No.10628495]

>>10627359

wtf is that pile of crap?
the"author" is either a paid shill or he's incredibly stupid LMAO

[Anonymous No.10628649]

faggots from ivy league unis have been yapping about worthless bitcoin for years now. quote in pic related was made in 2012.

[Anonymous No.10628658]

Yale?

Oh, so it's a jewish diversity xer.

[Anonymous No.10629149]

>>10627854
get off my board

[Anonymous No.10629174]

>>10627407
yikes

[Anonymous No.10629485]

>>10628649
Why do we even listen to teachers? The existence of their profession relies on them unable to expand on their supposed profession.

[Anonymous No.10629521]

>>10629485
there is always a place for experts, they have value in their knowledge and the dissemination of it. unfortunately they are also the barrier to growth as the investment of time, reputation, and theoretical contribution they have provided prevents new ideas to take root. oftentimes a generation needs to die off to truly progress. he is no different.

[Anonymous No.10630671]

>>10629485
nah, things like math, physics, biology, etc. are fine, since they are real sciences. teachers and "experts" impede progress in areas that are not sciences, like literature, econ, entrepreneurship, etc. those faggots need to stop being leeches and gtfo

[Anonymous No.10630678]

imagine being taught by this person, now you realize most of what you learnt is fucking useless

[Anonymous No.10630736]

Thank you for checking out my article! Please reach out if you have any comments or concerns.

[Anonymous No.10630747]

Entropy favours the bears

[Anonymous No.10630748]

Even bitconnect is still $1 and it does nothing

[Anonymous No.10630834]

>>10627854

Its blessed Nasim, may she rest in Valhalla, you culturally iliterate barbarian Hivite.

[Anonymous No.10630853]

>>10628649
He's right though about bitcoin.
It's not a currency, it will never have widespread adoption. It's a commodity that currently lacks regulatory control beyond the market

[Anonymous No.10630867]

>>10630853
He's right though about the internet.
It's just a bunch of hypertext markup, it will never have widespread adoption. It's a network that currently lacks regulatory control beyond the market

[Anonymous No.10630868]

>>10630853
imagine

[Anonymous No.10630875]

>>10630747
>the only moral action is the minimization of entropy

You know what you got to do

[Anonymous No.10630921]

>>10630853
idk, nigger, i bought some acid, shrooms, misc electronics and sold my car with btc.
sounds like a functioning currency to me.

[Anonymous No.10630981]

>>10627407
CNBC isn't as bias as CNN, and are actually good for business news.

[Anonymous No.10632473]

>>10627359
and that's a good thing

[Anonymous No.10632513]

Long BTC, short Yale

[Anonymous No.10632776]

>>10627359
https://99bitcoins.com/bitcoinobituaries/

add this to the list lmao

classic nocoiner cope

[Anonymous No.10632814]

Did anyone actually read the fucking article?

2 Yale jews say that bitcoing has a .4% chance of going to zero.

POINT FOUR PERCENT.

You know what the chance of USD going to zero is? 100% once the chink wars begin and we lose because niggers outbred us and spics moved mexico into the US

[Anonymous No.10632934]

>>10627633
>>10627808
Markets being efficient doesn’t mean bubbles based on hype don’t exist.

[Anonymous No.10632991]

>>10630867
And when you buy 1000 internets you will get JUSTED

[Anonymous No.10633027]

>>10632814
That’s 40%

[Anonymous No.10633037]

>>10632776
This.

I don't particularly like Bitcoin, or think it's very good, but these articles get so fucking boring

[Anonymous No.10633119]

>>10633027
holy shit you dumb nigger.

.4 is 40% of 1 which is why you're referring to.

When the percentage sign is used, it's a percentage. Therefore .4% means .4 of 1%

[Anonymous No.10633146]

>>10633119
no its 80% because two said it are you dumb

[Anonymous No.10633152]

"i can just use my credit card"

how will bitcoiners ever recover from this insult

[Anonymous No.10633225]

>Yale economist
>20 years from now
>millions of people will have amassed enormous amounts of personal wealth
>Yale economist will still be...
>a Yale economist
See the problem here?