A P O L O G I Z E

[Anonymous No.10615595]

[Anonymous No.10615609]

>back to where it was a few days ago

Wow such gainz

[Anonymous No.10615615]

I'm actually much more qualified than other anons.

[Anonymous No.10615619]

>>10615609
You're not going to be going to lamboland with that attitude.

[Anonymous No.10615622]

>>10615609
get dabbed on reqtard

[Anonymous No.10615629]

>>10615622
Be nice to your older brother

[Anonymous No.10615631]

Wow anon. Nice dust trading gains. 7 btc worth of sell orders on link at any given time. Mfw I made that and more from shorting at 8k with x2 leverage. Keep your lunch money to yourself. Yawn yawn.

Mfw I'm going to go all in on ethereum when it hits 0.024 and ride up the next x6-7 and the gains alone from that will be more than you working for 2000 years. Link is an utter shitcoin with zero liquidity. Enjoy your pitiful gains kek.

[Anonymous No.10615632]

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

[Anonymous No.10615633]

>>10615622

I dabbed on your mum when I sold my chainstink above $1 in January

[Anonymous No.10615636]

>>10615633
heavy larp

[Anonymous No.10615681]

>>10615609
>what is a good entry and exit

[Anonymous No.10615685]

Whys it pumping now??

[Anonymous No.10615691]

>>10615685
Some pajeet

[Anonymous No.10615712]

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

[Anonymous No.10615715]

>>10615685
>pumping
some biz autist bought a few thousand.

[Anonymous No.10615735]

>>10615712
Nice pasta Ranjeet. Your FUD is so obvious that now I'm convinced to buy ChainLink. Brb I've got to accumulate.

[Anonymous No.10615736]

>>10615615
Bunch of 4channers tried to force it

[Anonymous No.10615759]

I DONT WANT A FUCKING JOB

[Anonymous No.10615766]

>>10615595
This is why people don't like stinkers. The smallest of pumps due to low volume and market buys and you make threads like this. Until there's sustained gains or the singularity, stop making these.

[Anonymous No.10615771]

Rejoice, for you have reached.... 26 cents again.

[Anonymous No.10615793]

>>10615685
Discord whales bought the whole order book thrice earlier today to pump it, notice the volume.
It's gonna dump in a few days, don't worry about it anon.
t. Am in Delphi discord

If your see this, fuck you PumpsKang, you'll never find me. You'll have to ban the entire group if you want to get rid of me.

[Anonymous No.10615804]

looking forward to the inevitable dump and bleed down to a new ATL, its going to be fantastic

[Anonymous No.10615828]

>>10615793
Do they make money off these pumps? Doesn't everybody know it's just low volume pumps? How much money can you even make?

[Anonymous No.10616294]

>>10615793
can you send invite link to that discord? Thanks

[Anonymous No.10616339]

>>10615631
>7 btc worth of sell orders on link at any given time.
Stop watching a single trading pair on a single exchange, you absolute turbonoob.

[Anonymous No.10616354]

>>10615771
It's the number 1 gainer on CMC, again.
Rank 72.
Cope more and harder.

[Anonymous No.10616367]

>>10616354
>again

[Anonymous No.10616375]

>>10616367
Yes, again. Just like last week.

[Anonymous No.10616402]

>>10616375
why does it never reach 50 cents then?

[Anonymous No.10616428]

>>10616402
Because you touch yourself at night.

[Anonymous No.10616609]

>>10615609
Gay and blue pilled

[Anonymous No.10616621]

Wasn't this 30 cents just a few days ago?

[Anonymous No.10616700]

>this thread

[Anonymous No.10616873]

>>10616700
>can’t even get bingo
retire this shit already Jesus Christ

[Anonymous No.10616889]

>>10616621
It's rank 72, more than 15 ranks higher than when it was over 30 cents last week.
Fiat is ultimately the only thing that matters, but rising up the ranks on CMC is an extremely good indicator.
Markets go up and down, and the relative placing within the market matters.

[Anonymous No.10616896]

>>10616873
cope

[Anonymous No.10616902]

grug fomo

[Anonymous No.10616907]

>>10616621
Its almost at ath in sats in 1 month. Eth and ltc are at atl in sats in 1 month and btc is almost at atl in 1 month too. Its performing fucking great

[Anonymous No.10616908]

>>10615828

Yes. Although we are having people here in market for almost a year, most of biz is so stupid and still has no idea how trading metrics work like volume and the book.

They pump it and let biz fomo a bit while they slowly unload at the top most their bags.

Then when it slowly dumps they slowly buy again and repeat its so fuxking obvious. This is the 5th time in 6 weeks.
And they literally are pajeets. They are playing with poordag stacks so for them its worthwhile.

[Anonymous No.10616942]

>>10616889
Rising up the ranks is huge, matter of when not if it moons.

[Anonymous No.10616945]

>>10616908
That's ridiculous. If you want to buy link, you can literally just wait for your preferred price target. It always dumps down.

[Anonymous No.10617481]

>>10616945
Until it doesn't.

[Anonymous No.10617673]

going from 100m to 120m marketcap is like building the fucking great wall of china yet Digibyte sits up there on 280

[Anonymous No.10617689]

>>10616896
Forced meme

Delete and try again with 5x5

[Anonymous No.10617714]

>>10615804
God I hope so. I'm getting a 10k end of month bonus and am using it to buy some bags.

[Anonymous No.10617748]

Holding Link and Holo. Has there been dots connected between these two?

[Anonymous No.10617763]

>>10617748
Link has nothing to do with HOLO which is a literal shitcoin.