[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 120 KB, 629x505, IMG_0828.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10578577 No.10578577 [Reply] [Original]

How much Link to get her back?

>> No.10578795

Bump

>> No.10578834

>>10578577
Fleshlights cost around 60 dollars so like 120 link?

>> No.10578835

10k
100k to get over her

>> No.10579151

>>10578577
The answer? Infinite.

To get over her? 100k to fuck 10 prostitutes and forget she existed

>> No.10579169

>>10579151
*Fuck 10 prostitutes every month and have it make no impact on your wealth whatsoever

>> No.10580197
File: 16 KB, 225x225, FF45B9ED-FB2E-4079-BCB5-FB229E919898.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10580197

I feel this

>> No.10580212

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have high reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Ethereum hit. Happy gambling though anons

>> No.10581325

>>10578577
tfw she won't come back, tfw she wast the best i ever could get

>> No.10581372

Being single is a blessing in disguise