/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.10572243]

I only have 2,000 LINK... nothing else...

I'm not gonna make it...

[Anonymous No.10572250]

>>10572243
You better start fapping to that sigil so it goes to $1,000

[Anonymous No.10572255]

how much did you buy it for anon ?

[Anonymous No.10572285]

2mil isn't that bad anon. You'll live.

[Anonymous No.10572293]

>>10572243
>tfw only 200 LINK
In what year will I make it?

[Anonymous No.10572402]

>>10572255
$2,200

When it was over a dollar, aka FUCK ME

[Anonymous No.10572417]

>>10572402
i spent 500 on vechain and still hold it lol.

[Anonymous No.10572551]

Aim for 10k, but even if you don’t get there just hold out for a few years.

[Anonymous No.10572606]

>>10572243
1.5k here
you'll make it further than me, atleast

[Anonymous No.10573000]

>>10572551
>hold out for a few years

[Anonymous No.10573007]

>>10572293
In 2022 you will have 2million dollars.

[Anonymous No.10573018]

>>10573000
the other option is to wagecuck until you're 65, take it or leave it

[Anonymous No.10573029]

I bought 2000 link 1000 at .17 500 at .25 and 500 at 30

[Anonymous No.10573040]

>>10572243
You have already made it, breh.

[Anonymous No.10573353]

>>10572243

And you have had 6 months to downward cost average since then, and haven't?

If you put 2k into Link right now you'd get between 6-7k Linkies.

[Anonymous No.10574430]

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have high reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Ethereum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

[Anonymous No.10575046]

>>10573353
>tfw auscuck and have to multiply AUD by 0.74 to get the equivalent in USD before calculating how much link it buys me
1k aud gets me less than 3k link at $0.25 REEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.10575918]

>>10575046

I'm Auscuck as well mate so I have to do the same.

AUD is a fucking shitcoin among shitcoins. This fucking garbage coin is losing against USD more and more.

[Anonymous No.10575951]

I have just 8K link now

will I make it?