[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 403 KB, 454x538, 763643476237623.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10519758 No.10519758 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.10520148

>>10519758
>Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system
>We define an electronic coin as a chain of digital signatures
math checks out, BCH is the real Bitcoin. Just bought 100k.

>> No.10520166
File: 33 KB, 349x372, 1531604674245.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10520166

>>10519758
No way you just bought 100k. Prove it!

>> No.10520199
File: 330 KB, 863x981, Proof-BitcoinCash.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10520199

Idk if you guys are ready for this.
I've learned that it's best to take things slowly.
But fuck it.

>> No.10520221
File: 932 KB, 2080x988, swamp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10520221

>>10520199
11/11/18

>> No.10520239

>>10520166
https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin%20cash/address/3MuG5dDJX9DocnzCKBhdAq91CJiL5HKLmV

>> No.10520252

Bitcoin CASH is BITCOIN

>> No.10520253

>>10519758
no blocks for 8 hours and several EDA abuses
>just mined 100k outside consensus

>> No.10520260

>>10520252
>Bitcoin CASH is 0.1 BITCOIN

>> No.10520273

>>10520199
checked. but that text at the bottom isn't quite right. BCH forked on August 1, segwit forked later. by a few days/weeks I can't recall

BCH was the 'user activated hard fork' proposed first by Bitmain, planned as a backup in case core faggots backed out of segwit2x, which they did. thank satoshi for BCH, the real bitcoin will always fork off as needed

>> No.10520290
File: 54 KB, 665x800, 1532236786311.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10520290

>>10520239

>> No.10520293
File: 880 KB, 1900x1006, Blockstream.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10520293

>>10520260

Bitcoin CASH

>> No.10520323
File: 11 KB, 650x52, Screen Shot 2018-08-02 at 12.33.01 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10520323

>>10520221
Huh, it's legit.
I really have to look into gematria more.
One anon once tried to teach me how to use it with the clock but I brushed him off, now I feel bad.
Thanks for the info, saved.

>> No.10520371

>>10520273
You're right but let me break it down.

BIP 91 leads to segwit activation.
Segwit activates in late august, but BIP 91 locked in on July 20.

July 20 - BIP 91 set.
July 21 - Trump signs Executive Order on supply chain resiliency
July 22 - Bitcoin Cash announces intentions to fork (fleeing segshit)

Aug 1 - BCH is born.

>> No.10520378
File: 43 KB, 820x212, IsBitcoinAGovProject.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10520378

>>10520371
Note when this comment was made.

>> No.10520397

>>10520323
I mean the second part is legit, but CSW creating BTC is not legit

>> No.10520413

>>10520371
Also BCH got rid of RBF which means instant and 0-conf transactions, which BTC cannot and will never have again (since they added RBF and will never remove it)

>> No.10520415
File: 5 KB, 508x78, btc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10520415

>>10520293
It's been a year. The free market has spoken.

>> No.10520430
File: 72 KB, 1055x226, BitcoinOrigins.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10520430

>>10520397
Out of all the people in the crypto space CSW is the only one to who fits the archetype of the passionate almost crazy builder (INTJ?) - the kind of personality needed to architect something like Bitcoin.
Everyone else just seems like engineers.
Who do you think made it?

>>10520413
Very true as well.
0-conf is important for being able to be used as cash.

>> No.10520449

>>10520199
Q predicted this

>> No.10520498
File: 1.70 MB, 1407x1317, satoshi.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10520498

Also, who besides Satoshi would own this type of stuff?

>> No.10520572

>>10520378
source?

>> No.10520614

>>10520572
https://www.truthhawk.com/is-bitcoin-a-government-project/
https://archive.fo/ry3hv

>> No.10520636
File: 352 KB, 1461x497, 1533182767710.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10520636

>>10520614
cheers

>> No.10520685

>>10520415
If you take into consideration 1 year, I would say the free market decided nobody wants cryptos. Nobody has actually used BTC nor BCH yet to make a decision between them.

>> No.10520751

>>10520498
I do and my shit isn't fake. Does that make me Satoshi?

>> No.10520789

>>10520751
Not by itself, but if you also did all the other stuff he did, then it would work in your favor.
Got pics?

>> No.10520918

Bitcoin CRASH

>> No.10521423
File: 121 KB, 926x694, screenshotAtUploadCC_1533147956086.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10521423

>> No.10521434
File: 24 KB, 225x225, 1D293C9A-EB0C-4A39-A580-1A5EEDEE9B97.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10521434

>>10519758
Pump it

>> No.10521463

>>10521434
YEA I GOT THAT BITCOIN CASH
(THAT BITCOIN CASH)
YOU CAN SAY I GOT THEM BIG BOT RACKS

>> No.10521709
File: 101 KB, 1038x866, satoshi.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10521709

>> No.10521822

BCASH

>> No.10521834

>chinks still trying to shill bcash
it's over guys, nobody cares anymore.

>> No.10521842

>>10521822
How will bcash ever recover?

>> No.10522093
File: 140 KB, 1280x563, LK.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10522093

>>10520221
RIP

>> No.10522772

>>10520430
he's a narcissist who takes instagram gym selfies you daft prick

>> No.10522824

>>10522772
Based on Twitter he's a total cunt but it doesn't mean that he isn't Satoshi

>> No.10522835

>>10522824
>INTJ
>passionate crazy builder
If he were a woman he'd aspire to be a thot

>> No.10522839
File: 1.10 MB, 1024x724, 1533060803557.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10522839

> bcash
HAHAHAHHAHA you fell for the chink scam

>> No.10522848
File: 17 KB, 306x129, r.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10522848

how was lunch?

>> No.10522890

>>10519758
what a fucking chad

>> No.10523500
File: 935 KB, 1280x4752, Who watches the Watchtowers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10523500

>> No.10523607

Even with the blocksize increases it was only 5 minutes faster than Bitcoin when I made a transaction. And both transactions took atleast 30 minutes to confirm. What a piece of shitchain, I look at the blockexplorer and there had not been a block mined in over an hour!

BCH and BTC are both big piles of shit fighting over a brand thats worth $$$ by talking about their adoption. Yet its most likely that either BTC wins because it has first mover advantage or something completely different wins such as LTC, Nano, Holo, Cardano or something. I would bet my money on Cardano and Holo anytime over BCH for becoming a leader in adoption. BTC and BCH lie constantly all the time. BTC and BCH will both become super centralized, they can't avoid it, no matter what the shills on either side say. Doesn't mean there isn't money to be made in BTC and BCH, but atleast know they're both gigantic fucking liars and only want you to inflate the prices. You got some rich crypto billionaires come together and start their own Bitcoin, each has their own selfish interests to do so. Jihan wants his mining empire and Roger wants to pretend he's saving the world whilst his bank account grows exponentially. I think mr Satoshi Nakamoto is just in it for the attention, cause this man fucking loves it no matter what he says about wanting no publicity.

Not even going to respond to any counter comments cause they're always worthless and filled with subjective ''facts''

>> No.10523653

>>10523607
Nah, you made some good points about the reality of the situation with cryptocurrency right now. It's not ready yet. They need to get 100x better than they currently are.

>> No.10523696

>>10523607
>Satoshi
Stopped reading here.

>> No.10523769
File: 229 KB, 1388x1186, txs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10523769

>> No.10523892
File: 168 KB, 400x300, 700k.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10523892

>>10523769
Impressive.
Can't wait for Sep 1.
Also did you see, 700k transactions for BCH on the day.

>> No.10523943

>>10523769
5mb...out of 32mb
Nice stress test, but we need to see >50% of miners accepting blocks over 8mb

A month ago someone tried to transact an 8mb block but it was broken into chunks. This implies that it might be more costly for a miner to validate large blocks than was advertised. I mean, if it was simple, wouldn't every miner accept up to 32mb blocks so they get all of the sub cent fees?

>> No.10524125
File: 92 KB, 600x600, bodypattern.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10524125

>>10523943
unfortunately i dont think mining pools have enabled 32 MB blocks but still have them set to 8

however im sure that if the mempool starts being constantly full of over 8 MB they will switch over since they turn down a lot of money otherwise

i dont expect a single 32 MB block on sep 1 either to be honest

>> No.10524358

>>10523943
This wasn't the stress test. Sept. 1 is the stress test. Also miners are currently not signaling 32mb blocks because they are worried about being orphaned and losing out on a block