[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 21 KB, 731x548, literallystealing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10499249 No.10499249 [Reply] [Original]

anyone else LITERALLY STEALING at these levels?

>> No.10499260

>>10499249
I'm planning to literally steal at 30 cents.

>> No.10499265

Will buy at $0.85

>> No.10499372

look at the rankings. Nano is down more today than any other coin in the top 50... but is it for any real-life reason, (in other words is this because people analyze the top 50 coins and come to the logical conclusion that nano has the weakest fundamentals, so they sell nano the most)? No, anyone with a working brain can see that Nano has some of the strongest fundalemtals of any crypto, this is not debateable.

So why does the coin with arguably the strongest fundamentals of any "alt-coin" get hammered day by day more than any of the other coins which have FAR WEAKER fundamentlas, far smaller real global community, etc? Because someone(s) is intentinoally and systematically supressing the price. This is a clear fact, not debatebale.

So the only question is: who is behind this? is it

A) whales who actually support nano in the long-term but are keeping the price low to continue shaking out weak hands, allowing them to continue adding to their own whale-bags? or is it

B) People who actually wish to make Nano not succeed, (whether that's investors of other coins whom nano threatens, or people invested in mining who are obviously threatened by nano)?

I suspect the latter, but i can't know for sure, but what i do know for sure is that someone(s) is intentionally and systematcially depressing the price day by day to cause FUD. What we're seeing with nano is not organic, natural market dynamics. Organic, natural market dynamics dictate that the assets with the strongest fundamentals and those that are most undervalued are bought more than they are sold, which should be happeneing to nano but is clearly not happening. What we see happening is intentional manipulation, not organic dynamics.

>> No.10499485

>>10499372
if this is a serious post then I won't say much since you're deluded.

>> No.10499514

>>10499249
Unironically bought 500 NANO today, there's no way its' going to dump below the $1.70 mark unless BTC takes a HUGE shit.

>> No.10499516

>>10499372
>Nano has some of the strongest fundalemtals of any crypto
kek.
centralised as shit you mean?

>> No.10499530

Im the guy who made that post. You all keep mocking me. I have 50,000 bnb so shut the fuck up.

>> No.10499542

>>10499485
>>10499516
nah I just stole it from /r/nanocurrency they are a gold mine on pink dildo days like today.

>> No.10499573
File: 83 KB, 1603x1173, nano_good_coin_buy_sirs_free_transactions.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10499573

Some time ago I made some nano predictions.

>> No.10499579

>still at a quarter billion marketcap

This shitcoin still has a long way down to go, 25 mil marketcap qould be an accurate valuation for this shitcoin.