/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.10405313]

>YC business tactics are EXTREMELY aggressive. YC doesnt fuck around with their startups. They will push Request down the throats of the normies in Silicon Valley and they will use it like addicts. They made Airbnb, Dropbox, Twitch etc mainstream and they will make Request into Venmo/PayPal 2.0

[Anonymous No.10405328]

>>10405313
>THANK YOU FOR THIS DELICIOUS MEAL

[Anonymous No.10405330]

>25$ mozzarella

[Anonymous No.10405339]

Whenever I feel that LINK may have a chance, I think to myself that if everyone shitposted this much about REQ we’d all be believeing in this dead coin as well

[Anonymous No.10405345]

B A G U E T T E D

[Anonymous No.10405346]

>>10405313
15k req hodler. Seriously this update pissed me off today. I cannot believe the audacity of the team to do this and rub it in the face of the investors.

[Anonymous No.10405353]

Check the list of y-combinator backed projects. How many of them have you heard of? The association is a big plus but it doesn’t mean that Req is a sure thing, at all.

[Anonymous No.10405413]

>>10405313
Team "diner". Not dinner you guys. Lets put our faith in a team that can't even spell a simple word... twice.

[Anonymous No.10405439]

>>10405413
i somehow missed this.... this is laughably terrible

[Anonymous No.10405448]

I must say REQ fucked me over the most, I really did think that they'ed get shit done. My portfolio is now under 10k from the 60k Dec break out.

I'm now out of REQ, these updates have been so shit for months and todays was a nail in the wood. REQ holders have blind faith.

[Anonymous No.10405482]

>>10405346

480K ICO hodler here anon.

I never throught I'd say this because I really believed in this project, the team. It's not a $600M token. It's not $60M.

It's not $47M how it is now.

It's honestly a sub $10M project.

This was just the right project with the right backers, the right hype, a slick ICO at the right time, right at the start of the biggest ever bull run.

Now, they are well in over their heads. They over promised pre ICO (fiat was never going to happen) and underdelivered.

The original roadmap was bait to reel in investors. Half that shit has been removed from the new roadmap altogether.

I also invested in Verify (CRED) and honestly, they've been impressing me more with their tiny team and miniscule funds than REQ has been. They just announced partnerships with some of the biggest banks in the UAE.

Fuck this team.

[Anonymous No.10405497]

>>10405413
>>10405439
That's the French word for dinner.

[Anonymous No.10405501]

>>10405345

FUCKING FRENCH MONKEYS

[Anonymous No.10405507]

>>10405413
we were scammed

[Anonymous No.10405536]

>>10405482
>It's honestly a sub $10M project.
without pwc and yc definitely

[Anonymous No.10405577]

[Anonymous No.10405594]

>>10405577
Haha I was just about to say that's $25 please

[Anonymous No.10405602]

makes me want to sell, but at this price it's just not worth it.
maybe 6 months from now they'll have something to show. reminds me of 2001 bubble when people were using all their dot com money on expensive dinners

it makes sense to use the money to go to singapore and do whatever shit, but to flaunt it on social media while your investors are suffering is fucking braindead

[Anonymous No.10405643]

>>10405497
Cool. Well the rest of the article is written in English.

it's not like this is a company that's developing a product that requires extreme attention to detail in its coding or anything.

[Anonymous No.10405672]

>>10405643
who cares about a fucking spelling error? blog updaters are not even coders. and coders would have a compiler and tests and reviews and all sorts of shit that makes spelling errors irrelevant
t. good speller

[Anonymous No.10405676]

>>10405313
Their updates have been consistently riddled with typos as long as I’ve been paying attention. I emailed them a few times about typos on the roadmap image and never got a response. Their code must be fantastic.

[Anonymous No.10405841]

>>10405643
The fucking developers are not writing these blog posts you idiot.

[Anonymous No.10405863]

>>10405330
seems like some people cant appreciate the taste of some good buffalo mozzarella

[Anonymous No.10405885]

>>10405841
The brand manager is. Is that better or worse?

[Anonymous No.10405950]

>>10405863
>implying you can get actual buffalo mozzarella and not some fucking pasteurized cow's milk bullshit

[Anonymous No.10406061]

>>10405841
>>10405672
Because the team matters.

Investors care about every last single person you hire. If I can't trust you to hire someone to do a SIMPLE job, why would I trust your judgement to hire someone to do the IMPORTANT job?

From top to bottom, janitor to CEO, if you represent a company that wants investors money, you better do your job as flawlessly as possible.

And if your job is to be a blogger, perhaps you should learn to spell.

[Anonymous No.10406123]

>>10406061
1 typo per article does not mean you're failing at your job, especially for someone translating from french to English
Missing the forest for the ants
you sound like someone who knows nothing about investing

[Anonymous No.10406186]

>>10406123
Two. Two typos. Same word. Twice.

And I'm a 15k Req hodl-er.

I have a 250k retirement fund at 30. 100k in a mutual fund. I invested pretty aggressively in things that I did basic research on. Nothing fancy

So yes, I know the 'boomer' version of investing. Not much.

So, like the other 90% of people who want to throw their money into something, when I read a report that just talks about how they spent investors money on $25 plates of cheese while butchering the English language, I tend to question the company and its team.

[Anonymous No.10406203]

>>10406186
oh we're going to measure dicks now?
doesn't matter how much REQ you own
I have 700k btw. doesn't fucking matter.
you're a moron

[Anonymous No.10406272]

>>10406203
My dick is tiny.

The team is literally using their blog update to say "We spent your money on expensive ass food".

What company worth anything gloats about this to the shareholders? I know damn well that they DO this, and on a MUCH MUCH grander scale. But they don't gloat about this shit when your coin has dropped its value back to the original ICO.

[Anonymous No.10406344]

I sold my 105k req stack for hot. I intend to buy back but some other shitvoin will make me moon

[Anonymous No.10406391]

>>10406272
yeah. the food part is what you should worry about, not the fucking typos from a french writer dinner vs diner

[Anonymous No.10406426]

>>10405950
>implying i'm a mutt

[Anonymous No.10406436]

req is that shit coin originate outer space only aliens held it

[Anonymous No.10406459]

>>10405577

REQ is so tarnished now, I don't think it's even possible for them to recover.

[Anonymous No.10406473]

>>10405482
You know, this is actually a thoughtful post. I’m an ICO investor and came to the same conclusion.

[Anonymous No.10406504]

>>10405482

Hit the nail on the head

[Anonymous No.10406510]

>>10406123
Dumbass, Robbin is Dutch not French. They weren’t translating anything from French.

[Anonymous No.10406837]

>>10405482

Post-ICO investor here.

I fucking held because of self-discipline, telling myself a project will mature. I denied myself easy profits.

At 800 SATs now this is basically a write off, isn't it? I can break even or there is some sort of miracle and these French motherfuckers actually do so work.

Never fall for the HOLD meme, ALWAYS take profit.

[Anonymous No.10406892]

>>10405482
Good post. I bought at 0.08 and sold around .45 when it was on the way down. O thought this project looked good with all the "professional" articles praising it and the concept. Wish I cashed out at $1 but it was better than nothing. I learned a valuable lesson not to invest on emotion in a company and ALWAYS TAKE PROFITS!!!

[Anonymous No.10406918]

>>10406837
when was the last successful company founded by the french? you got scammed