3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
Seriously, do you really believe it has a chance to reach $3?
Yes
>>10293463Every shitcoin will eventually 100x from their bottoms in the next cycle, so yes it can reach $3 sometime in the future.
Easily. It already reached $1.20 without a working product and no hype
Realistic percentage chance of $3, $30, and $300
>>10293513100%, 20%, 0.1%
>>10293513100%, 50%, 5%
>>10293513>chanceNice fud, guy. 100% on every one
>>10293544>>10293563Are you guys all in link if you think it's 100% to reach $3? Your risk would be 0 and reward be a factor of x
if the supply doesn't instantly increase after main net it will. if the 350mil is locked up for node insurance as promised. and the team slowly starts selling their stacks to fund the growth of the company $100 is absolutely possible within 2 years.
>>1029351398.86%89.54%76.8%
>>10293618but they are just gonna sell the link tokens for cheap over the counter ... i fully realize links potential but the team holds too much of the supply, it’s not gonna be a huge gainer like this at least not a bigger gainer than all other shitcoin that will moon during a bull run
>>10293649Whe4e did you pull those numbers from?
>>10293463Times 333.3333333
>>10293463If it hits 300 most of biz will retire. On their fully decked out yachts.
>>10293707My magic Chainlink future price calculator (my ass)
>>10293664invalid argument. I suggest you take a look at the coin distribution of the coins in top 50. and you will find out most founders hold between 20-50% of supply
>>10293497One out of two shitcoins are exit scams that will disappear beyond the next cycle.
fomo3d + link is the ultimate combination. steady income from fomo3d and huge moonshot from link. It's impossible to be comfier. look into fomo3d anons, so that you don't sell your link stack too early to cover living expenses. if you can see the potential of link, you should be able to see the potential of fomo3d. if you don't, then don't buy it obviously kek but it's worth looking into it.http://exitscam.me/linkmarine
>>10293707memes
>>10293791Why do you fomo3d shills think LINK holders are retarded? The reason we hold LINK is because we can see through all the garbage and want to own the best token available. It's the same reason we will never buy your ultimate shitcoin. Go shill to 0xbtc cucks.
>>10293615I was during the initial hype but now I don't own a single LINK. But don't get me wrong it's still one of my favorite projects. I'll wait until the bear market is over so I can buy at the cheapest prices. I'm hoping it'll hit at least 10-15 cents for maximum ROI. Keep in mind that alts tend to correct 90-98% during bear markets and if the ATH was $1.40, you can do the math yourself.20 cents to $3 is only 15x, that's nothing when you're entering the market just before the start of a new cycle.If you buy at 10 cents and sell at a "conservative" price of $10, you just made 100x easily.But this goes for any "decent" project out there, just wait out for the absolute bargain prices and your patience will be rewarded.>>10293664The team holds 30%.>>10293789This is true, though with the connections that they have, it's pretty safe to assume that this is not a scam. Whether they'll succeed or lose to competitors is another discussion.
>>10293544Seems a pretty legit estimation to me
>>10293827I'm shiling it to you because you're not retarded you retard. all you have to do is read about what the project is and form your own opinion. just like what you did with chainlink. fomo3d isn't a scam and if you could see through the garbage you would realize that. I feel like a dirty pajeet for shilling it like this, but I want the referral % to buy more link. and I have enough self respect that I wouldn't be shilling if I thought that it was a garbage project. all the dividends that I'm making from fomo3d is going directly to link. if you already made up your mind, that's fine, but don't fomo in when you hear about the anons who 5x'd their money buying in now.
>>10293463a reasonable estimate for the next top will be around 4T (about 4x of previous top) since most predict a market of 10T+ within 2 years(this is way too high so 4T is a reasonable estimate for next 2 years). now have a look at the historical snapshot of 7 jan 2018. if you have truly understood the potential of link you will realize it's easily a top 10 coin. so you will be looking at a 40bil marketcap, even it gets only to top 20 it will have an 12bil marketcap. if the circulating supply has increased to 500mil you will be looking at 24-40$/link. in my opinion, link is actually a top 3 coin. and i won't sell a single one before $50
>>10293932I don't think any protocol/layer/infrastructure project can ever be a Top 10 coin. Those spots are reserved for blockchains, just look at the current Top 30 lineup.LINK may get into the Top 20 assuming every single rumor is true.I also think your 4T estimation is very conservative. Imagine how many more projects will further sature the global market cap, the 4T would barely mean 2-3x over the previous highs in 2 years. This cycle brought us 50x global marketcap increase from the previous top.
>>10294045The one thing I will say in favor of Link is being blockchain agnostic means it benefits from every smart contract platform.
>>10293513100% all the way through. It’s just a matter of when. By 5 years in $300 will seem cheap.
>>10293463Yeah, 2 digits wouldn't surprise me either.
Easy
>>10293513100%, 100%, 30%>>10294045we have similar calculations, nice anon. I won't be selling too many LINK under triple digits either
>>10293497Every shit coin has marketing, and some sort of communication
>>10294376
missed a work like a true retard
My dad got laid off from Chain Link Industries a week ago. I would not advise investing in this corn.
I have 80k link. My cut off point is pretty much 0.5M$ or in a bull run 1M$. That is like 12$ for me to sell. Problem is, some people have millions of link. For the, at 10$ they would be multi millionaire. What makes you guys think that they won't dump the price?Smart contracts are barely used in enterprises. So passive income is just a meme. There is not ONE coin in production right now. So if eth is not being used, neither will link.
>>10294593Thanks just sold 100k
>>10293463people keep overlooking the main point about holding LINK; it will deliver an income to those who stake, and it's likely that that income will be pretty lucrative. this in itself could propel the price to between $50 and $100. ater that and once it becomes established and associated with the new smart economy, it'll be a slow walk up to $1000 (or thereabouts).again, i'll repeat; LINK will make holders actual real money. this is a huge distinguishing point in its favor.
>>10294613so if you've got 80K, why would you sell all of it? Doesn't make more sense, take out cost, profit,and gravy, then ride the rest to the moon or zero?
>>10294680Given the network is used and right now there is no sign of that whatsoever. Smart contracts are not even fully covered in legal code (who is responsible, what if it gets hacked et cetera). Before customers will use chainlink with eth we will be years from here.
>>10294613I hope the guys with tons of Link sell early, it'll mean more price stability in the long run.I've been thinking, and if chainlink really takes off and the link token appreciates significantly, it might but be a better idea to sell your whole node with all the link in it instead of just selling all your link. It's like selling a business vs. selling every piece of furniture, the company name, the clients, etc separately. Plus, since the age of the node is significant and is one of the factors that dictates the amount and quality of jobs you get, it makes sense to not destroy it. I have a feeling guys with 100k+ or millions of Link will do this. It makes so much more sense. Maybe Linkpool could have a page where they bring buyers and sellers of nodes together for a small commission of 20% too.
LINK $1000 EOYLINK MARINES UNITE
>>10294781
>>10293463
Assblaster said $3 by April Linkies forever btfo
>>1029351310% 0% 0%
>>10294757Holy shit that's a great idea. Set up some lazyass node and sell the whole thing in 2020. Seems like the kind of thing they'd try to discourage though, its a vector for gaming the system ie. Buying nodes with good rep
>>10294781Captain reporting for duty
>>10294727You don't have to use Ethereum blockchain. Most companies will be using Hyperledger and Corda. Hyperledger will most likely be using Chainlink as it's main oracle service and Corda can list Chainlink next to it's 2 other oracle services(Thomas Reuters and Oraclize).Whole point of Smartcontracts is to save money by automating stuff. Whatever businesses start saving money first will be seriously balling and competition has no option other than to implement smartcontracts asap.
>>10293463didn't some Anon calculate exactly what each Link will be worth and came up with about 10k usd? I'm sure there was a thread like that
>>10294956ah yes the old "10t derivatives market divided up among only 10m link tokens out of the one billion" valuation DELUDED
>>10294956yeah, it's pic related. there's an error in one of his calculations, but it doesn't detract from the overall point.LINK is gonna be huge.
>>10294999yeah, that one, I think it was turned into a pasta with a picture of an iceberg
>>10293463>marketcap>roi potentialunlikely
>>10294727smartcontracts are still subject to national court jurisdictions. i find it amazing people dont realize this. youre an idiot.
>>10294956Have my calculation. How likely does it seem?
>>10295021>link directly captures 10% of global GDPthe absolute state of deluded linkies
>>10293732This is why it won't happen, because it's too good to be true.Yall are living in fantasy like Democrats.
>>10295021I’m stuck. Holy shit
>>10295021>$342,857 per linkDeluded the Post>t.30k stinkie
>>10295021Isn’t ChainLink inherently different from bitcoin, given the the latter is a currency and the former is legal.So we can mooon outside the galaxy
>>10295021this is what linkies actually believe
>>10293513Link is an all or nothing investment. Either you lose it all or you end up with nothing
>>10295073This. It can't be this easy. Only reason people got rich with bitcoin is that no one expected it to go to 20k. It was like winning the lottery. One time thing. It literallly can't keep happening over and over again.
>>10295113>Isn’t ChainLink inherently different from bitcoin, given the the latter is a currency and the former is legal.yes>So we can mooon outside the galaxyyes. this is why so many of us are so excited about LINK
>>10295144Exactly. The fantasy and hope of it mooning and becoming the greatest thing since sliced bread is what makes naive people FOMO in. If it were that easy to become a millionaire Chainlink would already be top 5, instead, it barely moves at all.
>>10295158
Damn man $3 is a given. Just hang on and enjoy the ride.
>>10295168nobody knows about Chainlink. As soon as people start thinking Link will be used in the derivatives market, people will fomo.
>>10295021pure delusion
>>10295168what's wrong with you people. LINK has only been around since 2017. fuck, i try and defend millenials but sometimes it's hard. LINK is at the absolute beginning of its journey. if i was told i'd be a millionaiare in 3 years i'd be happy. why cant you be happy too?
>>10295126this is a straight up retarded mindset to have you really shouldn't listen to shills pushing that "all or nothing" or "hodl to death marine xD" bullshit investing 101 dude holy fuck
>>10295200this. people are ecstatic with 10%/year on the stock market
>>10295209Read again dummy
>>10295245Lmao nice one
>>10295209>>10295251>average reading comprehension of a link fudderno wonders you dislike it, even if you read the whitepaper i doubt you understood it
>>10295144But it happens over and over again. No matter if it’s Tulips, Gold, Amazon Shares, BTC or LINK. It will happen again and again and again. The only difficulty is to pick the right one.
>>10295200And the fact is 90% of start ups fail. Guess what, all the people running those start ups have optimistic dreams and Peter Thiel himself said the vast majority of them exhibit signs of cultism to "keep up the spirits".Facts and reality are not on your side, you are dreamers and fantascists - there's nothing wrong with this. I have a small stake in ChainLink but these ideas of it becoming Top 5, the greatest thing ever... absolute delusion.
>>10295144>Yeah man it just can’t because bro there’s no wayYeah man
>>10295200>>10295354What i mean by "theres nothing wrong with this". I mean it's OK for meme purposes, but when you have serious posts who actually believe this, I worry for your mental health.The amount of Linkies who will be killing themselves in 2 years time when it barely breaks $2. All that waiting and for what? Fools.
hodling until it surpasses $1000
>>10294727>Smart contracts are not even fully covered in legal code (who is responsible, what if it gets hacked et cetera).This isn't true. If you watch the "Are we getting rid of lawyers?" talk Sergey, Tom Gonser, and Perianne Boring had at SXSW they addressed this and there are no legal hurdles for smart contracts.
>>10295378lol, LINK is positioned perfectly in the space it needs to be in. it literlly couldnt be any better placed.http://www.initc3.org/partners.html
>>10295378This. The bottom isn't in till we see at least 2 LINK marine suicides on video.
>>10293511>tersely wise fundamental analysis>repeating digits>green I'd$1k eoy
>>102953782 year return where .17 cents turns into two bucks... yeah stick with your savings account retard. get that awesome return... god i hate this place
>>10295463most fudders are 100% all in on LINK t/bh
Can't wait till people go through the archives and read these threads when Chainlink is 5-10 in the next few years as Smart Contract adoption starts to take place.
>>10295493Aka 6 months bagholding hurt them bad in the coco
>>10295496
>>10295496More like, reading archives to see where the suicide epidemic begunAnd it was so preventable
>>10295537it does have 10 times the supply of ETH
>>10295537
>>10295493Well, I confess I have a small bag of LINK and I can't stop fudding it for some reason. Every day I come to 4chan and see if there's a LINK thread and automatically start FUDding it. I can't stop it. Why?
>>102955701000 a bit high, im happy if hits 100.
>>10295570The total crypto marketcap will probably be 10x sooner or later.
>>10295583>Every day I come to 4chan and see if there's a LINK thread and automatically start FUDding it. I can't stop it. Why?the same reason ppl attack the Catholic Church; b/c it is the truth. No one attacks something which is self evidently false. Like they say, you only take flak when youre over the target.
>>10295572lol I remmember those times.Every 2nd post in threads about Ethereum was some variation of "Its totally a russian scam!!"
Riddle Anon here. A message for LMFG. I'm going to call you guys "L" from now on, just to keep it riddly. Research Bruce Pon. 99% data. Do you want to believe? I love you.
>>10295583How else will I accumulate 100k?
>>10293932Interesting analysis.
>>10295537>>10295572should I redump my eth FUD folder again for that comfy feeling?
>>10295749Transactions in the network have been correlating very precisely with valuation. See ETH for example. Link 1000$ is not a meme
>>10295665the time for lapsring is up. the parterships have already been confirmed. we;re just waiting for singularity now.
>>102935130.001%, 0%, 0%
>>10295810yeah and then post old btc fud and claim that 0btx being called a scam is the exact same thing Lmao
>>10295810I always enjoy those. Yes pls>>10295810
>>10295845Read your posts in this thread. A lot to learn. Start with the valuation. You posted a pic with estimations. If x amount of derivatives are processed using Link x amount won't directly translate into value. As I said above. The amount (and value) of transactions correlates with the token value. Not the value of the contracts being triggered by the blockchain
Looks like general consensus believes $3 will most definitely happen. Does link moon have the capability to moon in a bear market?
the only way it possibly could was if speculators were interested in it. but speculators literally dont care about chainlink, and they never really have.so many new more tradable coins with real volume and actual activity, things to trade against. why would anybody dig deep into shitcoins of the past and waste time trading dead tokens like chainlink?
$3-6 is guaranteed just by holding the sat value. BTC is projected to 100k in next few years. A 50k btc would already get you $3-5 when LINK is pumped back to its previous value of 0.00007-8 sats. Whether it can go past it's previous highs in sats is the bigger question. The tech is interesting, the devs are legit people but it's unclear whether any industry will adopt. Are any industries using oraclize at all? The revenue seems like it is below 0.7m/year
>>10296080>why would enterprises be interested in one of the most promising crypto-projects to this date?
>>10296027Link will spark the next bullrun, buddy.
Lot of people dont understand that smart contracts are worthless without Link. 4th industrial revolution anyone?
>>10295997>As I said above. The amount (and value) of transactions correlates with the token value. Not the value of the contracts being triggered by the blockchainwe dont know that yet. if fintech takes off, it's very likely that transaction costs will take into account the staking penalty if things go wrong. this is why LINK being a high price is a good thing in the model that sergay has articulated.
>>10293791The Pajeets are getting better at this. No more Sir this, pls that, poo here, poo there.
>>10296112Decent book but boring.
>>10295887>>10295900you got it
>>10295665this?
>>10296481
>>10296491
>>10296539
>>10296545
>>10296558
>>10296576
>0xbtc is the next btc >look at all the old fud, it's the same as the fud today!pajeets who shill this way are absolutely pathetic
>>10296491>>10296539>>10296545>>10296558>>10296576Sweet mother of god
>>10296585
>>10296585>>10296576>>10296558>>10296545>>10296539>>10296491>>10296481imagine being so autistic and so butthurt you screencap a whole thread - individually - answer by answer, just to post it into a new thread where inevitably hardly anyone will read your wall of spam. So in the end you end up proving a point to yourself, and only yourself while still displaying your mental condition self-evidently for the whole world to see.
>>10296597
>>10296596will post more soon :^)>>10296602yes, us linkies have a severe mental condition. do yourself a favor and never buy.
>>10296602>no LINK cope
>>10295378Lol killing yourself over losing money you were already willing to lose in the first place? Get out of here, if LINK ever fails then BTC will have a solid gain as well. We are dreamers, but its a calculated dream. Really there are no other new technologies that can provide blockchain functionality to the real world. We're betting on if chainlink (the only decentralized oracle solution) succeeds, then we will finally see USEFUL smart contracts.So yes we're dreaming, but its no delusion, its based on a real solution to a real problem with the blockchain. Once we solve this, then we enter the trillion dollar cryptomarket for sure.
>>10293463No, the prophecy foretold us $1000 EOY
>>10296643lol investing money and being ready to lose it all you are literally fucking gambling. actually no, gamblers typically have a "I'm out" number so they don't lose it allthe actual fuck are you doing here bro. seriously. you aren't investing you are a dumb fuck who fell for that crypto rich neet fomo bullshit.but hey, I shouldn't hate or discourage. we need people like you so we can actually profit. Lmao.
>>10295654somebody shilled ethereum to me in the early days but then I read some FUD and fell for it. this FUD stuff really works.I changed a lot over the last couple years and learned finally to think for myself and do my own research and now I'm early in chainlink.
>>10296675yes sir I am the same like you I also buy chainlink and 0xbtcfomo3d is also very good sir I no make mistake twice so you know is good also buy espers on yobit
>>10296666I'm not losing all my money? I said I'm willing to lose what I invested in chainlink, its fuck all money relative to what I can earn in a job.
>>10296701I only hold chainlink Rakesh
>>10296709stop loss will stop loss of life just saying
>>10296666you're the kind of moron that's never even heard of the term "kelly criterion" but think s he knows shit about gambling/investing.
>>10293463love how every LINK thread turns into a 150+ reply thread. its absolutely amazing
>>10296741Kelly bet is shit not a single chink high Roller uses it Lmao
>>10293463$3 is guaranteed, im more concerned whether or not we'll break $30 by EOY
>>10293463Can’t wait until we all gather in a third world country and party like a rebel group.
>>10296675I feel your pain anon Same thing happened with me and bitcoin in the early days. Fuck that shit. No more. It’s a good feeling to go off of your research, investigation and reading every bit of investigatory news that link marines pull.
>>10296745I've noticed this aswell.
>>10295181projectchicago.io shilled by Sergey
>>10295181>As soon as people start thinking Link will be used in the derivatives market, people will fomo.average people don't know what that is
>>10296861>Ari Juels
back
>>10296897Uncle Ari is the real madman here, he will make all of us rich
>>10296920
>>10296939
>>10296953
>>10296491Thank you for making me feel comfy as FUCK.
>>10296939Sounds familiar.
>>10296963yeah, thx for this anon.
>>10296936hes one of us. Have you been following his twitter?
>>10296939Haha, it's literally the same type of FUD. I bet it's even the same people FUDding it.
This is a gamble in the same way as holding AA vs an underpair is in poker
>>10296775I love you all (doubly so once we make it) but there's a very low chance I'd ever meet with any of you in person. Too much risk.
>>10297130yeah dude, i dont want some fellow /biz/ tard stabbing me in Thailand and trying to steal my linkies
>>10296745>rent free
>>10296963
>>10297238
>>10297250
>>10297261
...Gulden?
>>10297270last one ;)
>>10297277it was to ethereum FUD what Mobius is to link FUD
https://digitalchamber.org/chamber-of-digital-commerce-announces-new-executive-committee-members/https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/cap/view/767206708/Docusign getting serious af about smart contracts and Jumpstart (chainlink follows on twitter and uses smart contracts for parametric insurance) is hiring and quote "Get in at the ground level of a B-corp startup that's about to launch."
>>10296488Source for this?
>>10295583You are a dickhead maybe?
>>10297320SALT, bitpay, nexus, civic and docusign. Interesting.
>>10297561At least I'm not all in on an obvious exit scam in progress.
>>10297532ocean protocol
>>10293847[citation required]
>>10297612Two ways to look at that, if you are wrong, and I believe you are, you are now a dumb dickhead.
>>10296745It's a bullish sign. Think trumps presidency. People just couldn't stop talking about him. This board just cannot stop talking about link. It's being constantly wrung out through a social Darwinism and still survives every single time. It's is the most talked about token BY A LARGE MARGIN on this board and that alone should prove this technology is at least going to spark an interest.
>>10293463Where is assblaster?
>>10297687>>10297708Yeah, that's actually a good comparison. Both Trump and LINK will end up being obvious failures in hindsight and both Trump voters and LINK bagholders will feel fucking RETARDED af and we'll be seeing literal suicide videos in a year or two.(I'm serious I can't stop FUDing LINK pls help)
>>10297725Dead from ASSbleeding
>>10297776Intelligent argument
>>10297708Was ETH talked about to this extent?
bull run is now...
>>10297708flim a flob flubthanks for the dubs
>>10293463segey has a a telepathic link with Ted K
>>10297708On this board alone. No one else cares about oracles. The coin has been shilled here constantly for a year by those who bought into its ico. Then the larpers like assblaster came and told lies about chainlink. Then the >>7777777 get. Since then this board has become a cult. Cults can ladt for years before they fall apart. How long do religions last?
>>10298089>>10297288>>10297270>>10297261>>10297250>>10297238>>10296963>>10296953>>10296939>>10296920>>10296610>>10296585>>10296576>>10296558>>10296545>>10296539>>10296491>>10296481God DAMN we need to start having threads titled "/biz/ REKT" and dump this kind of shit
>>10295126Ya got me
>>10296643but what if i told you dreams are real and are merely an experience within the astral realm?
>>10298111Ted Kaczynski? What the fuck does that mean?
>>10299028it means $1k eoy
>>10299028Ted Kaczysnki is the smartest living human bieng. He exerts his will onto the world from his supermax cell through his slavic surrgogate, Sergey Nazarov. Ted is Sergey and Sergey is satoshi.
>>10299028The Fourth Industrial Revolution will have been tremendously succesful for link marinekind.
>>10295570Eth is going to $10k eventually, I'm 50% sure of it.if eth flips btc, i won't be surprised if it hits $20-50kThe equivalent would be $2-5k per link, but they'd never be equivalent, since link has no chance of becoming a replacement for gold. Only btc and eth and maybe something unforeseen so far have that chance. A utility token, though? I don't think gold replacement will happen. Thus, link almost certainly won't hit 2-5k.But don't say link can't hit 1k because it has 10x the supply of eth, when eth has a very real shot of hitting 10k.I'm like 90% sure we'll see $2k per eth at some point. That would be equivalent to $200/link.
>>10300066>I'm like 90% sure we'll see $2k per eth at some pointWe will see at least $2k per eth next bullrun regardless of if it scales. When it scales we will see at least $10k per eth easy ($1t mcap)
>>10293732oh brother, that'd be beautiful
>>10293847>>10293847I love you anon
>>1029351380%, 5%, 0.001%
>>10295410In theory, yes. Practically stil a lot is unknown and will require new laws. Like automated consensus etc. Who can be sued when solidity has a bug? Who if the contract fails or has a bug or exploit? Who if a hacker gets all the funds? So many grey factors.
If people think $3 is practically guaranteed, why aren't they literally not all-in? If you genuinely believe it why not limit your risk.
>>10301180Seriously?Because $500 -> $3k is not enough.I had like $150k. I could have put it into eth or into link and JNT.I make ~$200k/yr at work. $150k took me a while to save up, but I can lose it and still hit $1M one day through stocks in my 401k, real estate, etc. I'll never hit $10M, though. Not without crazy speculative stuff like link.$1M is basically useless for me to stop working. If I invest it and live off 3% per year, I'd be living off $30k/yr. That's not enough to live well in Manhattan like I want. I'd have to move some shitty cheap place in Florida or some other shit state.$10M? I could take $300k/yr for living expenses and continue to live a really comfy livr in downtown Manhattan pretty much indefinitely.
>>10301348>JNTHow is that going by the way?
>>10301348I may get be willing to live on $30k/yr when I'm 60.But right now, I'm under 30. $30k/yr isn't gonna help me get laid lolSo if I got $1M tomorrow, I'd still keep working and saving. It wouldn't change my life at all.
>>10301356There is always farther down for it to go lolI have $30k over the next two months and am undecided on whether to put it into eth with the goal of breaking even as eth goes to $3k over the next few years, or pray for further crash so I can double down on link and maybe slightly expand my knowledge position.
>>10301180>implying I'm not
>>10293732>>10295073>>10295144>>10295168>>10295200>>10295354>>10295378>>10295463>>10295493>go to their site>latest news>September, 2017lol
>>10295025all I have is this globe
>>10295059>LINK $1000>still Bart formations in the chart
>>10293478bpfp
>>10302962man, if only
Should I throw a couple hundred into this shit coin?
>>10303915only if you want to leave humanity behind and become a living, breathing GOD
>>10297288I fucking love this
>>10301180But I am... My entire life savings. I'd rather lose it all and kill myself than miss the chance for total freedom
>>10303931I do anon...I do...
>>10304199I'd throw in $2,300 minimum. Go ahead and get yourself 10k link. If possible that is but not owning link seems as if you're betting against smart contracts from ever seeing mainstream adoption and mimicking real world-data driven financial agreements.
>>10304125This unironically
>>102935135%, 0%,0%
>>10296491>>10296539>>10296545>>10296558>>10296576>>10296585>comparing LINK to ETHkek, you retards make me laugh, keep up the good work
>>10304286I can do that, but I'd be taking a hefty chunk from my OMG stack
>>10305077Just dump your omg. Link has a better long term potential long term and omg has no short term potential gains (getting on coinbase for instance)
>>10304368>>10304353COPE
>>10304368LINK is more important than ETH. Ethereum is like investing in a gold mine. Chainlink is like investing in the pickaxe & shovel company that sells equipment to 10,000 gold mines
>>10293513guaranteed 5x within the next 2-3 years if it isn't an exit scambut it might be an exit scam
>>10305077Id much rather hold link than omg but that's just me.
>>10296878No, but investors do.
25 cents incoming.
>>10293463$3 is inevitable, I'm more curious if we'll break $30 by EOY
>>10293463>Seriously, do you really believe it has a chance to reach $3?no
>>10293497I literally believe this, maaaybe not 100x for all the memecoins out there, but all of them will moon eventually from where they are today.
>>10295410>Are we getting rid of lawyersI need a url to this video
>>10306199not at all honestly, that’s just some shit tier simplified comparison you read somewhere else but in reality doesn’t even get close to make sense.link would be the tool to communicate between miners in the gold mine and people wanting to buy gold from the gold company lel
>>10301180Your first day on biz? Tons of anons are all in
>>10296897God I fucking love this man
I have close to 2 million link and I'm still accumulating
>>10308092Link is the only coin that even matters.
>>10307924chainlink network gives smart contract developers access to the toolkit they need that will make it possible to build so in a way the other anon was more correct.
>>10293463Yes, briefly on the way to $5
>>10293513100% 100% 100%
LINK has the head start to give Smart Contracts, on any blockchain, actual, real world purpose besides creating shitcoins and stupid games.
>>10308611$3 in reach then ?
Do you think Link price will dump again? Hoping to buy lower...
>>10309008I think any price under 50 cents is a great entry. that's just me though. Thinking longterm having an average buy-in of 50 cents will be damn good.