[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 407 KB, 720x1280, Screenshot_20180715-084943.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10275679 No.10275679 [Reply] [Original]

Why did this thread get shit on so much? Seems like a great idea to me.

>> No.10275717

Sounds like the guy is recreating the government from the grounds up.

>> No.10275780

>>10275679
Its all fun and games untill uncle jerry decides to take your place as the leader, so he cracks you on your head with a 3 ft bong, kills you, then fucks your sister in your place.

>> No.10275797

>>10275679
See this
>>10275780
Jealousy is a human trait that cannot be erased. People always seem to think the leader does not put their share in and people think they are always better fit to be the top. People are ignorant.

>> No.10275803

>>10275780
that only happens when it's thousands of dollars at stake when it's millions and everyone in the family is living like a king it doesn't matter.

>>10275679
would only work with billions of dollars

>> No.10275804

>>10275679

>install family members in various levels of government, business, and cultural institutes

>use said family members to influence society to further your own goals and benefit yourselves at the expense of others

sounds like he is jewish desu.

>> No.10275811

>>10275679

also link to the thread pls

>> No.10275820

>>10275797
if it's an equal slice of the pie for everyone and all the leader does is control the flow of the money and direction of the family's vision than no one will care in fact most people probably wouldn't want the leadership role and would be content spending their millions in a life of semi leisure

>> No.10275824

>>10275804
Shouldn't we be doing this too? Saying we shouldn't is like saying the Soviet union was wrong to acquire nukes because America got them first.

>> No.10275833
File: 14 KB, 400x400, 1529047555317.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10275833

>>10275824
>inb4 Commie

>> No.10275837

>>10275820
There always has to be a leader. A final word for any split decisions. I think this concept goes back thousands of years. There has to be compensation for this. If there is not better compensation then nobody will fill that role (except for a power hungry numb-nuts that will self-destroy the organization).

>> No.10275847

It sounds nice but it's really just a fantasy that would never come to fruition, as many or most of the adults wouldn't want to risk their livelihoods if they don't trust the anon running it with money entirely, plus organizing and operating with such a structure probably wouldn't be easy.

>> No.10275858

>>10275837
look at the way his trust fund is being set up at that level the difference between $100 million and $1 billion literally doesn't matter it's likely no one in the family will even think about money and the leader will be elected from within. leadership compensation won't even be in their vocabulary

>> No.10275862

>>10275820
>implying some people dont want power just for power's sake

>> No.10275866

>>10275858
>literally doesn't matter it's likely no one in the family will even think about money

Good luck with that Anon. People care about money. It is never enough, especially when a group gets larger.

>> No.10275878

>>10275866
Maybe we're reaching an era in which comrades and culture are seen as more important than money?

>> No.10275894

>>10275811
>>10273341

>> No.10275906

>>10275717
lol you got it spot on
>>10275894

>>10275894
his business tier list is interesting implys multiple leaders

>> No.10275923

>>10275878
No, just no Anon. People try with communes and disconnected communities but those always end up with the leader fucking all the women and children and drugging the men. People are fucked up Anon. The grass is always greener on the other side as they say.

>> No.10275928

>>10275862
>Implying a fraction of a fraction of a % of the human population isn't capable of banding together for the sole purpose of cooperatively sustaining themselves in order to overcome any environmental threats and hardships.
just do low-key eugenics man

>> No.10275940

>>10275928
>banding together for the sole purpose of cooperatively sustaining themselves in order to overcome any environmental threats and hardships
Any time there is concentrated power there is corruption. Disprove this.

>> No.10275944
File: 125 KB, 1227x1037, 1529604400402.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10275944

>>10275923
fair point anon, but you know what they say...

>> No.10275960
File: 278 KB, 1280x720, Screenshot_20180516-203233.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10275960

>>10275940
Shitty meme, I know, but they got pretty close...

>> No.10275970
File: 38 KB, 657x527, 1529433603595.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10275970

>>10275944
If at first you dont succeed...

>> No.10276049
File: 92 KB, 796x588, 1526505150734.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10276049

>>10275970
Try try again.

>> No.10276067

>>10275923
Seriously though you could make it law that the leader should abstain from that degeneracy because the only thing that should be motivating a leader is near-blind love for his people.

>> No.10276076

>>10275906
Yes, balkanize the power. Create the corporate-state!

>> No.10276088

>>10275847
Small scale could work no?

>> No.10276093

>>10276088
it wouldn't work unless you have billions of dollars you need to eliminate desire from their lives so you can play hitler and direct them

>> No.10276094
File: 226 KB, 720x1280, Screenshot_20171216-102728.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10276094

>>10275803
>would only work with billions
>80 people

>> No.10276111

>>10276094
>all have 2 kids

>> No.10276123

>>10276093
>you need to eliminate desire from their lives.

So either pray for treaty of Versailles 2.0, Eugenics... Or use genetic engineering?

>> No.10276133

>>10276111
>abort the kids
>invest in SENS meme
>????
>profit

>> No.10276134

>>10276123
not even sure what you're implying here but money is what i'm talking about all desire stems from lack of money

>> No.10276255

>>10275824
Honestly this desu. The jews have a good thing going for them. The #1 reason why WE cant is because we dont exist in a strong enough tribe, and it would be very difficult to build one from the ground up.

The jews got their start thousands of years ago AND they had religion to command the rank and file members.

Gangs do this on a small scale, but they successfully recruit youth that need a sense of belonging, which isnt exactly our target demographic

Frats and sororities are another example

>> No.10276294

>>10276134
Money is merely a trusted proxy used to facilitate trade. Once a man has the necessities to live, all other forms of value are relatively subjective.

>> No.10276303
File: 80 KB, 502x446, 1530815314741.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10276303

>>10276255
Wanna start a tribe(s) wit me?

>> No.10276342
File: 246 KB, 337x613, 1531119588108.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10276342

>>10276255
You make it sound simple:
We establish a crypto tribe.
Even the eldest of tribes will have to buy in and membership is simply determined by wallet age / transactions/ smart contracts.
>our tribe shall worship a mysterious being known as Satoshi

>> No.10276406
File: 26 KB, 367x500, 1530838368885.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10276406

Someday capital will be replaced by the folk being held to a standard of greatness and meeting that standard. For now those of us with IQs over 115 must use it as a means to navigate this capitalistic society, until, one day, they'll sell us the rope we'll use to hang them.

>> No.10276418

>>10276342
Was just about to respond similarly. All financial aspects of the tribe are handled via smart contracts. Decisions handled via voting on blockchain (representative governing though ie head of individual family vs pure democracy). And on and on.

>> No.10276517

>>10276418
I would agree with this, however some aspects of action (ie. subversive factions, non-auditable transactions) could be the downfall of this system. Plenty of people pencil whip their numbers to look good and even more people outright ignore documentation - probably why industrialized societies are teetering right now
>t. pharmacy technician (sees a lot of pills going to people who just wanna get high)
We'd have to establish an entirely trustless culture, wherein every aspect of life is audited or justifiably punished for infraction - slaps on the wrist for selling pounds of fentanyl to junkies shouldn't occur and possibly all recreational drug use should be sanctioned as long as it can be shown such pastimes aren't a detriment to individuals. We're gonna need FAP tokens and DRUG coins to keep this sort of thing from becoming another trans-Mormon cult.