[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 230 KB, 1794x960, 1521215564660.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10243931 No.10243931 [Reply] [Original]

Seriousy, what is the price of Link EOY?

>> No.10243939

$0.20

Dubs.

>> No.10243951

dat marketcap meme

>> No.10243958

777.77 USD

>> No.10243961

>>10243931
>Market cap matters for currencies

lol

>> No.10243975

>inb4FUD

>>10243931
depends on BTC price cus LINK won't take off until next year. it will also not explode like many believe as migrating the systems LINK is aiming will not be an easy over-night-task.

everyone needs to realize that stuff like this takes time. a fuckton of time. why do you think they've been working on this for years?

as they said: they've got one shot to make it.

>> No.10243982

Worst math ever. Reminds me of when people it would be impossible for ETH to be $1000 without a multi trillion dollar market.

>> No.10243993

>>10243931
wow. Please unironically delete this. This is the best (worst) FUD I have ever seen.

>> No.10244032

>>10243931
>he implies market cap is an actual amount of money invested and not just coin price * circulating supply
LINK could be at $100 with a global crypto market cap of 300 billion. Demand is everything.

>> No.10244058
File: 73 KB, 750x571, 1531172359370.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10244058

>>10243931
Mainnet September

$10-$15

>> No.10244067

>>10244032
No you don't understand they list market cap on every coin site and even normies talk about market cap it is the only thing that matters! :')

>> No.10244141

>>10244058
Uniromicslly this, except $5-15, I think the bottom for btc is $4800

>> No.10244290
File: 313 KB, 2316x1198, IC3 Link partnership.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10244290

>>10243931
1K EOY fren

>> No.10244312

>>10244058
I remember in september people were saying mainnet q4 2017. Now most shillers here say lucky if its released in 2019, top kek.

>> No.10244412

>>10243958

this

>> No.10244416

>>10243975
You're just making shit up. Link could go to 100$ within a few months. Stop trying to be the rational conservative investor guy its obnoxious.

>> No.10244719

>>10243931
"You are here: Crypto marketcap $390B, Chainlink $0.52"
I wish we would hit that again at EOY. I just want my money back, reeee.

>> No.10244742

>>10243931
$0.001 eoy
$0.0000000000000001 by 2030

>> No.10244771

>>10243931
Crypto market cap is an absolute joke, look that shithole called iota, which is high on market cap rank just because they changed its subunits lmao

>> No.10244772

LINK $1000 EOY

>> No.10244784

STINKY FOR THE LINKIES

$100 EOY

>> No.10244805

>>10244312
I don't remember a single soul saying that. The ICO itself was in Q4 ffs, they didn't even have a testnet scheduled back then, who the fuck was predicting December mainnet?

>> No.10244823

Why is marketcap a meme lads? Is it because of the incentive to hold Link on a node?

>> No.10244873

Realistically? Probably around 5-10 cents.

>> No.10244925

>>10244823
What is the market cap of the USD? British pound or any other currency?

>> No.10245589

>>10244925
This. Too much emphasis is put on mcap here. Its a factor to look at, but /biz/ makes it out to be the most important factor.

>> No.10245640
File: 679 KB, 1242x2208, 1523490272270.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10245640

>>10245589
1k per link is fud

>> No.10245821

>>10245589
Its because nobody here really knows anything about finance and sees everybody else talk about mc so they talk about it to feel in the know.

>> No.10245871

$0

>> No.10246042

>>10244290
So they donated some money to get on the same list as these bigshots, nice play, fooled you at least

>> No.10246061
File: 23 KB, 112x112, 456715302248513537.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10246061

>>10244312
nice fud pajeet

>> No.10246120
File: 430 KB, 1592x1548, 1528853322091.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10246120

>>10246042

>> No.10246139
File: 71 KB, 720x1080, tumblr_p396w7wotL1s2yc47o2_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10246139

marketcap is still valid link can only reach 100$ maximum and that would have to be the number 3 coin which is unlikely

i dont see how "demand" can invalidate the laws of physics that the market cap they use on coinmarketcap would objectively be higher than bitcoin if it went to 500$

>> No.10246144

>>10246139
see
>>10245640

>> No.10246167
File: 201 KB, 1200x900, tumblr_pbdf7u3c0v1s2yc47o2_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10246167

>>10246144
it still has to be bigger than bitcoin

youre depending on bitcoin growing when you cant assume that

youre expecting to see chainlink #1 coin by far on coinmarketcap

to see that number of 1000$ per link

>> No.10246176
File: 105 KB, 960x548, 1524885127231.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10246176

>>10246167

>> No.10246202

>>10246144
Just leave that retard alone. He actually thinks scientific laws are the same ad market laws.

>> No.10246206

>>10246167
what if link is the chosen one surpasses the bitcoin and starts the mass smart contract bubble with industries fomoing in monkaGIGA

>> No.10246232

¢8 EOY, if you can’t see that the devs are just keeping up appearances so they don’t get sued for fraud, you are gonna have a bad time in this market

>> No.10246241

>>10246206
Its almost like the ability to link real world data to blockchain and smart contracts is the next step in the 4th industrial revolution that will start the next crypto bull run, pushing link to the top 3 of CMC.

>> No.10246274

yeah, any day now link will make everybody rich! its just around the corner!

>> No.10246290
File: 103 KB, 1200x800, tumblr_p79akfNwxP1s2yc47o6_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10246290

>>10246206
>>10246241
i mean top 3 coin is a tremendous long shot more than you could ever hope for

and that would only give 92$ a coin

>> No.10246338
File: 260 KB, 480x395, 1523849817238.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10246338

>>10246290
see
>>10245640

>> No.10246354
File: 186 KB, 1280x853, tumblr_pa6rx9KejR1s2yc47o2_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10246354

>>10246338
look m8 even if the coins are "staked" they arent going to disappear from the overall supply

it STILL has to have a bigger coin market cap than bitcoin to be where you think itll be

>> No.10246384

>>10244719
That’s why you will never make it
>$1000 eoy

>> No.10246486

>>10246290
>only $92
>only
What the fuck

>> No.10246512
File: 332 KB, 1280x1920, tumblr_pbg5qpxyyJ1s2yc47o3_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10246512

>>10246486
its good but most people saying 1000$

arent realistic

see OP pic

>> No.10246561

why would the price of link go up after main net when so far every other crypto has dumped after main net?

>> No.10246573

>>10246290
I'm not saying 1k but your thinking as if the cryptosphere will not grow.

>> No.10246596
File: 127 KB, 1280x853, tumblr_p72wuysyaI1s2yc47o6_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10246596

>>10246573
well youre thinking that it will

you rely on future conditions and i dont

bitcoin could go to 3k in a few months

>> No.10246754

>>10246596
If you don't think it's going to grow you shouldn't be in any crypto threads besides shorting BTC

>> No.10246769
File: 221 KB, 853x1280, tumblr_pbe74ertMg1s2yc47o5_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10246769

>>10246754
im all in chainlink bro im just kinda sad that its not really feasible to reach even 100$ based on the op pic

>> No.10246777

i am a LINK whale with more than 10 million LINK, all of which i acquired below ICO price back in october. LINK performed way better than i thought it would in december/january, and i cashed out more than enough to live comfortably for the next few decades.

after cashing out a few million dollars, i let my remaining 10MM LINK tokens ride. however, after realizing the volume for LINK on binance was so drastically low, i figured it was more profitable to actively manipulate the market, than to hope for another bull run of 2017 proportions.

so i dumped.

and dumped.

and dumped.

i found the best time to dump was not when the price was tanking (medium-sized bag holders with 100k+ tokens will take care of that for you), but when the price was mooning - or looked like it was about to moon. here's a secret for you: LINK has some of the weakest bulls of any coin on binance. usually it only takes less than a million tokens, efficiently timed, to crush any small pump and take LINK/BTC ratio back into the red for the day, where it ought to be.

want to know why for the last 38 days on binance, the LINK/ETH chart only has seven - yes, seven - green 1-day candles?

because of me.

want to know why everything today seems to be in the green, but LINK is still struggling to make it back above 10 cents, and has currently dipped to under 100 on coinmarketcap?

because of me.

i refuse to let the price go up, and i won't for a while. in case you're wondering, that 10MM tokens i let ride now exceeds 13MM, simply from doing this over, and over, and over again.

i am a bagholder's worst nightmare,

>> No.10246781

>>10246777
>link whale
that's like saying you're a fund manager for your family

>> No.10246858

>>10246777
stop posting this req pasta

>> No.10247310

What LINK tokens will be used for?

>> No.10247871

>>10246354
staked tokens would be somewhere in a gray area between circulating/noncirculating supply. Staked tokens will stay locked up unless the value of LINK greatly exceeds the value of staking. Nodes will probably sell off during bubbles, but not their whole stack, since they function like a business, and to abandon their "customers" would not be a good business move. There are incentives to keep holding link besides its market value, and that puts it in a completely different league than a straight up token of value like bitcoin.