/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.10213018]

Hope you sold at 26 cent Iink, in a week youll be able to double your entire stack

[Anonymous No.10213023]

>>10213018
Try a pool cleaner vacuum while underwater, especially with a heated pool, it will give you the best orgasm of your entire life. the fans rapidly but gently smack the head of your dick while giving really strong suction. obviously stick your fingers in first to make sure it's safe, not every pool vacuum is the same. I've had blowjobs from 3 different women and 4 different men, I've used vacuums, cock-pumps, fleshlights, vibrators... and NOTHING compares to the pool cleaner. I'm not even fucking kidding right now, if you get the chance, try it. the only thing that is even remotely close to how good that pool vacuum felt was straight up vaginal sex with this fat chick who had a really warm snatch, it was like sticking my dick into a wet loaf of banana bread straight out of the oven, and yes this fucking pool cleaner vacuum was better than that. I don't own a pool or else I'd be doing it every day. unfortunately the owner of the pool caught me doing it so I'm not allowed to be within 1000 feet of his house anymore but it was so fucking worth it, I'm telling you that fucking pool vacuum is like heaven. honestly the only reason I even want to make it is so I can afford my own house with a heated pool and of course a pool vacuum. I can't wait to buy a dozen different brands and styles of pool cleaners and fuck them all. I live for that day to come.

[Anonymous No.10213054]

The moment you solve the oracle problem, which I'm sure chainlink will do, you are essentially moving the goal post and moving the single point of failure further back.

How do you get api into the chainlink network? Sensors that provide api cannot be decentralized to the extent chain link nodes are decentralized. Sure you can have competing companies provide their own sensors and multiple different sensors can send the real world data to the contract, BUT that's not decentralized enough and much more susceptible to a 51% attack.

>Inb4 read the white paper and learn about link tokenomics
I already did.
This encourages people staking their link in their nodes to find a good data provider so that your nodes retain good reputation.
Let say that company x provides consistent correct data. You, as a node runner, are incentivized to get data from company X (see passive income).

Suppose you stake 1000k worth of link in the node as collateral for a high end contract by company X. There is always a possibility of bad actors colluding and perhaps interfere with the development of sensors (let say add a backdoor). And during this critical moment, multiple different sensors provided the incorrect data onto the contract. You just lost the 1000k worth of link you staked as collateral.

Even if the company is financially invested in sending the correct data to the contract, it only takes a few bad actors for this to happen.

Solving the oracle problem is NOT ENOUGH for smart contracts to be adopted by mega corps who literally put billions on the line.

> if bloomberg wants to offer data to a contract he could do it himself without outsourcing node running. So why would it benefit from sabotaging himself?
Good point but significantly limits the number of use cases for smartcontracts. And also if every big corp ran their own node, who would use the nodes ran by us neets?

My estimate is 10usd max per token by 2022

Refute this