Can someone explain...

[Anonymous No.10188273]

How this can compete with Venmo and Apple Pay?

[Anonymous No.10188287]

>>10188273
>how can a french exit scam compete

[Anonymous No.10188307]

>>10188287
I’m talking about if it existed as outlined in the white paper (which it likely never will). How could that compete with Venmo or Apple Pay?

[Anonymous No.10188324]

>>10188307
lower fees, you can use fiat to crypto fluently. escrow services and automatic tax payments.

[Anonymous No.10188346]

>>10188324
It wouldn’t have lower fees. If you use your debit card Venmo and AP have zero fees.

[Anonymous No.10188359]

>>10188346
Your debit card has fees

[Anonymous No.10188365]

>>10188359
Wrong

[Anonymous No.10188378]

>>10188359
What? For withdrawing a couple hundred at most?

[Anonymous No.10188390]

>>10188365
Wrong

[Anonymous No.10188397]

>>10188346
Request would as well then.

[Anonymous No.10188426]

>>10188390
>>10188397
Even if true that debit cards have fees, fine, but the only reason you can do feeless debit card transfers using those services is because the centralized entity eats the cost. Request is decentralized and therefore there is no mechanism for that to be possible.

[Anonymous No.10188429]

>>10188359
That's why many small mom and pop stores hate when you use a card for small purchases. It hurts their bottom line.

[Anonymous No.10188456]

>>10188273
Why is there suddenly 1000 threads about REQ?

[Anonymous No.10188476]

>req

[Anonymous No.10188525]

>>10188307
What >>10188324 says basically. REQ is beautiful on paper, but the idea is years from viability, assuming the team is not a bunch of incompetent frogistan scammers (which they are).
>>10188426
You can't decentralize crypto to fiat. Only way is tokenized fiat. Which is years away from mainstream adoption.