/biz/ - Business & Finance

File: 31 KB, 614x614, 1527007837690.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Chainlink and Cryplets Anonymous Sat Jul 7 10:20:17 2018 No.10183838 [Reply] [Original]

One thing that bothers me about the potential cryplets connection is the thought that Link has nothing to do with it. Is it possible that smartcontract.com may be working with Microsoft, but they are 2 separate things? Are they 2 separate networks that makes Link worthless as it relates to cryplets? Maybe smartcontract.com will make money by working with cryplets, but it will be separate from the value of Link. Not saying that the Chainlink network won't do well on its own, but maybe we shouldn't get so excited about the Microsoft connection.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 10:23:34 2018 No.10183853 >>10183838 Nahh. Your concern is stupid you retard. Just buy link and get rich.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 10:25:08 2018 No.10183867 >>10183838 >several tech giants meet up in a room several times a year and everyone works on his own solution to the oracle problem now THAT would be retarded

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 10:28:50 2018 No.10183891 >>10183838 You should sell anon. You don't deserve to be rich if you doubt link.

Anonymous Sat Jul 7 10:46:23 2018 No.10184020

>>10183838

This is actually legitimate concern. We don't know the relationship between cryptlets and ChainLink. We know that cryptlets serve the same purpose, but on the other hand why would sergey help them if they were replacing his product offering.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 10:47:49 2018 No.10184031 >>10183838 >>10184020 Didn't Sergey patent the term 'cryptlet'? Or something like that?

Anonymous Sat Jul 7 10:49:01 2018 No.10184040

>>10183838
I think ChainLink will be the behind-the-scenes oracle provider for all these different corporations, but they’ll rebrand it to their product. So Microsoft will have “cryptlets” which is ChainLink, but it won’t be called that. Same for all these other possible corporate partnerships

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 10:49:47 2018 No.10184045 >>10184031 We know he claimed a cryplet domain name the same day cryptlets.com was bought by someone else...and he's said they are working with Microsoft on their bletchley offering. That's all.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 10:49:59 2018 No.10184048 >>10183838 Or Microsoft runs a bunch of nodes making all of the free software they've been releasing create an endless supply of money for them.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 10:51:09 2018 No.10184053 >>10184040 This doesn't make sense from a functional standpoint. To use ChainLink Microsoft has to use ChainLink nodes...it doesn't make any sense to call them anything but what they are.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 11:17:49 2018 No.10184219 >>10184045 This is juicy

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 11:19:29 2018 No.10184227 >>10184020 He may be helping because they may be getting paid by Microsoft to do so. Smartcontract.com may be viewed as the top dog for work on oracles and may be assisting other projects as an advisor or consultant.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 11:25:04 2018 No.10184262 Maybe Chainlink is meant for the big fish, SWIFT, Salesforce, etc, while cryplets will be the more commercial version for the masses.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 11:30:35 2018 No.10184298 >inb4 FUD maybe LINK testnet is a prototype to show these big shots how things could work. if it's functional maybe they will adapt it for their own solutions somehow? I'm not tech savvy enough to understand if that could be the case.

Anonymous Sat Jul 7 12:06:02 2018 No.10184554

>>10184298
I've thought about this too, but then there is evidence of connections to the actual Chainlink network. That's why my worst case scenario is that Chainlink and Cryplets are separate networks, aimed at a different clientele. Chainlink and it's Link tokens are a product of smartcontract.com. That doesn't mean that is the only product that they may be working on, especially in consultant roles.

Anonymous Sat Jul 7 13:06:52 2018 No.10185064

>>10184554
I think this is likely.

We have reason to believe that they are separate products. Right now if you look at the schematics for Microsofts blockchain cloud offering, there is no room for ChainLink. Cryptlets is clearly going to be an independent Microsoft branded solution in their ecosystem.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 13:56:48 2018 No.10185490 >>10185064 My worry, if this is the case, is that Chainlink won't have the monopoly that we hope for. It will still get use, but Cryplets will likely be very successful too.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 13:57:49 2018 No.10185498 is 30k link enough to make it, lads?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 13:59:48 2018 No.10185515 >>10185490 It's not a stretch, in my opinion, to envision Chainlink as the middleware for Salesforce, SWIFT, etc, while the Microsoft Cryplets grabs the commercial market. That's not fud, as I think Chainlink can still be very successful.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 14:01:43 2018 No.10185524 >>10184554 Cryplets = shadow fork Any corporation that was considering chainlink would have seen the army of autistic racist neckbeards sperging out all over the place and don't want to associate with it so they forked it

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 14:10:13 2018 No.10185603 >>10185498 Need 100k to make it

Anonymous Sat Jul 7 14:11:56 2018 No.10185623

>>10185515
Something like this could be the case and wouldn't be terrible. Sergey was probably just excited to have Microsoft as a smartcontract.com client and content to collaborate with them in a consulting capacity. This was 2016..so I'm sure he wasn't swimming in major tech firms interested in oracles.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 14:16:36 2018 No.10185667 >>10185603 What's the significance of 100k?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 14:33:01 2018 No.10185794 >>10185667 >>10185667 It means you'll own 100,000 LINK tokens

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 14:37:43 2018 No.10185835 >>10185794 Is that to buy a node or somethin?

Anonymous Sat Jul 7 14:50:18 2018 No.10185937

https://amp.reddit.com/r/LINKTrader/comments/7ve3kb/my_research_on_the_bletchley_cryplets_and_why_i/

Cryptlet Schema: { "title": "Cryptlet Schema", "type": "object", "properties": { "name": { "type": "string" }, "publicKey": { "type": "string" }, "config": { "description": "describe what Cryptlet does", "isolation": "boolean", "...": } }, "required": ["name", "publicKey"] }

This is an exact JSON schema fit (other than title) to the Chainlink Adaptor JSON found here: https://github.com/smartcontractkit/schemas/blob/master/schemas/adapter_schema.json

This finding was the first thing which made me think "Man, it's actually using it"

>>	Anonymous Sat Jul 7 15:02:56 2018 No.10186043 >>10185835 Yes. 100k needed for a node if you can't afford 100k then your tokens are worthless. No poorfags allowed. You a poorfag?

Anonymous Sat Jul 7 16:29:08 2018 No.10186694

>>10184298
Oh shit this anon figured it out.
Swifts smart Oracle is rebranded chainlink and Microsoft cryptlets is Microsoft's interface into chainlink.
In other words, chainlink is the underlying back end infrastructure and companies access it through their own front end product.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]