OMISEGO WHAT THE FLYING FUCK IS THIS SHIT

[Anonymous No.10152039]

https://www.reddit.com/r/omise_go/comments/8w51ij/daily_discussion_july_05_2018/e1sv0kl/

[Anonymous No.10152056]

What’s the big deal, you NEETs get worked up over the most mundane shit

[Anonymous No.10152070]

>>10152039
This is one of the reasons why Link is the best project in crypto. None of this bullshit.

[Anonymous No.10152077]

>>10152039

its a fucking liberal feminist bitch who sucks at her job and got offended because she fell on the crypto hype chain and made it about gender when it wasnt.

fucking disgraceful. complete untalented waste of life that makes excuses

[Anonymous No.10152228]

did they seriously post this meaningless mumbo jumbo? lmao

[Anonymous No.10152259]

>>10152070
Yeah, sergay just steals your money and tells you to fuck off without further discussion.

[Anonymous No.10152279]

https://youtu.be/tTCP4n1pfAY


OMG diversity hired this dumb Aussie girl as biz Dev.

[Anonymous No.10152298]

>>10152039
just dumped all my OMG someone recommend me a chad coin

[Anonymous No.10152307]

>genuine critique of absolutely shit interview
>feminist sarcasm freak out
>more genuine critique
>a huge blob of text saying the critique is harsh and unfair while doubling down on the feminist bullshit
who the fuck is still in this TRASH

[Anonymous No.10152319]

SELL SELL SELL SELL SELL SELL SELL SELL SELL SELL SELL SELL SELL SELL SELL SELLSELL SELL SELL SELLSELL SELL SELL SELLSELL SELL SELL SELLSELL SELL SELL SELLSELL SELL SELL SELLSELL SELL SELL SELLSELL SELL SELL SELL

[Anonymous No.10152337]

>OMG doing something to appeal to normies
SELL SELL SELL SELL
>does absolutely nothing
we're gonna make it

the absolute state

[Anonymous No.10152341]

seriously brainstorming about switching all my OMG into QASH and go nearly all on on QASH

[Anonymous No.10152349]

>>10152039
>https://www.reddit.com/r/omise_go/comments/8w51ij/daily_discussion_july_05_2018/e1sv0kl/

[Anonymous No.10152372]

>>10152349

[Anonymous No.10152396]

>>10152372

[Anonymous No.10152408]

>>10152396

[Anonymous No.10152415]

>>10152259
Kek

[Anonymous No.10152419]

>>10152408

[Anonymous No.10152424]

>>10152408
Try reading Don Quixote, each sentence is a paragraph.

[Anonymous No.10152441]

>>10152298
AMB. Real life use case, mainnet this month and the CEO is right wing but knows to keep his mouth shut. Read the recent reddit ama and then go all in.

[Anonymous No.10152460]

>>10152039
If you care about not supporting sjw culture your only option is get out of crypto. They are all run by shitlib--omisego is not a unique case, as you're pretending it to be. The one exception is perhaps urbit. But omg, xlm, eth, link, binance, etc. have all either donated tons of your money to nogs in Africa or espoused far left ideology.

[Anonymous No.10152465]

>>10152259
This one is going in my nolinker folder

[Anonymous No.10152484]

>>10152441
>knows to keep his mouth shut
lol?
>Read the recent reddit ama and then go all in.
1k bundles instead of 1 mio and no interest in marketing?
you are the worst pajeet ever
no 4 amb for you

[Anonymous No.10152493]

>>10152039
Thanks just sold 100k.

[Anonymous No.10152500]

>>10152484
Amazing, everything you said was wrong.

[Anonymous No.10152505]

>>10152424
>comparing literary works to a business representative communicating on a forum

ok

[Anonymous No.10152533]

>>10152337
amen, virtue signaling is in

[Anonymous No.10152557]

>>10152533
Hi Chris D.

[Anonymous No.10152564]

Can we downvote that fucking comment? Its si stupid she needs to learn

[Anonymous No.10152663]

>Writes a wall of text filled with gibberish because someone gave a dogshit interview
>still thinks that coin will make it

[Anonymous No.10152980]

>>10152056
>>10152460
You will find higher IQs working in the computing / cryptography / software engineering fields. Liberalism is associated with higher intelligence.
This isn't saying that they're correct -- maybe they're just smart enough to fool themselves.
Here's a link, there's more links from this page to other studies if you care.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886915002925
This is the journal chaired by richard lynn, by the way, you can trust it.

>>10152077
>and made it about gender when it wasn't
She didn't do that though. The guy criticizing her did. And it was all over some stupid non-tech interview video with a normie. The woman on the left said nothing that should make you doubt her abilities as a dev.
As usual investors and VC's are quasi-brainlet, they make judgments based on complete nonfactors, not just gender and race but also by AGE. Notably harder to get a job in the valley if you're older than 40 even if you're a white male with decades of experience.

[Anonymous No.10152991]

when you have to argue with a community member you already lost

[Anonymous No.10153023]

>>10152419
>brainlets will have trouble following this sentence

[Anonymous No.10153134]

>>10152980
>Liberalism is associated with higher intelligence
Patently wrong. When they have surveyed people with the highest IQs it was found they lean strongly in the libertarian direction politically. Liberals just have a lot of 120 IQ people who write for jewish owned media to convince you to think they are so super smart and lots of non-liberals claim to be liberal in the open to avoid backlash.

[Anonymous No.10153158]

>>10153134
>patently wrong
>proceeds to not actually refute what he said in any way

[Anonymous No.10153173]

>>10152070
yeah nothing better than over 6 months of pure silence and no way to know how the project is progressing other than watching github contributions and making wild speculations

[Anonymous No.10153182]

>>10152424
Cormac Mccarthy is like that as well

[Anonymous No.10153200]

>>10153158
Libertarians are not liberal democrats stupid cunt.

[Anonymous No.10153212]

>we have also found that female team members have been targets of attacks on their intelligence and competence in a way that male team members have usually not been, sometimes subtly, sometimes not-so-subtly, sometimes just subtly enough to be ambiguous.

just sounds like they can't take criticism well

[Anonymous No.10153248]

>>10152039
this is why i hold AMB nad LINK, no sjw or shitskin bullshit

[Anonymous No.10153472]

>>10153134
>avoiding backlash
these are real statistics, nigger, with sample sizes in the tens of thousands. chances are the study participants do not even know what they're being tested for, to avoid contaminating the results.
the journal this was published in is refereed by the same guy that originally published the african IQ studies. they are not controlled by some leftist agenda.

>he didn't even read the study, let alone follow the links
there are a mountain of studies showing the clear correlation between liberal attitudes and IQ, and a strong positive association between prejudicial attitudes and lower IQ. open the fucking URL, read the abstract and follow the links.
here is a little-understood secret: you will never learn anything in life if you refuse to read. most of the really useful information is stored ONLY in written form.

>>10153158
like most t_d implants he simply thinks "libertarians = conservative". and if this thread is any indication he will never deepen his understanding; he'll continue to get all his info from plebbit and youtube channels, and continue to buy high and sell low. oh well, that's life

[Anonymous No.10153506]

>>10152279
>What are your skills?
>*starts sucking interviewer's cock*
>Welcome to the team

[Anonymous No.10153635]

>>10152039
What an absolute corpo-sjw speak, it's only missing 'toxic masculinity'.
Bleurgh.
It's like that mew drama, only 10x worse, at least tayvano didn't write like a passive aggressive pmsing bitch.

[Anonymous No.10153656]

>>10153472
Friendly reminder that Trump won :)

[Anonymous No.10153706]

>>10153656
yeah, i know. i voted for him. you can fuck off back to t_d now.

[Anonymous No.10153719]

>>10153706
never been there, stop projected so hard and remember that Trump won :)

[Anonymous No.10153902]

>>10152980
>The guy criticizing her did.
No he fucking didn't.

How many threads have ridiculed Jun the past week? No sexism there? Idiot.

[Anonymous No.10153957]

>>10153472
no point, trying to debate with retards is like playing chess with a pigeon, it knocks the pieces over, takes a large steaming shit on the board, and flies back to its circlejerk to pretend they won, u will not win in the long run as they can't be convinced, they were born retarded

[Anonymous No.10153958]

>>10153472
These statistics are such bullshit and you strike me as such a self-important faggot that I can't pass up the opportunity to blow you the fuck out.

These statistics measure ATTITUDES such as the "openness to new ideas", equating that with liberalism. The fact is that liberalism historically may have meant something akin to that, but the idea of "being a liberal" does not actually have any association with the Democrat party, globohomocapitalism or anything that currently in 2018 carries the BANNER of liberalism. Of course smart people are going to be open to new ideas, it's literally just a reflexive statement at that point.

To CONSIDER new ideas says absolutely nothing about your capacity or ability to accurately JUDGE the sufficiency of the new idea.

I am a white nationalist who believes every race ought to have it's own political territory with the exception of the Jews who ought to be exterminated from the planet.

I arrived at this belief through a liberal attitude.

[Anonymous No.10154030]

>>10152424
KINO.

[Anonymous No.10154042]

So many incels Jesus fucking Christ

[Anonymous No.10154047]

>>10153958
Answer this

[Anonymous No.10154072]

>>10154047
There is a 50% chance

[Anonymous No.10154074]

>>10154042
>Incels

Nah, but you have to admit it's funny to hear this dumb bitch talking about "everyone is so welcoming", where as, If I or pretty much any other male on the fucking planet within crypto asks a question that is considered 'stupid', we'd be laughed at and/or mocked.

If the cunt is dumb she's dumb. Team full of autistic savants and a 'hot' blonde who is dumber than half of this board. HMMM!

[Anonymous No.10154079]

>>10152039
chinks are subhuman
chinks are natural cheaters/scammers
chinks make shit up/use google translate to fix their shit english
pic/video related is the product

they are worse than niggers I think; anyone buying chink tokens deserves to lose all their money

[Anonymous No.10154082]

>>10154047
2/3
NEET millionaire masterrace

[Anonymous No.10154091]

i honestly cant understand anything this person wrote
whats being implied here
what was the original issue
im so fucking close to crashing this piece of shit into the ground

[Anonymous No.10154124]

>There are people who actually bought this shit
I actually feel sorry for you

[Anonymous No.10154154]

>>10153212
The guy did not use any gendered language at all. There is no way to prove whether their being female had anything to do with his criticism. There is no evidence for it so a reasonable person would assume there was no relation. They even admit this, saying it was subtle enough to be ambiguous. That's another way of saying you have no evidence. But they felt confident enough to mock him sarcastically for sexism? Talking about whipping women and keeping them quiet and implying he shared this attitude? This is sick. I don't like these people in my life, I don't like even hearing about them and the fact that they exist. The last thing I will do is support them financially and promote their products.

[Anonymous No.10154198]

>>10154154
exactly

[Anonymous No.10154235]

>>10153958
>These statistics measure ATTITUDES such as the "openness to new ideas", equating that with liberalism.
another faggot who doesn't even read the studies and then develops an entire "argument" debunking a strawman.
various studies used different proxy questions, none of which relied on vague cues like "new ideas."
they use concrete indicators: opinions on gay marriage, opinions on racial equality, opinions on fiscal policy, etc.
for example, it was found by one study that fiscal policy beliefs are not mediated by iq in any significant way. however, two studies found that conservatism with respect to specific social issues (like gay marriage) is inversely correlated with iq.
sorry, but you're not going to be able to blow anyone the fuck out if you haven't even read the literature.

>you strike me as self-important
no, you reddit-spacing t_d implant, that's actually your inferiority complex nagging you as you charge headlong into a debate completely unarmed. shut the fuck up, turn off the news, and read.

[Anonymous No.10154239]

>>10153506
For an Aussie girl she is above average in the looks. I've never been chad enough for sex with white Aussie girl but being the complete degenerate sluts they are I imagine they know how to suck a dick well

[Anonymous No.10154534]

>>10154235
>and read
read what exactly? what cool jewish book is going to convince people that evolution didn't happen for humans only when it's politically convenient?

>muh gay marriage
nobody cares, reddit faggot. your "studies" are 1) probably literally made up, and 2) don't take into account, you know, the entire fucking political media industry that brainwashes people from birth.

take these """"""studies""""" 30 years from now after technology has allowed *some* differentiation to take place regarding the available political opinions people can hold (still wouldn't be perfect but would be better). I'm not taking anything seriously from the era of pure centralization of Jewish political propaganda and the social implications that come with it.

shut the fuck up, turn off the news, and consider the jews.

[Anonymous No.10154630]

>>10152039
Translation:

>we factor in qualities like race and sex that have nothing to do with the project
>depending on the qualities makeup of the team, we give weight to those variables when hiring/firing
>we imagine women in tech as vulnerable targets, so we go to extra effort to defend them
>we made a joke that we're telling you went over the guy's head because he didn't even realize some things he did
>thanks for having opinions everyone
>we're all better because everyone has opinions
>let's get back to talking about OMG instead of our joke that's way too sophisticated for you guys it was definitely a very high IQ joke and if you don't get it you're probably even more sexist than the guy we scolded initially.

[Anonymous No.10154638]

>>10152298
Ark or Sky.

[Anonymous No.10155079]

>>10154235
wow! I wish I had a high enough IQ to be perfectly fine with faggots sticking their dicks into each other asshole and spreading STDs like a wildfire.

perhaps blacks really are dumb and violent because of their poor socioeconomic status rather than the other way around, if that's what all the intelligent people believe. I'm sure it has absolutely nothing to do with years of indoctrination from colleges and the mainstream media.

[Anonymous No.10155224]

>>10152259

[Anonymous No.10155470]

>>10154047
1/4

[Anonymous No.10155521]

>>10155079
Calm down sperg, it probably has more to do with personality type and whatnot, maybe urban versus rural (high IQ people get high IQ jobs, spend all their time in cosmopolitan "culture" centers aka cities).

[Anonymous No.10155535]

>>10153958
>my definition of nu-liberal is the real definition!
Lmao at you bro. Get fucked.

[Anonymous No.10155542]

>>10154047
50%. Its a philosophical dilemma not probability.

[Anonymous No.10155564]

>>10154047
1/3

[Anonymous No.10155699]

>>10155535

[Anonymous No.10155715]

>>10154047
Okay I shall have to break this down for anyone else
Because it is 100% guaranteed you pick a gold ball first try every try, the third box (from the left) is removed from the equation. Two boxes, you can only pick one box, BAM 50/50

[Anonymous No.10156118]

>>10152039
OMG is already looking for excuses.
Pepper your angus.

[Anonymous No.10156141]

>>10152279
>I'm not a technologist, I just follow my passions
women

[Anonymous No.10156177]

>>10154047
2 out of 3 the next ball will be gold.

And yes, this is the definitive answer.

>>10155542
>>10154072
This isn't a coin toss.
Two out of the remaining three balls are golden. That means the odds of the next one being golden is 2/3.

[Anonymous No.10156211]

>>10156177
>Two out of the remaining three balls are golden
You only operate within a single box. Once you pick the first gold you dont have three other possibilities, just the two. And either result depends on which box your hand went into to.
Two boxes. Two outcomes. One is gold for the second. The other is silver for the second.

Simples.

[Anonymous No.10156222]

>>10156211
>You only operate within a single box.
No, you operate from two possible boxes.

You don't know which of the two gold-containing boxes you just drew that first golden ball from.

[Anonymous No.10156235]

>>10156222
>you operate from two possible boxes
Yes. So two outcomes only as the first ball will be gold no matter which box you happened to choose.
Pick first box and get a second gold. Pick second box and get no second gold. 50/50 on which box you pick.

[Anonymous No.10156247]

>>10154079

Accidents happen, let me call my lawyer he is great at what he does

[Anonymous No.10156262]

>>10156235
>Pick first box and get a second gold. Pick second box and get no second gold.
Except there are two possibilities whereby you picked the first box.
You could've taken the left golden ball, or you could've taken the right golden ball.

Pic related, it shows the options you have left after taking the first golden ball.

[Anonymous No.10156467]

>>10152980
Your study shows that the elite is neoliberal (the term for "socially liberal-fiscally conservative").
Neoliberalism is the dominant ideology of our time so it's absolutely natural that people prospering and being highly functional in this system blindly adopt its values, why would they consider any other system and risk to lose their positions in the process?

Most people are drones when it comes to politics anyway, they just bend to adopt the dominant consensus of their environnement instead of doing some introspection and challenging themselves, which is understandable (noone want to be an outcast among your peers and you will always have higher chances of success if you fit in) but extremely submissive.

[Anonymous No.10156565]

>>10152039

>Neurological difference

What if my autism causes me to LARP as a Nazi, will that be tolerated?

[Anonymous No.10156579]

>>10152056

[Anonymous No.10156733]

>>10152424
Compared to anything by Nietzsche, Don Quixote is written like a first graders essay about his favorite food.

[Anonymous No.10156752]

>>10156733
Don Quixote was the first "modern" novel though. It was absolutely groundbreaking.
Also, it was written over 400 years ago.

[Anonymous No.10156848]

>>10156752
Not hating on my boi Cervantes, just saying these niggas need to step up their reading game.

[Anonymous No.10156922]

>>10156262

Wait, you did all of this and don’t understand how it’s 50/50? Now I know for sure not to take investment advice from biz.

[Anonymous No.10157177]

>>10156922
The first ball you grabbed was golden, that means you took one of the three golden balls:
1) Box 1, left ball
2) Box 1, right ball
3) Box 2, left ball

That results in the following scenarios:
1) next ball = golden
2) next ball = golden
3) next ball = silver

Thus: the odds of the next ball being golden are 2 out of 3.

[Anonymous No.10157194]

>>10152259
>end of discussion

[Anonymous No.10157996]

>>10152279
mirror?

[Anonymous No.10158045]

christ that ball shit again
if you didn't think 2/3 you won't make it

[Anonymous No.10158252]

>>10155079
>corroborating the study

>>10154534
>read what exactly?
>your "studies" are probably literally made up
as i said before, these studies were refereed and accepted by the same journal that published the studies on racial IQ differences. these people do not give an fuck about your all-powerful jewish conspirators.
your entire argument so far has been "i haven't read them but the studies are fake1!!11!" which, humorously, is the same argument 99% of blacks use when presented with the data on black-white iq differences. try to argue better than a nigger next time.

>reddit faggot
it's your spacing that gives you away. it's time for you to go back. you'll find it safer there.

[Anonymous No.10158288]

>>10158252
>the same journal
Harvard is the same institution as the one founded as a Catholic theological seminary.

Now it's a Jewish ingested cesspool.

Are you sure your amazing journal that published racial shit (in the '60s?) wasn't coopted by Jews in the intervening decades?

And you still refuse to consider the fact that 99% of people are not leaders and are perfectly happy to accept whatever the dominant ideology of the current time is.

The smartest people in Nazi Germany were Nazis. Because smart people are really good at being followers and knowing the social rituals of their time.

[Anonymous No.10158291]

>>10156467
>Most people are drones when it comes to politics anyway, they just bend to adopt the dominant consensus of their environnement instead of doing some introspection and challenging themselves
This is a convenient, one-size-fits-all way to dismiss the beliefs of those who disagree with you, but do you have any data to back it up? Where did you get "most people" from? Just your personal observation and conjecture, right?

[Anonymous No.10158335]

>>10158291
>Just your personal observation and conjecture, right?
Haha yeah I know what a completely irrelevant thing - my own experience. My own experience is so subjective and stupid lol.

You know what I should do? I should ignore everything that my own brain and my own body tells me and replace it with the "studies" of people I don't know, whose intentions I don't know, whose methods I don't know, and whose allegiance I don't know.

There's not 1000x more potential hazards of trusting a team of "researchers", university administrators, journal publishing boards and the social implications and considerations of all involved.

No, all of that should be blindly followed instead of my own observations.

YOU ARE A FAGGOT SHEEP

[Anonymous No.10158451]

>>10158288
>Are you sure your amazing journal that published racial shit (in the '60s?) wasn't coopted by Jews in the intervening decades?
they also published in the 70's, 80',s and 90's. the people refereeing the journal are the same; Richard Lynn still sits on the board. it's very weird that you admit you know nothing about it but still keep trying to argue, again, just like a nog.

>And you still refuse to consider the fact that 99% of people are not leaders and are perfectly happy to accept whatever the dominant ideology of the current time is.
not a fact. but something like that is exactly what's being considered here -- ~66% of people are not smart enough to form a rigorous opinion based on facts and logic. in fact, they violently refuse to even glance at the facts.

>Because smart people are really good at being followers and knowing the social rituals of their time.
you forgot about how opponents of the regime were jailed, executed, or exiled?

>>10158335
>completely irrelevant thing - my own experience
but i never said that. you're doing the strawman thing again. you might be retarded.
i've never been robbed by a nigger, so niggers don't rob. gotta trust my own observations and ignore the statistics, right?

[Anonymous No.10158493]

>>10158451
>you forgot about how opponents of the regime were jailed, executed, or exiled?
Are you literally not paying attention to what's happening to the alt right?

>muh 66%
If you accept this fact why the fuck do you care about the amazing studies you're citing?

>70s 80s and 90s
Curiously it stopped after that? I wonder if there was any sort of political shift that happened around the 2000s and continues to this day...... It's a mystery.

>no niggers have robbed me
Tell me how many niggers you know that have built and maintained a first world society.

[Anonymous No.10158757]

>>10154047
It's one fourth
1/4
25%

[Anonymous No.10158783]

>>10158757
There are only three balls left, it can't be anything x/4.

[Anonymous No.10158792]

*snap*
sounding pretty desperate with all that bull crap

[Anonymous No.10158826]

just don't ffs

[Anonymous No.10158874]

>>10156141
crypto is a new interior design

[Anonymous No.10158918]

I love how easy it is to send retarded carelord poltards into a flying rage. This is the language of global capitalism now, if you don't like it you can go to your nazi containment board.

[Anonymous No.10158986]

>>10158918
>This is the language of global capitalism now,
Have you heard of Trump's win?

[Anonymous No.10158993]

>>10158757
You're right! It must be 2/3. Thanks!

[Anonymous No.10159006]

>>10158783
>>10158993
oops

[Anonymous No.10159015]

>>10152039
Looks like a dead coin like it should be omg is a shitcoin and will be treated as such

[Anonymous No.10159060]

>>10156922
I'm sorry to inform you, but you are a brainlet. You probably weren't breastfed as a child and so you won't be able to comprehend the answer here. Move along.

[Anonymous No.10159385]

>>10157177
But you can't see inside the box. Since the two golden balls haven't been observed, they are in a quantum state of flux between left and right. When you pull one of them, the other only remains. Since it has not been observed which ball is which, there is no quantum alternative timeline in which you pulled either the right or left ball; this means that, probabilistically, there was only one possible outcome, not two. Now you're left with a box that has one ball in it. It is one of two boxes, and the ball is either gold or it is silver.

[Anonymous No.10159692]

>>10152279
They deleted it, damage control. Anyone got a mirror?

[Anonymous No.10159773]

>>10159385
You can't see in the box, which means it could be any of the two boxes.
The golden ball you just grabbed could have come from box 1 and box 2.

If it's box 1, the next ball is gold. If it's box 2, the next ball is silver.
BUT
Two out of three times the box in front of you will be box 1, since it has two golden balls.

[Anonymous No.10160103]

>>10159773
lmao you can't pick the same box twice! it's either the one or the other, if mathematix says otherwise science is wrong, kek I always analyse these things myself so the fucking jews don't trick me. If I didn't interpret climate data myself I wouldn't know those kike bribed ""experts"" were pulling a scam on me to destroy the western white race. fucking brainlets!

[Anonymous No.10160160]

>>10160103
>lmao you can't pick the same box twice!

You can choose between two balls from the same box.

[Anonymous No.10160251]

>>10160160
>160160
Nice digits.

You are right about the probability problem.

[Anonymous No.10160253]

Where plasma?
Where staking?
Where cosmo?
Where conglomerates?

[Anonymous No.10160913]

>>10152460
Which doesnt mean shit. Bitcoin doesnt care for race or gender and factually makes both deficit spending, loan defaults (non backed loans in general) and UBI impossible

[Anonymous No.10161093]

>>10152039
>Thanks. Just sold 100k.

My sides