[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 99 KB, 750x1068, 7EA3AC44-7668-4CC5-9DA2-1A9E26C7D0C6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10098491 No.10098491 [Reply] [Original]

Nearly 500 peequests pendings
Why?

>> No.10098511

>>10098491
Someone sent eth to the burn contract. But also there are purchased made w/ crypto on websites using REQ pretty regularly now. Pretty cool. Most undervalued token in crypto right now for sure.

>> No.10098512

>>10098491
Syphoning is not complete.

>> No.10098526

>>10098511
All the websites using anything with REQ are dumb niche sites nobody uses

>> No.10098531
File: 14 KB, 251x242, annoyed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10098531

>>10098526

>> No.10098535

>>10098531
Show me a site people use that has a REQ thing

>> No.10098536

Can we have a party thread when the 10,000th REQ is burnt?
0.00001% of the total supply being burnt is a big milestone.

>> No.10098556

>>10098535
That's not really the point right now. The fact that usage is increasing is a good thing, we're still extremely early in this. Most thriving businesses don't start out with high level usage right away.

>> No.10098828

>>10098526
>Nobody uses
>Clearly people using based on the token burns happening daily from purchases on the REQ platform
Your head is squished in, anon. Sorry for that.

>> No.10098843

>>10098535
This is a list people have been trying to keep but at this point over 50 sites are using the plugins:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aXk5Q4W4bleI94NZyPYWS_Tzr1790uZOdieOnTGYYQ4/edit#gid=0

>> No.10098857

>>10098491

That's just like a few dollars worth of ETH.

French devs took 10,000 ETH and can afford to feign usage and shill their failed token by send scraps to the burner and get the REQlets riled up.

>> No.10098885

>>10098857
lel, except you can clearly see that's not true by looking at how the transactions are happening on ethscan, you dumb fucking cunt. The majority of recent burns have been from actual transactions taking place utilizing the REQ platform. It's not a ton of tokens because such a small % gets burned of each purchase, which is the entire intention of the platform - fees are incredibly low. NEXT.

>> No.10098895

>>10098526
>Nobody is using the platform!!!
>*shows proofs of many webpages and shops using the app*
>Uhhh b-b-but no one cares about THEM! It's only valid if BIG COMPANIES use it!
Kys

>> No.10098929
File: 150 KB, 1067x1600, 1415998709564.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10098929

>>10098895

Literally no one is using this token. These are probably devs fucking with you.

It's funny how desperate you are to become wealthy, without actually putting in effort.

You realize that in order to succeed in life you need to get involved and show personal initiative and produce something of value. Sitting at your computer shilling shitcoins is not going to get you there I'm afraid lil REQLet.

>> No.10098934

>>10098929
Literally all you have to do is read the other replies in this thread to realize what a fucking hopeless loser you are.

>> No.10098990

>>10098929>>10098929
>Literally no one is using this token
Is this pasta adapted to FUD REQ? Because you don't use the token. Are you ok anon, do you need a (You)?

>> No.10099003
File: 38 KB, 500x492, 1435774637334.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10099003

>>10098934

5 cents next week REQlet. Doesn't matter how many niche crypto ass-plugs some Redditor's webshop sells.

>> No.10099024

>>10099003
Go jerk off you lonely, whiny little bitch. You have no value.

>> No.10099085

why cant I buy a 4chan pass with request yet? screw these tshirt dropshippers

>> No.10099107

>>10099085
mootwo is already rich enough from selling confidential data on 2chan. He doesn't need your money.

>> No.10099115

At this point I assume it's just trolls trying to fuck with reddit or something.

>> No.10099165

>>10099115
Nah, definitely people who bought the top. Look at all the things people completely shit on to the point discussion is impossible. REQ, NANO. DBC etc. The things people shit on are the things that lost them the most money. Whether it is a good project or not is pretty much irrelevant.

>> No.10099268

>>10099165
Is it really about price development right now though and top buyers? Go read some of the old blogs and how hard they were bullshitting us. We're past mid-year and there is ONE, fucking ONE, application that gets used a bit which is a e-shop plugin like any fucking other which offers little to no needed functionality for most people (they don't even support that many currencies yet) which is literally only used by redditors buying other redditor's handicraft 'HODL' t-shirts for $100.

>How Request will integrate Continuous Payments?
On the user interface side, Request will make it easy to create a continuous payment request, as well as other payment types (escrow, factoring, down payments…).

>Continuous invoices will be incorporated into Request as an extension. The extension layer has been designed to handle any type of advanced payment conditions.

>To bypass an infinity of transaction costs, a continuous invoice will work in a similar way as a vesting contract—your balance on the invoice increases continuously and you can withdraw the invoice funds to your account at any time.

>Depending on the demands, we expect Request to support Continuous Payments in Q1 2018.

WHERE IS THIS? Q1 ?! It's past Q2 AND WE HAVE FUCKING NOTHING.

>> No.10099296

>>10099268

This.

The market price is a reflection of this.

>> No.10099316
File: 84 KB, 750x334, F7FE45C0-C31D-482B-97F7-AF2CC7C0913A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10099316

Even more pending now

>> No.10099355

>>10099268
The team have fucked up a lot with delays I agree. This is crypto though and the fundamentals barely matter, If it had continuous payments the price would probably be the exact same. The reason for the price drop is lack of advertising the product. Best case scenario is they drop a load of cool shit at once.

Again I was commenting on the people currently shitting on the projects reason for caring.I just bought back after selling way too early in December because I though it was too early for it to be worth so much.

>> No.10099362
File: 697 KB, 2000x2374, we aim for hundred percent completion in 40 years.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10099362

They gave us such a fine chart to compare the current Request Network to their dream.

>> No.10099437

>>10099355
>If it had continuous payments the price would probably be the exact same.
Well I agree with you on that. You need something big to even elevate the baseline price of anything by only 20% during this bear market, but with the utter lack of progress and the many completely baseless deadlines they offered it's no surprise it doesn't even manage to maintain it's value for even a little bit.

>A few projects (less than 10) have signed up with an NDA and/or a contract and are in the final phase.
This is a tiny ray of hope left to REQ for the short-term. Although my research made me quite bitter and I wouldn't be surprised they're just fucking lying again. If the next blog doesn't showcase some of these, I am positive they just made this shit up.