/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.10071704]

DOUBLE SPEND BUG IN TETHER NOT A DRILL
>DOUBLE SPEND BUG IN TETHER NOT A DRILL
DOUBLE SPEND BUG IN TETHER NOT A DRILL
>DOUBLE SPEND BUG IN TETHER NOT A DRILL
DOUBLE SPEND BUG IN TETHER NOT A DRILL
>DOUBLE SPEND BUG IN TETHER NOT A DRILL

https://twitter.com/SlowMist_Team/status/1012362798137872384

[Anonymous No.10071755]

>>10071704
since im not a blockchain coder i dont know if its true someone eloborate who has the skillset (i know what doublespend is)

[Anonymous No.10071760]

Every tether tx looks like this.
Is this a fucking joke? Where's the double spend?

[Anonymous No.10071768]

>https://api.omniexplorer.info/v1/transaction/tx/f2e4b555532c6abd9065ab6158a1eec184e4fa8a570e9fb1ede4022589904dd8

[Anonymous No.10071775]

>Everyone in the reply chain calling bullshit

Do you just post whatever lets you shitpost the hardest?

[Anonymous No.10071787]

>>10071760
follow the fud and find the source of who paid for it

[AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA(...) No.10071809]

There is a logic defect in the USDT recharge transaction to confirm whether the transaction is successful or not. If the value of the valid field in the transaction details on the blockchain is not verified to be true, it results in a “false recharge”. The user has successfully recharged the exchange without losing any USDT. USDT, and these USDTs can trade normally.
We have confirmed that a real attack has occurred! The relevant exchange should suspend the USDT recharging function as soon as possible and check the code for the existence of the logical defect.

[Anonymous No.10071810]

>>10071760
>>10071775

>https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/8ulr0t/a_doublespend_has_been_successfully_performed_on/e1gispn/

OMNI DEV PLACING BLAME ON EXCHANGES INSTEAD OF TAKING RESPONSIBILITY. TETHER GOING TO 0 THIS IS NOT A DRILL
>NOT A DRILL
>NOT A DRILL
>NOT A DRILL

[Anonymous No.10071813]

>>10071704

[Anonymous No.10071842]

>>10071768
Yes, brainlet.
Click on any valid tx and then raw data
https://www.omniexplorer.info/
It looks exactly the same.

[Anonymous No.10071856]

>>10071810

Anon this is getting sad. Stop trying to force something that isn't happening

[Anonymous No.10071864]

>>10071704

MY LINKIES AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

DON'T FOLLOW THE LINK

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.10071866]

Would be nice to catch one of these double spends one day. Who gives a fuck if your account is verified. Go crazy buy and bunch of btc and withdraw to address not tied to you.
Mix and laugh.

[Anonymous No.10071867]

>>10071704
It sounds like some exchange implemented omni protocol incorrectly, wonder which one

[Anonymous No.10071869]

bitcoin 500,000 usdt EOD

[Anonymous No.10071895]

>>10071856
>thinks it's a drill
>it's not

[Anonymous No.10071900]

>>10071867
bitfinex : D ?

[Anonymous No.10071929]

>>10071900
Very unlikely, as it would have already happened. I bet it's some asian exchange, they get hacked constantly due to sloppy security

[Anonymous No.10071976]

that's glorious
if true then insta BTC pump

[Anonymous No.10072037]

HERE WE GO

[Anonymous No.10072059]

>>10071810
You're an idiot, the exchange is literally accepting tether with a flag that says 'false'. That's like if I printed US dollars that said 'not real currency' in big red letters and the cashier accepted them. It's the cashier's fault for being a massive tard and accepting fake money

[Anonymous No.10072100]

wow tether shills out in full force today