political compass

[Anonymous No.10034309]

/biz/, where are you? jw

https://www.politicalcompass.org/test

[Anonymous No.10034395]

[Anonymous No.10034456]

>>10034395
are you marx?

[Anonymous No.10034501]

>>10034309
I don't know man, I feel the opposite.
Some questions about weed, sex and religion are useless.
Me being religious or atheist won't change my views on politics and economy.
Also, there are some aspects of this that may change from country to country, many cultures have different cardinal points on their morality

[Anonymous No.10034519]

[Anonymous No.10034520]

>>10034456
No, he is upper left.

[Anonymous No.10034529]

[Anonymous No.10034542]

??? am i retard??

[Anonymous No.10034548]

Whatever the most Fascist is, Im that

[Anonymous No.10034558]

>>10034501
Here an example:
on the last elections I was unsure between the "yellow" and the "green" point.
I'm an entrepreneur now, and views on taxes and de-burocracy are important aspects of my decision; but I also care about the rest of the country, and this doesn't make me left wing

[Anonymous No.10034559]

>>10034519

I'm also a big fan of Bobo memes. I wonder if political affiliation correlates or if everyone loves Bobo

[Anonymous No.10034560]

>>10034309
>>10034395
>>10034501
Dumb yuropoors. This is what freedom looks like.

[Anonymous No.10034570]

>>10034558

[Anonymous No.10034627]

>>10034570
None of those election maps are accurate though. There isn't a single yuropoor politician outside of the far left portion of the green or red squares.

[Anonymous No.10034649]

[Anonymous No.10034746]

>>10034501
I did it again changing the opposite the answers on sex and religion.
Not much changed

[Anonymous No.10034791]

[Anonymous No.10034792]

> business & finance

[Anonymous No.10034797]

>>10034501
DESU, sounds like you might be a centrist in absolute terms. Keep in mind that the far left is extreme communism and the far right is extreme corporate dictatorship.

[Anonymous No.10034860]

>>10034309
where would /r/shareholdernation be?

[Anonymous No.10034895]

Who else /radical accelerationist crypto-monarachist/ here?

[Anonymous No.10034937]

>>10034627
>government decides to give one dollar to the poor
>"FUCKIN' COMMIES STEALING MR. SHEKELBERG'S HARD EARNED MONEY"
>americuck detected

[Anonymous No.10034962]

>>10034309
nam

[Anonymous No.10034977]

>>10034309
name me

[Anonymous No.10034989]

>>10034309
>>10034395
>>10034501
>>10034542
>>10034649
>>10034746
>Disgusting commies shitting up this board
Shame on you, faggots

[Anonymous No.10035016]

>>10034309

[Anonymous No.10035030]

>>10034977
Radical centrist

[Anonymous No.10035049]

>>10034895
DESU this is me

[Anonymous No.10035379]

too many communists on this board.
crypto isn't for you.

[Anonymous No.10035393]

>>10035379
I'm not a commie, nowhere close. I just don't want kikes, boomers, and mega corporations to own everything. Step up

[Anonymous No.10035423]

If you're not in the rightmost side of the purple square, you deserve the gas

[Anonymous No.10035503]

>>10034309
>tfw too smart to take stupid compass tests to appease gay OP and his buttbuddies

[Anonymous No.10035515]

White girls fuck dogs

[Anonymous No.10035519]

>>10035503
>he thinks people actually take the test and not simply modify the URL to put their dot wherever

[Anonymous No.10035529]

>>10034977
that weird boring guy who sits in the corner

[Anonymous No.10035897]

[Anonymous No.10036608]

[Anonymous No.10036673]

[Anonymous No.10036735]

>>10035897
Close

[Anonymous No.10036808]

>>10034797
far right isn't extreme corporate dictatorship; the more left-wing things are, the more prime for authoritarian rule they are
authoritarianism can come in the form of a government, a corporation, or any mix between the two
in the u.s. right now, we have a corporatocracy; if not for big government collecting taxes and deciding who gets what, this entity wouldn't have had a means of existing in the first place
enable individuals to become powerful and to operate in the way that they find best suits them while not treading on others' liberty, and you'll have the greatest nation in the world
srry dead tired or would give a better explanation, see pic related for a similar rundown
just, uuuh, ignore the snarkiness at the end there

[Anonymous No.10036825]

>>10034309

[Anonymous No.10036830]

Got to say though, a lot of the questions I didn't really knew the answer to mostly because they ask an opinion of something which should be considered from factual points of view, such as ''is homosexuality natural''? Idk that..

[Anonymous No.10036846]

>>10034309
Get fuck'd libbycunt

[Anonymous No.10036859]

>>10036808

This, rights of the indvidual are paramount. And that means individual responsibility as well.

[Anonymous No.10036895]

>>10036808
I've given serious thought to creating a new country free from communist green-square yuropoors, kikes, and niggers.

How much would such an enterprise cost, and where would be the ideal location? I know /k/ has already given some thought to this.

[Anonymous No.10036915]

>>10036846

[Anonymous No.10036918]

>>10034309

[Anonymous No.10036923]

>>10036918
and over time

[Alpha™ No.10037105]

I'm surprised at this. Most of my views are that of Hitler's.

[Anonymous No.10037299]

>>10034309

[Anonymous No.10037436]

Name me

[Anonymous No.10037615]

>>10037436
Some type of yuro, but not full commie like a kraut or a Swede. Maybe Nordic, Eastern yuropistani, or Swiss.

[Anonymous No.10037725]

>A significant advantage of a one-party state is that it avoids all the arguments that delay progress in a democratic political system.

Impossible to not strongly agree, but that doesnt mean the one-party system is superior. A lot of leading questions like this.

[Anonymous No.10037809]

>>10034309

[Anonymous No.10037846]

>almost nobody is an authoritarian or muh white ethnostate totally not dictatorship based utopia
Actually pleasantly surprised

[Anonymous No.10037857]

>>10037725
>Impossible to not strongly agree
This answer follows the false assumption that "progress" is always a good thing. Stalin created a lot of "progress" that could have been avoided in a democratic system.

As such, I wasn't sure whether to slightly agree or disagree with that question. Sometimes an authoritarian government is useful to reset a manipulated society, but other times it can be used to create a 1984-thought crime dystopia. I finally went with "slightly disagree".

[Anonymous No.10037862]

>>10037846
Purple is white ethnostate, Muhammad.

[Anonymous No.10037867]

you're all a bunch of filthy commies

[Anonymous No.10037876]

>>10037862
>white ethnostate
>non authoritarian libertarian
pick exactly one, an ethnostate is literally impossible to establish without central planning on the scale of a dictatorship.

[Anonymous No.10037882]

and i made fun of lefties all my life. fuck. is this shit rigged?

[Anonymous No.10037897]

Hitler was the greatest man to walk the face of the earth.

I'm not sure why I'm so far left, maybe I have a streak of Strasser in me or something.

[Anonymous No.10037906]

>>10037876
Border control isn't authoritarian though as it imposes no restrictions on the populace of the country. A white ethnostate can therefore be created via strong nationalism and resistance tailored to shitskin immigration.

[Brigadier General Damu !!6rIK3ka6TND No.10037912]

>>10034309
Some pretty poorly worded questions in there

[Anonymous No.10037916]

>>10037906
You'd need to enforce the nationalism somehow.
If people are free to disagree even if it's unpopular then over time the protections keeping it an ethnostate will erode.

[Anonymous No.10037925]

>>10037906
>a white ethnostate can be created by limiting immigration
Ah yes, and do tell my man how you're going to get rid of all the niggers and spics who outnumber whites and are living here legally. Gee, it's almost like the only way to do that would be to establish a military dictatorship and then proceed to do truly abhorrent things.

[Anonymous No.10037929]

>>10037916

This.

How do you think America devolved?

[Anonymous No.10037942]

>>10037916
Nationalism doesn't need to be legally enforced. As seen in the U.S., it has thrived for 242 years on a strictly voluntary basis. We only stopped being a white ethnostate after sufficient government perversion created the 1965 immigration act.

However, such steps could be taken making such government subversion illegal.

[Anonymous No.10037948]

How’s this?

[Anonymous No.10037949]

Calling me far right, yeaahh... no.

[Anonymous No.10037950]

>>10037916
>>10037929
>nationalists
>"fucking sjws YOU WILL NOT TAKE MY FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND RIGHT TO DISAGREE"
>the very same nationalists
>"in the end the only way we will be able to create the aryan pure utopia will be by curtailing any dissent against us. freedom ain't free, but it's for a good cause!"
I've seen this shit before and people expressing that type of doublethink baffles me.

[Anonymous No.10037953]

>>10037925
>killing niggers and spics
>abhorrent
In any case, you would create a new country without these problems and make sure they can never happen in the first place.

[Anonymous No.10037954]

>>10037846
I don't believe we can get to a libertarian utopia with out harsh authoritarian temporary rule setting up an ethnostate and and deporting the non-whites and useless eaters.
Either that or a race war, but a race war will result in a purge within the government anyway, or the collapse of government

[Anonymous No.10037958]

>>10037950

I never said the sjw's can't take my free speech. You can strawman all you want though. Any healthy nation must accept hierarchies; free speech is a difficult issue inside of a fascist state.

[Anonymous No.10037962]

>>10037916
It doesn't need to be fully enforced by force of law, just by social standards. The only thing I actually want government to control is media

[Anonymous No.10037975]

>>10037950
Libertarianism cannot work in a multi-cultural society.
At the very least legally enforced segregation would need to be reinstated, and we would need a intelligence apparatus preventing another 1960's with the full force of lethal force

[Anonymous No.10037976]

>>10037942
You just contradicted yourself in that post. You say nationalism doesn't need to be legally enforced and yet follow up by saying legal action is needed to prevent the government from changing it's mind. That's being authoritarian. Also the US was being invaded by germans, irish, and chinks for plenty of that timespan and even though you might think the first two groups are white today they definitely didn't count in the past. Which is another thing to consider since these sort of things change overtime.

>>10037950
I'm not saying it's a good thing I'm saying that if you want it done you essentially need to use the government to enforce it otherwise it won't last. You cannot have a libertarian ethnostate unless there are literally no other peoples that can migrate in.

[Anonymous No.10037983]

>>10037953
>create a new country
Oh wew lad, that's a great pipe dream. Please tell me more about how one day the white revolution will take over in the northwest or whatever the embarrassing meme is. Even assuming a revolution could get going, your dumb as fuck if you think the military dictatorship running it would give up control and say "yeah senpai, we're going to return to democracy and the allowance of free speech now". A state like you describe would constantly be on the hunt against internal people who disagree with the policies in place and would likely end up continually killing them off.
>>10037958
>free speech is a difficult issue inside of a fascist state
It's an impossible issue. Human nature would inevitable lead to those in power in said state clamping down hard and turning it into a miserable clusterfuck like the USSR or Nazi Germany

[Anonymous No.10037992]

>>10037925
It only ends 2 ways, Ethnostatists take over America intact, de-citizenise non whites a la Operation Wetback I/II, and deport them en masse, killing those who resist.

Or America balkanizes anyway, they cut out a nice chunk of it, any chunk with a nuclear arsenal really, grow military power, and use warfare to reclaim the former US, killing alot more "people" than they can kick out

[Anonymous No.10037994]

>>10037975
>Libertarianism cannot work in a multi-cultural society.
You have any actual reasoning behind that?
>At the very least legally enforced segregation would need to be reinstated, and we would need a intelligence apparatus preventing another 1960's with the full force of lethal force
I'm going to go with my gut and say that this is bait.
>>10037976
I know. I wasn't actually addressing any of the posters ITT with that but rather something I've seen happen again and again with authoritarian favoring people I've spoken with.

[Anonymous No.10037995]

>>10037950
The problem is you thinking they care about hypocrisy. They have a set of goals and will back anything to achieve it, even if it contradicts what they said before. Luckily it's more like "larp anything" than "do anything" in reality.

[Anonymous No.10037996]

>>10037983

Nazi Germany was a paradise. Strasser had a pretty good take on free speech, but I have my doubts that you have read up on fascism at all.

Strasser basically said that anonymity should be taken from the journalists, but they could say whatever they wanted. There would just be social consequences.

Personally, I don't think it's a big issue. Once jews are killed or removed a lot of big problems today won't really be debated anymore.

[Anonymous No.10037998]

>>10037976
Wrong yuropoor. Nationalism is a belief held by the people and has nothing to due with whether the government can import 12 trillion shitskins. Making a law saying (((they)) can't import the entirety of Africa is not authoritarian, and if anything is anti-authoritarian because now you won't be ruled by spearchuckers.

[Anonymous No.10038013]

>>10037992
>movement and entire motive behind the revolution is to outright kill enormous sums of people and any who oppose the ideology
Because this sure as fuck has gone well in literally every prior example in history. I wonder how many commies who were part of the vanguard got dragged kicking and screaming to the wall because after they served their purpose the people in power came to see them as a threat.

This revolution you describe would sure as shit do the same to you guys in the end. It's human nature.

[Anonymous No.10038020]

>>10038013

So what? Disgusting individualists are always so obsessed if they would die. What about the nation? I would gladly die for my people.

[Anonymous No.10038028]

>>10038013
>literally every prior example in history
Nazi Germany worked out pretty well. After they got rid of the kikes like you, there was a utopia.

[Anonymous No.10038029]

>>10037996
>Nazi Germany was a paradise
Protestors routinely jailed and killed, the media entirely controlled and cucked by the state, anyone who disagrees with party ideology (but more importantly the Great Leader figure) jailed, punished or shot. It was quite a bit more than social consequences.

>once x group is removed everything will be fine
Once x group is removed the leaders would create a new internal group that needs to be removed in order to sustain the entire social system of a dictatorship.

I honestly can't believe I'm debating this grade school shit with unironic facists on /biz/ of all places, but then I guess chainlink did bring in a lot of clueless /pol/ users.

[Anonymous No.10038039]

>>10038028
>it was a utopia
Say that enough times and I'm sure it will become true eventually. Just like how the USSR was a perfect utopia of socialists living in perfect harmony with no social ills, no starvation, and no dissent!

[Anonymous No.10038053]

>>10037994
>You have any actual reasoning behind that?

Multi-cultural societies always devolve into conflict, Yugoslavia is the biggest example, despite the Yugoslav's attempting to develop a unified yugo culture in a multi-ethnic state, they failed absolutely.

Yugoslavia stayed together because it was a moderate left authoritarian system.

You see it in waves in conflicts all over the world - Syria - ISIS Arab's killing Yazidi's, Kurds, and non-Sunni's

Iraq - how it exploded into violence following the takedown of Saddam's regime - Sunni's killing Shiites in the streets much more than attempting to kill American's.

Monocultural societies are the most successful long term, minorities are never satiated, they will always consider themselves less than or otherwise chip on shoulder. The whole minority mentality is a historical recipe for war and genocide, which has repeated time and time again throughout history.

You cannot reasonably think that the US, with 1 million H1B's flooding in a year from China and India, Nig refugees flooding in from Horn of Africa, and tens of millions of illegal immigrants is going to hold together do you?
The only thing keeping the shit together right the fuck now is the expansion of the police state and that's being fought at every turn by the libertarian left and right, as well as the Authoritarian left - because they want a police state in their image with their idealogy that they control

[Anonymous No.10038058]

>>10038029

Media deserved to be controlled and communist jewish protestors deserved everything they got.

>muh x group meme

Ok, jews were a random minority chosen, removing them totally created a market supply for another x group. Lmao.

[Anonymous No.10038064]

>>10034895
Become a neoliberal already, stop messing around.

[Anonymous No.10038074]

>>10038039
"Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck. I didn't know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying. Gradually I began to hate them."

[Anonymous No.10038075]

>>10038020
>I would gladly die for my people
You wouldn't die for your people, you would end up dying because the ruling party you helped put in power came to be afraid of you and viewed you as a threat to said grip on power. This shit has been shown to be true with virtually every single violent revolution in history yet mongs like you continue to lap up the propaganda and end up slaving and dying for {{{their}}} interests.

Keep telling yourself it'll never happen to you, one day you might have the luck of getting to join the tens of millions of others like you who died once they had outlived their usefullness.

[Anonymous No.10038078]

>>10038013
Commies aren't right authoritarians.
The right is primarily concerned with destroying the left intelligentsia (which is fucking huge in the USA) and other political enemies on the left, from there on it will be race traitors and unwelcome minorities

[Anonymous No.10038094]

fucking commies
This test is bullshit either way, the very first question is retarded

[Anonymous No.10038106]

FACT: you CANNOT believe crypto is a revolutionary technology if you aren't in the purple square

[Anonymous No.10038108]

>>10038029
The protestors weren't on the right. The entire political right wing and almost all of the centrists aligned with Nazification.
So again the Nazi's were removing their political enemies of import.

>the media entirely controlled and cucked by the state
I believe that open media we so tout has long ago been subverted by internationalist and leftist financial interests. I would have a government exercising strict regulation on the Media. I believe suppression of the media to be moral in dire circumstances

[Anonymous No.10038110]

>>10038094
Nice try Marxist. Now post your PolitiScales results.

[Anonymous No.10038116]

>>10038053
And yet somehow for the past 200 years the US has managed to continue with a fair amount of success even though the population if a giant salad bowl of people who hate each others guts.

I'm not even talking different races, I'm talking about people from different European countries who loathed each other and yet were able to get along even with their different cultures.

>>10038058
>media deserve to be controlled because da joos did this and that
That's great and all, but unfortunately it wouldn't have let up after the Jews were gone either. As long as the state existed, the media would have basically been required to toe the party line and never speak out against anything.
>Ok, jews were a random minority chosen, removing them totally created a market supply for another x group. Lmao.
It's like you either didn't read or didn't have the reading comprehension to understand what you read. Dictatorships thrive on internal enemies. Once one enemy is gone another gets made up to fill the role. All this has happened before and will happen again.
>>10038074
that's a great and fancy way of saying
>I have no rebuttal to anything you said so I'm just gonna call you a cuck and joo

[Anonymous No.10038120]

>>10037998
I'm not going to be able to keep debating with you since I have work in the morning, but I sincerely hope you are larping and don't actually think that passing laws to prevent non-nationalist actions isn't an authoritarian act.

[Anonymous No.10038133]

>>10038029
Nazi Germany was one of the most Corporatist states to have ever existed. Most of the platform was economic, and those economics favored eliminating foreign and Jewish interest, deregulation, and freeing the market in many ways.

Every leftist there ever was opposed it, and the Nazi's shot them, end of story

[Anonymous No.10038148]

>>10038078
>>10038108
>dude lmao it's just the left we want to kill off and those allied with them

Again, it's funny how in revolutions and military dictatorships through history the public enemy group usually would end up growing to have this nebulous and mysterious definition.

If you don't think in the end the excuse of "they're a leftits jewish commie nignog sympathiser" won't be used to kill off people who become politically inconvinent or who {{{those}}} in charge view as threats your fools who are ignoring history.

[Anonymous No.10038162]

>>10034309
>>10038162

[Anonymous No.10038163]

>>10038116
>And yet somehow for the past 200 years the US has managed to continue with a fair amount of success even though the population if a giant salad bowl of people who hate each others guts.
It was only this century that the black population hit 13% - there was a consistent non-white population in the US of under 10% of the total population before the Baby Boom.
And now non-whites are at half, they fight and victimize each other until it's time to gang up on whitey.

The US was a 90%+ white country until after WW2

[Anonymous No.10038176]

>>10038120
>It's the government's right to import 6 gorillion shitskins goy! You disagree? What are you some kind of shitskin authoritarian Nazi?!?
You got me good, Muhammad. Good luck with your caliphate.

[Anonymous No.10038199]

>>10038116
>I'm not even talking different races, I'm talking about people from different European countries who loathed each other and yet were able to get along even with their different cultures.

All christian, all shared the same skin tone, and there was some violence and open hostility but it was mitigated.

It's alot easier to unite people of the same race who believe in the same god, and come from the same damned continent, esp. when the policy is mono-cultural/multi-ethnic = ie Americanization - if you can't realize this you are lost.
You aren't Americanizing a Black Somali Muslim or a Mestizo Brown Mexican.

Look back at Europe, at the most discriminated ethnic groups there historically - the Roma - a turkic nomadic race instantly recognized by their darker skin tone, and the Jews - Yiddish, Ashkenazi, Sephardic, etc - Semitic Nomad's identifiable by their facial characteristics and their customs

[Anonymous No.10038227]

>>10038116
>It's like you either didn't read or didn't have the reading comprehension to understand what you read. Dictatorships thrive on internal enemies. Once one enemy is gone another gets made up to fill the role. All this has happened before and will happen again.

Dictatorships generally rely on one internal enemy minority or political movement before they move on to external ones - case in point Argentina with the Dirty War followed by the Falklands invasion. Yes Hitler did it too, but he targeted Jews and the left.

The Soviets kept losing ground wars so they kept manufacturing internal enemies of the state, until a ground war came their way that threatened their very existence.

Then you have abberations like Pinochet. He was a Libertarian in many regards and he used the power of the state to solely crush the left. He even stepped down years later and retired to a manse

[Anonymous No.10038236]

>>10038110
here you go faggot

[Anonymous No.10038240]

>>10038148
There is plenty of Jew's and non whites to kill though, I don't think you understand how long it's going to take even with mechanized genocide

[Anonymous No.10038253]

>>10038236
>19% communist
>79% globalist
REEEEEEEEEEEEEE! I knew it. Literally Stalin.

[Anonymous No.10038269]

>>10035423
implying that isn't the Jewiest corner.

[Anonymous No.10038285]

Just stopping by to say that Zionism would die in a month if all whites disappeared. They're the only thing holding it up at this point.

[Anonymous No.10038315]

>>10034309
Russia want more info on biztards so they can shill shitcoins more effectively?

[Anonymous No.10038328]

>>10038253
It isnt 19% commie from what I understand though, it should be colored. I mean there are a bunch of transparent percentages between each axis, I guess it means something inbetween?

[Anonymous No.10038336]

somewhere around here depending on my mood. can't find my old compass.

[Anonymous No.10038392]

The only acceptable side

[Anonymous No.10038426]

>>10038029
(((Protestors)))

[Anonymous No.10038529]

>>10034309

Purple Master race.

M.A. Economics degree.

[Anonymous No.10038671]

I don't know. All I know is that we need catgirls

[Anonymous No.10038755]

>on /biz/
>not ancap

[Anonymous No.10038759]

[Anonymous No.10038769]

absolutely haram i swear I'm more libertarian than this

[Anonymous No.10038828]

The center is a weird place to put me considering I literally want to gas the kikes.

[Anonymous No.10039450]

>>10034309
Guess I'm a right-winger somehow. Even though I'd consider it a pejorative.

[Anonymous No.10039484]

>>10034309
onions

[Anonymous No.10039558]

[Anonymous No.10039689]

>>10034309
>>10034395
>>10034501
>>10034542
>>10034542
>>10034649
>>10034746
>>10036608
>>10036673
>>10036825
>>10036918
>>10036923
>>10037436
>>10037882
>>10037949
>>10038162
>>10038828
>>10039558
found the reddit normies ruining this board

[Anonymous No.10040381]

>>10039689
The absolute state of this place

[Anonymous No.10040387]

Green space is literal normalfag "dude WEED lmao" bullshit. #FEELTHEBERN
no wonder this board went to shit, I'm browsing with a bunch of freeters and r*ddit manbabies.

[Anonymous No.10040479]

alt-left it is

[Anonymous No.10040766]

Absolute based, I am.

[Anonymous No.10040783]

>where are you?
None of your fucking business, you prying cunt.

[Anonymous No.10041026]

>>10038064
>>he thinks liberalism is not a mental disorder

[Anonymous No.10041038]

>>10040766

[Anonymous No.10041048]

>>10040479
Amazing.

[Anonymous No.10041124]

>>10040766
Well shit, looks like we're twins.

[Anonymous No.10041142]

>>10037897
Because Hitler was left.
The
>>Nazis are far right
is bullshit.
Yes, they allowed private businesses and had some crony capitalism going 9n, but at the core they were socialist.
National socialist to be exact.
It's really hard to find much difference between Hitler's Germany and Soviet russia.
There are a few. The most important was probably that in Germany the life of an individual(unless he/she was from the not accepted group( was still important and individualism was allowed to some degree, while in the Soviet Union individualism was not accepted at all. And Soviets were as Nationalistic (I mean the mainland Russia) as German Naxis.
And it surprises people that the authoritarian regimes all are very very simmilar.
The left/right division is a meme.
It's freedom and small government vs safety and big daddy government.

[Anonymous No.10041160]

[Anonymous No.10041188]

[Anonymous No.10041198]

>>10041038
Nice post, now go back to your gulag.

[Anonymous No.10041234]

>>10041142
You are an Amerimutt.

[Anonymous No.10041397]

What are some good ways to monetize lifeless losers obsessed with politics?

So far I thought:
>making custom T-shirts, caps and merchandise of whatever political meme or hashtag is popular at the moment
>creating professional-looking blog sites that peddle to their pet beliefs, selling the merch there
>make some of these losers write in them for free in exchange of feeling important, rack up the ad income

[Anonymous No.10041701]

>>10041234
Wrong. But that's ok.
I was called a Nazi, a libtard and a repub/conservative.
I'm none of these.
I don't like labels in general and try to not close my thinking with a label.
I also don't claim I'm right because second guessing my convictions is important to me. I think that it's the only way that humans can grow.
There is only 1simplistic opinion that I have and will never change:
Pedophiles have no place in the society and should be castrated if non violent and killed if caught raping a child or watching live cp.
I just refuse to see the "grey" areas.

[Anonymous No.10041855]

That test is shit, I always go to the left side even though I think taxes are a fucking crime.