[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 306 KB, 798x672, goodbye friends.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50692674 No.50692674 [Reply] [Original]

Whenever I ask about price action I get labeled as a fudder. I'm not trying to fud and it's a pretty genuine and a good question. Why is the price action so shit? But I'm talking to a fucking wall and all you bag holders are just going to dismiss me as a Bulgarian. Ever since 2020 the quality of chainlink threads have gone downhill and nothing important about the coin is discussed anymore. And I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one thinking this. I think the "fudders" were right that OG's have abandoned the project. No one makes chainlink memes anymore, and the ones that are still made are absolute shit. Also Sergey have been shilling Smartcon really fucking hard recently. My gut feelings are telling me no one is buying tickets right now and Sergey and the team are panicking. How else would you explain cutting the price from $1500 to $200? Sure the tech sounds great on paper, but making money is literally the only thing that matters. Yes, I did make some money from chainlink. But I'm also very disappointed on how little I made in profit, and watching other coins moon during the bullrun.

I'm going to start DCAing into BTC and ETH. What else should I start dumping my link stack for? Any non meme suggestions are appreciated.

>> No.50692694

most of the ogs are retired or got jobs in blockchain
you should too
instead of wasting time, learn to code or run a node
but most of all make sure you get off here and just check in on big news
then you'll see people return

>> No.50692725

>>50692674
We dont talk about price.

>> No.50692731

>>50692694
Currently I'm looking for a job. This is my capitulation. I'm so sick and tired of watching other coins moon meanwhile link has been dumping for two years.

>> No.50692740

>>50692725
Maybe we should start talking about it.

>> No.50692751

I'm also really concerned and selling. Let's sell together.

Anyone else want to sell LINK together with us?

>> No.50692768
File: 1.71 MB, 1970x1970, 1659415091081084.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50692768

>>50692674
>Why is the price action so shit?

>> No.50692771

>>50692740
it sucks
we all knew it would be like this
we held anyway
there's nothing we can do to make it go up and it's unclear if the team will release anything to change demand.
what else is there to say? sell half your stack and buy a different shitcoin at the bottom of this dip

>> No.50692782
File: 120 KB, 928x939, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50692782

>>50692768
>>50692751
It's been consistently the worst performing asset for almost everyday. Seriously, how do you guys not get bothered by this? I wish I had the same mentality as some of you guys.

>> No.50692785

>>50692674
Hey man, I'm Dave from Chainlink customer support. I have to say I actually share many of your concerns, and I have been selling Chainlink. Who else wants to sell LINK together with us?

>> No.50692792

>>50692771
>we all knew it would be like this
Not really. Everyone genuinely thought the top of the cycle was at LEAST $200.

Do you know any good coins that has potential?

>> No.50692807

>>50692674
Do you understand that cefi scum have been abusing borrowing services to manipulate price action? Also there is nothing else to discuss as far as tech goes. The research has been done and everyone is waiting for staking. The same thing goes for other successful projects like ETH.

>> No.50692824

>>50692782
It's like this because Bitcoin dumps on literally every single bit of Link news.
Been like this for years.

>> No.50692860

>>50692807
Well, celsius, bancor, and nexo are all "insolvent" right now. But the price hasn't improved at all. So it's obviously just another cope for us to hang onto.

But let's just say there were malicious cefi exchanges shorting link. I don't understand why Sergey hasn't done anything about it. Seems like he was over confident about chainlink and now starting to realize just how bad his position is right now. That explains the desperate attempt to shill Smartcon. That ain't cheap, and he most likely has to pay a lot of money for it, which really digs into his war chest.

>> No.50692870
File: 514 KB, 730x640, 2022-07-17--1658127210_730x640_scrot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50692870

>LINK spends most of july around $6
>constant fud and shill threads
>last week it pumps to 8
>radio silence
>drops to 7 today
>8 fud / its over / ect threads in the last hour
Are you fucks actively trying to turn people into schizos?

>> No.50692879

>>50692792
anything that isn't chainlink
preferably first minted within the past year
has yield for lockup features and incoming feature releases.

>> No.50692886

>>50692824
But why hasn't Sergey done anything about it? At first I admired his confidence, but now it's making me lose faith. I'm starting to think it wasn't confidence, but arrogance, and it's starting to bite him in the ass.

>> No.50692898

>>50692886
>why hasn't Sergey done anything about it?
lol are you like 12 or something?

>> No.50692910

>>50692898
dude sn=sn amirite lmao

>> No.50692911

>>50692879
thanks fren
What projects are you invested in, if you don't mind answering?
>>50692870
This is exactly what I mean. Stop dismissing any concerns as fud or schizo ranting. I want link to moon as much as the next guy.

>> No.50692922

>>50692898
What?

>> No.50692929

>>50692911
>Stop dismissing any concerns as fud or schizo ranting
If you're simply complaining about the low price, literally nobody's going to say you're fudding or a schizo.

>>50692922
What the fuck is Sergey going to do about Bitcoin dumping?

>> No.50692953

>>50692929
he is going to use the BTC CFB talks about to buy LINk and pump the price lmao

>> No.50692976

>>50692929
>What the fuck is Sergey going to do about Bitcoin dumping
He could buy it back?

>> No.50692985

>>50692976
SER DO NOT REDEEM THE BTC SER!!!

>> No.50693006

>>50692976
>Sergey could buy back the dumped BTC

See, this is exactly why I asked you if you were 12 years old.

>> No.50693008

10k was always a suicide stack and 100k was always the make it stack
People who bought Chainlink for 0.20 and under always knew this. Newfags slowly creeped in and they idolized retards like “Chainlink god” into unironically believing link was going to hit $1k/token

You’d literally have to be sub 90 IQ to have held through $50 and not sell at any point on the way down.

>> No.50693031

>>50693006
sn=sn satoshit I mean sore gay could theoretically cancel the btc blockchain no harm done but then again theoretically we are all made of green cheese.

remember when conventions tweeted sir gays shirt instead of the main twitter account?

>> No.50693045

>>50693006
You can keep being a dick but I’m not going to sit around and watch my profits go to waste. Not all of us are financially lucky as you

>> No.50693051

>>50692870
if anything, this is proof it's disgruntled link holders who are posting FUD like the little bitch OP.

>> No.50693061

>>50693045
You can look into CFG I think it has upside potential

>> No.50693063

>>50693045
Imagine saying something as childishly dumb as "Sergey could buy back BTC to cancel out the BTC dump", and then getting upset when someone asks if you're 12 years old lmao

>> No.50693067

>>50692731
good
you need to do something to get yourself out of obsessing about the price day and night
yes you fucked up by being greedy and not selling more earlier to make the wait easier
but now you should wait with staking and ccip close
remember: the market can said irrational longer than you can remain solvent
focus on coding or running a node, even with naas. when you see the dev community and see everything happening you won't be thinking about price
there's a hackathon in three days if you can code a bit for example

>> No.50693069

>>50693051
>it’s fud I’m telling you!
Way to prove my point retard

>> No.50693070

>>50692976
I bet 100 LINK this faggot is as new as they come, no way he's been here since 2019.

>> No.50693098

OP I share your disappointment. It’s clear that the “company” behind the token believes they are not beholden to the token holder. That they are not fiduciary or bound to performance like a real company with stock

It would’ve been ok had they not aided Celsius and cefi in fucking us over. Chainlink has a hand in this indirectly or not by letting Mashinsky have his way

>> No.50693111

>>50693063
Says the retard that still hangs onto the Btc dump conspiracy. I tried to take you seriously but you’re obviously way up in your own delusions. Try to step back and question your own actions for a change instead of being hostile to every criticism
>>50693067
Do you really think staking and Ccip will be game changers this year? Maybe I’m too demoralized to see what is happening.

>> No.50693129

>>50692911
look at up and coming arbitrum projects and figure out their revenue models. i wont tell you because you need to help yourself

>> No.50693130
File: 124 KB, 1170x678, 9053E80A-827F-4F9D-ABE1-3F10E0DBBF71.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50693130

>>50693070
I’m not a very technical guy. Sue me

>> No.50693131

>>50692674
chainlink is a complex scam and you got scammed. you can literally see the CEO selling tens of millions of link tokens .

>> No.50693132

>>50693111
>the Btc dump conspiracy

At least that's not as bad as the "Sergey could buy back BTC to cancel out BTC dumps but he refuses" conspiracy.

>> No.50693139

>>50693129
Thanks friend

>> No.50693142

>>50693069
>complains about the quality of link threads
>posts a shitty link FUD thread
what's the purpose of this thread? It's not to discuss the price action for link, since you've already decided to sell. Then why didn't you just post a thread to ask for suggestions on what to buy?

>> No.50693147
File: 560 KB, 1073x530, TIMESAND___3fz6GfwsutrwwGJ7GfwsutrwwGJ74q2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50693147

The movie Gold with Zac Efron tells everything about Link, imo.

>> No.50693154

>>50693132
So the best thing to do is nothing? Do you have other suggestions instead of pretending everything is ok?

>> No.50693166

>>50693142
what should I buy them?

>> No.50693173

>>50693154
>So the best thing to do is nothing?
Again, what can Sergey do about Bitcoin dumps you absolute child

>pretending everything is ok
Everything isn't ok, Bitcoin is keeping Link down for years now.

>> No.50693174

>>50693166
you really are retarded, aren't you? Go all in LUNA.

>> No.50693187

>>50693173
are you arguing that sergey is dumping BTC himself?

>> No.50693188

>>50693063
“Duuuuuuude just get scammed and dont complain”

Faggot, shut the fuck up. Sergey sat back and turned a blind eye to company’s he was partnered with destroy his community. He did nothing about. Hes a fucking cuck

>> No.50693189
File: 96 KB, 1279x1009, 2342354278.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50693189

>>50693111
i don't think ccip will do anything to the price
but i do think that staking will as people see the revenue come in. people are hunting out yield and this is the best possible yield you can get
the other thing is that market.link is an eye opener to anyone with mid iq after the update
i think staking income + market.link stats probably needs to be shilled on ct and r eddit as sad as that is
also remember that eth went through this too, here's the btc/eth chart during last bear

>> No.50693196

>>50693166
Anon you will make it look into CFG

>> No.50693207

>>50693187
lel no

>>50693188
>Sergey sat back and turned a blind eye to company’s he was partnered with destroy his community
Well that was almost English.
Protip: Sergey doesn't run the companies that use Chainlink.

>> No.50693212

>>50693173
Maybe you should ask Sergey about that instead of being frustrated with me. Or you know, just do nothing you absolute cuck.

>> No.50693216

>>50693142
Holy shit you cant even read. Daily reminder that to the shills, saying was has literally happenned w Link price is fud. Insane logic

>> No.50693221

>>50693188
>company's
what language do you speak at home lmao still mad sir gay frontran your discord tranny outfit by re re re announcing the staking is coming soon blogpost?

>> No.50693232

sell then you fucking pussy, you want someone to hold your hand tell you its gonna be okay? what the fuck you think it is, the team owes you nothing you useless piece of shit

all you have done is sit on your computer and throw money into a 4 letter token on the internet , you deserve nothing, you are owed nothing. cry and bitch somewhere else, no one wants to hear it

>> No.50693241

>>50693189
Yeah but ETH also had an actual bull run before the last bear, whereas links bullrun was suppressed by their own arrogant management team.

>> No.50693242

>>50692976
>Sergey should control the price of Bitcoin

>>50693188
>Sergey should control all the projects that integrated Chainlink

The absolute state.
No wonder /biz/ hates Sergey this much; half the people on here think he’s all-powerful but simply refuses to act.

>> No.50693246

>>50693232
dude I want to sell but I need you to sit behind me and do like a reach around on the binance sell button

>> No.50693251

>>50693212
>you should ask Sergey about that
Ask him about what?

>>50693242
fucking exactly

>> No.50693263

>>50693241
newsflash nigger the mETH foundation caused every ETH top by printing and dumping

>> No.50693273

PLEEASE BRO PLEAAAS E THIS TOKEN IS SHIT I BOUGHT IT IN 2018 HAVE HELD FOR 4 YEARS BUT ONLY NOW AT A LOCAL BOTTOM DURING AN ACCUMULATON RANGE I AM GETTING WORRIED BROOO PLEEEEAAAASE I WANT TO SELL WAAAAHHH WAAAAAHHHH BROOOO PLEEEAAASE HELP WAAAAHH WAAAAAH

>> No.50693277

>>50693242
>a fat man with mind control powers and an oracle brand can't act
lmao the cope

>> No.50693280

WAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH WAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHI WANT TO SELL BUT IM NOT GOING TO SEELL BUT IM GONNA MAKE A THREAD BECAUSE I AM CRYBABY BITCH WAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH

>> No.50693284

>>50693273
just sell bro you sound fucked

>> No.50693293

>>50692782
This. Listen I genuinely care about about Anons financial well being. Its hard as shit to get ahead in life now, not just working 9-5 for the rest of your life. The sooner you start saving the sooner you can get ahead in life. Chainlink is a meme started by 4chan (an infamous trolling board) to lead people to financial ruin. This is NOT A JOKE. Don't let your saved wealth be thrown away over night. Vitalik Buterin the creator of ethereum said himself the days of making x100 or x1000 are over, that right the guy who created the second most popular crypto said himself those days are over. Now 4chan is trying to get people to lose even more money after the December/January bloodbath. Smart money already exited the crypto world. Crypto is basically a highly specialized database, companies don't need this. They will just create their own private blockchains. There is no need for crypto chainlink isn't even needed to run the nodes. Think XRP when you think chainlink. The company ripple (smartcontracts) is doing well but the coin XRP(chainlink) isn't even needed for the companies technology. Considering what Vitalik said "The days of making x100 or x1000 returns are over." Chainlink needs a 399900% increase in price over the next couple of months to reach $1000 this is ludicrous. Don't fall for it, chainlink its a meme to fuck you over. Consider this for chainlink at current price to reach $70 you need an increase of 700% or a 233% increase every month until EOY. This is a 4chan meme to siphon money out of the hands of the already vulnerable.

>> No.50693295

>>50693232
Hahahhaahahahahahaahah christ what a fucking cuck you are. Youd lay down your life for a Russian scam artist who has nothing but utter contempt for his investory community. You guys have literally proved OPs point. You cant handle any criticism of the project, which objectively was an absolutely horrendous investment for anyone who didnt get in pre 2020.

In before “broooooo just take a time machine back to ico price”

You guys are lashing out because youre also demoralized about Sergey fucking you for years. Dont take it out on OP though because youve got it all bottled up. Its healthy to let this stuff out.

>> No.50693303

no IM NOT GONNA stop CRYING until someone tells me WHY THE PRICE IS GOING DOWN WAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH i deserve TO KNOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH

>> No.50693307

>>50693295
>Youd lay down your life for a Russian scam artist
lmao at what point in that post does this come up?

>> No.50693310

>>50693295
I didnt read your well written post. I want you to know that I care about YOUR financial wellbeing. This is financial advice.

>> No.50693311

>>50693242
He could control not partnering with Celsius, and not shilling them in every presentation.

>> No.50693316
File: 120 KB, 2040x1112, 1632788096276.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50693316

>>50693241
who knows what was happening there with suppression
but when the increase to circ supply was limited compared to crap that went up massively you have to wonder...
either the team was coordinating with whales etc to suppress the price which would be crazily risky
or other actors were doing it which the team has no control over
the other thing is that maybe chainlink just got bunched in with defi which all underperformed the same
https://cobie.substack.com/p/trading-the-metagame
lots of defi project holders are just as pissed off and got compeltely fucked on eth ratio like us, just that it's a link echo chamber here
but yeah it's shit, i thought i'd have eight figures by now. i wasn't greedy but wish i'd sold more to usd. but you have to grow up and get over it

>> No.50693322

>>50693295

MY INVESTMENT HAS MADE ME FINANCIALLY FREE AND YOU ARE STILL IN AN OFFICE SWEATING MAKING POST AFTER POST FOR CRUMBS FROM YOUR GYPSY OVERLORDS

I AM LITERALLY A MULTI MILLIONAIRE SITTING IN MY UNDERWEAR SHITPOSTING WHILE YOU HAVE TO WORK

>> No.50693323

>>50693310
Nah bro you read it. Its ok man we all are disappointed. Say it with me, Sergey fucked us

>> No.50693327

>>50693311
He should have partnered with them and sent treasury funds over to alex but he didnt because when chainlink took back their treasury under article 216 of the indian giving convention celsius died.
cause = correlation you fucking weird schizo

>> No.50693335

>>50693323
who is this sergey you are so obsessed with?

>> No.50693341

>>50692886
Sergey does not care about price. The fact that there is a speculative market around link is worthless to him. All he wants is for the network to succeed at it's actual goal of being an oracle.

>> No.50693349

>>50693242
>No wonder /biz/ hates Sergey this much; half the people on here think he’s all-powerful but simply refuses to act.
You do realize this is a huge problem then right? No amount of development is going to fix this. The project is beyond fucked but you faggots will continue to label anyone who dare to question his investments as fudders.

>> No.50693352

>>50693335
He works at mcdonalds. Im going to sleep, see you guys tmrw

>> No.50693356

>>50693316
>but when the increase to circ supply was limited compared to crap that went up massively you have to wonder...
This.
The "muh Sergey dumps" narrative was always inorganic as fuck, and it never made any sense. Yet it was carpetbombed on here for years by bots and fudders.

>> No.50693362

>>50693316
the trick is to expand the supply by having newfags to sell to. twitter were so busy fudding and depositing on nexo they failed to attract new buyers for the dumps. this coupled with the fact that the twitter marines launched a vicious FUD campaign on leddit while earning nigger tier crypto welfare gibs failed to produce number go up action

>> No.50693369

>>50693341
If that’s really what he wants then there’s literally no point in holding the token

>> No.50693372

>>50693349
When people get mad at Sergey for thing he cannot control, that’s kind of a problem yes.

>> No.50693374

>>50693352
sounds like a big guy ok bro night night sleep tight no homo

>> No.50693387

>>50693356
>Yet it was carpetbombed on here for years by discord trannies and twitter marines
ftfy

>> No.50693392

>>50693369
>if Sergey wants the network to succeed then there's not point in holding the lifeblood of that network
And OP wonders why he gets called a fudder

>> No.50693393

>>50693362
but that really stopped by 2019/2020? that's what i don't get... the fud was there while people accumulated but after mainnet the fud was called off
but then there's been further waves of paid fud all through last year, mainly here as far as i could see

>> No.50693403

>>50693356
Sometimes I wish I was arab and I owned a carpet store selling persian rugs. I would learn to charm snakes out the front to amaze my customers and cause them to associate snakes with rugs and thus they would buy double or triple the rugs they would without any snakes being charmed.
do you see what I am getting at?

>> No.50693409

>>50693372
>he cannot control it!
Which is another way of saying he didn't have a good basis to start his project. Thanks for reaffirming my stance. Makes a lot easier to sell my link stack

>> No.50693414

>>50693369
The speculation on link isn't that Sergey will launch a massive pump and dump campaign to make tons of cash and help his OGs. It's that he WON'T do that. The speculation is that he's really building useful technology here which will eventually be recognized as a genuine new paradigm. Shit takes time and this waiting hell is what you have to go through when putting chips on emerging tech.

>> No.50693419

>>50693393
>called off
oh my sweet summer child you cant call off discord trannies they are like a pack of wild dogs hooked on mETH

>> No.50693421

>>50693409
>if you can’t control the price of Bitcoin, then don’t start a crypto project
LMAOOOOOO

>> No.50693432

>>50693421
Eth doesn’t seem to have that problem.

>> No.50693437

>>50693421
this unfortunately. BTC is retarding the progress of crypto. It's retarded I know but its a fact, jack

>> No.50694035

>>50692674
>No one makes chainlink memes anymore
desu nothing hits harder for me than this. you can tell all the energy and steam has completley run out of this project. i remember back in 2018 link was worth a fraction of what it is today but people were so enthuastic about it and everyday for months the top threads on this board was link memes and people checking eachothers digits. now we are worth way more and there is nothing.
>>50692792
if i was you i would not rely on chainlink anymore and just DYOR into something that you think is good. also dont rely on this board to tell you which investments are good anymore you need to be able to find these yourself otherwise crypto is just not for you. plain and simple

>> No.50694154

>>50692807
Yeah but somehow Eth is still at $1600 instead of $7...

>> No.50694283

>>50692674
I didnt read all that but I feel some duty to play the other side when threads are nothing but bitter negativity.

>> No.50694590

>>50693392
>network succeeding means price is irrelevant
and shills wonder why they get called deranged and retarded

>> No.50694700

>>50694590
Read your greentext again, are you sure that’s an implication you unironically walt to make you absolute dumbass fudder

>> No.50694708

>>50694700
this is the implication implied by the retarded shill
I don't "walt" anything jeet

>> No.50694727

>>50694708
He calls the token the lifeblood of the network.
Pretty sure that’s the opposite of irrelevant.

>> No.50694728

>>50692674
why would anyone buy this anymore? it mooned, so the chance you'll get rich is gone. it has no use. you can buy it for the meme, but you will be holding a dead coin that shined and is now on an eternal death spiral.

at the same time, there are so many nice projects like matic, tezos, dot, hell even rose can help you make money when the bear market ends. so ask yourself, do you want to be part of the poorfag link cult, or do you want a lambo?

>> No.50694738

>>50694728
Im part of the lambo LINK cult

>> No.50694755

>>50694727
he (You) claimed that the price of a speculative asset in a speculative market is irrelevant
step back and realize how retarded that sounds
keep coping harder

>> No.50694777

>>50694755
>he (You) claimed that the price of a speculative asset in a speculative market is irrelevant
Where

>> No.50694809

>>50694738
but it's not happening anymore. I also had link at a point, then made some money, and I moved on. I could agree that there is a chance to make millions if the coin was new and hadn't moved a lot, but it mooned years ago

>> No.50694816

>>50694777
in the post I quoted

>> No.50694831

>>50694816
He’s directly implying that the success of the network makes holding the token worthwhile.
Maybe you’re just dumb.

>> No.50694837

Every single day there’s 8 to 10 “Link OGs” who finally sell. Underestimating with a 50k stack (which costed 10k usd in 2018) per individual we get 500k link that’s being sold per day. That means about 150M link has been sold per year by capitulating /biz/ marines. Pretty crazy that people still complain about Sergey dumping some tokens when the real culprit of the underperformance are these capitulating anons.

>> No.50694853

>>50694831
he's directly implying you shouldn't pay attention to the price, just like Sergey does
cope harder, it's amusing

>> No.50694855

>>50692674
There are only two things that matter, LINK and HBAR. It took a decade for the internet to be adopted in volume and two decades before in reached normies. We are now in the second decade for DLTs (barely)

>> No.50694857

>>50692674
dr;ns

t.oglinklet.eth

>> No.50694863

>>50694853
Fucking where

>> No.50694869

>>50694857
literally whomstve?

>> No.50694872

>>50694863
lel, so next step is attempting to derail the discussion?
smooth

>> No.50694882
File: 76 KB, 960x960, 20220703_115653.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50694882

I fucking LOVE the price and teh tech it's so rAnDoM and nonsensical

>> No.50694889

>>50694882
what a fucking ugly troll
why are white children so ugly?

>> No.50694892

>>50694872
He’s saying the success of the network will make holding the token worthwhile, which directly implies a token price increase.
Yet somehow you’re inferring the exact opposite.
You truly are just dumb.

>> No.50694909

>>50694889
weak bait mETH tranny 2/10 for making me respond

>> No.50694949

>>50694892
let me break it down for you
network is already big, it already powers half the space, it already is the "lifeblood" of the netwok
OP is inquiring why the price action is so shitty, the answer you guys come up with is "Sergey doesn't care about the price, he's focused on the tech"
>keep holding bro, keep blindly trusting the team and at some point it should pump
if apparently the team themselves don't "care" about the price, it won't see much upside no matter how "big" the network gets
>inb4 beta staking is just around the corner
yeah with limited access to ICO holders and further subsidization from the team
don't care, and you're constant mental gymnastics won't cut it anymore

>> No.50694963

>>50694949
The post you quoted as saying “price is irrelevant” is actually saying the exact opposite.
That is all.

>> No.50695101

>>50692674
I don't overthink it
I just buy regularly and when staking comes I'll stake and continue to accumulate with the rewards

>> No.50695107

>>50694837
Not a single OG has capitulated

DR;NS

>> No.50695340

OP is a larp. Writing that wall of shite right before co firmed staking, ccip etc is pants on head retarded. Last ditch attempts by paid fudders. Piss off.

>> No.50695527

>>50694949
Show me where the token collateralises smart contracts. It doesn't, it can't until staking starts.
Do you actually not know this?

>> No.50695719

>>50693189
compare both in log up till now

>> No.50695884

>>50693130
wow 300 linkies we got a whale over here

lmao. go ahead sell your pocket change you dumb nulinker, no one gives the slightest shit

>> No.50696135

Listen I simply don't care. I've already sold my car and I'll sell ever single asset I own before I sell a single stinker. Yes I'm that delusional and I browse this board for hours every day so I'm beyond immune to any fud attempt. I simply didn't read and I'm not selling lmao why does it anger you so

>> No.50696148

>>50696135
Nice one, brother. How many you got? I'm 55-60k
WAGMI and soon

>> No.50696151

>>50694889
why are trannies so bitter?

>> No.50696177

>>50692674
The only people still holding after this bullrun are the crypto equivalent of Qtards. You might still find one or two greedy OGs who are holding, but the majority saw the writing on the wall and locked in their vast profits

>> No.50696180

>>50696148
Never enough brother. I'm still buying and have been since 17 cents. Biggest buy was around 70k usd at 30usd lol just a day before the market tanked but I simply don't care I'll never have enough ever

>> No.50696539

>>50695884
That’s just my very first buy you fucking moron

>> No.50696580

>>50696135
>why does it anger you so
I don’t care what you do but you sure are projecting

>> No.50696613

>>50695340
What will you do if Ccip and staking does absolutely nothing to the price? Seems like the past two years not a single development affected the price positively.

>> No.50696626

>>50696148
if you had of sold and dca into eth you would have already made it by now. now you are in so deep you might as well see this whole thing through for better or worse

>> No.50696654

>>50696148
>WAGMI and soon
This gets cringier as time goes on.

>> No.50696659

>>50693111
>do you really think
absolutely not the fact is anon that LINK is a scam and a complete and total piece of garbage that is not worth investing in its just a simple fact and your right the cult here is insane sorry it took you so long to notice and you missed out on countless opportunities but if your still holding now you should definitely sell all of it

>> No.50696690

Off topic, but why is Cronos pumping?

>> No.50696699

>>50696613
>Seems like the past two years not a single development affected the price positively.
Wrong, every single development caused Link to pump but the pump was immediately quashed by Bitcoin dumping.

>> No.50696743

>>50696699
>Wrong, every single development caused Link to pump but the pump was immediately quashed by Bitcoin dumping.
Even if that’s true, so what? It still dumped. Stop trying to find blame. Look at the results. You’re basically like a magatard. No matter how much cope you try to muster up, Biden is still president.

>> No.50696770

>>50696743
>hurrr don't look at the actual cause, just join me in blaming Sergey haha
You're a retard.

>> No.50696803

You JUST realized that chainlink is a cult being shilled by retards on 4chan relentlessly? You JUST realized? better late than never I guess anon. DCA into BTC, ETH and MATIC.

>> No.50696815

>>50696770
Wrong
I’m trying to move on and looking for better opportunities, unlike you. But keep coping bro. Two more weeks and trump will be sworn in!

>> No.50696828

>>50696815
Anon, you're on record literally trying to blame Sergey itt.

>> No.50696850

>>50696828
Fine. You got me. I guess that means number goes up now right?

>> No.50696872

>>50696850
If everyone would acknowledge some basic truths and not try to spin literally everything into fud, that would help yes.

>> No.50697035

>>50696872
I agree

>> No.50697055

>>50692674
Sirs. Ignore this guy he is a scammer FUD benchode.

>> No.50697081
File: 155 KB, 626x527, jonneh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50697081

>>50692674
I came to that realisation around Feb last year when I couldn't even call out that LINK was lagging and not primed without being called a Bulgarian jeet Jew gypsy discord tranny.

I've said it before but the performance of late has washed away all cope except "LINK is literally Amazon". There's no in-between anymore. It's defiance of reality. Nevermind the dying throes of every other forgotten piece of shit in the graveyards of crypto history all sounded exactly the same in the midst of their demise. At some point you need the fantasy to bear out to reality. Consider there are still anons here pushing this idea LINK will make a new ATH then go draw it on the chart and see how utterly ridiculous that looks. LINK was #5. Now it's #26. That's reality. It's been quite humbling to realise how emotionally overcommitted to LINK I was, and to have been retarded enough to lose a mill and many dreams and aspirations because of it.

>> No.50697138

>>50697081
Whenever I try to discuss about price I get shit on for being a fudder. You can’t even get a genuine discussion on this board anymore. It’s so fucking bad now. Ironically Reddit and Twitter are better. But of course when I say this there will be hoards of angry retards telling me to go back.

>> No.50697184
File: 266 KB, 2057x1207, link 30.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50697184

>>50697081
>around Feb last year when I couldn't even call out that LINK was lagging and not primed without being called a Bulgarian jeet Jew gypsy discord tranny
lol what, everyone and their dog knew Link was lagging at that point (and what was causing it)

>> No.50697219
File: 601 KB, 1597x1247, Opportunity.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50697219

>>50696743
>No matter how much cope you try to muster up, Biden is still president.
Dumb point. Biden "won", but he won't be president forever. He is either going to die or lose the re-election in 2 years, in which case Magatards are winning again. Using your analogy, you are trying to argue Chainlink will never perform well again because it didn't perform well in the last 2 years.
>>50696815
>I’m trying to move on and looking for better opportunities
Which is exactly how it always is with people who refuse to look at the why and only look at the fact that it happened. "Number is going down, I must sell!" "Number is going up, I must buy!" "Why does the market always dump after I buy and pump after I sell D:??" -t. every person in stocks/crypto.

You ate losses for 2 years on Chainlink and instead of DCA'ing down, you are capitulating while the factors you based your first buy in on have improved. Which means, by default, you let sentiment dictate your actions both on the way up (when you bought) and on the way down (when you sold).

Look at the graph in pic related. Where did you buy, and where are you planning to sell? Now think about where you should have bought and should have sold, given the opportunity?

>> No.50697359

>>50697138
The fact that you think you can have a genuine discussion around something so meaningless in the short term shows where youre coming from.

Why does anyone care what you think the price should be? Is it undervalued or overvalued to you? No one gives a fuck dude.

How about you have discussion about topics that have a price impact in the long run?

>> No.50697448

>>50697219
Those are good points. I admit I am trying to trade based on my emotions right now, which always end up being a bad decision. But based on the past two years can you really blame me? It’s not a good look when every single development gets suppressed to shit meanwhile other coins like matic can sustain its pumps with partnerships.

>> No.50697560

>>50697184
Ordinarily this would be a reason to drop the investment. Regardless of the reason, it is performing poorly. That was my point then yet we're still here talking in circles about what may be causing shit price performance instead of calling it shit price performance and moving on. This is a perfect example of asence of objectivity. You basically intentionally miss the point.

>> No.50697620

>>50697138
People say >I get shit on for being a fudder because of statements like >>50696613. Chainlink already won since it started being grandfathered into the tradfi industry. People point out that Sergey doesn't care about the price since he knows this as well. This matters because right now no one is focused on fucking utility, if they were you'd have XMR in the top 5 and Cardano wouldn't even make top 100. The game is speculation and people can't really speculate on Chainlink without any concrete revenue figures. Even if there were figures, Chainlink is never a token that will be shilled or advertised like other projects. It's a standard. You never had TV ads for internet protocols, just like you'll never have ads about oracle networks.

>> No.50697659

>>50692694
Can I get a QRD on blockchain jobs? I'm a data scientist who can't code anything besides sql.

>> No.50697669

>>50697560
You said people called you a fudder for pointing out that Link was lagging.
Reality is nobody called you a fudder if you pointed out the Bitcoin suppression.
You’re a bullshitter.

>> No.50697675

>>50697448
There is no better position on planet Earth than Link right now.

You have bitch like emotions and your 50 faggoty posts come across so whiney.

Sell every Link you have and never talk about it again. We both know you won't. I'm out, I can't read anymore of your limp wristed shit Link fud.

>> No.50697782

>>50697675
>You have bitch like emotions and your 50 faggoty posts come across so whiney.
>meanwhile having a bitch fit himself
wew
>>50697669
>>50697359
>>50697620
Why is discussing price action such a taboo to you people? The point is to make money. I get it. You're already rich. Not all of us are as lucky as you. I'm not planning on holding crypto for ten years.

>> No.50697819

>>50697219
Good post. That talks me off the ledge some.

>> No.50697839

>>50697669
I love how you try to shut down what I'm saying out of hand based on slinging some loose slur at it. That happened 100% and I lived it. People were still trotting around 2020 price performance as surely as you're saying your bullshit right now, and that LINK would therefore turn it around and so on, instead of assessing objectively while it plummeted in the rankings. Keep saying I'm "a bullshitter" on some totally beside the point aspect of what I'm writing. Do you read the shit you write? How far down the copehole are you exactly? Time to take stock of reality, I think.

>> No.50697844

>>50697782
> Why is discussing price action such a taboo to you people?
It’s not.
We’ve been discussing, cataloging, and exposing Link price suppression for many years.
It’s literally only when you drag retarded fud into it that you get called out.

>> No.50697869

>>50697839
You said you got called a fudder just for pointing out that Link was lagging.
That’s 100% horseshit.

>> No.50697903

>>50697869
I'm pretty sure he did get called a fudder in other threads. You do realize that there are other threads too right? Are you fucking retarded?

>> No.50697905

>>50692731
You sound like a rekt fools anon when Buying NFTS, staking, farming and LP pools are easy to use on ElrondNetwork that will help with mass adoption. Fast, easy, secure and clean with a growing ecosystem go get rich Dickhead

>> No.50697930

>>50697903
Nobody ever gets called a fudder simply for pointing out that Link is lagging.

>> No.50697981

Sergey needs to buy back every LINK he sold over the past 2 years. Fucker crashed the price hard it should NOT be allowed below $15

>> No.50697998

>>50697869
I was called a fudder for pointing out LINK was lagging and suggesting it was out of position for the bullrun and a poor performer - its performance was 100% horseshit, you could say - as early as Feb. You can have your pointless incredulity all you want as your randomly selected point of contention to provide you some comfort while you disregard everything else I've said, as brainlets typically do, but as OP pointed out and many others itt have you get called a jeet Jew Bulgarian gypsy fudder for any suggestion that LINK isn't hot shit, or there may better options for ROI, or these days even bordering on a conversation about its performance, any number of things. The fact you find this hard to believe is comical actually.

>> No.50698043

>>50697930
Now look who's bullshitting

>> No.50698151

>>50698043
It's usually something along the lines of:
>"LINK is lagging behind in price"
>Yes, we noticed that everytime LINK pumps it is kneecapped by BTC crashing
>"Wew, conspiracy much. Take meds. Anyway, LINK price action is bad lol! How do you feel about that?"
>I think LINK price action should have been better than it has been, given the positive developments over the past months/years. I can't pinpoint the exact reason, but I think it is plausible that certain parties are shorting LINK or the market to keep it from rallying
>"L M A O. Linkies so deluded they think the whole world revolves around their shitcoin!!"
>"Anyway, LINK price aug 2020 vs LINK price aug 2022. LOLLLLL!"
>Yes, funny. Fuck of fudfag
>"HAHA JUST MENTIONING PRICE IS NOW FUD. LINKIES FOREVER DELUDED TOKEN NOT SNEEDED DOWN 10X VS ETH HR ROASTIES SERGEY FAT KLAUS SCHWAB WEF TOKEN EAT THE BUGS"
I'm only slightly exaggerating, this is literally what most interactions look like when discussing price.

>> No.50698248
File: 116 KB, 733x782, just-wait.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50698248

>>50698151
For me it was just the suggestion LINK was out of position. That impies selling LINK to reposition, implies bringing up the idea maybe the bullrun dries up before we get momentum. You'd rather postulate about reasons etc rather than observe objectively and draw an actionable interpretation. That's where the point of difference is. This kind of thing in LINK threads though is like bath salts to the snowflakes. They all go apeshit at the suggestion and resort to trying to discredit with slurs or coming up with ulterior motive theories or whatever, which is exactly what the fuck the other anon is doing right now. OP just resonates more after that exchange. It's a totally bizarre point to take from what I wrote and start contesting.

>> No.50698290
File: 57 KB, 976x850, _91408619_55df76d5-2245-41c1-8031-07a4da3f313f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50698290

Wtf is Luna this shit got me rekt i wouldn't be surprised to see all retailers actually integrate into crypto payments, because it's capable to offer every merchants, online stores the ability to accept digital assets from any wallet.

>> No.50698436

>>50697998
> you get called a jeet Jew Bulgarian gypsy fudder for any suggestion that LINK isn't hot shit
Well obviously lmao

>>50698043
I’ve never once seen any of the “bitcoin dumps on Link news” posters get called fudders, for instance. Even though they obviously talk about Link’s underperformance.
Explain that

>> No.50698447

>>50698248
> You'd rather postulate about reasons etc rather than observe objectively and draw an actionable interpretation
The problem with that interpretation is that without knowing the cause, you can never make an educated guess as to HOW LONG the bad price action will last or if there is chance for a reversal. You're literally just flipping a coin. You will have repositioned from an asset in the "through" (bad price action, no hype, high reward) to another asset at the peak (lots of hype, euphoria, lots of risk) because you objectively observed one line trending up and another trending down. Postulating about reasons at least lets you draw a framework from which you can decide to reposition or not. Yes, you observed objectively (and in the end correctly), but that didn't tell you anything besides "price action bad".
Ethereum's price action was bad compared to BTC in late 2020, but right when anons like you would have "observed" that for long enough, and repositioned, ETH started its own rally that went on well into 2021. All those who jumped ship were left out to dry as Ethereum reached 2017 sat levels.

After retracing the 2020 DeFi bubble, there was no reason for Chainlink to perform so bad. Had I known about the CeFi shorting, I would have perhaps sold more during the 2021 peak. But I did not, so I gambled that the market wouldn't stay irrational. You gambled that the trend would continue. We both gambled.

>> No.50698453

>>50698151
Exactly

>> No.50698483

>>50693437
Wtf is a moron saying, You'l love it when the pussy get wet, you don't want to know the process dickhead when merchants can buy a house cars and do shopping from the comfort of their homes and pay using crypto like BTC ETH and other web3payments platform.

>> No.50698491

>>50693293
>Considering what Vitalik said "The days of making x100 or x1000 returns are over."

That quote was from 2019 lol

>> No.50698586

>>50698436
Right. Glad I could clear up that bizarre little misunderstanding then.

>>50698447
I think the fallback to "it's all a gamble anyway" is a bit of a cop out. The trend is your friend after all. I've learned a lot over the past few years from traders who absolutely fucking crushed it and the difference between "buy and be paralysed into holding" is pure objectivity. I think you and others undersell what an emotive decision it was to continue to hold LINK through poor price performance regardless of the reason, in a time when everything else was popping off, which we may never get in that way again, and comes roughly once every four years. I don't know how else to put it but I'll remain grateful I've taken this as an opportunity to learn rather than brushed it under the carpet with platitudes.

>> No.50698587
File: 60 KB, 550x366, 1514684264037.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50698587

>>50698491
So is that pasta

>> No.50698754

>>50698586
Well there’s a big difference between pointing out that Link is lagging, and saying “Link isn’t hot shit”.
Obviously

>> No.50698785

Honestly, the stupidity I read on here sometimes amazes me. I barely post, but even I'm aware of the gambling weak handed mentality some of you have.

The fundamentals of Link are phenomenal, and it poses the next step forward for Web3. Right now price action is shit for everything, whenever the stock market takes a minor dip you have trading firms pull money out of BTC from their diversified portfolio, which then has a knock on affect for owners of alt coins. Whether it's link, dot , eth, etc.. And this makes perfect sense because if you were a normal buyer new to the game, or if you were part of an investment firm you would want to make sure the main stable coin isn't collapsing, so that you wouldn't risk your losing your money on your small moon shot alt coins that are higher risk, high return.

Even if Sergey is dumping to pay for company overheads, this won't make a difference as he did this prior to the last bull run and we still had it pump to the circa $60 mark. Assuming the world economy doesn't implode, its safe to say our next major pump will be higher than the last ATH. And this may take 6months to 2 years once things stabilise economically (regardless if its a great reset or legitimate global recession). This is all dependent if we don't get dragged into an actual world war from the current proxy war taking place in Ukraine.

I work in the engineering and construction industry on various large scale projects. Projects are still moving forward, and supply chain costs have gone up globally for raw materials. But nonetheless projects are still moving ahead, and we haven't had any major unemployment yet.

Build your stack, have some cash reserves, and worse case is if link does fail us like the fudders have claimed, well then at least you'll get a 10x from todays current price in the near future, as I believe its still a safe bet. FYI BP today made record profits. So atm there is a lot of coin being made.

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-62382624

>> No.50698799
File: 30 KB, 800x842, alien.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50698799

>>50692674
>Whenever I ask about price action I get labeled as a fudder
if you read the whitepaper and still think in any other terms than "chainlink per starbucks grande" then you did not pass the IQ test.

>> No.50698802

>>50698754
I think you just got a bit needlessly and autistically stuck on that point, anon.

>> No.50698828

Listen you've been granted by God an opportunity to buy single digit links again. Each day that passes the fundamentals of Chainlink only grow stronger. This isnt pre main net days any more. The network is operational and has added functionality as time goes on. The company is growing and there have been big names like Schmidt adding their peice to the project. The market data is easily viewable and there's been dozens of Oracle failures that would have been totally avoided had they used chainlink. Nothing is stopping you from playing the lottery with dog coins and exit scams with a few thousand dollars to try and 1000x in 5 hours.
The project has been unfuddable for a long time now and that's about when the good memes dried up too. Argue whatever you want about what Sergey should have done about the shorters and the poor marketing of link and I'll agree but already nothing can stop the inevitable

>> No.50699114

>>50698828
cope nigger you're down 90%

>> No.50699287

>>50692860
smartcon would be worth paying for if they fucking released anything there
an announcement simply won't do anymore, they have enough of those

>> No.50699395

>>50699287
Would you be able to personally talk to Eric Schmidt and network with him? If so it might be worth going if you’re some kind of business owner. If not then lol

>> No.50699419

>>50699395
you have to win some stupid mcdonalds prize to even meet Sergey, what do you think?

>> No.50699454

>>50699419
In my head canon I like to think that Sergey was planning to have the price of the ticket equal to one link token, which obviously backfired really fucking hard. But I’m sure there are reasons to how they priced the tickets. Kind of retarded to price it so high when link holders lost 90% of their investment.

>> No.50699484

>>50699454
I wonder if he was planning that before or after he sent millions of tokens to Binance.

>> No.50699526

people that own link are bad people. simple as

>> No.50699702

It's really quite simple. Link Marines are the chosen ones. I'll never sell and just enjoy goading fudders. I don't even want to make it, particularly. I like my life and am well comfy already. Telling the trannies i don't think i'll sell is fucking hilarious. They tie themselves in such knots trying to persuade you. Classic pisstake, every day.

>> No.50699806

>>50692807
This.

>all in since 2019, nothing have changed and staking is finally around the corner.

>> No.50699952

>>50699702
I don't give a fuck if you buy or sell, but it's no surprise that people of marginalized communities (including trans folks or POC) hate you people and your scams. After all, it’s common knowledge that 90% of LINK OG’s came from /pol/, and are thus unironic Nazis and extremely racist. This is evident when you look at the chats whenever Chainlink presents at conferences such as consensus or smartcon. It’s always N word this, N word that.

I personally don’t want to put my money into a project like that and keep that sort of company. Moreover, I question the intelligence of people who shill LINK given their backwards and racist political views.

>> No.50701412 [DELETED] 

As ethereum moves forward towards Proof of Stake, Syscon remains committed to Proof of Work but not in the wasteful manner it is often made out to be.

>> No.50701488
File: 173 KB, 1536x1288, 1658818438237838.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50701488

>>50693130
Fucking dump now before that shit falls another 4x and you get rekt.
Chainlink is great but link is a shitcoin just to attract hype.
Get into based projects like QANplatform. The blockchain even uses Chainlink.

>> No.50701508

We had our fun but it’s time to sell

>> No.50701533

Don't get married to a shitcoin

>> No.50701845

>>50692674
buy signal af

>> No.50701987

Real talk, how high can LINK go next bull run? Anyone who unironically thinks it's a shitcoin that won't pump is incapable of thinking for themselves, unless you're saying that all the projects by LINK crash and burn in which case sure I guess but the landscape would be vastly different

>> No.50702021

>>50692674
Get lost, FUD bot

>> No.50702088

>>50693147
5.4/10

efron bros.....

>> No.50702097

>>50701488
>Falling another x4
>Down 10x vs ETH
>ESL
At this point it's intentional right, R-right?

>> No.50702099
File: 13 KB, 209x228, 1645025974024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50702099

Absolutely useless 6IQ thread getting close to 200 replies at this point. My fucking face when.

>> No.50702211

>>50701987
If staking, CCIP, etc. all deliver, $20 sounds right

>> No.50702280

>>50693111
>Do you really think staking and Ccip will be game changers this year? Maybe I’m too demoralized to see what is happening.
You have to be extremely demoralized to not think these matter, but honestly it's better that way so you aren't just hanging on waiting for something to happen

>> No.50702326

It's not a cult it's a Russian pump and dump

>> No.50702449

>>50702211
Damn that'd be amazing

>> No.50702665

>>50701987
Link will go so high it wouldn’t even make sense to sell a Link for dollars anymore. You’d need a few properties a boat and probably a couple slaves to make it worthwhile to sell a LINK.

>> No.50702687

>>50702211
Checked but you’re incorrect. We’ll easily see three figure LINK next bullrun.

>> No.50702744

>>50702211
Still here, Michael? Not polishing your ANS tokens? kek

>> No.50702901

Staking will have an impact even in it's "beta" form. All sorts of scams pump based off of potential staking yields. Take into account LINK not only isn't a scam but is "blue-chip" and you are looking at a potential homerun.

>> No.50702950

>>50699952
This is my favourite tranny bot pasta, it's in every Stinky thread... makes me buy more every time.

>> No.50703030

>>50702901
Also, staking means liquidity will dry up on CeFi platforms which means they can't dump and short LINK for free anymore as easily.

>> No.50703416

>>50692886
What do you want him to do? Call the blockchain police?

>> No.50703515

>>50703416
He probably needs to work harder, I should think. No one loves a slacker. Perhaps we could round up a bunch of spotty neets like the one you answered and have them supervise his work output. I'm sure we could squeeze a little more out of the guy before Smartcon.

>> No.50703549

>>50692674
I bought in 2017 and sold during the run up to 50.thanks for holding my bags they were heavy

>> No.50703815

>>50692674
I bought a couple link in 2020 and then a thousand since then
it is a cult but not the kind you think
ygmi

>> No.50703986

>>50702097
It has to be intentional. I know a ton of projects that use Chainlink too. It seems as they grow, the token falls. WTF is going on.

>>50701488
Interesting.

>> No.50704853

>>50696626
If every eth holder sold their stack for the link ico in sept 2017 they would have 10x their eth stack now

>> No.50705086

>>50703986
token not needed

>> No.50705103

>>50703030
I thought they were all insolvent? Thats what you guys spam every day

>> No.50705120

>>50703416
Publicly call them out, file lawsuit against Celsius, etc. Literally do something

>> No.50705171

>>50692694
Can I start a node for radiation count from my USB Geiger counter?

>> No.50705309

Things are moving more slowly than I’d hoped. If they hadn’t at least addressed staking at consensys I would have lost a lot of faith in the teams ability to execute. Obviously the promise of chainlink is the greatest in all of crypto, but it doesn’t matter if that promise is not delivered. I’m somewhat disappointed that the initial version of staking will be so anemic. I understand they only have one shot at this and the network will be fragile in its initial stages, but I expected more than this by now. That said, they have hit the bare minimum of achievements to keep me engaged. There’s a lot of newfags and low iq holders that don’t understand that chainlink does owe us something. The network is what gives chainlink value, not the other way around, and we are the network. Chainlinks schema isn’t purely cryptographic, it’s cryptoeconomic, and the behavioral security guarantees built into the rational behavior of the network are just as important as the cryptographic guarantees. So, it’s time to shut up and deliver. It’s been 5 years. If we don’t see big things in the next two quarters I’ll reevaluate my position.

>> No.50705437
File: 522 KB, 2076x1094, chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50705437

have faith, you heathen fags

chainlink will deliver

>> No.50705467

>>50692886
Because he's already given you a moneymaking opportunity in the form of being able to short Bitcoin using an accurate indicator basically nobody outside of /biz/ is aware of.

>> No.50705840

>>50698785
>https://www.bbc.com/news/business-62382624
>atm there is a lot of coin being made
holy fuck this is the strongest sell signal I've ever seen

>> No.50705897

>>50705103
Insolvent as those platforms may be, lot of Linkies still keep their LINK in CeFi.

>> No.50706629

>>50692674
People thinking Chainlink is a cult is a cult.

>> No.50706668

>>50692674
Brother

Check out Portus Network. It's not even launched yet. Massive potential if you're already knowledgeable in Oracles.

They've had things from the Chainlink 2.0 paper months before Linkies made it public

I'm literally still bagholding what I bought in at $22 but I have hope with these guys

@portusnetwork on tg

>> No.50706813

>>50699395
You think buying a ticket to Smartcon is going to get you a business deal with Eric fucking Schmidt? LMAO

>> No.50706993

Im still processing my shock over the guy earlier in this thread saying there was “nothing” Sergey could do. Holy shit cult confirmed. So no ceo of any crypto can do anything other than partner with people who are destroying his coin? And you want institutions to buy this? WHAT THE FUCK.

So you tell a billion dollar institution “oh hey sorry man theres a porn star managed cefi company taking everything down. Oh well we tried”

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>> No.50707018

I changed into an XRP schizo a few years ago and sold my 2017 stack. LINK has accomplished the mission commonly thought of by OGs back then, and the further end of the information market is after a few globohomo steps yet. All their current development is really a nothingburger waiting for that time.

>> No.50707087

>>50706629
This kek. The FUD feels like more of a cult than the Link holders

>> No.50707104

>>50692782
It's the best preforming asset I have ever purchased in my life and I am still tremendously up on my $.45 average $15,000 worth of LINK and the Linkpool that I traded some of that $.45 average LINK into did even better.

>> No.50707130

>>50706668
Buying in at $22…”knowledgable about oracles”. Anon if you were knowledgeable you would have bought in at $0.25 like the rest of us and then you wouldn’t have to shill “muh LINK killers”

>> No.50707238

>>50707087
FUD'ers wouldn't give a fuck if the word chainlink is never mentioned on /biz/ again, that would be a relief

>> No.50707377

>>50698151
this is true because heroku gpt3 bots are retarded

>> No.50707416

>>50707238
there was a period in early 2020 when it was normal to have literally zero LINK shill or discussion threads, and yet there was a constant cycle of fud threads rolling through the catalog at all times.
Which means either a substantial amount of the fud is automated, or some of the fudders will continue to persistently fud even when LINK is not otherwise being mentioned, or both.

>> No.50707428

It's the hope that kills you

>> No.50707458

>>50693147
I thought it was pretty good.

>> No.50707509

>>50697138
Why is price action so important to you? Did you buy above $20 and are now underwater? What do you do? Do you double down and buy more to bring your average down? Or do you capitulate? Buying more at a generational bottom of $6 vs buying above $20 and selling below $10? Price action does not matter until the staking functionality is live. Let’s take a look at tech. DEFI in entirety depends on it, it enables smart contracts to be smart contracts because oracles function as they should, it is currently being used as a currency to pay node operators for decentralized services. Guess what, once you can treat an Oracle node as a bank, things change. Imagine being able to stake your tokens and guarantee yourself a percentage of the annual revenue paid in link, those same link tokens being removed from the circulating supply and open markets. Until Staking is live, price action does not matter. And guess what, Staking will be live, and there’ll be 75M tokens scrambling to be the first to get that percentage. Did I mention that staking will only be live for the ETH/USD Network before it goes live for other Oracle networks and that 75M LINK will be securing just one Oracle network and that it is entirely possible for there to be an infinite set of Oracle networks? KYS, and sell you don’t deserve to ride of the coattails of Chainlink labs, and the fat man.

>> No.50707629
File: 91 KB, 1200x905, 1654673226620.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50707629

"KIKE NIGGER JEWS AGAIN!" Sergey roared stomping into his office decorated to look suspiciously like the Cayman Islands.
"What's the problem this time?" inquired Adelyn looking up from her wet dictionary with a jaded glance.
Rory and Thomas stood over in the corner by the coffee machine. Rory shrugged his shoulders, Thomas rolled his eyes and mouthed "not again" to Rory. Rory, not wanting to get involved in yet another morning 'incident', thought of his wife's son and all they had built together.
"Well..." Sergey began before staring into space for a solid 42 seconds. The others had grown accustomed to this inevitable delay and waited patiently.
"The media, in all their wisdom, cannot see the value of smart contracts; but flippantly share BLM bullcrap". “It’s like a torrent of shit published minute by minute hour by hour!” Rory and Thomas kept their poker faces while Adelyn blew a big bubble of blue HubbaBubba, seemingly immune to the rhetoric, possibly because she was an Asian woman on loan from the Chinese state department.
"And, what's worst," Sergey continued jumping up and down, his fat violently oozing, his chubby arms flailing wide around, "that Microsoft dude is coming today and I'm just not in the mood to talk about "how much I care about BLM"” Sergey fingered the air overemphasizing the quotes and the problem.
"Aww just focus on your oracles sweetie" said Adelyn cooing, "that's what he's come for. Try and stay focused!"
"yeah focused and 1keoy" thought Sergey. Out loud he said with a wink "You're right my little spelling bee, everyone come over here for a group huddle"
Rory and Thomas looked over at each other and sighed in unison and Adelyn complied with a ‘white people walking past you grimace’ expression on her face.
Each put their hands into the center, "One Two Three, We Just Win" they shouted together smiling the Smart Contract mandated smile

>> No.50707655

if you've been around, you probably know the theories that $link staking was pushed off for years because eth2 wasn't ready. now there are regularly rumors that eth2 will be particularly dependent on chainlink and that the ethereum foundation has completely bent the knee

>> No.50707685

>>50707104
prove that you have link at .45 avg. Ive never seen anyone prove these low buys ever. people who bought below $3 have sold a long long time ago.

>> No.50708958

>>50692674
Chainlink oracles allowed the DeFi summer and betting on the then unknown platforms like Aave which were enabled by it made some fortunes.

What will CCIP enable which will become very profitable as an investment?
A second DeFi pump?

We know that Chainlink subsidizes the complete space which profits from it to milk out huge amount of capital and siphon it away from Chainlink.
If we want to profit from CCIP we need to find which coin will use it to improve or add new features and attract more investments.

>> No.50709214

>>50694837
Post addresses.
>captcha hrtxx9

>> No.50709467

>>50708958
unironically chainlink benefits the most from ccip. already profitable network of nodes will take on more and more fee generating tasks as network effect happens.

>> No.50709521

>>50707685
that's not true I bought my 3500 at about $1.50

>> No.50709611

>>50707685
Fuck no I won't.
I'm still here
I still hate /pol/ for brainwashing my brother into a subconsciously perverse shame-driven self-hating ineffectual consumer coomer
I still fucked my Jewish friend's wife while he was in the room (cost for 8 months of just wife encounters in hotels and shit was 700 LINK)

>> No.50709653

>>50709611
*Fucked the wife while the husband was in the room
Cucking is less exciting than philandry desu, it was always better in a hotel room.

>> No.50709725

>>50709611
>>50709653
>heroku gpt3 bot posts story
great story bro very realistic

>> No.50709770

NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER
also nexo is insolvent and i speak english at home

>> No.50709814

>>50709521
do you still have them?

>> No.50709867

>>50694035
almost like there have been multi-year long systematic and paid demoralization campaigns to demoralize and make the board unusable. sounds like they were successful too.

>> No.50709883

>>50709770
>posts a bunch of racist spam all the time
>wonders why their coin is performing like shit
Hint: it's because you're driving away all the smart city folks who actually have money to spend, unlike you bunch of racist backwoods hicks. Fuck you, man.

>> No.50709901

>>50694035
Imagine lamenting that every post on this board isn’t link spam anymore

>> No.50709954

>>50709467
According to >>50709167 it should allow the emergence of big apps which would capture all the value from the space maybe in a similar fashion to how social media like Facebook or other media giants like Google did it.

This would mean L1 would bleed against these big apps which become bigger than the L1.
Maybe this was the original vision of Sergey to have people use the blockchain without knowing it through apps.

It would be a mix of centralization with a bit of decentralization using chain transparency and proof of reserves, but if someone can build a platform to interact with the blockchain without all the complexity and make it accessible to everyone it would certainly gain a lot of users.
However it would offer all the services available through the blockchain: financing for companies and users, insurance, gambling, betting, gaming, next gen of social media and streaming, cloud...

It wouldn't have to own all these sub services more than by being a majority holder with 5-20%, but mostly it would have to gather everything in one place and simplify to the extreme every functionality so that everyone can just click 1 to 3 buttons to reach everything.

We once thought this would be done by Chainlink because it is enabled by CCIP and is the real value capture of this space to reach every user. If someone can replicate a google of blockchains he will win everything.

>> No.50710338

>>50709867

I have a five-figure LINK stack and I fud LINK here every single day. This shithole is infested with reddit scum, and if I can trickjust one redditor into not making it, all those hours were well spent

>> No.50710529

>>50710338
Sounds like you've got a secret crush.

>> No.50710609

> oh maybe this will finally be a good link thread instead of low effort fud and nonsense
> ctrl+f "nigger"

Cool

>> No.50710618

>>50692674
I too I'm a LINK marine but for a year of hodling, ain't fudding but price isn't what I expected it to be.
Anyways ERC20 tokens are my alphas coz why not, the likes of Sylo, FLD, TEAM and more alts. Good a thing I do save ERC721 and all ERC20 tokens on sylo smart wallet.

>> No.50710703

>>50710529

did that somehow make sense in your head

>> No.50710743

>>50692674
Im going to give you an honest answer and you will call me a schizo for it. Its artificially suppressed by pockets deeper than you can fathom.

>> No.50710774

>>50693166
You will make it by buying good privacy tokens like SCRT, NIM, and ROSE. With regulation coming into the space, privacy protocols will thrive.

>> No.50710929

>>50710703
It's OK anon. You can admit it.

>> No.50711029

>>50710338
What makes you think you can make it after missing out on your last easy exit last year?
We may get one final miracle after which we could see a multi year bear market which would take down the crypto market with it.

Even if the Chainlink team can survive that if they have enough funding which is not certain, we have no way of knowing how much time it can take and how much the funding of the space would be hit if we were forced to go through a world wide currency and economy collapse.

In those conditions even if the network grows and survives because of the deflationary pressure it would cause on assets it could take multiple years for a new bull market to occur as we would go through a multi year crypto winter.
We are currently in the 3rd world war.
Only Trump may stop or slow this and in the best case that would be 2 more years of wait, and unlikely to happen after they manipulated the election once.

>> No.50711074

>>50711029

ngmi

>> No.50711676

>>50709867
>It's all a conspiracy bro

>> No.50711714

>>50710338
48k stack here
the most zealous fudders understand that link will melt faces regardless
the only purpose this board serves now is to trick plebbitors and twitter niggers into thinking they've stumbled across a super secret crypto success goldmine, and their answer when asking about link should always be "token not needed, buy xrp / icp / bsv instead"

>> No.50711741

>>50710774
Let's see what privacy protocols bring in the fear of regulation. It's not far before we get cut up with this regulation.

>> No.50711757
File: 47 KB, 640x428, 1658510067755080.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50711757

>be linktard
>marry your bags
>become the eternal bagholder
like pottery

>> No.50712858

>>50692782
Because the tokens haven't been monetised yet nobody can take anything from the current price action.
If you look at the fundamentals and the connections the team has you can't deny the potential of the project, the problem is that the institutions won't buy in to a project that doesn't show profits for the holders. The market makers are very cagey and will wait to see profits being made before they will go all in.

You probably know this already are are trying to poison the well but I for one am not selling.

>> No.50712929

>>50712858
>the tokens haven't been monetised yet nobody can take anything from the current price action
You're falling into a fudder trap.
Bitcoin, ETH, etc. never needed staking to accrue massively in value, so don't let them convince you that Link needs staking to accrue massively in value.

>> No.50713092

>>50712929
>fuds Link
>claims fuddees are falling into fud trap
welcome to clown world

>> No.50713096

>>50713092
>>fuds Link
... what?

>> No.50713109

>>50712929
btc was a special case and eth was public facing and the ico onramp
link currently sits in the background, top nodes are being paid $2m a year in link but it's invisible to the market until staking

>> No.50713120

>>50712929
They're much higher profile than LINK at the moment but the real problem is that the institutions are shook so you're going to need to put your money where your mouth is going forward because too many people have been burnt by bad projects.

LINK is in safe hands, nobody can ever claim they rush things.

>> No.50713128

>>50713109
>btc was a special case
Lots of BTC-alikes have exploded in value as well, also without any kind of staking.

>eth was public facing and the ico onramp
Chainlink is the same, thousands of projects run on it.

>>50713120
>They're much higher profile than LINK
That doesn't mean anything.
BTC and ETH were a lot less high-profile than Link is currently for much of their existence.

>> No.50713180

>>50713096
The other anon rightly suggests the shitty price action is because the token isn't really in demand yet due to no staking. ie price is based purely on speculation. I don't know why you would disagree with this, it's pretty clearly true. The intense fud and the lack of marketing hype from the team has ensured this speculative price remains low. Once staking begins, this all changes.

>> No.50713182

>>50713128
chainlink is not public facing at all
that's part of the problem
normies just see the dapp they're using or the blockchain they're on
that's why uni had such a high ranking in the bull run despite having no token utlity even planned for it
people are fucking stupid
i thought people were kidding about buying stuff with unit basis leading into the last bull... how wrong i was

>> No.50713240

>>50713180
>because the token isn't really in demand yet due to no staking
BTC and ETH did not need staking to explode in value.

>>50713182
You have to understand that what makes BTC and ETH go up in value isn't simply use. Both could be sub $1 right now and still be used just the same.
What makes them go up in value is news; like the Tesla adoption for BTC or the foundation of the EEA for ETH.

>> No.50713293

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER!

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY!
HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

>> No.50713328

>>50713240
yeah link needs a f100

>> No.50713345

>>50713328
>f100
what?

>> No.50713504

>>50713345
Fortune 100. Like Oracle.

>> No.50713596

>>50713328
>>50713504
Link is connected to and shilled by many massive corporations, and is actually adopted by more massive corporations than Bitcoin or Ethereum.

>> No.50713685

>>50711757
if chainlink moons I am going to buy a bigger chin

>> No.50714378

>>50713240
Bitcoin was the first crypto ever and had no competition. The network became massive and vast as a result. Ethereum isn't just a token but a development platform which also benefitted from the 2017 ICO launches. Normies don't understand what Link does, and it has fallen down the ranks because of this and the other reasons I mentioned. Fucking hell, anon, how new are you?
Tell me, if your theory is correct, why the fuck is Link doing so badly then? The situation has been as it is for ages, but is about to change. Why are you clinging to some other notion?

>> No.50714781

>>50714378
I already addressed all of your points; you're not making any sense.

BTC and ETH never needed any kind of staking to moon, and neither did their copycats.
And neither did tons of projects with virtually zero usage, so the whole "user facing" argument is completely bunk as well.

You're holding Chainlink to a completely different standard from literally all other cryptos in existence, thus falling into the trap set by the fudders.

>why the fuck is Link doing so badly then?
What happens every time a major announcement is made that benefits Chainlink?

>> No.50714932

>>50692674
Chainlink already did its 500x. It's not that its a cult, it's just that it already happened, people made a lot of money on it but now they're trading other things on L1s and L2s.

>> No.50715625

>>50714781
Ok. Lets pretend for a minute that Link staking is never happening. The team announces that they have abandoned the idea. It's confirmed. You still think the token price of Link is going to moon? Why? It's not for anything at that point and you might as well be trading seashells. Bear in mind you can stake Eth and Bitcoin's value is in its network size and strength. Why would anyone buy Link, an ERC677 token at that point? Remember, no staking.

>> No.50715783

>>50715625
To access the LINK network?

Market.link

>> No.50715830

>>50715625
>You still think the token price of Link is going to moon without staking?
Well how did ETH and BTC explode in value without staking?

>Why would anyone buy Link
Same reason they've been using the Link token since May 30, 2019.

>> No.50715870

>>50692674
>staking
tokenomics are not going to save a project. they are good to have but the thing that matters most is are people going to buy this token? and if u ask me after all the things that have happened in the last 6 months including celsius and problems defi has i dont think chainlink has something people want to buy anymore. call me a fudder im just stating wht i think

>> No.50715940

>>50715870
What matters most is the chainlink network increasing in usage you nigger.

>> No.50716133
File: 104 KB, 800x622, 4ad7941f4973d548_800.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50716133

>>50710774
>With regulation coming into the space, privacy protocols will thrive.
It likely will but we'll likely see more adoption in Railgun's privacy solutions before anything come from the wannabes you mentioned. In case you don't know, security is now a major requirement in PriFi

>> No.50716150

>>50707087
Just what I was thinking

>> No.50716208

>>50696626
>if you had of sold and dca into eth you would have already made it by now.
There is probably a second chance in investing privacy coins. They've got the potential to flip anything right now

>> No.50716439

>>50715830
>how did ETH and BTC explode in value without staking?
i answered here >>50714378
>Same reason they've been using the Link token since May 30, 2019
Your date is 18 months out and the reason people are still buying it now is because they know staking etc is coming. Otherwise it would go the way of the Dodo, like all these other tokens that have faded into obscurity. They weren't used for anything at all and so they died. Link would have also but it has promise, as yet unfulfilled.
Also, you're a retard.

>> No.50716575

>>50716439
>i answered here >>50714378
None of those points make any sense whatsoever, see >>50714781

>Your date is 18 months out and the reason people are still buying it now is because they know staking etc is coming. Otherwise it would go the way of the Dodo
Are you trying to tell me the token is not needed until staking?

>> No.50716655

>>50716575
>Are you trying to tell me the token is not needed until staking?
Are nodes being paid in LINK right now?

>> No.50716948

>>50716655
Yes, and they have been since May 30, 2019

>> No.50717014

>>50716948
Nice, just confirming token is needed.

>> No.50717270

>>50716655
Yes but this alone is not enough to drive up the price of the millions held in wallets by the likes of us. There are loads more things the token will be needed for and staking is needed first. If staking was never coming the token value would be a penny or something. Instead, it's going to be much more. We're speculating/investing on/in that

>> No.50717312

>>50717270
>but this alone is not enough to drive up the price
Why is it enough for literally every other crypto (99% of which aren't used nearly as much as Chainlink) but not Chainlink?

>> No.50717342

>>50717312
Because other coins/tokens didn't have nefarious outfits shorting with insider information to survive overleverage

>> No.50717394

>>50717342
So you agree that it's a double standard to believe that Chainlink needs staking to pump, while other cryptos do not.
And that what's keeping Link back is not a lack of staking, but rather some nefarious external factor.

>> No.50717566

>>50717312
They're all worth jack shit, anon. You think Doge actually serves some purpose other than speculative gambling? The only tokens worth having in my view are Link, BTC and Eth. It might well be that something else finds a reason to live, but i won't be trying to guess which. I certainly wouldn't be up to my neck in Chainlink as I am if i thought staking wasn't coming. I probably wouldn't be in crypto at all desu

>> No.50717583

>>50713293
You are a MANIAC!

>> No.50717596

>>50717566
They're all worth jack shit without Link, I should say

>> No.50718035

>>50716208
You should probably get started with Railgun.

>> No.50718099

>>50713293
>THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY!
EASILY? For real?