[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 12 KB, 400x400, 63260F1C-2BBE-4992-93B3-1C61A2C3A8C6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
28647809 No.28647809 [Reply] [Original]

BTC needs to be start selling in satoshis by the 100,000,000 instead of 1 BTC

Normies aren going to sped $50k for 1 Bitcoin but they will spend $500 if they see “1,000,000 satoshi” instead of “0.1 BTC”

>> No.28647902

>>28647809
High IQ poster detected

>> No.28647974

>>28647809
true

>> No.28648105

>>28647809
Sorry 100,000* Satoshi instead of 0.1 BTC

It just makes more sense that way to the general pop and would make it much more adoptable by the world as whole

>> No.28648883

>>28647809
just make a stablecoin pegged to a value of a satoshi and ship it

literally free money

here, steal my idea and patent it, i dont care, just give me credits "UY Anon"

>> No.28649020

>>28647809

someone should just make a Satoshi Coin pegged to BTC as 1 Satoshi

maybe I'll do it myself and collect 0.05% as overhead, I'm a goddamn genius

>> No.28649096

>>28648883
god dammit you beat me by two minutes
great minds think alike anon. I'm a genius so this bodes well for you.

>> No.28649204

>>28647809
1 sat is only 0.00047016 USD!!! Imagine if it went to $100 #investing #bitcone

>> No.28649231

>>28647809
1$ buys you 2100 satoshi
still fucking cheap

>> No.28649870

>>28647809
normies don't move the market anymore, it's institutions and high net worth boomers buyinf

>> No.28649948

>>28648883
wait...so
wait
its just btc but a stablecoin broken down to represent individual sats?

>> No.28650130

>>28649870

true to some extent but normies can still move the needle if there's a lot of enthusiasm

they also indirectly decide what the institutions invest in, because they can choose to buy "Aggressive Tech Fund" rather than "Safe Dividend Fund" at their bank

>> No.28650217

>>28649948

Yes, it's basically an arbitrage opportunity that results from the IQ gap between current BTC hodlers and potential normie buyers who are too stupid to understand that price per share (or per coin) is meaningless without knowing the outstanding shares/market cap

>> No.28650339

>>28649870
Doge

>> No.28650544

>>28648883
>>28649020
SatCoin General when?

>> No.28650573

>>28650339

most of doge's bull run was before normies found about it, since it's become a mainstream meme it's been waffling around 6.5 cents and now seems to have lost all its steam

and why wouldn't it? it's literally just a musical chairs meme coin, you'd have to be pretty dumb to buy and hold it expecting anything long term imo

>> No.28650581

>>28647809
How retarded are normans to get fooled by unit bias? Literally why all these normans I talked to in 2017 were buying XRP.

>> No.28650678

But how do you get everyone to agree? Wouldn’t this eventually cause massive errors akin to going to the moon with half your scientists measuring in metric and half in imperial?

>> No.28650719

>>28650217
>potential normie buyers
BCH is your answer. It's BTC but cheaper.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/

Looks like they are all getting behind BCH.

>> No.28650756

>>28650719
BCH is like halfway between being BTC and Bitcoin. What they (Roger Ver and his team) did is like beginning restoration work on an old broken car, with the intention of bringing it to perfect concours condition, making it run as it should etc, but then 75% through the project taking a sledgehammer and start banging on the car and pissing and shitting inside the engine compartment and replacing the wheels with square blocks of wood, and then saying, "There, now we're done! Woohoo!" ... like, huh? what the hell?

>> No.28650788

>>28650544
SatCoin would be too far down the list for it to pick up normies.

>> No.28650839

>>28648105
you are really bad at math aren't you?

>> No.28650984

>>28650839
100% of 1 Bitcoin is 100,000,000 sats

10% of 1 Bitcoin is 10,000,000 sats

1% of 1 Bitcoin is 1,000,000 sats

0.1% of 1 Bitcoin is 100,000 sats

Sorry

>> No.28651063

>>28650984
the most useful unit currently is 0.0001 btc
good luck naming that in anon retarded way!

>> No.28651148

>>28650788

How about:
BTS (Bitcoin Satoshi)
BSC (Bitcoin Satoshi Coin)

>>28650719
BCH is a different coin with different fundamentals though, the idea here is to bring down the nominal price of BTC (per coin) because normies literally only think about the fiat number they see. To these maroons, Bitcoin going from 50k to 500k seems less plausible than "BTS" or whatever going from $0.10 to $1.00

>> No.28651253

>>28651148
>BTS (Bitcoin Satoshi)
>BSC (Bitcoin Satoshi Coin)
Better. Definitely want the Bitcoin(tm) in there.

>> No.28651430

>>28651148
I own the domain Bitcoinduo if you are interested.

>> No.28651457

>>28647809
Dont worry OP, that time will come after this run is finished.

>> No.28651585

>>28651430

I have a friend at CSIS reading this thread and he tells me you're af fellow leaf, I'll consider it

why bitcoinduo though?

>> No.28651762

>>28648883
>>28649020
Yeah, but it's kinda dumb because why not just buy BTC then? Normies won't buy it

>> No.28651859

meanwhile bitcoin mempool clearing up

>> No.28651952

>>28651585
Duo=pair

It implies there are only two

Or you could call it BitcoinPair, BitcoinPaired, BitcoinPear

>> No.28651979
File: 18 KB, 512x340, 1612519880478.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
28651979

>>28651762
>Yeah, but it's kinda dumb because why not just buy BTC then? Normies won't buy it

you clearly don't understand how dumb normies are. The normie sees two equities:
a) $10,000 per share (100 shares total, $1M mkt cap)
b) $10 per share (200,000 shares total, $2M mkt cap)

The normie chooses B every time because A is "too expensive". If you don't believe me, casually ask 10 normies and see for yourself.

>> No.28652128

>>28651979
Wrapped Bitcoin is number 16 on the charts so a satashi version would have some value

>> No.28652258

>>28650719
>investing with reddit

>> No.28652299

>>28651979
What I'm saying is it has nothing to do with individual price, but name recognition. Normies have heard of bitcoin before, but they don't know what a satoshi is. Even if it's just called sBTC, they still won't know. Exchanges would have to agree to start listing BTC price as a satoshi, instead of a full BTC.

>> No.28652365

>>28652258
It's important to know what Reddit is doing

>> No.28652649

>>28652258
intelligence
>>28652365
wisdom

>> No.28652799

>>28649204
Fucking genius. This is how you market.

>> No.28653100

>>28647809
I agree, it's like a stock split

>> No.28653253

>>28647809
They already do that on cash app

>> No.28653278

>>28647809
They should stop calling it satoshi and call them "bits."

>> No.28653360

>>28647809
LOL the "store of value" narrative ain't gonna work out.

>> No.28654222

>>28653360
I don't think it will either when the price of btc drops and gold doesn't (significantly). Btc might even fall more than silver.

>> No.28654412

>>28654222
Fud cope

>> No.28654482

>>28654412
It could go up to 100K but then as soon as it drops significantly the store of value argument will be more difficult to make

>> No.28655038

>>28647809
This

>> No.28655048

>>28653278
No. It would create too much false information about what a bit is, and as a consequence normies would think that bit means crypto money stock.

>> No.28655927

>>28650719
>>28650788
>>28651253
>>28651430
>>28651952
>>28652128
>>28652365
>>28654222
>>28654482
You provide no insight and your comments are like 50% of the posts right now.