[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 8 KB, 300x300, 1521881052066.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9947267 No.9947267 [Reply] [Original]

Will REQ still be worth $100 EOY?

Asking for a friend.

>> No.9947281

>>9947267
More like $10.
Sorry bro.

>> No.9947283

Yes of course sir. You rich EOY. Buy now or die poor sir.

>> No.9947289

peequest haha pooquest

>> No.9947294

>>9947267

We'd be lucky to get 50 cents.

The devs screwed over post-ICO token holders, and they still have not provided any incentives.

I want to ride this bitch to June 29th and duemp it.

>> No.9947309

>>9947281
Ha I wish

>> No.9947320

>>9947267
I'm fucking bullish on REQ and I believe we won't even be close to $100 in 2018, maybe 2019.
HOWEVER, if REQ pulls off the fiat integration AND gets public approval from a big enterprise (Amazon tier shit), this is going parabolic.
Of course, that's just wishful thinking, and we probably will see $10 EOY tops.

>> No.9947347
File: 2 KB, 125x93, 1518886600419s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9947347

>>9947294
Your a fucking moron. I'm sure the DEVS are crying like fucking babies because your investment hasn't x 10. They gave you $1.00 per REQ in January up from ICO around 6 cents. Why the fuck didn't your stupid ass take some profit then. They are building a company. Here's a tip dip-shit... Investments don't have training wheels. I feel I speak for most investors... Go Fuck yourself and Die in a fire.

>> No.9947349

>>9947320
>>9947281

Is this larp?

>> No.9947353

>>9947320
Honestly we'll be lucky to hit $1

>> No.9947389

>>9947349
Why not? If the REQ team do what they say they will do, this could be big.
I know this board likes to go full memeing on everything, but I did my own research and REQ is 1) cheap af 2)getting incredible partnerships (Wikimedia France fiasco wasn't that big of a deal, tho it's still a shame) 3) getting a lot of unnecessary FUD, which is a bullish sign

>> No.9947394
File: 17 KB, 320x364, red.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9947394

>>9947320
>HOWEVER, if REQ pulls off the fiat integration AND gets public approval from a big enterprise (Amazon tier shit), this is going parabolic.

Not a chance you worthless, delusional piece of human excrement. Go back to your wage cuck day job and stop fantasizing.

The dev fucktards and their 12-year old blogger couldn't even communicate to seal an agreement with some shitty ass French chapter of Wikimeidia. They announced it and never bothered to even follow up to set a ground work for technical implementation.

It's a fucking joke.

The only way for REQ to rise in value is for the entire market to rise, like in late 2017, where every floating shitcoin turd was buoyed by the rising tide. REQ has no fundamentals.

>> No.9947410
File: 72 KB, 561x604, IMG_3140.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9947410

>>9947353
That's like, your opinion man.

>> No.9947418

>>9947347

Devs didn't do shit, except to dump their tokens on bag holders to fund their expensive offices in Singapore and to hire an army of Pajeets to write some basic bitch dApps.

REQ hitting a dollar was a fluke and had nothing to do with the project or its fundamentals - there are no fundamentals. Nothing works right now, it's a 30-million dollar ETH payment button that doesn't work correctly.

>> No.9947439
File: 125 KB, 1280x960, w6CzApH.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9947439

>>9947389
>Why not? If the REQ team do what they say they will do

That's the thing. Every 2 weeks the project becomes something different: one day it's a PayPal 2.0, then fiat integration is dropped and it's suddenly some "crowdfunding" dApp that absolutely no one asked for.

This is what a project looks like run by stinky 20-something year old students from a socialist country.

If you want to see what a project run by absolute ruthless pros and technical wizards? Check out Republic Protocol or their Telegram for comparison.

REQ is kindergarten amateur hour.

>> No.9947440

>>9947394
>Not a chance you worthless, delusional piece of human excrement. Go back to your wage cuck day job and stop fantasizing
Incredible how anons here who supposedly don't hold any REQ get so emotional the second someone is slightly optimist on REQ lmao

>> No.9947452

>>9947347
Not that you’re wrong but do you honestly expect people who think their investment is worth $100 to sell it at $1? The delusion is what causes these people to not make smart decisions.

>> No.9947461

>>9947294
>>9947394
>>9947418
>>9947439
All of this just to shill Republic Protocol? Damn

>> No.9947488

>>9947461

No, I own both and participate in the Telegram channels for both.

The difference in the professionalism of the teams is night and day.

REQ is babby's first crypto for a lot of you faggots, you have no reference datum to evaluate a project's merit.

>> No.9947579

>>9947267
No. The team is so fucking dumb it cant even announce a partnership right
Fuck this shitcoin

>> No.9947592

>>9947389
that wikimedia france thing was some bullshit. they waited a full fucking MONTH to back out of the deal and when they finally did, their pretense for doing so was crap—and, meanwhile, people were trading under the expectation that they weren't gonna get bullshat. if anything, this shows that THEY are hard to work with. the req team is at fault for making the error, sure—but, what a delayed overreaction from wikimedia france.

>> No.9947727 [DELETED] 

peequest
S
H
A
M
E
pooquest

>> No.9947768

Imagine thinking they won't pull an exit scam LMAO