/biz/ - Business & Finance

You're literally stealing at these prices

>>9932395

But I saw the guy on Youtube say that and he lost $100K.

Also, isn't stealing bad?

we should have another 3 months of ranging around here, but this should be the bottom.
the graph looks very similar to how btc looked in 2013, but things are moving faster now.
notice after it reaches a bottom, it doesn't recover for awhile, just kind of moves back and forth while not making any new lows.

>>9932486

What do you suspect NANO's future potential is? Could it surpass BTC? Could it get to a major marketcap? Is it pure hype?

>>9932486
could be an inverted lisa pattern

>>9932522
hard to say really. all of crypto feels like a meme at this point. but as actually a functioning decentralized currency it's my best bet.
but it's been around for a long time, and still works instantly without having to worry about how many miners there are

>>9932391
If you're a pure currency you better be bitcoin or might as well bury yourself already. Nano is never going to make it. If you like DAG show some dignity and buy IOTA. Once they win the Swedish e-krona competition they will be a legit, official currency and soon after all the other countries will follow. Sunken cost fallacy, don't fall for it. Unironically, dump your nano for iota, they almost gell the same percentage.

>>9932616
iota? Are you dense? Literally worse than bitconnect.

Nano is never going to recover mate, sell now.

Major shills on online forums and manipulation on a dodgy as fuck exchange that's currently being seized all of it's assets is why raiblocks got as high as it did, that value will never return. The supposed USP of nano is to be the best at transferring currency and that's it, this purpose alone is not enough for it to see any more future investment. Nano will need a lot more going for it to be considered for mass adoption, it's already proved to be a liability. Financial institutions won't trust this coin for a second. It feels like the coin has hit rock bottom but I believe it'll keep on sinking.

>>9932616
Swapping nano for iota would be a good shout, at least iota has a chance at making it.

Just wait for bitcoin transaction speed/cost to skyrocket again like in Dec/Jan, people will look for another option that's cheaper and faster.
My bags are heavy but im buying all the way down.

>>9933610
Very foolish, but carry on it suits you.

>>9932561
Nano... decentralized..bwahahah, hate to break it to you, it's as centralized as it gets, bunch of sql nodes you twat

>>9933320
You're actually retarded aren't you?
Like chewing on crayons, in a group home, retarded.
Never change biz.

Always do the opposite of what biz says.

>>9932391
I bought at $21 it was literally stealing! I am still holding this stolen hoard.

>>9934501
I'm slowly accumulating nano because biz is fudding it hard

>>9934744
Do you really think that biz with its total net worth of $93.84 has enough influence to change the price of nano?

LOL just LOL

>>9932391
My buy target is <$1 - but I'm a greedy motherfucker b/c I lived thru the last crash (BTC from $20 -> $2, VTC $1.5 -> $.05 etc)

>>9934808
Uironically, that is a good buy target. Nano is a great coin with solid tech behind it, but the fact of the matter is that it's still in a downtrend.

>>9934844
I feel like if/when there is another bullrun it could easily be in it (based on what happened to LTC/VTC)

A lot of this shit today will die.

>>9932391
another 6 months of down trend for you nanites OP.

>>9932391
Looks like you're one of a few dozen who where stupid enough not to sell

>>9932561
"Functioning"
"Decentralized"
....