/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9681100
FUCK
U
C
K

>>9681126
F A T

>be sergey
>dress smart and slick whilst pumping the ICO
>ICO makes him an instant millionaire
>he gains a fuckton of weight thereafter
>he dresses like a slob, same flannel all the time
>his manner of speech and facial appearance becomes no different than some sad neet
>absolutely no positive PR effort, he leaves it all to some faggot to chat on discord
>has office in SF, the most expensive place in the USA to operate, thus showing he's a wasteful piece of shit
>no word of hiring more devs

seriously, this shit sounds like the biggest scam of all time. if you had bought EOS or even the nigger-loving Stellar, you'd have made much more than "holding LINK". the writing was on the wall when /biz/bots started calling themselves LINK marines. holy shit am i glad i didn't buy this. it sounds like another SIGT.

>>9681182
>psyop confirmed

The link logo is cube worship (Google it) which convinces me it'll be huge. Anyone else think so?

>>9681368
>it's just a cube
>cubes are found in all hexagram

some idiots worship saturn because the internet told them to. like the cube of saturn is like something.

all you meme magic believing inbredish piece of human scum are literally retarded and you will never ever make it!

I hope it works out for you guys, I really do. But in all of the research I've done nothing really positive comes out of Chainlink.

Most of the promises are ideological and there are current blockchain limitations in terms of scalability concerns.

EOS is also facing similar consequences in terms of scalability as they will be against the same hurdles Ethereum has already faced and is now trying to fix.

Unless they opt for a federated network like Stellar I don't see them succeeding long-term. There's a lot of projects that are much more promising that aren't attached to uncertainties and FUD like LINK.

I'm not saying it isn't going to pump, look at VERGE. Shitcoins are bound to make you money. But try to be a little more conservative with your outlooks of the technology before promising such an incredible appreciation in valuation in a market that is just now starting to crack down on regulations.

This is a speculative market that is slowly transitioning into a space that is finally starting to look at projects that actually work rather than hype whitepapers alone.

You're still going to get pumps, but the days near closer and closer each day until the shitcoin pruning happens.

I don't know if I would hedge my bets into LINK.

I am in charge of the Chainlink Psyop
>AMA

>>9681420
>vague but wordy fud implications
>no concrete examples
Uh huh

>>9681512
1 thing Stinkers haven't taken into account is the competition

Oracleize may be shit, but there are other projects that will give Link a run for its money

Only link holders are so deluded to think their coin will be the next BTC or ETH

Of course, who really knows at this point. It has first mover advantage so we'll have to see what happens, maybe they're really working with big players and that could lead to massive gains

Even then, it will take a miracle for link to gain the hype it needs to moon, no marketing means no gains

Oracles will be important, but probably not to the point where Link shillers delude themselves into believing, take everything with a grain of salt.

You'll have to make a decision to join the linky cult and drink the koolaid or buy coins that will actually go somewhere, don't spend all your money on memes