/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9549301
Smart man. The REQ FUD is strong on /biz/, which is always a strong buy signal. It may be hurting for now, but I think REQ is as close to a guaranteed hit as you can get

>>9549330
what kind of FUD does it even get? The company is evidently real, and the product although small, has some users.

Anything after this point can only be "buts it bad" shitposting

>>9549380
People say that no one uses their product..
Are they wrong?

>>9549380
>what kind of FUD does it even get?

Clearly you haven't been browsing lately, as REQ has become the trendy coin to FUD. It's been having a rough time in the markets lately, and the price has slumped, which means that the ADD children are dumping on it simply because it's not doing well on this, particular week.

I think you've been had, I think the REQ fud is desperate bagholders trying to reverse psychology any small pump so they can get out. I've been there.

>>9549380
Lots of autists make up shit about it. Some examples:

>weird and creepy
>your REQ tokens in your wallet have a chance of getting burned when transactions take place, therefore you can randomly lose your own tokes
>never ever going above $0.30 because whales suppressing price forever
>other coins do REQs job such as OMG

These are simply retarded or untrue as you can see. Tbh they are probably REQ holders because the lower the price is, the faster the coins get burned.

>>9549403
Nah, that's true. But no one uses crypto in general. Yet.

>>9549607
You forgot the pee and poo posters, the FUD isn't even funny anymore.

>>9549425
>>9549607
>>9549635
I mean, is children shouting "poo coin" and "weird and creepy" even real FUD?
Would you doubt an investment into google or apple because someone said it was "creepy"? Would anyone for that matter? I don't know.

>>9549607
I'd assume one of the bigger factors of this coin not pumping is the lack of marketing as they've already stated as to why.
Aside from the medium update articles, /biz/ and reddit, REQ is almost unheard of

SELLING REQ WAS THE BEST DECISION OF MY LIFE

>>9549301

As an auditor who has been warned about blockchain for years through the journal of accountancy magazines that our firm provides us, you've picked the right erc20 token.

If you want to feel even better about your investment in Req, go read the new AICPA whitpaper on the implications of blockchain tech and smart audits. This shit is real. And this the AICPA warning us CPA's, which is the US! Not even crypto friendly Europe, which will get adoption much sooner than the US. Don't listen to any FUD on this board.

https://www.aicpa.org/interestareas/frc/assuranceadvisoryservices/blockchain-impact-on-auditing.html

>>9549676
It just shows how much the conversation has devolved. There is zero good FUD, just whining about price action and the amount of REQ burned. Once the network starts seeing growth, and it will, this coin will make a lot of /biz/ralies rich.

>>9549766
Why would your gay little tokens increase in value? REQ doesn't even have a working accounting product, aren't thry trying to outsource that to pajeets

>>9549766

Just an FYI, the AICPA set the standards for GAAS. Generally accepted auditing standards. They are one of the major governing bodies in the audit profession along with the PCAOB.

>>9549766
Godspeed anon.


>>9549810
>gay token
Weak FUD pajeet, unironically kys

>>9549807
just imagine all the tokens burnt by the yearly wikipedia fundraiser alone. Shit's going to be good in the medium to long term by design.

The only thing really threatening that development (or any crypto really) is an even better technology coming along out of nowhere. But as an actual computer science guy, I can assure you crypto is about as we can do with the current technology, save some optimization on the engineering end.

>>9549810
DYOR. Not going to spoon feed you.

>>9549865
You need hundred millions of normies using req for the coin burn to be relevant also you don't need req tokens to use any of their platforms so why someone pay money for it besides speculation.

>>9549865
While the wikipedia thing is cool, the PWC partnership is easily the biggest partnership in crypto. Dozens of projects claim "partnerships" but PWC actually tweeted about REQ the other day. Anyone who doesn't realize how much the request network will be worth clearly hasn't done any research.

>>9549903
>You need hundred millions of normies using req
nope, you just need millions of usages, not millions of users.

>why someone pay money for it besides speculation
also nope. It's literally speculation. It's a deflationary asset - the number is limited and getting less. Economics predict this to have a positive effect on price, without any necessary increase in demand.
The same theory that keeps bitcoin afloat, to make it simple.

>>9550034
You are smart anon.
Dare you make a prediction eoy ?
$1 is edgy ?
Will help me sleep at night..

>>9550130
>Dare you make a prediction eoy
nah. Really depends on what bitcoin and ethereum do. The whole market might be fucked, or golden in the next semester.

I'm leaning more towards a positive outcome seeing that the EU and US are trying to make crypto a legitimate asset class, as well as traditional players like NASDAQ joining in.
If shit doesn't hit the fan in form of war, economic disaster, legal trouble, or other cataclasms I can see the whole market going 4-5x EOY though.

https://www.telegraaf.nl/financieel/1568287/ing-en-abn-laaiend-enthousiast-over-sojatest-met-blockchain

ING, which invested in and backs REQ, did a test transaction using blockchain. They found it cut costs and time. They have said they will have fully incorporated blockchain in 4 years MAX, with the financial officer saying it could be much, much sooner.

>>9550163
>>9550193

Holy crap, reasonable biz posters coming out of the wood works for once!

>>9550238
yeah, biz likes to fud this coin so much that it gets hard to have any real conversation about it. also i think we've hit rock bottom, crowdfunding dapp is dropping this friday with the biweekly update and we should some some good news with that.

pooquest peequest hahaa

>>9549301
Press S to spit on OP

S

>>9549425
>on this, particular week
You mean the past 5 months of constant dump, right?
>>9549586
Can confirm. I'm holding heavy as fuck bags and I'm shitting on this shitcoin at every opportunity. Already written off the whole position. Might as well go to 0.

>>9550810
>I bought the literal top why am I not making money

>>9550193
Nice, REQ confirmed $1 EOY 2022.

>>9550817
>projecting this hard
Bought literally at 4 cents. Not everyone is a latecomer, I'm afraid.

>>9550837
>I bought at a really low price
>my bags are heavy
you can only have one of those, retard

>>9550852
Are you retarded? Do you not know what an opportunity cost is? 350% in 7 months is terrible performance in crypto.

>>9550875
Nope he is right, the definition of "bags" is having bought at a higher price than the current valuation.

>>9550903
Maybe you should look up the actual definition instead of guessing with your peanut brain.
>An informal term used to describe an investor who holds a position in a security which decreases in value until it is worthless. In most cases, the bag holder will hold the position for an extended period during which most of the investment is lost.

>>9549607
You also forgot
>low volume so any rally can be easily crushed by bots
>its a french coin
>no one uses it

>>9550927
>bag holder will hold the position for an extended period during which most of the investment is lost
>several hundred percent in the green
maybe you should do some reading mate?

>>9550981
Maybe you're the one who should do some reading. The buying price is irrelevant and neither it is mentioned in the text. The fact is that the investment lost 85% of its value in 5 months.
>hold some shitcoin for 10 years
>you're up 1%
According to your retarded logic I'd not be a bagholder in this situation since I'm up 1%. It's because your idiotic brain can't comprehend the concept of opportunity cost.

isn't getting annoying to constantly embrasses yourself? atleast some holders admit defeat like Bancor and Digimarines.

>>9551050
it's pretty shocking that you don't understand "investment" is literally "money invested in the beginning", but figures what kind of person comes to FUD a working project

>>9549403
Nobody will use it until fiat payments roll out. Assuming this actually happens, it works as promised with low fees (>0.1%), REQ will be absolutely unstoppable. I mean, literally, the largest online payment processor.

Once REQ has the same marketshare as PayPal, tokens will be $20/each.

Odds of this happening? 50/50 IMO. Any of the above factors could go wrong, due to regulation, bugs in the ETH network, or just some competitor beating them to market. Who knows.

>>9551081
>"investment" is literally "money invested in the beginning",
That's your retarded definition that you just made up to fit your moronic argument.
>FUD
And this is what it always boils down to with desperate bagholders. Pointing finger and calling FUD everything that attempts to burst your bubble of delusion. You're so easily triggered I bet you unironically reply to meme Stacy-tier baits as well.
>working project
I never once mentioned the fundamentals of the project itt.

>>9551150
my condolences to your parents

>>9551165
Now that's just pathetic.

>>9551207
no, raising a mentally disabled child is an impressive feat, and nothing short of heroic. Show some gratitude

>>9551224
Nice comeback.

>>9551244
He >>9551224 is right though.

>starts reading thread.
>”wow this is a nice change.”
>gets halfway through.
Ya got me again /biz/, ya got me again.

>>9551381
It was a nice thread but you know, le funny fud xD haha poop

Theres no reason to hold req right now

>>9549733
>>9549810
>>9549903
>>9551076
>>9551464
Jesus... is this the power of... autism?

>>9551526
I might be autistic but im smart enough to nit invest in garbafe LMFAO!

>>9551554
Take a (You) and fuck off. You make me sick.

>>9551571
Lol fucking loser, hows that REQ investment thats barely up in sats since december?

>>9551554
lmao, you need to stop.

279 tokens burnt. Ill be so fucking rich soon reqbros

>>9551526

Just ignore them, they're in every thread contributing nothing but shit.

I for one appreciate some knowledge drops in this thread! I've been in since the ICO and have just x4 my investment.

Without shilling too hard (I genuinely don't want this idiots to mistakenly make a lot of money), I'm more excited about REQ as a platform to be built upon than the single use case of buying things people keep ranting about.

If you make people's lives easier, you're valuable, if you make businesses lives easier, you're incredibly valuable. I sincerely hope request continues to interest in their platform than in a single use case

>>9551674
Your shit stinks pajeet. Nobody gives a fuck about this piece of shit. 279 tokens burned top fucking kek enjoy watching your 4x wither away just like that 10x did.

>>9551050
Bagholders are people who are in negative and don't want to sell at a loss. Hence they are holding bags until price goes up. So yes if you are positive on an investment you aren't a bagholder you can sell take profit and leave if you wanted to. Bagholders cant.

>>9551674
I'm very excited about the crowdfunding dapp. Imagine ICOs launching using their dapp so they can accept other cryptos and eventually straight fiat, along with regular kickstarter esque crowdfunding. Also the donaid app which lets twitch users accept crypto using req. Very excited for the future.

>>9551674
This. REQ will be top 5 soon. The ammount of use this product has is incredible. His accounting side is extremly underlooked here.

>>9551854
Any idea when new roadmap is out? I want them to focus more on this auditing use.

>>9552053
my guess would be end of this quarter.

>>9552053
No idea. I think REQ is going to be listed and/or used in Coinbase and that's why they changed their roadmap.

>>9551854
I dont think top 5. Especially when 4 of them (Btc, Eth, XRP, Bch) are probably not dropping from their place anytime soon. Top 10 is definitely a possibility though.

>>9552175

>>9552175
I've heard that idea before. Makes sense but could also be that fiat integration isn t easy. I hope it's because they have some stuff with coinbase and not that they choose to scrap it.

>>9552192
Well, XRP and Bcash are memes. But I agree it will take some time.

Less than a week ago people were saying 2400 sats was the bottom. Never trust this shitcoin.

>>9552207
With Coinbase fiat integration would be solved brilliantly.

>>9552246
>>9552207

>>9552207
Time will tell. REQ is probably the only crypto with serious partnerships.

>>9552246
Agreed. Would be werid for coinbase to add a coin that is under a dollar usd. All their coins are higher prices and lower supplies. Guess we will have to wait and see what newsletter has and next roadmap.

>>9552263

Someone's panicking they sold their bags, we can see straight through you anon

>>9552283
>coinbase will list a token with one of the shittiest liquidities on Binance

>>9552283
>>9552278
>>9552275
>>9552246
reminder: REQ followed coinbase on twitter, and they both were started by YCombinator. They very likely run in the same circles.

>>9549676
PEE QUEST POO QUEST

>>9549403
Yeah but nobody uses any crypto product, practically. Know why? Because 99% of projects don't even have a product or service to offer yet, it's hype and hypotheticals.

REQ mainnet's capabilities are shit at the moment, but at least it has them. In the long term this is good, as they actually have a foundation that might last them through the great alt purge coming soon. In the near term, it sucks for bagholders because REQ is like a guy at the poker table playing with an open hand. In reality everyone else at the table has cards just as shitty if not shittier, but nobody knows it yet so they can still bluff and rake in the chips.

>>9552278
The thing is that Coinbase using REQ would be a killer product. Maybe the ERC-20 support comes from adding the REQ platform instead of adding tokens.

>>9550163
Some, probably all of those disasters mentioned could accelerate crypto adoption, mind you. Especially inasmuch as any of them could destabilize trust in traditional asset classes and cause a mass exodus of investors looking for anywhere to put their money in that won't bleed like a pig. See: Venezuela, Zimbabwe

>>9552307
Do you know when REQ started following Coinbase? If it was close to the change of the roadmap...

>>9552364
Could entirely happen. I still think it's interesting that req added knc and omg. Curious if there is more partnership between them.

>>9552400
During the dec bull run 2017

>>9551244
That isn't a comeback it's a statement of fact. You are literally the dumbest person ITT who doesn't even understand basic terms like bag holding. Please leave.