/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9501835
Nah corecucks must be gassed

>>9501871
I think you're a blocksteam shill trying to divide and conquer

NO MORE BROTHER WARS

>>9501835

Corecucks have reached Bargaining

>>9501835

BCH is even worse then XRP,
did you actually know how BCH plans to scale?

They give a shit to individual nodes ( what actually makes it decentralized) they dont love all the pi-s that run.

you can sync the XRP ledger and run your own XRP validator. how is it not decentralized

>>9501889
there will be no mercy for those "get rich quick HODL", banker dick sucking traitors.

>>9501939
YES I HAVE DONE EXTENSIVE
>EXTENSIVE
RESEARCH

I am sick of arguing about it. A bunch of us on /biz/ argue with the same people every single day and its hopeless. We've both made up our minds on which coin we prefer. I prefer BCH you prefer BTC.

I think its better for both of us if we're a little bit more positive about eachother

>>9501939

r/BTC: https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/7hqdck/craig_wright_dont_run_a_node_to_help_the_network/?st=JHCAVCC7&sh=13bfe0aa

CSW: dont run a node to help the network you are not

>>9501939
bch is peer to peer electronic cash. ripple is not. lightning is not.

>my thread is already a BTC/BCH debate thread

>>9501889
KEK, I do agree with OP
t. Corecuck

why do people like bcash? I bought 5 of them and all it does it bleed out. also the chart looks like a pnd.
oh and it didnt even pump when it overtook bitcoin's hashrate last year. I'm an eternal bcash bagholder.

>>9501985

I also hold BCH - the same stack size as I have in BTC, but just because i got them for free.

Like I also HODL, XRP or others, because emotion never should be a advisor of a investment.

Anyway, the only thing I dont like is Roger and CSW, for a shitload of reasons. BCH itself is somehow great ( no segwit simple onchain scaling )
But with these two guys on the front shittalkin the whole day I just cant take it serious.

>>9502039
Because Bitcoin Cash is literally going to fulfill Satoshi's visions of "Peer-To-Peer Electronic Cash" with no middle men or intermediaries. You either get it or don't, don't come back when one of the 500 pump and dump coins fucks you over.

>>9502039
Stop buying into highs maybe?

>>9501835
Fuck off CobraBitcoin, don't try to weasel your way back in - your whole gang are rats. Fuck you, fuck your coin and fuck BCore.

>>9501939

non-mining nodes don't participate in consensus. They don't validate anything. They just observe the blockchain and disseminate copies of it. No reason not to just use a block explorer. Satoshi original envisioned full nodes being run by large operations only and any small miners or whatever could hook into the network through them.

You might be baiting but your raspberry pi node is literally useless, does nothing for the decentralization of the network, and does nothing you couldn't do by going to blockchain.info

>>9501985

and guys like him >>9502124
talkin about BCH like it is a religion or a fuckin vision no one cares about

DO NOT FALL FOR IT. They know that they have failed and are now trying to weasel their way back in so they can fuck everything up once again. Their reputations and livelihoods are on the line because we are going to fuck their lies up.

>>9502222

just read through that, https://blockstream.com/liquid/

its a inter exchange liquidity pool, what you need if you want that the wallstreet adopts crypto. Like they operate with inter banks liquitiy pools

>>9501939

>XRP

>>9501835
bingo! https://fudbingo.com/
xrp IS a cryptocurrecy

>>9501835
Sure, hard fork to a different proof of work and abandon the name Bitcoin and we're all good. I'll even buy a hundred k which I promise to baghold right into the possible ground which your architecture kind of guarantees is going to happen as a show of good faith.

>>9501835
>IE Ripple (not even a real crypto currency).

https://fudbingo.com/

>>9501835
No. Bcore will be shown no mercy and we will destroy all of you. Every single fucking one of you.

>>9502745

>tfw stuck with bcore running the market for the foreseeable future

Question about the coingeek event, why is it so much more awesome than consensus 2018? I would assume it would have like a tenth of the budget.

>>9501835
Bcash isn't our brother, he's some weird guy that broke into our house and put on our clothes.

>>9502800
Dude, stop.

You're giving me a 12 inch raging & veiny boner right now.

>>9502916
> says the weird guy in my bedroom wearing my pyjamas.
fuckin coretards eh.

>>9502916

>Bcash arguments: 0 conf, Smart contracts, 32 MB blocks, Coinjoin, Colored coins, full Scaling plan
>Bcore arguments: A fucking tweet

>>9501835
Only if you let us call you bicashies and stop with bitcoin core fud. Also, release the r/btc/ page and @bitcoin twitter. Then we can do whatever you want.

>>9502176
>They don't validate anything.
Jihan Wu lies designed to keep all nodes mining nodes. bitcoin need full noes to validate to keep the mining nodes honest.

>>9502972
>n-no you
>>9502991
Bcash isn't even a 105 coin. It's a 95 coin. The amount of times I've been quoted section of whitepapers or other technical materials by people who obviously can barely read is unbelievable.

>>9501939
I can't believe there are actualy ppl defending XRP.
I mean it's a good coin to make some BTC, but c'mon..

>>9502916
>this coretard thinks this screenshot supports core and not the other way around.

>>9501835
>we're not so different, you and i...

>>9503004
Dump Coreans only understand top down control.

>>9501835
Agreed, I don't see why both can't exist. Let the hand of the market decide rather than paid shills. For those of you that want to support one of these Blockchains, contribute to the hashrate rather than shitposting here. If you can't, then you are too poor or uneducated to voice your opinion on the matter.

>>9502991
that single tweet owned you so hard tho its over

>non-mining nodes are discouraged on bcash
this is why.

>>9503051
bcash isn't a coin at all, it's a node implementation of the bitcoin cash protocol. But as an 85'er it's alright that you don't know that. I forgive you.

>>9503202
Vitalik is BCH gang bitch.

>>9503234
non mining nodes *aren't* discouraged on bcash, or any other node implementation of bitcoin cash.
They're just sanguine about the exact use of said node and what it can do, and acknowledge that running a node has a non zero cost, rather than absolutely deluded like your pic related, and willing to compromise the entire value of the chain in order to subsidize people's ability to run a full node on ancient completely unsuitable hardware to the point that said hardware can be cheaper than a single actual on chain transaction fee.
This is stupid, but... well, core has always been stupid, so it is also unsurprising.

>>9503234
>Implying non-mining nodes can "reject" blocks
>Implying non-mining nodes aren't 100% dependent on miners when it comes to deciding which chain is valid

You are retarded

>>9503373
>absolutely deluded like your pic related, and willing to compromise the entire value of the chain in order to subsidize people's ability to run a full node on ancient completely unsuitable hardware

spotted the paid pajeet! you sir are full of lies.

>>9503396
>reading comprehension

how does it feel to have Jihan Wu's balls slapping the back of your taint when he fucks you right up the ass

>>9503540

non-mining nodes can't do shit you goddamn retard

>>9503566
>mommy told me so.

does his balls slap your balls while he pile drives his little 4 inch chink dick up your pooper. fucking lying chink lover

>>9503514
Do you somehow think that image proves you right? You realise that Satoshi's plan at scale was SPV wallets, which don't require running a full node? You realise that the whole core narrative on full nodes is simply complete bullshit? Well, I guess you don't, because otherwise you wouldn't be making a cunt of yourself.

>>9503637
>whole core narrative on full nodes is simply complete bullshit?

says you... and who else? Jihan Wu that's who the largest mining node operator in the world.

>>9502916

>our
>us
>we
>together

>>9503746
What would you take as absolute evidence that you're wrong?

>>9503907
let's start with...
>absolute evidence
yeah, how about evidence. Evidence sounds good.

If you are the same devop i think you are... You and I have gone round and round... you mine btc I run a fully validating btc node. We both like IT we should be friends... you and I. lets talk... if you have absolute evidence that my bitcoin core v 0.15.1 full node running on CentOS 7 is doing dick all, I am all ears.

>>9503991
fellow node runner here. what are tx stats on bitcoind on average? do you limit your bw usage in .conf file.

I just want to show to some retards that multiplying everything x32 has some serious issues, although the only response I always get is
>why on earth would you transmit blockchain data to someone else

>>9504151
>do you limit your bw usage in .conf file.
No
>what are tx stats on bitcoind on average?
negligible, when I run nethogs is only a few hundred KB/s. I can't narrow it down futher than that because I also run a Monerod node and a few other network resource heavy applications...

>transmit blockchain data to someone else
Yes. I do have my bitcoin ports forwarded so I completely connectable

>>9503991
What do you think it does?

>>9501835

I have nothing of value to say so I just call everyone corecucks

>>9503566
Keep relying on blockchair to make sure all your transactions went through ok and hope that no one ever hacks that stupid site

>>9501835
Everyone who is arguing about which coin is better has already fallen into the bullshit trap by people who are smarter than you. >>9504658

>>9504151
this is me >>9504274 I'm at a different IP now.

I just ran vnstat and like I said it's not too conclusive... pic related. some months I can blow over a TB of just download usage (according to my ISP) and some months I top out at half a TB.

>>9504447
>What do you think it does?
hey buddy, I'm not playing games. I've already posted a screen cap of exactly what the bitcoin dot org wiki says that they do. You say that they are full of shit. You have the burden of proof . Now post some absolute evidence or shut your fucking faggot dick sucker.

>>9505286
Stupid cunt.

Nothing that image says actually states that your observer nodes have an external effect, which is what everyone pointing out you're a fucktard is telling you.
So answer the fucking question or get back to sucking dick for a living. What actual *effect* do you think your shitty non mining observation node has on the network?

>>9505117
>Stop arguing about technology
>Stop talking about ideas
>Stop thinking about the world around you
Oh ok thanks anon I'll be a good little goy

Kek. Like I'd ever break bread with some subhuman cashie.

>>9506110
And the only thing I'd want to break with cunts like this is their neck.

>>9506151
>bcash

>>9506170