/biz/ - Business & Finance

shittiest fud ive seen yet.

>>9478170

LOL I know, stupidest coin in the market, been getting smashed down the whole time.

>>9478194
why do you type like a nigger

>>9478294

dude why do u gotta use that word. I'm white

>>9478166
fees are to security as aids are to elephants, completely unrelated in every way shape and form. i feel bad for you if you're actually this braindead op

>>9478320

why would people keep the network security if there is no incentive?

>>9478329
Because they want to protector their investment. Da

>>9478329
wow, this is a struggle to read. i assume you wanted to say "secure," but weren't taught english very well in your Bangalore middle school. that being said, people are not what keeps the network secure, the code behind the coin does, and that's impossible to change and requires no maintenance from humans rajeev.

>>9478329
>why would people want to keep their network secure
Do you realize how stupid you sound you nigger?

>>9478350

first of all how can their investment be worth anything to protect without the security to make it worth something in the first place?

>>9478378

I'm using network security as a verb, even though secure also works. The code behind the coin does, then how do we know this code is security?!

>>9478403

I am saying people want to keep their network security and the only way to do this is through payment and fees

>>9478412
The mano protocolo is secure. If you make a rep you are making it safer, thus protecting your investment. Also exchanges have to make their own reps so every exchange is helping.

>>9478469

Ok first of all the coin is called NANO you brainlet.

The reps can also make it less safe! If it is so cheap to make one then someone bad can just make many and then they control the coin!! That's why fees are needed!!!

>>9478499
proof of stake means you need to own a lot of coins to have a say and if you choose to fuck the economy of nano by doing something shady, you could very well see the value of all your own coins drop.

>>9478419
Yeah and I'm saying you're wrong you dumbass

>mfw this thread
at least come up with some serious fud brainlet

>>9478638
>>9478665

ok first of all NANO is not proof of stake and also what if the cost to ruin NANO is in someone's financial interest?! (keep BITCOIN ALIVE)

>>9478687

This is a theory I have developed, not FUD

>>9478412
again, at the end of that sentence you should have used 'secure' not 'security'.

"how do we know this code is security" is the same as saying "how do we know this room is heat." you don't say 'heat' in that case, right retard? you say 'hot'.

same thing here. it's not that you're choosing a verb over an adjective, you're simply speaking incorrect gibberish you fucking pajeet.

>>9478766

you could say "heated" which is the equivalent for secure and security.

regardless to be honest maybe I'm not that good at speaking but whatever I do know that fees make incentives for keeping the network secure and right now ur argument isnt winning me over

>>9478166
OP is officially an obsessed psycho ex-girlfriend type. because he lost a shitload of money on NANO he's trying to create weak FUD for it lmfaooo.

Here's his other NANO thread where he admits that he bought high and sold low, you can tell it's him because he's spamming the same stupid shit about "i'd rather have security through fees like BTC"

proof:
>>9478206

Nano's a fcking scam. You should have sold when you had the chance. This will never be ATH again.

>>9478848
>>

MY NETWORK IS NOT SECURITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>9478823
wrong again. "heated" is not the equivalent of security, it's the equivalent of secured, which would have been correct.

jesus christ you are actually fucking retarded.

>>9478877

OK we disagree to disagree then. And nice double dublets

My English language ability sucks but my spatial and physics and math levels are high and I can't see how your argument makes sense

>>9478714
a theory is actually based in reality though. you're just a retarded middle-schooler who's literally making something up out of thin air because they lost money and got salty. you have 0 understanding of how security works, this is not a 'theory' it's just unintelligible rambling.

>>9478908

OK if I am a middle schooler how did I lose money then?

And no I have heard the same argument online I just have changed it (not plagiarised just fixed)

>>9478894
we don't agree to disagree, you're simply wrong and embarrassing yourself. be thankful this is an anonymous board.

>>9478166
These are the exactly posts that I come to /biz/ for. I love the salt. OP has made several NANO posts today thinking that he can in some way influence the price one way or another. top kek

Just sell the mofo coin already. Buy a shitton of it back in a year, when the crypto bear ends and we are at the bottom. It aint rocket science.

>>9478928

I said disagree to disagree

>>9478935

this is anonymous board and I use a proxy you idiot so no that was not me I think lots of pplr upset at nANO because they scammed us sort of

>>9478941
this is actually painful at this point. saying you disagree to disagree is the same as saying agree to agree, meaning you implied i agreed with you. seriously, just leave this board and stop spamming the same retarded threads, it's not gonna get you your money back.

>>9478966

ok obviously you don;t know what youre talking about bro

>>9478954
AHAHHAHAH it literally couldn't be any more obvious that every thread about 'NANO security' and fees is created by you. it may be an anonymous board but you can't hide your terrible grammar and bizarre way of speaking.

you're actually one of the stupidest and most immature motherfuckers i've ever seen on /biz/

never waste time arguing with braindead nano holders, everyone with half a brain knows nano is going to die

>>9479002
I've had a really fun time playing a pajeet to you, you took the bait pretty well desu.

Thanks for playing along though; you're right I did make the other threads. I've been making NANO threads for the past couple of months, gauging sentiment. Lately the sentiment has changed - in the past there was heavy FUD on NANO. I've noticed now that there is some support and realism in these threads (count you as one). I'm not sure though if it's actual belief, or if other bagholders are started to get worried about the overall success of NANO and have stopped FUD'ing their own coin.

>>9479069
>gets proven to be a retard
>claims to be trolling

pretty much what every 13 year old on the planet says when they've been proven to be a no-life autistic retard. nice try though ;D

>>9479093

haha you got trolled bra
look for one of these NANO pics in the future

>>9479108
this is what we want back again

>>9479124

I love this