/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9458628
No one.

Except some retards who try to steal the BTC brand and fail miserably

/thread

Buy Mobius, Sir.

>>9458628
>muh smart contracts
>muh eth killer

>>9458636
BCH is the true Bitcoin so technically BTC fans are the thieves

20 BCH reportin easy, this is going to be the easiest 10x ever

>hey kid, want sum fireworks?

you mean nChain's Fake Satoshi. 1Terabyte blocks, Oracles, Smart Contracts, proof-of-stake masternodes, colored coins, second layer off-chain transactions with Teechain... the world's most convoluted bitcoin knock-off.

Not even Roger is all in on Bcash. He still holds Bitcoin.

>>9458693

It's not the true vision. It's an off-chain from the original chain.

It's a faster/cheaper coin. But it's not Bitcoin, it only shares the name.

So please, go kill yourself painfully.

>>9459142
Bitcoin is an idea and not a brand you stupid nigger. The BCH branch has a bigger claim to be true to the original ideology than BTC.

>>9458961
>when BCH gains majority it will be the real BTC
Remember you said that when the day comes

>>9458636

100% BCH. Try and FUD me.

Pro tip: you can't.

>>9458961
nakamotoChain's Real Satoshi

BCH will likely double again in the coming weeks. Screencap this

BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH BTRASH

Bitcoin maximalist reporting in
Which means balls deep in BCH
Fully out of BTC
OG from 2011

>>9459908
You're unironically making BCH look better and BTC look worse with these retarded replies.

>>9459190
>Bitcoin is an idea and not a brand you stupid nigger. The BCH branch has a bigger claim to be true to the original ideology than BTC.

Yes, yes, I've heard the Bcash propaganda straight from Ver himself. If I want to hear what Ver thinks about it, I'll just go listen to him. Tell me, do you Cashies even think for yourselves, or do you just let Ver sink his arm all the way up to the elbow into your well-worn assholes so that he can use you as his talking puppets?

>>9459995
cashies are so fucked... they even turn on each other. savage cannibals these cashies are.

trading BCH since august has made me more capital than any other trading pair.

BCH has some interesting properties:
- low supply (21m) exactly the same as BTC
- ~1/10th the price of bitcoin, meaning most people own/can buy 10x the amount of BCH vs BTC with the same overall total supply.
- When BTC fees go up, BCH has typically seen good rises

The BCH pump to 0.5 on poloniex made me 2 years salary in november. If you aren't trading and holding BCH you are a retard

>>9459995
fucking non-believer, you probably dont even know that there is actually no such thing as an address in bitcoin. all you care about is your god damn profits.

>>9458636
>/threading your own post
Get the fuck out of here, you reddit nigger.

Big blocks = inefficient for decentralization.

Big blocks = not filled blocks, lots of blocks going to waste not efficient.

Big blocks = 0 confirmation transactions b/c network is too inefficient to confirm.

Big blocks = low fees, but temporarily b/c fees will inherently go up as more people use the network. Just the way it is. Big blocks leads to more big blocks. True scaling is offchain using bitcoin/litecoin blockchains as anchors for sidechains with filters to scale from.

Claiming Big blocks = True vision of Satoshi.... false.... b/c big blocks are bad for decentralization.

Blockchain is great for the financial system b/c it get's rid of centralized fiat... but big blocks are literally bad for decentralization.

When will bcashies relize that roger, and jihan are fucking stealing your money. The BCH circulating supply is a lot lower than BTC. Now the fork of BCH will have a lower circulating supply than BTC b/c there are people who won't claim/have access to their forked coins. BAKA. Wake up you normie cucks. Roger wants you Bitcoins. He doesn't even like BCash, he is doing it to sell you naive newbies a worthless clone of Bitcoin, and is claiming that it is BTC.

lets face it crypto hype is over
>muuhhh institutional buyers comming in now

>>9460508

yes goyim lets take all the transactions off the blockchain, much more decentralized that way

>>9460508
>Big blocks = not filled blocks, lots of blocks going to waste not efficient.
why do you people believe that not filled blocks still take up 32 MB of space. if only 100 kb of transactions happen the blocks will just be 100 kb.

>Claiming Big blocks = True vision of Satoshi.... false.... b/c big blocks are bad for decentralization.
anybody on a 56kbps modem will be able to download 32 MB blocks in 10 minutes, it doesn't lock out anybody

also microtransactions is completely possible ON-CHAIN, it's called micropayment channels:
https://bitcoin.org/en/developer-guide#micropayment-channel

no need for complicated off-chain "solutions"

>>9460508
You are retarded

>>9460595
Nothing wrong with an off chain solution that uses the Bitcoin blockchain to back the transactions. The money is still gets to where it needs to be and the underlying ledger still secures the transaction in a means that still surpasses fiat in a decentralized manner. An off chain solution still let's people to use the chain to send funds.

Bitcoin Cash's bigger blocks are not a decentralized solution to this b/c it'll inherently lead to centralization and eventually loose all purpose of decentralization. Using 2nd layer solutions will keep the underlying network decentralized.

>>9460674
i did some quick math and ok i was wrong about 56kbps (32 MB is 32*1000*1000*8 = 256000000 bits and at 56000 bits per second you'd need 76.19 min to download 32 MB)

you'd need 427kbps to download 32 MB in 10 minutes. however that is assuming that compression isn't applied to the blocks, which would be a logical protocol extension in however many years it takes before the blocks get full. also in that many years internet should have improved a lot all over the world. and also you of course don't need a full node to actually make use of bitcoin cash.

>>9460831
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYHFrf5ci_g
Watch it.

>>9458693
>Literally an altcoin
>Technically bitcoin
>Technically
wew

this shits sooooooooooo funny

corecucks are so unhinged lmao desu

cant wait for the big green dildo up their stupid asses hahahaha

Just wait till I have step 16 of 24 figured out! Lightning will blow BCH away.

I laugh everytime autists fight over who's action figure is the coolest. Face it, bitcoin is bitcoin, bch is bch. The 3 letter word itself says bch isn't bitcoin. Also even though in theory I find lightning stupid and btc fanboys autist, Roger Ver is seriously off putting personality who doesn't really come like he's defending the honor of his project or glory, only to shill so his bags grow bigger in size. There is no genuine shilling on this crypto space, only bag holders trying to get rich. Just like you, just like me.

Im all in bch and chainlink. I hope bch drops to $1000 and i'll but 10 more

Bitcoin Jesus Returns

https://twitter.com/CNBCFastMoney/status/996505307651166208

Totally not ironic how Roger "Bitcoin Jesus" Ver is now one of the most hated in Crypto for preserving the Bitcoin Whitepaper

Bless you, Roger.

Can someone spam txs to get a few full blocks? This is boring.

Fairly certain the cryptospace is just dead. Bitcoin killed it ; Bitcoin cash tried to revive it. Won't work because normies got burned

>>9463342
the normies who will buy my bch bags havent even been born yet. I am in for the long con

>>9463375
You get it

>satoshi's true vision is smart contracts + litecoin

how long do you think even those completely indoctrinated by bcash can keep believing it's anything close to what satoshi intended bitcoin to be?

>>9463461

Who cares? Everyone here acts like satoshi is some sort of infallible God. Shut the fuck up about satoshi