/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9449641
In 1900 everyone was self employed because of farms and few massive cities, right? Not really something that can be undone

>>9449641
You can't. You also are conveniently leaving out that in 1945 the government was far smaller than it is today.

>>9449711

>>9449815
The bottom pic is ancap, you brainlet.

>>9449641
Just will Yellowstone into erupting.

that's terror

>>9449641
this an actual quote from the game? and what a game btw

>>9449855

>>9449711
In 1900 the US was roughly 40% urban and 60% rural.

If OP's stat is correct, there must've been a lot of self employed people in cities -- shop keepers, craftsmen? Maybe union carpenters/plumbers counted as self employed?

Still surprising. The history books have you believed every 13 year/old was working in a factory, slaughterhouse or coal mine.

>>9449882
>3d waifus
Holy shit, neckyourself polshitter.

>>9449641
>In 1900, 90% of Americans were self employed; now it's about 2%
This is retarded. It's called industrialization. We don't need half the population to be farmers.

>>9449882
Only this

>>9449641
>Now, about 2% of Americans are self employed.
suck my dick motherfuckers
t. entrepreneur

>>9450010
2% seems low, arent more and more people becoming 'self emplyed' by driving ubers, grocery delivery services, etc. doing tasks for richer people.

>>9449882
TFW Our grandparents let us down big time and now we've mouthy tramps and nigger culture instead of utopia

>>9449815

>>9449882
that supposed ancap society on the left only has traits of today's barely-capitalist, highly-regulated and high-cost-barrier corporatocratic societies
i've got limited knowledge, but from what i gather, i think the closest thing that there was to an ancap society was the pre-1930s states

>>9450010
though i agree with you, the ones to decide that should be the entrepreneurs—but certainly, if their businesses fail, they shouldn't get government help

>>9449641
>>>/leftypol/
commie nigger

>>9449641
https://youtu.be/ASUHN3gNxWo
https://youtu.be/U-sKZQXjRr0

>>9449815

>>9450123

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRf8WfuKkEc

Check the optimates/populares in Rome, the birth of tyranny in ancient Greece or the French Revolution.

It always happens, generally it results in a redistribution of ressources either through reforms or civil war generating a wide redistribution, then of course the dumb/unluckiest mismanage and lose their capital again while the smartest/luckiest accumulate and consolide their positions again during generations.

The root is that humans are fundamentally inequal at a biological level, being individuals or groups.

>>9450253
Feels sad, man.

Vote for Patrick Little.