/biz/ - Business & Finance

No I refuse to believe BCASH is the answer, I was told Roger Ver was a scammer which invalidates all their code.

>>9376766
Absolutely fren. Do not go off the map of acceptable /r/bitcoin opinions.

>>9376800
I mean LukeJr literally spreads gospel. Why would anyone oppose his views.

>>9376822
I wouldn't slander gospel like that

>>9376712
It's not fast at all actually, it's only marginally quicker than BTC

>>9376854
>>9376822
>>9376800
>>9376766
nice reddit circlejerk losers

>>9376885
See this soiboi? This is you.

>>9376900
>circlejerk like a redditor
>expect not to get called out on it
shouldn't you be making unfunnny puns somewhere

>>9376912
nah this is the perfect spot.

Wanna tell me why you havn't bought BCH yet?

>>9376949
Because you are reddit.

>>9376966
Wow, great reason. Do you hate money?

>Even with our fake volume, we don't have enough transactions to justify 8MB blocks, and the shill armies are running out of ammo, what should we do?
>Hmmm...lets quadruple the block size and say bigger blocks are needed.

>>9377029
>having no idea how blocksize works

>>9377006
No all he can do is attack people and name call. He has no way of defending his btb tribe from the invading bch tribe and he thinks the strategy of yelling BCASH will save him.

>>9377051
keep circlejerking you reddit loser, totally makes your discussion look organic and non-forced

>>9377072
Wow, great reason. Do you hate money?

>>9377072
accuse your opponents what you are guilty of, classic Core playbook.

>>9377078
BCH is down 33% since sunday

I like money and that's why I'll never fomo into BCH no matter how much you paid shills try.

>>9377090
nice reddit saying, reddit

go back there

>>9376712

>>9377115
I wouldn't know a reddit saying if I saw one, just saying.

i have to wonder who the people paying for this shilling are expecting to fool. big non-speculative money wants nothing to do with these clone/fork coins

>>9377140
>t. moron thinking eth was just a shitcoin back in 2015

>>9376822
>capitalism is immoral
>is suppose to be developing the most capitalistic technology known to man

The reasons for Core's sabotage of Bitcoin become clearer everyday.

>>9377151
>b-buy my altcoin, it's j-just like eth in 2015
t. pajeet

>>9376874
0-conf is basically instant, newfriend.

>>9377140
Here's a hint. I do it for free. Ron Paul 2012.

>>9377175
>0-conf
>secure
kek no thanks

>>9377182
less chance of losing funds than lightning

>>9377029
>not realizing it shows the tech works and the hysteria put out by Core concerning blocksize is literally manufactured FUD

>>9376712
mycelium wallet now has BCH support

>>9377199
>you have a chance to lose funds but it's less than this other buggy thing!
convincing argument

i dont think i'll ever buy this coin now

>>9377105
>he only buys the top

P A I D S H I L L S

I can always tell because no one here gives a fuck about bcash when you aren’t around

>>9377221
I don't buy bch at all. Your point?

>>9377182
Explain to me why 0-conf is insecure, I'll wait.

>>9377228
Good, I don't want retards on my chain.

>>9377227
>paidshills

Kinda like those endless twitter brigades? Kinda like that?

>>9377233
youll be waiting a while

>>9377233
hasn't been confirmed by the network yet, could easily be double spend. Easy

>>9377217
The spender has 0% chance of losing funds on 0conf. The chance of the merchant losing funds is like 0.0000000001%. Most 0conf payments are going to be in the $1-$20 range. No one is going to sell a house or car without confirmations.
With lightning too much can go wrong for it to be useful of anyone to want to use at scale.

>>9376766
>>9376800
>>9377105
When he set out on his path as an unknown and nameless soldier, he too had to create a utopia with the greatest of hopes. It was realized.

The year of our lord, 2009.

>im so sure about my investment that I need to samefag on an internet board all day to shill it
>im dumb enough to think this will have an impact on the market
kek

>>9377258
>could easily be double spend
You realize you need 51% of the hashpower to double spend right? How many faggots buying a candy bar at the store have that?

Also do you realize how amazingly unprofitable it is to double spend for a candy bar? No you probably don't.

>>9377233
Here, now please kys.

>>9377287
>You realize you need 51% of the hashpower to double spend right?
That's false, see BIP-133. I love how cashies don't even know their own coin

kekekekek

>>9377282
b-but muh miners are all switching to bch

>>9377258
0conf are 99.9999 insecure on BTC because of full blocks and replace by fee.
0conf are 99.9999% secure on BCH.

>>9377327
>0conf are 99.9999% secure on BCH.
Oh okay, I guess I'll just take some random shill's word for it on 4chan.

>>9377323
miners mine what ever is short term profitable, that is in their interest. If you had a massive mining farm you would still mine btc if you believed bch was the future.

>>9377327
The only reason they would be more secure is simply because no one cares about bcash.

>>9377341
damage control

>>9377287
You don't need 51% to double-spend when you do 0-conf.

>>9377140

You're kidding right? There's like hundreds of thousands of corecucks lapping the dried out dickcheese out of Blockstream's arse. Everything Blockstream says is gospel to them.

>>9377350
I have posted a pic of satoshi basically calling 0conf users cuck, yet the fucktards still think Roger Verconomics are perfectly fine.

>>9377327
>replace by fee
still optional, and wouldn't be used for 0-conf

>>9377356
0.01 jihancoins have been deposited in your account. Thank you for correcting the record on the real bitcoin.

>>9377282
This is /biz/ right? You should remain current on things. The hashrate is trending down for btc and up for bch.

https://fork.lol/pow/hashrate

>>9377313
All this is saying nothing is final until on chain. It doesn't invalidate 0-conf, brainlet. Why would Satoshi even allow it if that were the case? Besides there are plenty of posts from him explaining that 0-conf is secure and should be used.

>>9377317
Literally nothing.

>>9376712
>Bcash

>>9377346
how? The profitability balanced itself out. BCH difficulty is set so the hashrate ratio is equivalent to the price ratio between the two coins.

>>9377369
>Literally nothing.
Kek this faggot doesn't know 0conf is is double-spendable with very little expenditure. I think you will see eventually.

>>9377105
Your reasoning is clouded, my son.

You cannot look at this from a short term perspective, as everything else.

I implore you to search for answers. I don't understand why you use the internet to post blinded comments, but you don't use it to search for truth and reason.

I will never bash on others, even those who shill shitcoins. Please, just search for the truth, no matter how painful it might be to read.

>>9377390
Desperate shill is desperate.

roger ‘our chad’ ver will make sure normies know which one is the real bitcoin staying true to its original vision

stay mad corecucks

>>9377390
There's no use arguing with someone who identifies first and foremost as part of a collective rather than an individual.

>>9377412
>he says as he falls for the CSW cult of personality
kek

>>9376712
More info on the decentralised pirate bay pls, how do I use that?

>>9377435
Heck half of what Craig says might be a bunch of hot air, and roger is overly emotional. Doesn't have anything to do with the code or economics of BCH.

>>9377369
You could "trust" 0 confirmations for a cup of coffee, but at that point LN is insanely better at that, without cluttering the blockchain with your nigger tier transactions.

>>9377443
it is super early. people are posting uncensorable magnet links on memo.cash

>>9377346
Truth actually. I realise asking a coretard to think is a waste of time and all, so don't bother with this next part I include for interested lurkers with an actual brain ;
Why would you mine currency x at y *1, when you could mine currency z at y*1.1 and sell it for currency x immediately? You're leaving ten percent on the table. Not economically rational.

>>9377469
you didn't ask me anything retard, there was no question involved. just an angry cashie shouting at the wind.

>>9377464
LN is pure vaporware and the entire point of DLT is to keep all players honest. Moving everything to a 2nd layer banking system defeats the entire point of crypto.

>>9376712
>Continuing to show big blocks were always the solution
>No bullshit cultish leaders or corporate cocksucking, made up largely by the people who made Bitcoin great in it's first years

>>9377464
the fee for opening a lightning node defeats the purpose of lightning.

The whole point of lightning is to lock up large amounts of bitcoin to prevent it from being sold for fiat. That's why it might be smart to hold some btc so sell into a price pump before people realize exactly what is going on and people dump btc like they did with $50 fees.

paid shillers no shilling!

>>9377452
Roger is perfectly right to get emotional. Anyone in Bitcoin pre-2015 knows how much he did for it and crypto in general. He had a first row seat to the faggotry that happened when Greg and Co took over the repository and kicked all the oldfag devs out. Then started a shilling and gaslighting campaign. Then started DDoS'ing dissenting nodes. Then blackmailing and threatening people and outright lying to miners. Now any crypto person that got in after that thinks hes some kind of traitor.

Fuck that. He's done playing nice with these snot-nosed newfags. Just tell them to fuck off and do their own research. He doesn't owe them shit.

>>9377487
Right, I wasn't asking you anything, just directly telling you you're wrong, then pointing out to everyone else that cared to listen why, knowing you would not bother to read or understand it because you are an idiot.
Thank you for demonstrating my point so clearly.

>>9377528
>I wasn't asking you anything, just directly telling you you're wrong,
You mean repeating talking points? Thank you for admitting you're a paid shill.

>>9376712
It's way worse than BitBean/Bean Cash though.

Get fucked with your slow ass coin that gets BTFO by Bean Cash lmao

>>9377511
>Anyone in Bitcoin pre-2015 knows how much he did for it and crypto in general.
Oh yeah, he did so much for bitcoin top kek

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UP1YsMlrfF0

>>9377511

this. he also has sick bjj skillz, all the haters wouldn’t dare talk shit to him irl

>>9377537
>everyone who disagrees with me is paid

You're never going to make it.

>>9377511
Yeah the way I look at it, BCH is Bitcoin that fired the incompetent or corrupt Core devs.

>>9377550
imagine being this cucked

>>9377546
>has nothing to do with solvency and everything to do with fiat on-ramping from banks

>>9377549
There are clearly paid bcash shills, are you denying this?

>>9377492
>LN is pure vaporware
>LN is released and working

Merchants and exchanges definitely need to wait for confirmations any time transactions are of significant value and/or in exchange for cashlike goods. Individuals transferring small amounts need to be more worried about other aspects of trust in the exchange, and can protect themselves quite effectively with just a single confirmation.

Satoshi predicted later on how people would be against big blocksizes.

>>9377564
lmao you still fall for his lies 5 years later huh?

>>9377546
that was back in April of 2013 like 7 months before they went bankrupt. Really dumb of him to speak on behalf of an exchange he had no financial ties to either way.

>>9377581
>exchange he had no financial ties to either way.
lmao the cashie lying

>>9377603
ok maybe I'm wrong I don't believe he investing in MTGOX. What ties did he have?

>>9377566
You're saying everyone on here that disagrees with you is paid, stupid faggot.

>>9377569
LN doesn't work, devs tell people not to use it because its unstable. If you sell your house and call it good on a 0-conf that's your problem. Satoshi predicted people would be against big blocks and despite how tyrannical they are about it should be ignored.

time to stop pretending

>>9377579
Did you even listen to the content of the video or do you just assume?

>>9377561

salty corecuck detected. besides lil b, roger ‘the alpha’ ver is the only one I’d let fuk my bitch

>>9377625
he worked with mark in some capacity in 2011, afaik

>>9377511
Yeah, Gavin "just taking a picnic to the CIA bro" Andresen was fired along with his loser friend from google, such a loss. And guess what, it was not Core who fire them.

http://shitco.in/2015/08/19/the-bitcoin-xt-trojan/

You summerfags need to do a lot of reading.

>>9377629
No, he didn't say that. What he said is people should not fork his software, yet you cucks are supporting an altcoin.

Satoshi failed to predict some things such as mining pools, he wasn't God, contrary to what cashies may think.

you must be a clear retard for real to use your crypto as a payment method wether its bcash or bitcoin core or bitcoin potato, the price is clearly not set for any peer to peer transaction only for exchanges to trade against fiat ok, but you are deluding yourself bitcoin cash is not a scam

>>9377695
also before the retards tell me, muh fees muh tx speed, if thats the case buy ripple...when was the last time YOU actually spend crypto pulerly bcash cuz thats whats it for right? to spend? fucking retarded

>>9377641
I was actually in Bitcoin unlike you BCH newfags

>>9377680
>What he said is people should not fork his software, yet you cucks are supporting an altcoin.

You do realize Segwitcoin is not at all the same technology he developed, right? Core is the fork.

>>9377733
Not an argument.

It's going to be hillarious if Blockstream is still around after the flippening and they try hard-forking despite their retarded lies. Maybe then they'll realize that white-knighting for Elizabeth Stark was a huge waste of time.

Also TPB on Bitcoin will be top-tier. ISPs won't be able to do shit to muh linux distros if they can't block every node.

>>9377725
>buy ripple
kys

>>9377765
>Not an argument.
Yet you know it's true, you bought in during summer 2017.

>>9377782
Stop projecting.

>>9377543
when did you realize BeanCash is the real Bitcoin?

>>9377792
t. nucoiner

>>9377767
you don't get to talk about the flippening until it actually happens

>>9377824
Maybe on Reddit, but not here.

>>9377808
>I-I swear I'm an oldfag, p-please b-believe me

Start arguing anytime, newfriend.

>>9377875
bch is the newfag coin. All the newfags buy it because if they can convince themselves "it's the real bitcoin", they can convince themselves they bought bitcoin at $1000 instead of $10,000 like they actually did

Eat shit.

>>9377886
Again with the projections.

>>9377934
How am I projecting? I'm just describing the psychology of your random shitcoin "early adopter". You were too late for bitcoin so if you convince yourself something else will replace it you convince yourself you will rich.

I bet you bought in 2017.

>>9377973
>H-how can you see right through my bullshit!

>>9378001
You haven't refuted my assumption that you bought in 2017. Looks like I was right on the money.

>>9378020
All you've done is project. There is still time to get BCH, anon.

>>9378043
2017-buyer spotted.

Did somebody say Bit CONNNNNNNNNNNNNEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEECCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCTTTTTTTT?!

>>9378056
>i-if I keep r-repeating it, it'll make it true!

>>9377973
again attacking people and not logic, reason, or ideas. See how far your "store of value" goes.

>>9378065
ah not even, bruv. Anyone in bcash is a newfag or shorts it

>>9378056
Most old coiners realize how far Bitcoin core has strayed from its original path. What the hell is the point of blockchain if you make zero attempt to scale on chain? Bitcoin has become a sad, sad state of affairs that's headed for centralization. I'm not saying BCH is the answer either because I'm not comfortable with ASICS in charge of the entire network, but I'll take Bitmain over the Bilderberg Group any day of the week.

>>9378065
>>9378070
>>9378100
butthurt 2017 buyers mad that i hit a nerve

>>9377765
No, the chain is the legacy chain, it just supports a new transaction format. In this case, segwit was added through soft-fork, just as many other things that satoshi added himself, throught the same method.
You can ignore segwit transactions if you want, and continue as nothing happened, using legacy format addresses.

BCash is an altcoin whose blocks are ignored by the original client, for it doesn't follow consensus rules.

>>9377767
>muh flippening

Last time you autists predicted the flippening, it was when Bitcoin started his run to $20k, then you went back into a cave waiting for the dip to come back with your bullshit. Now that's hilarious.

oh look another btrash v the king of coins thread...

by a show of hands how many bitchcash supporters here are actually mining bitcoin? (hint: all of them)

>>9378116
> butthurt
> mad
> hit a nerve
> 36 posts by this ID

>>9378176
you haven't shown me any evidence you aren't a 2017-buyer

kek

>>9378176
the post counter guy is here...

>>9378193
You got me. I bought in 2017.
And every year before that going back to 2009.
In the meantime you clearly are so new you have no idea what the fuck you're actually talking about, and are projecting so hard you need to get a job at a cinema. Preferably one that's about to have a mass shooting.

>>9378116
What the fuck difference does it make when someone bought? That has nothing to do with the merits of SegwitCoin vs Bitcoin Cash. None of you corecucks can ever debate on facts because it's obvious the coin has been completely co-opted by banks and that LN is a meme.

>>9378252
Hello, newfag.

whatever, cashies.. you can take the chink miners we dont need them, we'll just mine bitcoin with our gpus like the old days. you can take the op codes and all the spam tx's, good luck with your gigabyte blocks kek. we'll be busy coding the future of money on the Lightning Network. I'm working on a portable, wearable raspberry pi full node you can connect to Blockstream satellites so you can confirm every transaction from anywhere on the globe

>>9378163
Kek. Can't wait for that shit to happen again.

>>9378268
>What the fuck difference does it make when someone bought?
Spoken like a true nucoiner.

>>9377468
But how do you index them... do you need to run a node?

>>9378272
This post is ironic, right? Can't tell with you people anymore.

>>9378272
LMAO.

>>9377345

and yet here you are, posting about your fears of BCH for the world to see

>>9378272
That's the spirit, One Meg Greg! And even if evil Ver and the Chink win, ideologues like you will keep the price afloat!

>>9378272
Are you working on a Predator mask too so you can walk around cloaked for higher security?

>>9378291
Nah, fuck off.

>>9378268
boy you got the wrong motherfucker motherfucker.

>>9378333
middle girl is absolute god tier

>>9378365
t. inspect element nucoiner

>>9378128
You can't ignore Segwit transactions. They are forever in the blockchain and not legitimate transactions as they lack digital signatures. This is why even if Core some how manages to raise blocksize, people on Cash won't be coming back. Segwit is an altcoin.

>>9378272
Almost good enough to be new pasta.

Bitcoin is Cash.

Bitcoin Cash Wins.

#BCH

>>9378406
>this amount of cope

>>9377227

Bitcoin Cash is #4 on CMC and discussed less than shitcoins such as chainlink, VEN etc. Of course when there are Bitcoin Cash threads they're instantly spammed by Blockstream's pajeet department with the same absolute shit such as 'bcash roger jihan, covert asic boost, centralization' over and over again.

It doesn't work though because Bitcoin Cash is the real Bitcoin.

Kill yourself Apu

*flip*

>>9376712
>Continuing to show big blocks were always the solution
stupidest comment of the day.gif
When you don't have scale, you don't have scalability problems.

>Cheap and fast as fuck
Because nobody wants it.
And 0-conf does not guarantee double spends
(https://doublespend.cash/))

> unironically using "corecuck"
you sound like 12, seriously. The only purpose served by using childish name-calling is to look retarded or just simply immature and childish.

btc down 4.25%
bch down 8.5 %

is this what you Wu cocksuckers call the flippening?

>>9378656
Fuck you caught us. one day returns invalidate everything

>>9378653

>you sound like 12, seriously.
Why do corecucks get offended by being called corecucks? It's what you are, corecuck.

>Nobody wants it
#4 on CMC, soon to be #1

>When you don't have to scale, you don't have scalability problems
Bitcoin Cash doesn't have scalability problems! It's shortly 32x more scalable than bcore!

>>9378653
>putting links in parentheses

I hope you get ass cancer. At any rate, if you faggots really think you can double spend on BCH there are companies out there who want you to try. Don't cry when you lose you money doing it though.

https://news.bitcoin.com/someone-spent-2000-1000-gift-card-trying-double-spend-bch/

https://cryptonize.it/

>>9376712

I'm here love

>>9377273
I fucking dislike craig because he acts like he can predict the future.

Telling minimum wages to put their entire salary in it and then it crashes in jan

>>9378919
I don't like him because he's an insufferable faggot. I don't care when people are arrogant but his brand of pretentiousness makes me want to puke

>>9378918
Wth does it even allude to?

>>9378948
He also takes all the credit for it from Scronty. CW had the idea first but later when he came to Scronty for help he ended up with a different solution than he had yet he takes credit for it as his own. That guy makes me sick.

till mining btc in your bch data center?

inb4
> you don't understand how mining works

>>9378656
>btc down 10% for the week
>bch down 6% for the week

Only retards pay attention to the weather and not the climate.

>>9378656
>btc down 4.25%
bch down 8.5 %

is this what you Wu cocksuckers call the flippening?
BCH UP 100% the past month, BTC up 10%. The flippening never stops bucko.

Core cucks are the Hillary supporters of crypto. Blows my fucking mind

isn’t it funny that when bcash is -11% the paid shills come out in droves? pathetic, will never support this roger scam

>>9379156
It's up over 100% the past month you idiot.

>>9379237
>bitcoin is not for coffee
yes, yes it is
>hahah hurr duurr roger said 'babies literally are dying'
yes, yes they are
>where my HODLERS at??
you are the reason BTC is doomed

>bitcoin is not for coffee
yes, yes it is
>hahah hurr duurr roger said 'babies literally are dying'
yes, yes they are
>where my HODLERS at??
you are the reason BTC is doomed

>>9379156
>>9379156
https://coinmarketcap.com/all/views/all/

Look at 7d% stupid faggot.

Bitcoin Cash will destroy Bitcoin!

>>9376712
I got $100 worth of Bitcoin Cash in Christmas of 2017, primarily on December 22nd 2017, I think it's value would be 40 or $50 by now.

BCH > Holo

>>9376766
>>9376800
>>9376822
>first 3 responses all dubs
just bought 100k

>>9377361
>you have control over the option someone else sets on their transaction
I mean, I've always heard that BTC fanbois are retarded but I didn't think it was this bad . . .

>no cultism or corporate cocksucking

Ummmmm, sweetie

>>9377464
>insanely better at that
sure, if you want 30% success rate in your transactions AND (if nobody connected to you already have a loaded channel) having to go through the hassle for setting up a channel by sending BTC on the blockchain, wait for confirm, and THEN try using lightning network with 30% success rate

also if someone else spent your crypto using your channel you're fucked and either have to open a new channel or load new BTC into your channel - with a transaction on the blockchain, which you have to wait for to confirm

LIGHTNING NETWORK IS COMPLETELY OBLITERATED BY BCH. they both do the same thing except one is super simple and *always* works.

>>9379937
yeah, so is $100 worth of BTC from 12/22.....were you trying to make a point?

>>9381330 24 hours now cashchads and it's still happening...

>>9377804
As soon as I read the whitepaper I saw that it was satoshi's true vision.

Also, PoB (proof of bean) is a great system and revolutionary. Bean Cash rivals ripple, with the main difference that it's decentralized and it's an actual crypto.

>>9381437
It's going back down now, they had to sell BCH to make BTC more profitable to mine but the writing is on the wall

>>9381780
Where are you seeing it going down? Still above 16 days to da when it should now be 13. Also pic related.

>>9378444
Yes you can, just don't use segwit.

>>9376900
>soiboi
Why spell so᠌yboy like that?

>>9380934
bcash "works" because no one uses it.

>>9382430
He's from /pol/. The word is filtered there.

>>9382417
Segwit transactions are still in the blocks and the goal is to get all transactions using Segwit with the eventual move to LN, newfriend. Learn you own coin.

>>9382456
It will also work just as well when 32 times more people use it than bcore as of Monday, though.

BCA$H better then BC0RE

>>9377126
Hehe nice meme fren i go now have to buy btc thx

Every bcash poster just seems like an edgy ancap with a massive persecution complex. How am I to take it seriously?

>>9382492
Segwit is fine, and if you don't like it, your coins can sit on legacy addresses, which wouldn't work under the (fictional) attack on segwit coinbases.

On the other hand, your coin is fucked at layer 0.

>>9382493
No, the amount of people will be the same: none. And for some dumb reason, you want even bigger blocks.

If it were to be used at scale (full blocks) only a couple of datacenters would be hosting the blockchain, which is what the USG has been trying to do since the begining, but all their previous attempts failed (XT, Classic, Unlimited..) so they had to create an altcoin, hire a conman to trick noobs into a cult of satoshi personality, and get Gavin and co on board (again). Too bad it's already late. Bitcoin is already set in stone, no one can change it, which is why it has value.

BTC needs to die.
It always drags the whole market down with it..
Imagine gold value dropping/rising massively and Apple stock crashing/pumping because of it. So fucking retarded.

>>9377090
classic cashie playbook actually

>>9382898
That's possibly the most delusional picture I've ever seen. At any rate you're glossing over the entire purpose of Segwit (probably because it destroys your argument), but hey man you do you.

>>9382898
> being this fucking retarded.
Amazing.
So 32mb is impossible to run anywhere except data centers. The US government is behind the coin all the ancaps have gathered around and we should pay no attention to their sponsored dev team that forced through segwit and officially plans to push over 99 percent of the transaction throughput into a routed and staked centralised hub and spoke network which necessarily will force said volume through massive lightning banks, right, got it.
You're so fucking retarded it's just funny. The usg sabotaging the project clumsily and in plain view and having fucking idiots like you rushing to their defense and attacking the immune system of bitcoin must have them in fucking stitches.

>>9376712

>>9378070
>>9378070
because "corecuck corecuck corecuck" spammed in every bcash paid shill thread counts as logic, reason, ideas

>>9383032
>butthurt corecuck detected

Whats the matter, blocklet? Girls laughing at your size?

>>9382980

Goyim do you know how big 32mb is? Do you want to cause another holohoax or 9/11? Because that's how bad 32mb is.

>>9383001
>>9383032
>>9382960
>>9382829
paid shills as I said earlier, kikestream has funded their accounts again zzz

>>9379237
a fuckton of coins are you ignorant fool

>>9383068
Absolutely. Look at those speeds, I haven't seen such dizzying heights since 1996 ISDN lines in backwater shit holes like Australia.

>>9383045
wow, i own no bitcoin btc, another paid cashie shill who is a brainlet pajeet

>>9383108
>owns LTC and thinks he's superior

Blocklet, please.

>>9383045
i just realized that you must be a teenager by your post. fuuuucking impressive

>>9383155

I'm 30, blocklet.

>>9376712

>No bullshit cultish leaders
>Bitcoin Jesus

>>9383137
wow, i own no ltc. cashies have used this one-two idiotic retort on multiple seperare occasions. is this in the handbook of retorts that all paid bcash shills have on screen during biz raids?

>>9383173
no, no thirty year old is that immature. 10th grade i'd guess

>>9383187
Nigger, you wish I was paid.

>>9383211
Yes, 4chan is peak maturity. How fucking retarded are you, blocklet?

>>9382898
Hope you take what's been said here and learn from your mistakes and oversights, this place is anonymous afterall. But since it's been almost a year and your still a delusional twat I'm gonna assume you have an ulterior motive.

>>9383234
He sounds like one of mp's clueless goons.

>>9383630