/biz/ - Business & Finance

do the reverse and thank me later

Just bought 40,000 ZIL and I'm quite certain it's about to dump HARD. Dont do it anon

I'd dump WAN for ZIL. Top 5 coin for sure.

>>9327820
Well I currently don't have any ziil so you are suggesting that I just hold on to my wan?

>>9327838
If you're so sure it's about to dump hard, why did you buy 40k? No logic.

>>9327796
Retard

Zilliqa is lock for the top 10 maybe even Top 5 soon. Not so sure about Wan. I think more people will start catching on to Fusion soon and Wan may be playing second fiddle to them.

>>9327855
Do the opposite of what /biz/ says.

Zil is about to pull an EOS/Tron and rip out a 10-20x. Wan is going nowhere right now. It was hyped to shit and its correcting right now. Wan is comparable to other projects in the ~500b mcap. ZIL is on a whole nother lever. Marketing hasn't even started yet.

I hate the Zilliqa logo so much it's fucking repulsive

>>9327982
Exactly This.

>>9327982
This.

What do you think will happen with ENG in the short term?

>>9328057
Alot of rumors going around about a ENG possibly forming a partnership with ZIL.

>>9327999
You don't have any taste

>>9328078
TNC is also going to help ZIL to scale even more. DYOR.

>>9328099
Why has ZIL been poppin today?

>>9328171
Cause it's the only legitimate threat to Ethereum outside of EOS and NEO. It's god tier and people are finally catching on. I fully expect this to be $5 minimum by eoy.

>>9328099
Ok let's break down WHY it's a bad logo

1. > 3D geometric shape on top, forms the top part of the letter Z, this is fine if it didn't deviate from this style

2. > This section is a 2D strip can't physically fold down diagonally this way and connect with the flat bottom section without some kind of a mobius strip effect. Even with that the "Z" on the side can't physically be a flat surface

3. > The bottom section is a flat base because of how it attaches to the diagonal and it's a vertical bottom section of the letter Z at the same time, it's like it can't decide what it wants to be.

4. > Now it suddenly wants to continue the 3D geometric theme with a side piece, this would honestly be fine but it DOESN'T FUCKING CONNECT WHY NOT? Now it it's a thin 2D strip attempting to merge with a 3D block on top of it, why not let them connect.

It's as if the logo is supposed to be a rectangular prism with the letter Z on the side but it doesn't achieve this because it breaks from 3D to 2D and doesn't merge them at the end. If the left side's bottom connected with the top then the Z would have 2 consistent sides and would not look as choppy, or even if the right side was connected to the top would it create consistency.

>>9328375
So it is the Homer of logos?

Bump

>>9327862
He's implying the opposite, in that he just invested on proper logic but solely due to his luck it will dump. Al Bundy Syndrome.

>>9328375
autism, it's a good logo

no contest, wan is nothing amazing tech wise, seriously even fusion is better.
zil, radix and dfinity are going to take the crypto space one step closer to adoption.

>>9328610
No it literally isn't, I get a brain aneurysm whenever I see it

>>9328375
look at this pleb who has never seen an mc escher drawing

>>9328671
>Sameposting to defend a virtual currency logo

>>9328714
>implying i was sameposting and not just calling attention to your idiocy twice

well i made some money on this since this thread was made thx fags