/biz/ - Business & Finance

throw money at it, NOW!

>>9311685
I heard their white paper is plagerized from others.. I'd be cautious.

>>9311732
Lel

>>9311685
This will double in sats within 30 days. Potential 10 to triple digit x eithin a year or mores time. Unmatched in there skillset and execution so far

It is legitimate. The best FUD is the low volume. But it is also the best asset. When this thing wakes up, get out of the way. Only those who get in early will make it, wont me much time to fomo in.

this is a buy and hold type of project. may take a few years. holding 4k

>>9311767
Is 1700 sats the new floor or do you see it dropping below that?

holding 1.5k since .90 cents. it's the real deal anon

>>9311685
The idea of execution inside walled garden docker containers for common compute tasks (transcoding, rendering, etc) is fucking genius. Keeps the hosts safe and provides a zero barrier to entry for companies already doing this shit in in containers.

This is like an even cheaper aws lambda that you can actually use for long running processes.

Sleeping giant is an understatement.

>>9312033
can you say that again in brainlet for me? i don't speak high IQ
>pic related, me

>>9312047
Companies already do their everything that is "job" based inside of Docker containers , unless it requires some kind of special hardware access.

Lets say you are a software development shop, you need to build an extremely large software project like Android from source code hundreds to thousands of times a day. Or you are a media distribution company and you need to take a master of a video and transcode it into 50+ formats for all of your customers/players.

Right now they do this on farms of servers usually in AWS at extremely high cost with an object storage backend.

1. Job is given a trigger via an api
2. Compute hosts put the job in a queue
3. The jobs are executed by priority on the cluster
4. The input for the jobs is a series of ENV variables (think of this as metadata)
5. The job pulls the input from object storage (just a password protected http host)
6. The job processes
7. The output is uploaded to object storage when finished.

Now these types of systems are a dime a dozen in the corporate world right now, and everyone is trying to figure out how to get their 6 figure a month AWS bills under control. The biggest cost in AWS is normally compute (EC2 or ECS running on top of EC2).

So you now have a service that is less than 1/10th the cost that can use the same input output workflow and you do not need to manage or monitor compute hosts, the Iexec platform just does that for you while saveing you 90K a month on your AWS bill.

>>9312244
How is 2.0 coming along, any news?

>>9312244
ok thanks. i have a slightly better understanding now. i only knew about rendering blender files from a video on youtube and a partnership with one of the top ICOs that will use iexec for their scaling issues. this is an additional layer.
pic related is one of the potential partnerships for the ICO so you know this back end solution will be put to use if everything plays out.

Amazing project, but I'm afraid it might never really reach it's potential since the marketing is nonexistent...the best tech doesn't always win in the end.

Heard there's an upbit listing coming with v2 at the end of the month, can anyone confirm? Also wondering if we'll see a pump leading up to the 18th

THIS IS SHILLED EVERY FUCKING HOUR ON THIS BOARD HOW COULD IT BE A SLEEPER YOU PIECE OF FUCKING SHIT DIE SHILL DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

teehee

>>9312371
I only get information from their dev letters:

https://iex.ec/news_categories/devletters/

>>9312390
I thought golem was doing the blender thing. I didn't know they both were

>>9312602
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epIrtETCnp0

short vid, watch

sell walls in the order books are massive.

>>9311891
it never wakes up, literally better off just missing out on this and pursuing fresher chances

>>9312639
I expected something more impressive than that. Done locally seemed to take the same amount of time. Not shitting on the project just saying they could've rendered something really complex to show the merits of it being distributed

>>9312705
Bullish

>>9313166

this will be 5$ by the end of quarter 2

>>9312895
it's really just a proof of concept
i think for bigger files/bigger rendering using iexec will be faster

>32 btc volume on binance
*inhales*
hahahahahahahahaha

>>9313442
>implying that isnt a good thing

IBM partnership this month

>>9313491
brainlet
>>9313680
deluded

>>9313735
Stay salty

>>9314045
salty about what rlcuck

>>9313278
Lmao you do know what buy walls and sell walls are used for right?

>>9314329
About missing out on 100x coin, gnt cocksucker

>>9314359
we will see. price is dumping as of now

>>9314397
absolute state of rlc bagholders

>>9314561
absolute state of non rlc bagholders

v2 is already priced in. enjoy the dump

>>9315038
This

Everything about RLC is priced in lmao. Hilarious how these deluded bagholders make threads every few days hoping someone buys. Absolutely pathetic. This is going back to 11k sats within a few weeks and is sure to dump on "v2".

>>9315009
cope

>>9315222
nope

>>9315180
nah. i'll sell this one for 100x.
my first ~100x

>>9315275
It will never, and I mean NEVER go 100x from here. Expect this project to close up shop after the next BTC retracement cycle early 2018.

You invest in trash, in garbage. Period.

>>9315300
*2019

There is simply no doubt that RLC is vaporware. How long now have the same bagholders been making these shill threads?

>>9315300
>>9315303
This

>>9315300
>>9315328
not gonna make it

>>9315300
>>9315303
>>9315328
How desperate somn and gnt bagholders are getting. You know that ixec has superior team and superior tech. by mid 2019 ixec will consume mc of gnt, somn and dadi

>>9315383
I don't have either coin. The reality is you are desperately trying to invent a narrative of some competing coins spreading RLC fud.

But I have just one question - what makes RLC anything but vaporware? What have they even released? What is being run on the RLC network?

Where's the IBM partnership? Presenting at a conference means nothing. Weeks have passed since with no news - that means no partnership.

RLC will be delisted from Bittrex and Binance soon enough as the project begins to fold up and fade away.

I'm telling you this because I feel bad that delusional bagholders will lose their money on this vaporware "project".

Once again - show me anything concrete developed by the RLC team. You can't. You're going to be dumped on when the v2 release occurs and or (more likely) ends up being delayed indefinitely.

There isn't even a fucking official wallet for this.

They didn't even bother making a simple copy and paste wallet for this token. That says it all.

>>9315383
>much technology
gnt pumped hard and your shitcoin stays out of top 100 mcap

>>9315457
how fucking stupid are you to think that erc20 token needs its own wallet?

>>9315433
read their dev letters faggot. you can already go and run dapps on their network

>>9315544
and nobody uses it kek
>absolute STATE of this shitcoin

>>9315544
Name one dapp being run on its network.

There is nothing - this is complete vaporware. I can see you are upset; maybe you believe in this project but that doesn't change that this is vaporware which will be delisted from major exchanges before the year is over and likely exit scamming (-99%+ dump) early 2019.

>>9315457
ERC20 tokens can't even have their own wallet. Are you retarded?

>>9315571
>>9315554
Blender, R and many others.
I have skidmarks on my underwear that are snarter than you two

>>9315571
Request Network runs on iExec.

>>9315554
>>9315571
you can literally go look at like 20 different dapps on their website you fucking retards

>>9315592
>another low mcap shitcoin
wow, impressive

>>9315585
>>9315589
>>9315592
>>9315608
Here come the overly defensive, desperate, delusional bagholders.

Give it up already. You make these threads every day and use proxies to generate fake discussion. Just look at the pathetic shill OP pretending to be a new investor interested in RLC, a vaporware token with 30 BTV daily volume (bots propping the price up).

>>9315630
Welp, i can't change your mind. Stay poor.

>>9315630
rlc pajeets exposed

>>9315630
you're just diarrheaing out of your fucking fingers you haven't said anything to make me want to sell my bags to you faggot

Patrician tier project. Won’t see explosive growth soon, but will be huge in 2 years.

Guess why there’s no volume...holders aren’t willing to sell their tokens like this.

Ico price 0.25c, ath was 4.6 usd. Anything below 1.8 usd is a good entry for what is coming. Swing traded my 2k stack to 3k and will leave them like this until q2 2020 rolls out.

Don’t forget ubisoft.

>>9315691
Yep. If Ubisoft sees some sort of use for this coin that means they see that they can make money from it. Ubisoft only cares about money.

>>9315702
Exactly.

I divide my coins into several tiers and don’t shy away from confessing when I’m in for the gamble.

Zencash and RLC are the only ones I’d call a strong hold long term.

>>9315755
Yep, it's my #1 pick for mid/long term.

>>9315457
wow you actually are retarded.

>>9315433
>show me anything concrete developed by the RLC team
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epIrtETCnp0

>>9315755
Why zencash?

>>9316428
nice