/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9305546
>every fuckin time
>brother pepe looks like drinking from a glass with a blue flame in it

There is a big canade payments event this week and consensus next week.

>>9305602
>Catalog
What exactly is consensus?

Holy fuck....I remember some anon asking why was it so important to finish testnet by May 4th Friday. I thought about it and guessed we would find out Monday....what happened Monday -

https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/simplifying-blockchain-app-development-with-azure-blockchain-workbench-2/

>>9305668
What the fuuuuuuuckkkk, were actually going to be rich boys

>>9305668
Holy FUCK FUCK GOING ALL IN RIGHT NOW

>>9305668
Does anyone have a connection between Chainlink and Azure? I feel like I've seen screenshots here or there but I don't have any saved.

>>9305581
i never noticed that i always thought it was a curtain being pulled back in the background

>>9305668
>https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/simplifying-blockchain-app-development-with-azure-blockchain-workbench-2/

ctrl+f chainlink 0 results
ctrl+f smartcontracts.com 0 results
ctrl+f Sergey 0 results

>>9305750
yea, because they're going to come out and say they are using chainlink before it's even in fucking mainnet. absolute state of nolinkers

>>9305750

>>9305792
That pic really excites me

>>9305739
>>9094610

>>9305668
>https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/blockchain-workbench/blockchain-workbench-architecture

>Message consumers

>Message consumers take messages from Service Bus. The underlying eventing model for message consumers allows for extensions of additional services and systems. For example, you could add support to populate CosmosDB or evaluate messages using Azure Streaming Analytics. The following sections describe the message consumers included in Blockchain Workbench.

>Distributed ledger consumer
>Distributed ledger technology (DLT) messages contain the metadata for transactions to be written to the blockchain. The consumer retrieves the messages and pushes the data to a transaction builder, signer, and router.

>>9305774
I hold link. I just hate these threads spreading bs.

>>9305837
I think I may bust an actual nut

>>9305742
it's either that or the window showing from behind his chair

>>9305668
>https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/simplifying-blockchain-app-development-with-azure-blockchain-workbench-2/
>Ingest and manage the events required to trigger smart contracts using Service Bus and Event Grid.

>>9305750
Another one

>>9305920
I just busted a fake nut

>>9305668
The whole solution is about using a set of MS Azure API based services and integrate it with ethereum. This is like every linky wet dream.

>>9305668
I'll use this shit at my new work. Looks incredibly grand for a huge finance/corporate environment.

>>9305792
OH SHIT

>>9306087
I'm getting more and more convinced that the singularity is not a meme. Imagine a year's worth of /biz/ autism and shilling exploding out in the largest 15m green candle anyone's ever seen.

>>9306143
goddammit im about to fomo in

>>9306178
It has never been a meme, were going to make it harder than anyone else in crypto. Bitcoin millionaires will be overshadowed by Chainlink billionaires in the future.

You can't just ctrl+f "smart contract" and instantly assume it can't be anything else but Chainlink, ffs.

>>9306271
but chainlink and sergey is the creator of smart contracts

Now here is where it gets interesting...Microsoft will be at Consensus next week.... fits timeline

>>9305792
https://apttus.com/resources/smart-contracts/

Who is gonna go through this whitepaper and compare it to LINK's?

>>9306279
no, but they did create Microsoft Cryplets which are now called Enterprise Smart Contracts.

>>9306293
>>9305792
>>9305774
>>9305700
>>9305700
>>9305686
>>9305668


https://apttus.com/

This company is the chainlink wet dream.

>>9306251
I hope you are right, friend.

>>9305668
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/blockchain-workbench/blockchain-workbench-create-app

>Smart contracts represent the business logic of the blockchain application. Currently, Blockchain Workbench supports Ethereum for the blockchain ledger. Ethereum uses Solidity as its programming language for writing self-enforcing business logic for smart contracts.

Jesus fucking christ, anon....are we actually going to be rich as fuck?

Is this really happening?

>>9305750
ctrl+f the chosen one 1000 results

>>9306380
The dream is closer than it was two weeks ago. Unfortunately this is how we linkies must live for now.

Link doing 100000x would do a lot for 4chan imo. /biz/ would be treated as gods on other boards

>>9306349
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't there a strong connection between Chainlink and Salesforce? Anyone have that graphic with all the arrows pointing from link to salesforce, mulesoft, world economic forum, etc?

Possible companies using chainlink?

Here is my theory. SmartContract created Chainlink as an open source backbone with the intention of being the backbone to ANY product needing oracles. SmartContract is behind the scenes showing companies that they don't have to design an oracle solution as they open sourced for them. I think the company's customers will be using chainlink without ever knowing. For example, I expect Microsoft to own a bunch of link and then charge customers in dollars as the decentralized oracle is just part of their azure solution.

service announcement:
Smart contracts don't equate chainlink. Smart contracts equate to solidity code working on the ethereum network.

The name of Sergays company, Smart Contracts is just a smart marketing ploy to confuse people.

>>9306642
>smart marketing ploy to confuse people

>whois smartcontract.com
>registered 2008 by Sergey Nazarov
Fuck off you cunt

>>9306568
Agreed, I remember a thread where the idea was that it would run in the background for a lot of different services, and the users wouldn't even be aware of the fact that chainlink was a part of their transaction.

>>9306666
I remember that as well. Czeched

>>9306568
>decentralized oracle is just part of their azure solution

>>9306642
Yes but Sergey and team built Cryplets which is part of Azure. So there actually is a connection.

>>9306657
Smart contracts don't care about off-chain data. The term "Smart contracts" don't imply usage of off-chain data.

Currently, Smart Contracts mean Solidity code on ethereum. Nothing else.

>>9305668
oh wow a whole bucket of nothing.

SWIFT, FB, M$, TSLA, Salesforce, Docusign, and Domino's Pizza Delivery Tracker system have already been linked to the project. IT'S ALL PRICED IN.

Hope you are ready to sell the news.

>>9306683
see >>9306695

>>9306726
>Smart contracts don't care about off-chain data

Yeah I can't imagine any smart contracts wanting to use off-chain data. You're right, LINK is a scam.

Fuck off.

>>9306695
You can imply the connection not by ctrl+f "smart contracts". You can look for stuff like this by digging around:
>>9305868

God damnit linkies are so fucking deluded.

>>9306749
You show all signs of brainletism. Don't care what you'll say after this point.
Shame that people like you will become moneyed soon.

>>9306841
>signs of brainletism

Statistically, I'm probably a lot smarter than you are. But OK.

>>9306568
will this even affect the price of LINK tho?

>>9306841
Are there not countless instances in which smart contracts could perform certain tasks by pulling off chain data?

>>9306891
The current price is driven by pure speculation, meaning the only buy pressure is bots and memes. ChainLink is as under the radar as it gets.

As soon as there's a real world use (i.e. buy pressure), the price will go up. Supply and demand. Combine this with the staking idea, and you got a stew goin'.

>>9306863
just by saying that, even if I agreed with you everytime, you proved that you're indeed a fucking moron

>>9306936
I mean it's a douchey thing to say, but it's true... I can see why it would make me a cunt, but I don't see how it makes me a moron. Get butt blasted over an internet comment.

>>9305668
What color should my lambo be? Haha HODL to the moon boys hehehe

>>9306970
get one in every color anon

>>9306726
Smart contracts don't care about off-chain data because they can't see it presently*
There you go, FTFY. They will care about it - a lot - once CL is in full effect. I hope you're not trying to claim otherwise, because you would just be making an ass of yourself.

it's happening, for real this time:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Chainlink/comments/8hr6kn/chainlink_onchain_email_validation/

>>9306657
Sergey bought the domain from someone much later in 2014, not 2008

>>9306749
And the fact that you didn't get his point in this post

>>9306954
This is what makes you a moron

>>9307015
That's not his point though. Go read his first post.

>>9307156

10k linklet, will i make it?

>>9307227
no

>>9307227
It is written

>>9307227
You will make it, unless 10 million dollars isn't enough for you.

>>9305668
UHH guyss

>>9307284
wheres that from

>>9307284
rebrand

>>9307284
CUBES HAUNT ME

>>9307306
https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLXtHYVsvn_b_0qcjdVmv_Q5-7nLmbtJYK&v=gwrYspdaOx8

>>9307284

Just your typical hexagon.

No big deal.

>>9307266

>>9307364
Kek

>>9307197
...

https://domainhistory.net/smartcontract.com#record_286247618

The domain was registered to a different registrar (previously owner by some business) and only in 2014 it was transfered to Sergey. You can also check archive pages which show that the site was blank before 2014 and the period when Sergey bought it coincides with the first version of Smart Oracles website.

>>9307306
>>9307340
we are close frens this won't moon this will be a singularity.

>>9307340
1:45

>>9307397
forgot pic

>>9307393
You should google what that means and then fuck off. The domain is non transferable and has been like that since its creation.

>>9307425
>its happening

>>9307393
>previously owner by some business
>owner

>>9306474

Holy shit anon. Nestle owns so many subsidiary companies... if they automate a fraction of their corporate structure with Chainlink, then LINK holders will have a plethora of smartcontract jobs and a massive token price.

>>9307340
>>9307400
And around 2:55

>>9307425
Hexagon and the lock. Nowhere near as typical as just a cube, i.e., a block. Interesting.

>>9306841
>Shame that people like you will become moneyed soon.
>will become moneyed soon.
you're at least half way right there boyo

How you feelin fellow linkies

>>9307400
described how bitcoin worked whats the big deal?

>>9307570
good

>>9307570

>>9307425
which consensus algo do you think they are talking about here just seems like standard blockchain lingo

>>9307604
go get your bah bah, I'm not spoonfeeding you

>>9307589
new chainlink logo

>>9307476
Registrar URL: http://alpinedomains.com
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited


Registrar URL: http://www.name.com
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited

Linkies really are braindead, maybe you're the one that should google what it means.

>>9307510
>hurr durr I have no argument but he made a typo btfo xddd

>>9307604
If you still don't understand the connection between Chainlink and Azure after reading this thread, then you're a lost cause.

>>9307425
fuck chainlink and fuck nofap. Now i need a new pair of pants and underwear. Thanks a lot Sergey you absolute fucking madman

>>9307712
I agree with the nofap

t. former owner of NoFap.com when it was a botting website for Aion, AMA.

>>9305869
it's speculation, dude
gives people a chance to decide what they think might be right, and how much—if any—they should put in
these threads are great

>>9307101
Holy shit, it works

IT FUCKING WORKS

>>9306936
>>9306954
>>9307156

Each of you are more retarded than the next.

>>9306666
Checked.

>>9307780
>retarded
Not an argument

>>9307476
The domain was owned by Szabo, who renewed the registration of it 6 days before Satoshi rolled out Bitcoin. Szabo apparently sold or transferred the domain to Sergey in 2014. IMO This site and smartcontracts/Chainlink are part of a bigger plan that involves many. That is the reason I am 100% a Link hodler and comfy as comfy can be. It explains many things, including why Sergey gets so much air time at very critical events/conferences. He has the right people backing the project, he is the chosen one to deliver a critical piece of future financial transactions. Not sure how much those of us that hold Link are going to make or when, but it is a HUGE part of the future.

>>9307340
Doesn't mention oravles or apus or off chain data. Mentions corda though. The biggest competitor to chainlink. They are using corda whivh means chainlink will fail.

>>9307820
slightly delusional, zoom out for a bit and see other options. always hedge your bets

Can someone spoonfeed me this thread
I am too tired to go through another link larp

>>9307364
Omfg $2k link isn't greedy at all

I want to market sell all my JNT and all in in LINK so bad what is wrong with me

Smart Contracts doesn’t mean ChainLink. Just like when Mercedes mentions their new “cars” they aren’t talking about cars.com

You people are hopeless.

>>9307845
>pffff pfhfhfhf pffff

>>9307775
honestly, ive kept quiet abt this until now, cos i really didnt want to shake the tree with any real fud, but i truly thoight that the one point of faiure with LINK was that they literally werent able to build the code to enable the oracles. think abt it, it was always these talks abt grand, esoteric stuff, and, dare i say it, a lot of "philosophical" naval gazing. but now, we have proof it really works. i think today is the turning point. form now on were on a completely differnet road...

>>9307863
please die a painful death and film it. Then make someone post it here so it can be stickied.

>>9307570
Bretty gud, pretty warm and /comfy/ holding LINK these days

>>9307807
No shit, it's an insult. Thanks for the proof retard.

>>9306726
Neo has smart contacts

>>9307871

>>9306954
Duning kruger in effect.

>>9307959
about 7 deployed as of now I think. Shit's expensive.

>>9307891
Im in a rush. Mistyped 3 letters. Sue me.

>>9308019
keked

>>9305546
>speaks about a 3rd person on his post
>he forgot to delete his nickname, making obvious he is that 3rd person
>he is an obvious retard
we don't need more retarded tripfags here

>>9307859
Thanks but I will take my chances with a critical piece of what will eventually be considered a financial revolution. I don't have my life savings invested but don't believe there is a better buy in the crypto space, too many signs point that way. Time will tell.

>>9308068
It really feels like people will look back at us and imagine what it felt like... to know about Link that early.

>>9307845
>corda
>biggest competitor to chainlink
anon... I thought we had left this meme in the past when IBM themselves absolutely BTFO corda
chainlink has NO competitors. nobody else is building decentralized oracles.

>chainlink threads through time

something similar what happened with ethereum will happen to chainlink.

>>9306568
ding ding ding ding this is the current trend in big enterprise data solutions. Partnership over acquisition or direct competition

>>9308222
>8222▶
c h e c k e d

>>9308222
how can you be so certain. why would every company interested in using chainlink network come out at once?

>>9307316
Rory said on slack the old known blue cube will be used to represent link in diagrams but the rebrand logo for business letters, headings, PR, etc

>>9307928
How can I post something after killing myself?
You haven't thought this through anon

>>9308262
Would that cause an increase in the LINK token though?

>>9307744
For how much you sold the site?

>>9307685
shit man. im here at least trying ill figure it out

>>9308287
because of massive profits for everyone involved.

Should I FOMO guys? I've been all in in JNT for more than three months hoping it would moon so I could then diversify into LINK and become rich, but I'm experiencing a very serious case of fear FOMO right now aaaaaaaaaa
I DONT KNOW WHAT TO DO

>>9308354
Sorry anon, just check out this thread, lots of good info
>>9094610

>>9308400
read the whitepaper (really take time for it), watch some Sergey presentations on youtube.
buy LINK.

>>9308316
If any of these companies want to monetize their own data while cutting costs and improving speeds, then yes. Because they'll need LINK tokens to utilize the network and smartcontract capabilities. And word will get out, and regardless if Microsoft or oracle or sales force or Tesla or XYZ LunarBob's Hotdogs on the Moon customers realize they are using link, people who have data and want to make money with it will find out about link. And again decrease the supply.
Look I topped up another 12k link yesterday evening and it hasn't gone below since then. I'm one dude. Imagine when real companies or older more wealthy more experienced more technically inclined Normans start trying to get involved.

>>9308433
I've already done my research, I know LINK will be one of the biggest moon missions out there, I just don't want to miss the launch, should I FOMO in now, and take my small loss on JNT? Should I sell a portion of my JNT stack? Should I wait?
I'm lost and I don't know what to do

>>9308435
True, but maybe Sergey already gave companies some of the LINK tokens from the 650 million out of circulation for free or at a discount.

>>9308474
Compare the potential growth of JNT to that of link and make your decision

>>9308474
according to the facebook group informant. they're just getting started. pump should last a couple days.

use that however you like.
I did't think we'd break 6100 tonight, now im not sure where we're going to stop..

>>9308494
Do you think buying LINK now is like buying ETH in 2015?

>>9308474
sell everything for chainlink and just hodl in peace.
being balls deep in chainlink is a really comfy investment.

>>9308499
>>9308515

>>9308474
I topped off last night. I want more but I'm locked into hot rn with my last couple k fiat on idex...
>tfw still have way more than I thought I'd get to when I started this gloriously insane movie scene

>>9307946
Never notice the curtains patterns, the shirt.

>>9307101
Spoon-feed me anon. What's the real life use of this?

>>9305986
>>9305792

this doesn't mean chainlink.

>>9306731
thats the point of these threads popping up. To get idoits to fomo in

>>9308494
>>9308515
Now that I think of it I got banned from Jibrel's telegram for making a joke about autism, so I don't think they deserve me holding their token, I'm moving into LINK tonight boys.

>>9307910

ChainLink was never a meme.

Sergey presented at SIBOS.

If someone says ChainLink is vaporware, then they have no idea how huge and important SIBOS is.

>>9308597

>The smart contract. You opened it. We came. Now you must come with us, taste our oracles.

>>9308597
Buying Jibrel is literally funding saudi terrorists

>>9308499

I would 100% buy in now.

If you understand what ChainLink, and how it's purposely being kept under the rads, you should know how valuable 55 cent link is.

>>9308512
I think Chainlink expands the use case of blockchain far beyond anything we have already established already with Eth. At the moment were playing games like crypto kitties, but with chianlink we can do things like automatically pay out insurance settlements if you get too much rain in a certain area or an earthquake past a certain strength. One clearly has more use, if blockchain is the highway, and Eth is the car, chainlink is the gas. Everything that runs a motor needs gas, not just cars, link is blockchain agnostic that bridges the gap between smart contracts and real world data.

HFFFFF HUFFFF PFFFFT UGHHH..... PFFFFT PFFFT HHHUUUHHH HUUUUUHHH.... PFFFFTTT PFFFTTT PFFFFTTT

"Chainlink.... will be... worth one thousand dollars each... hhuuuuhhh... errrhhughh...."

>>9306666
If you want to make millions, design an interface that converts fiat to link and processes data requests. Just a plug in that any company can pick up, put fiat into and use chainlink without ever buying a token themselves. Would be easy to do but I am brainlet

>>9308758
One could even code a smart contract to turn fiat into link for payment. I assume companies will charge customers a network fee without naming chainlink and they would take care of it themselves, again I think most people using chainlink wont actually know its a part of the transaction

>>9308499
What is the target of this pump?

>>9307258
Anyone got the satanpepe get from yesterday?

>>9307887
I did exactly this. Let go of those bags.

>>9308910
I just sold 80% of my JNTs to put them into LINK
I hope I did not fuck up

>>9308925

>>9308925

100% Link is so so comfy.

>>9305581
wow your depth perception is absolutely shot dude
you're either retarded or heavily abused psychedelics

>>9307952

>>9308925
You fucked up only by leaving the other 20% of your jibbies stack

>>9308961

It's a 2d painting you mongoloid.

>>9308925
fuck i was so tempted to do this the other day when JNT was at $.40..... I'm regretting it now

>500+ connections
Well well well boys, the singularity approaches

>>9308222
lel that list of members is even larger now!
much larger

Are you ready lads?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYpz3abAk98

>>9307538
Nigger, Nestle is a megacorp bigger than Google. 40% of what you eat comes from Nestle's subsidiaries.

https://streamable.com/s2cdt

>>9308807
Priority: All in
Stop Loss: None

>>9308391
would this not be illegal? i mean i hope its true but seems like some people would be salt they did not get in and try and strike it down

>>9308419
thank you. i bought link/eth tonight at .000777777 hope i did alright

>>9309313
>t. believes insider trading is illegal for non-outsiders

>>9309329
You're gonna make it bud, 7s dont lie

>>9309313
Its going to be similar to when the EEA was announced with Ethereum causing the price to rocket, not illegal and very comfy when you're on the right side

>>9308019
Couldn't agree more

>>9309377
you are right. checked.

>>9309377
c h e c k e d

>>9306954
Retarded

>>9309411
did eth rocket to over $100 after this happened by chance? i remember that is when it caught my atttention unfortunately

>>9309516
I wasn't in crypto when the EEA announcement happened, so idk the price impact off the top of my head, but I know it brought a shit ton of attention and FOMO to the project.

>>9309045
now thatsa reel inerestin'...

>>9309377

>calls his own get

dear god we're really gonna make it

>>9309377
Damn son, nice 7's

>>9309516
Yes, most of the heavy ETH pumps were triggered by EEA announcements.

>>9309045
this guy is on the team also is he a new addition? i have missed a lot of threads.

>>9309721
Back to bed Boomer, he already unfollowed Sergey

200k LINK here lads. Wish I had sold mid-January, I could've bought more. I came so close to panic dumping on the 15th.

>>9309721
Its just a screenshot I saw floating around, first time I've seen him so i thought I'd spread it to some other linkies

>>9309780
doubt it but i just set a reminder with siri to check on that later.

>>9309721
he is the new business development person.

AKA he is designated to Shill link to big businesses. A lot more mature than shilling stupid skateboard meme's.

>>9309045
I-it's real guys.

>>9307820
If he is the choosen one then ehy does he needs 32 million ICO money from us.

>>9310175
They needed an ico, to legitimise the decentralised nature of the project. Also barely anyone got into the ico, it was all taken in the presale.

>>9305668
>>9305750
It's actually lisk and stratis that pertain to this at the moment. Stratis is for azure microsoft and at the moment azure is using lisk a bit for something.

Strat/link friendship when?

>>9310233
And actually...strat smart contract alpha is may 16th...didnt link need something done by then?

>>9310217
Yeah the presale was sketchy as fuck. Didn't some guy prove that the counter was completely fake and it basically started at 90% being pre-sold? Who the fuck bought that?

>>9310401
Microsoft, sales force, mulesoft, tesla, well Fargo, SWIFT. I wish but who knows I'm wondering this too I remember this and basically started the entire scam FUD.

>>9309377