/biz/ - Business & Finance

I have both tho

>>9305675
Yeah dummy he's telling you to sell the REQ for more LINK.

>>9305697
Yes. Look, REQ will do well. But NOT as well as LINK will perform in the coming months. The ChainLink network will be far more important that Request, even with triple entry accounting. LINK has a multitude more use cases and that’s objectively a fact.

And NOW would be a really good time.

Link going to pump to 70 cents tonight...

>>9305757
unironically this

make a move, make it fast. this is one of those moments where you'll kick yourself for waiting. you know it's already happened a few times already.

>>9305642
if req doesnt go to 100 i will kms. the prospect of wagecucking for the next 40 years is not something i can do

>>9305642
As someone with both I look forward to the two projects being very profitable in q3-q4 2018. I doubt we will ever get REQ cheaper than 20c and LINK cheaper than 50c again if they do dip... whichever dips first is the one I get more of

>>9305846
You should manage your expectations, anon. I hold REQ, and even I have my doubts that it will reach $100 anytime soon

REQ is like LINK's retarded little brother

>>9305875
Im fine holding for a year or two tho. hopefully if it gains mass adoption+token burn+the total market cap of crypto goes up, it should hit it.

>>9305846
LINK has a much much better chance of hitting $100. The ChainLink network will enable mainstream enterprise Smart Contracts and that is SO much bigger than Request

>>9305953
chainlink looks really interesting, and seems like the best way req will implement fiat to crypto, but the lack of updates/mainnet worries me. also chainlinks team seems so small for what they are trying to do.

>>9306006
Since you are a req bro...
Team isnt as small as it seems and the progress on pivotaltracker and github is phenomenal
The quality of code and ppl working on it is really something as well
They are ahead of schedule i think and mainnet is only a question of a few months i guess well see it before Q3
I doubt that link will make much down movements in the following months unless bitcoin is tanking hard
For the lack of updates
Its unusual if you are used to req which do a great job with keeping the community up to date without shilling bullshit like 90% of crypto
But the slack, gitter and github/pivotaltracker are a good indication what the project is doing and they have no reason to really market the product without mainnet especially via twitter

>>9306144
fuck it, ill buy some link and forget about it for a year. REQ/LINK portfolio is the only certified chadfolio

>>9306177
Does this mean I'm a Chad?

>>9307232

5k stinkies is the entry point for making it, so make something happen

>>9306177
Checked
>>9307232
In caps baby!

>>9307315
I've been slowly moving money into crypto without my wife knowing so if she ever tries to fuck me over, I'll have a backup. I'm doing everything I can.

>>9307360
>so if she ever tries to fuck me over, I'll have a backup
kinda sad to think about desu

>>9307371
Yeah, it's an awful thought, but the law is not on a man's side. As much as we think that everything is great, 50+ years of life left is a lot of time for things to go wrong.

>>9306177
>>9307232
Good stuff, going long on REQ is not a bad idea but having the majority in LINK in my opinion is best, if not all 100% LINK.

>>9307396
The law isnt on mans side indeed, I only have about 10K stinkies, but when im in lambo land im going to do my best to hide the extent of my wealth while finding love, fuck gold diggers.

>>9307315
The ever moving goal post

>>9305642
Pic looks more like dan larmier, get fucked linkie

I dumped LINK for ETH in hopes my ETH stack could supplement my future LINK stack. Why did it rise by 10% so fast???

>>9307812
Non believers sold

REQ failed because the French team is lazy (like all french)
Link is American and based

>>9307812
Thin order book no one in their right mind sells link. Tbf I did what you did. I just bought back in yesterday afternoon

>>9305642

If anything, this right here is a signal to sell LINK for REQ, sell when the hype is high and buy when the FUD is high.

I just sold of some of my LINK stack profits for WTC. Going to wait for the WTC bounce this week and rebuy into LINK and double my return

>>9305642
Sell low buy high, /biz/ meme edition.

>>9305889
Problem with total token burn is, whales are interested in keeping price the lowest possible the longest possible. Why? Because of the fixed USD rate. It's better if a transaction burns 3 REQ -currently 26 cents per token- (more or less $1) than burning 0.3 REQ if Req ever reaches $3...

That means, you might hold longer than expected. It has a nice risk/reward ratio in the long term, so it's up to you

>>9308286
i dont think whales would be able to supress the price if mass adoption occured.

>>9308345
Agreed, but while is under the radar, they supress it

>>9305740
nice

>>9308150
>hype for LINK is high right now

Literally no one knows about LINK, no hype except /biz/ and Corporate big wigs creaming at the savings the Network will bring. Also LINK only has 21K addresses, it’s so under the radar it’s funny.

>>9308392
i really hope link goes mainnet soon so req can use it
>>9308361
makes sense to me. as soon as we hit 30-31 cents massive sell walls go up.

>>9308055
Fucking French are the worst. They're lazy as fuck, and entitled like crazy. Nothing good comes from France. NOTHING.

>>9308605
Am french can confirm, french used to be hardworking and brave people until the middle of the 19th century approximately

Looks like REQies would’ve done well listening to OP when the thread posted, LINK is up and up while REQ remains stagnant with low volume

>>9308801
Yup Req is dead in the dirt. Another French failure.

>>9307360
Very smart thing to do. Go full stealth and buy bitcoin on local bit coins and then send to binance exchange.

>tfw OP was right

There is still time for REQtards to switch teams

Req will catch link within 2 days, it always has for the last 5 months.