/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9277818
Never. Kill yourself, linkjeet.

>>9277818
I have been studying the patterns in how LINK is bought, sold, fudded, and shilled on here along with when the LINK team actually does stuff, and I can with out a doubt say that mainnet comes in early August, although it will surpass 10k sats and $1 around mid to late June.

>>9277818
LINK doesn't have any partnerships or any use really. It won't go past $2.

>>9277870
August is a good guess for mainnet. They like to be early though

>>9277870

Nah, It'll pass $1 sometime between May 13th and May 16th.

Lmao. Who's going to partner with this mess?

>>9277911
Why will it double in a little more than a week? BTC's price is an effective ceiling on LINK's and LINK is a shitcoin anyway, but it doesn't have any hype to make it go up like other scams such as verge, tron, etc.

>>9277946
this

>>9277952

> doesn't have any hype

Wait until the 16th. Fresh round of press and partnerships coming out.

My data shows Link hitting $1 on 20th May at approx 10:04:32am EST

If it doesnt hit my mark its going down to 2cents rapidly.

>>9278005
>LARPing again
Will this ever end? Every week I see another LARP from you idiots. meanwhile LINK has been the worst performing coin in the top 100.

>>9278012
It will go down irregardless.

>>9278015
It's not a top 100 coin

>>9278030
Exactly. Of all the coins shilled regularly on here, LINK has gone up the least in every bull market and down the most in the bear market.

If you are all in link, sell now- buy into a solid project with short term growth potential- sell in 2 months time and buy 2 or 3 times more link than you had. Being all in at the moment makes no sense.

if they had partnerships they would have announced them already. this is not a coin for gains, simply an important project in crypto. dont confuse the two. this coin has been a horrible performer and will continue to be in the future. move on

>>9278015

Not LARPing, I just know how to find sources outside of /biz/ and piece together puzzles.

Hint: check the pivotal tracker. there's a reason they've only scheduled up to May 13th.

>>9278056
The coin value is shitting the bed. Other projects like IOTA are currently implementing their own oracles. No one needs link. Any potential partnership will be bombarded by haters link got from the daily mass flooding /biz/.

>>9277818
Sold all my link a few days ago on that small pump and was honestly shitting myself when testnet came out because I thought they might release some sort of update on the project. But, they didn't, and now I can just buy back at the same price in a few months.

Honestly it's a bit fucking stupid they can't even release some news for a testnet release. That is development, that's worthy of some 'news' (a fucking blog post is all is needed).

>>9278078
> there's a reason they've only scheduled up to May 13th.
That's when Sergey goes on a nice long summer holiday. They've been working solidly for 6 months now.

>>9278106
its a fucking disgrace frankly that they dont update thier users, and its absolutely pathetic that link cultists defend their actions

what are you buying into in the meantime? i have 70k i want to dump now but dont know what to re enter in the short term.

>>9278116

On holiday to New York ;)

>>9278121

> its a fucking disgrace frankly that they dont update thier users

you're not their "user" brainlet. the project won't succeed or fail based on Twitter updates. they're delivering code which is more than can be said for the overwhelming majority of crypto projects.

>>9278129
I like the way you think anon

>>9278078
Ok, let's check back on May 16 and see if anything has been released regarding LINK. Protip: Nothing will be released.

>>9278195

Protip: prepare your anus.

>>9278149
how thick do you have to be to understand i dont give a shit about the project, i care about making money, which i am not doing by continuing to hold chainlink. hype is all that matters in crypto

>>9278202
Please provide proof of your claims beyond a date on a pivotal tracker.

>>9278202
see, this is the sort of cope im talking about. you have NOTHING substantial, and cling on to smallest hope.

>>9278203

Spoken like a microcapped poorfag who needs to jump between projects like an ADHD spaz hoping for a payout. You'll stay poor buying FOMO and selling FUD. Enjoy your losses. Sell your stack right now and you'll see what I mean.

Your hands are made of paper anon.

>>9278233
lol fuck off you coping cunt. ive been holding since ico. ive also been holding WAN since ICO and thank god because it saved my portfolio. you dont realise how delusional you are, i feel sorry for you.

>>9278215

Here's another date. Notice a pattern?

>>9278293
Yes, I know about Consensus, LINK isn't on there.

>>9278293
That's when you get your asshole bleached?

>>9278304

You're right, they're not. But a few of their partners this shithole doesn't know about yet are.

All I'll say for now is that it pays to be a developer and have friends in high places.

>>9278078
Dude nothing’s gonna happen their pivotal tracker just happens to take it one month at a time.

>>9278339
>All I'll say for now is that it pays to be a developer and have friends in high places.
larping as usual, post one with a tripcode so we can make fun of you on the 17th.

>>9278056
>if they had partnerships they would have announced them already
This isn't VEN, you stupid faggot.

>>9278339
wow, you really are fucking deluded.

>>9278339
Post a TRIP
I actually like the LARPs

>>9278366
this isn't a coin thats had enormous gains? i know

>>9278358

fuck tripcodes. just scrot the thread and post it on the 17th. I'll make sure I'm around to gloat.

also thanks for all the cheap LINK today you weak handed lemmings.

>>9278379
If you had bought ONLY hypecoins you would've made a lot of money provided you dumped at the right time.

>>9278389
I only buy hypecoins, no one cares about "fundamentals" because crypto is fundamentally a scam, the idea is to ride it and then sell before its all over.

>>9278401
Bruh you missed it. If it's a scam, you should have sold in December 2017. But it's not a scam and you know that. That's why you still have a position.

>>9278203
Then dont buy link. Nobody gives a fuck about you.

>>9278369
>>9278389
I'm on board with this larp too. Might pick up a few more stinkies if they go on sale this week.

>>9278432
i dumped on dec. 18 because futures opened on that day, and i started buying scamcoins again in february. got justed by the march crash but oh well, so didn't everyone, especially stinkers. the scam has a few more years left.

>>9278401

> I only buy hypecoins

grats. you would have never bought ETH at 50 cents or BTC at $1. you're also statistically likely to lose all your gains to gamblers ruin chasing FOMO around like a brainlet.

I fortunately am not you anon. I remember when BTC was only talked about on /g/. I remember the DAO and how sketch it seemed. I remember Ethereum as a whitepaper. I remember Gox. I remember it all because I have the patience to stick it out, and since I'm not a microcapped pajeet I can easily afford to squat and accumulate more of the coins worth squatting on.

I'm already living in lambo land. What have you managed to do with your gains so far anon?

>>9278203
Then sell faggot

>>9278389
Take a screenshot of one of these replies that day (You) in it. Setting my calendar for the 17th now, then.

>>9278443
>>9278486
classic cultist cope

>>9278470
you could've made more money in 2017 buying jewish scams like ripple

>>9278470
>he had BTC in 2009 and ETH in 2013
then you should already have 100m-1b net worth or more so why keep posting here?

>>9278487

Done. scrotted up to your comment.

>>9278493

To make more money off lemmings. At this point its just a game to me and I'm going for the high score.

>>9278121
Its due to SEC’s ICO clampdown that they dont want to promote at this stage Only after the product is ready When the tiken can be utlized for applications.

>>9278511
>to make more money off lemmings
>shilling LINK
checks out, show 1m LINK or GTFO

^^ token*

Link is a super long term hold. Sergey is a person with high morals and integrity. It shows in his work. This project is being built to last for ages. Slow and steady wins the race and patience is the greatest virtue.

>>9278528

kek as soon as I posted that I knew people would think I'm fucking with them now. usually I FUD LINK but everyone's spinning out because they don't understand software development cycles and assumed Friday was their rocket. it was never going to be a rocket. decided to switch it up tonight and seed some optimism/remind people they were deluding themselves last week but that isn't a good reason to sell when its cheap.

just think of it this way... if you're selling because the rocket didn't come, did Sergey promise you a rocket was coming, or did you delude yourself and now you're just disappointed your timeline didn't come true?

>>9278572
i never bought LINK and never will. where is the hype? you could've made more money on chink scams (ven, tron, neo (still does not work, ICOs crash its network lel) and jew scams (ripple). EOS is another likely scam which has done about 3x in a month. i need to get into holochain too since that seems to be the latest scam coin.

>>9278572
Sergey posted some tweets of him in the microsoft office so everyone went nuts.

>>9278594
Same here dude. My 50% portfolio is LINK and all the scam coins are mooning. It makes me feel bad to hold this coin so long but then i look forward to the future that chainlink is creating and your only chance to be part of that future.

>>9278022
>irregardless

>>9278629
It means without regard, pajeet.

>>9278627
>network of decentralized oracles
>everyone just uses centralized oracles anyway
stinkers btfo

>>9278665
It is literally, unironically not a word. If it was it would be a double negative just like your portfolio Ranjeet. Now do a 360 and walk away

>>9278665
Irregardless is not a word you fucking mongoloid.

>>9278701
>>9278718
Irregardless.

>>9278718
Imagine calling someone a mongoloid, while being so wrong at the same time, yikes.

My LINK bag is getting heavier day by day. What to do biz.

>>9278870
Regardless means without regard, irregadless is a double negative. Anyone who uses that word is fucking inbred

>>9278701
kek

>>9278470
Yeah. Tell him anon.

I warned you guys last Friday with two posts; both basically saying there’s no reason why LINK’s price should go up until it’s completed. I expected this dump, and it doesn’t hurt as bad when you know it’s coming. I’m also waiting for ETH to dump. Heck, this might even be your last chance to accumulate before Mainnet.

>>9278005
This is actually getting boring now

>>9279867
wait were you the guy that constantly posted "dont buy before 6th may" L. ?

Link won't announce their partnerships. Their partners will. They made a strong statement about it.

Bless Sergay

>>9278203
>buy high, sell lowith
never change

>>9280343
No I didn’t
That’s crazy tho someone actually predicted today? I wonder how low we’ll go.

>>9280380
well if that dude implied to buy ON the 6th and if he is right then the price should go up in a few hours

>>9277818
Never, they don't announce anything unless the other party wants to.

>>9278078
Imagine being this dumb.

>>9278149
>he thinks link bagholders are in it for the tech
Don't fool yourself retard, there's a reason why everybody spams $1000, they don't even understand the tech. If you could sell for $50 right now, I bet every bagholder would get out right now and never look back.

>>9278470
Ethereum was always a Top 5 coin, you weren't buying some underdog project if you were buying cheap ETH. People who compare this crap to ETH deserve to lose everything.

>>9279867
I agree, there's no reason the price should go up right now. I expect mainnet by September and steady climb of price when/if companies start announcing they are using chain link.

>>9278701
Fucking faggot, 360 is in the same spot, 180 to go to the opossite direction.

>>9277818
>>9277837
>>9277870
>>9277873
>>9277946

We won’t know anything for sure until mainnet. Sergey knows that under the hostile SEC regulatory apparatus that he must maintain the idea that LINK is a decentralised utility token and not a security and once it has utility they can promote chainlink, but not before that, or it jeopardises the whole project

>>9280427
Link's always been a top 5 coin too, the price just doesn't reflect that yet.

>>9280626
D E L U S I O N

>>9280626
That doesn't help at all and that's not what they're doing. This whole SEC argument is something that bagholders made up to defend the team.

If ETH is a security so is every token. Even if ETH isn't, you have an official team behind the project that holds 65% of the supply, that's a security based on how things stand right now.

Guys I’m scared
What happens if September comes and Mainnet doesn’t deliver?

>>9280427

> Ethereum was always a Top 5 coin, you weren't buying some underdog project if you were buying cheap ETH. People who compare this crap to ETH deserve to lose everything.

You clearly weren't around then because no, that's not even remotely true.

>>9280712
What rank was ETH then?

>>9280712
Ethereum has been on CMC since 8/2015. Give me one historic snapshot of CMC that shows it wasn't a top coin.

>>9280771
You're missing his point entirely. Alts didn't exist back then. Bitcoin was the only crypto to 99.999% of people. If you bought an alt you were retarded.

>>9280738

It hung around 4th place for a long time, but keep in mind this is when DOGE was a top 5 coin so ranks != quality of the project in that era of crypto.

I'm not saying it wasn't a top 5 coin at launch, I'm saying it wasn't a guaranteed success of a project (because ranks had very little to do with the project's quality in the era of novelty coins). Most people in the blockchain space (like actual developers/cryptologists) had nothing but bad shit to say about the project because of Vitalik's design decisions for it and the fact that he's been promising side chains to deal with complaints about its architecture since it was still just a whitepaper. Most of /g/ shit on it and found it to be a novelty (which it still is) with FUD that looked very similar to LINK FUD. The technical limitations of Ethereum still exist, are still not dealt with, and frankly Ethereum is STILL not a guaranteed successful project because Vitalik's been resting on his laurels and is about to get lapped by any number of competing chains (NEO, Ziquila, Matrix, etc). It also has no cap on the supply of ETH, which in and of itself makes it impossible to claim it wasn't an underdog since you had no way to know how many coins would end up in circulation. It hasn't succeeded yet, so clearly it wasn't a guaranteed success.

The main reasons ETH exploded last year are a) the BTC bullrun lifted the whole market, and b) Vitalik is a fame whore who's managed to get in the faces of every crypto project at a time when there were no competing platform chains. But its all going to become meaningless quick if competing chains launch while he's still not bothered to deal with scalability issues. He says maybe later this year. I've heard the same thing for years though so I'll believe it when I see it.

>>9280783

This. You can tell who's been in the game for years and who just jumped in last year by how they talk about Ethereum/Vitalik. That was an entirely different world of crypto back then. If you were buying alts you were a degenerate gambler, not an investor. There was no guaranteed successes because everything, including Ethereum, was just a novelty experimental project.

That said I managed to make a killing off ETH, but I had to suppress every bit of advice I got from cryptologists and just take the dive and trust that sometimes simply handing developers new tools, even shitty tools, can manage to attract enough developers to get the adoption needed to stick around for at least a while. Its the same situation with LINK. All the FUD says sell, but I'm sticking with what I know as a developer, sticking to what I know as someone who's been in this game for years, and leaning on friends I've made in the space for inside scoops to confirm partnership suspicions before they're publicly made.

>>9278078
You know they add regularly tasks from the "Icebox", right? Thomas / vornth said on Friday they are JUST beginning to get prepared for testing network on Ropsten... It's minimum 2-5 months till mainnet IF everything goes well

>>9278116
>>9278129
>>9278173
You're implying that Sergey will announce something at Consensus which will be held in NY, May 14th-16th
https://www.coindesk.com/events/consensus-2018/

Protip: there will be no fucking announcement of anything. With LINK there is only disappointment. They may not even announce mainnet.

>>9280704
it wont. chainlink holders will be the most bitter people in crypto once mainnet launches at link is still between 30 cents and a dollar. this is the biggest steaming pile of shit in crypto

and no, fuck off, chainlink is nothing like ETH in its infancy. eth ico holders were on the moon after 7 months of the ico

>>9280975

>vornth said on Friday they are JUST beginning to get prepared for testing network on Ropsten

Go back to Plebbit.

Also I know they were just starting to get the release ready Friday. That's what I said. That getting the instance running on Ropsten was never the actual testnet release, just one of the tasks needed to get to it. We'll have the official release of the testnet soon though which will include an announcement, and it'll happen just in time for some partnership news coming out of Consensus (from the partner, not the team since that's generally how they do things).

>>9281005
>and it'll happen just in time for some partnership news coming out of Consensus (from the partner, not the team since that's generally how they do things).

the single most deluded poster on biz. top kek

>>9280976

I never implied Sergey will announce anything. Learn how to read. And then read the whitepaper.

>>9280977
I know you're probably deep in link but I really hope you actually believe what you're writing, and stay out of this coin in perpetuity.

Wanna hear the ugly truth?

Here it comes: "partnerships" are already priced in.
Everyone already knows about Chainlink and their ties to Sony, AXA, Swift, ...
It does not get any better than this, and this information has been out there for many months now.

So what's going to happen when mainnet hits and all those partnership rumors are "confirmed"?
Massive MASSIVE price dump.

>>9280427
pic related

>>9281021

It must hurt whenever you try to think. Like its got to feel like the equivalent of some scrawny dude trying to bench press 500lbs whenever you find yourself having to form a thought. Your brain must practically melt from the overload.

>>9281020
>i- hope your not holding any links! you'll miss out!

kek, cope

>>9281021
legit

>>9281021
Don’t you mean pump?

>>9281034

This guy remembers. Anyone claiming Ethereum was a sure thing is outing themselves as a newfag.

>>9280960
https://youtu.be/aJxrX42WcjQ

>>9281034
eth holders were already well over 10x their initial investment after 7 months, top kek at your delusion

>>9281046
Why would it pump?
The partnership rumors have been out there for over half a year, more than enough for everyone to buy in.

>>9281060
Apples to oranges. Stop comparing LINK and ETH.

>>9281035

>>9281065
Once it’s confirmed that’s when the normies buy in. Imagine seeing brands you’re used to and follow, everywhere, at the same time mention chainlink. We’ve been piecing it together out of the ether, so the conclusion is tenuous.

>>9281075
>Once it’s confirmed that’s when the normies buy in.
No.
All major current holders are going to dump on the news long before any normies get a whiff of this.
And by the time they do get a whiff of it, Link will already have dumped so hard they won't touch it.

>>9281060

>>9281065

Bud, you have no clue how many partners they have. You name dropped Sony, AXA, and SWIFT... welcome to November 2017. Great quality research. Everyone, make sure you listen to this guy. He clearly knows what he's talking about.

I've got a list of 17 confirmed partners I've not once seen shilled here. Partners confirmed by people who work for or with the companies.

The reason people don't jack up the price even though they know SWIFT is a partner is because everyone knows SWIFT's projects won'e be live until 2020. The other 17 partners are pursuing their DLT projects far more aggressively and will launch at or shortly after mainnet though. Anyone expecting the price to dump at mainnet is truly just too stupid to function.

I'll leave you with one hint about one partner. Sony and AXA have both worked with them before, as have numerous other fortune 500 companies.

>>9281130
>You name dropped Sony, AXA, and SWIFT... welcome to November 2017
These are some of the biggest possible partners any one company can have, let alone a fucking startup.

If these three names alone aren't enough to spark massive (and I mean MASSIVE) speculation, then this thing simply will not get off the ground, ever.
No matter how many other names you add to those three.

>>9281130
whats your price predictions

>>9281155

Again, your brain must constantly be hurting. I can't imagine what being this stupid must feel like.

Just sit back and watch the big boys make money pajeet. You're clearly a lost cause.

>>9281013
So there will be more of "muh dots" to connect because of "Muh top secret partners under NDA". What the fuck do you think will happen at concensus? Sergey won't even fucking be there. Sage.

>>9281157

Depends on if any of the partners on my list have to delay or can stick to their timelines.

A boring/avg year for LINK = $25 EOY.

A strong showing from at least 1/4 of the partners I've confirmed = $50 EOY

A strong showing from at least 1/2 of the partners I've confirmed = $100 EOY

$1000 EOY is just a meme gents.

>>9281130
So, let me get this straight, let's suppose I believe your information is absolutely true. You are a burger developer and have some colleagues in top positions. That's credible. Could you throw some breadcrumbs to follow? What do you think is reasonable to expect during May? And I mean news, announcements, medium posts which is more valuable for me than price predictions

>>9281130
such a fucking autistic larper. so sick of you cultists. sage and report

>>9281193
nice FUD

>>9281170
There's even a perfect precedent for what I'm saying;
remember the day of SIBOS itself? Suddenly, out of the fucking blue, there was an announcement that five major banks were also going to be involved in Chainlink's demo: Santander, Societe Generale, Barclays, BNP Paribas, and Fidelity.

And what happened?
The price went from 40 to 50 cents, immediately crashed back, and then kept tanking to a price of 12 cents over the next weeks.

And the only reason Chainlink recovered after that, is because of a crazy general crypto bull run which it simply followed.

>>9281185

He doesn't need to be there. Chainlink doesn't treat its partnerships as partnerships. These "partners" are SmartContract's clients, and they leave it up to the clients to make any releases about working with Chainlink.

As to what's going to happen, you're going to get two of these partners showing off their services to sell to the execs at the event, and those services will offer/lean on Chainlink as part of their pitches (at this point being able to offer Chainlink integrations is a huge unique value prop for the kinds of companies we'll see come forward). Its why they want a proper release of the testnet to happen by the 13th. So its ready in time for their partners to start selling it.

>>9281240

Not all events are created equal. SIBOS was never going to rocket the price and anyone who thought it was is a pajeet. SIBOS is an event for bankers to come to, drink, and then report back to their bosses they saw some cool new tech. Consensus is an event for corporate execs looking to be sold on new tech. These guys are way closer to releasing their DLT projects than banks are, and we're talking partnerships that aren't known about, vs SIBOS which was just the SWIFT partnership everyone already did know about.

Apples and oranges. Some critical thinking skills go a long way.

What is the probability of 10k LINK being able to stake $10k/year sometime next year?

>>9281312
>SIBOS was never going to rocket the price
... he says with perfect hindsight.
You'll be saying the same thing about the partnership confirmations after main net.

SIBOS was supposed to explode Chainlink in the faces of normies around the world, just like what you think is going to happen after main net.

>>9281327
exactly this.

>>9281323
Staking is a meme unless you want to actually start a business as an oracle.

Just put it into an income-generating ETF that puts out monthly payments.

>>9281193

I will remember you, anon. keep a screencap if you don’t want a trip, or post the sha256 digest of a message saying “I was right lol + [entropy]” that you can reveal the plaintext of later.

>>9281337
theres such a thing as income generating ETF's?
Tell me more

>>9281207

You'll only get 1 announcement from the team in May, and it will be the official testnet release announcement. It won't include a timeline for mainnet, but will manage to pickup some additional press and will be followed with an uptick in trade volume.

You'll also have 2 partners at Consensus shopping Chainlink around. 1 of them may go onto make a proper announcement about being partnered with the project, but I doubt the other one will (they don't really need to either, they have more than enough clients to shop sales pitches to and wouldn't gain much by making a big deal about it online since they've already got close relationships with the clients who'd want Chainlink so they'll just reach out to them/already have reached out to others).

Tbh, I don't know how much of this is going to end up bubbling into news since its going to be largely handled through booths and networking at the event, not from a podium. I do hope the 1 company plans to make a proper announcement during the event though since it'll be enough to send the price above $1 on its own easily.

>>9281345
Yeah, there's a few of them. Mostly targeted at retirees wanting to keep some cashflow.

Here's an example, Google around with similar terms to find equivalents for your region.
https://www.vanguardinvestments.com.au/adviser/adv/investments/product.html#/fundDetail/wholesale/portId=8155/assetCode=balanced/?overview

>>9281327

I didn't just say it with perfect hindsight, I perfectly flipped that pre-SIBOS spike and bought back in at 13 cents.

>>9278039
This is mostly true
Same with req
It barely ever gets pumped
And 1 week of pumping gets destroyed in 4 to 5 hours usually

Fuck these 2, I wonder why I still have them

>>9281406

You know what acted the same?

Antshares.

>>9281406
aside from WAN idk what else to hold. ive dumped my link already, but dont know what to re enter into

>>9281373
if you were actually a developer who knew anything about chainlink, you'd know this isn't even really a testnet since the reputation and aggregation contracts don't exist and thomas confirmed they haven't even started. It's just a single node deployed on the testnet, not the chainlink network.

>>9281378
youre saying I invest in this managed fund and get 6.72% annual return on average?

is that what you are telling me?

>>9281434

Dude... learn to read.

I've said multiple times now I know this currently isn't the testnet release... this board had themselves whipped up into a frenzy thinking Friday was going to be the release, but it was just getting a node instance running on Ropsten.

I've literally said everything you just said already. Twice.

Also I don't know if you've ever worked with Solidity, but a) its easy af, and b) the Chainlink team are killing it so far. I have no doubts they're still on schedule to officially make their release ahead of Consensus. They've likely already got the models defined on paper/whiteboard/text editor and just need to hack out the code. That's a relatively simple task once you've figured out the mental models, especially with Solidity.

>>9281440

What's the point? You can make that in a day in crypto and we're heading for a recession/depression.

Anyone who's still got money in traditional finance is going to get burned harder than BitConnect holders within 18 months.

>>9281440
Apparently.
That's less than you'd be getting on average with a regular index fund, but if you want to put your link millions to use generating cashflow then those ETFs aren't bad. Probably a good idea putting some of it in other cashflow-generating investments too, like real estate.

>>9281490
>>9281476
finance is fucking wonderful

>>9281060
there was literally only btc, the space has developed into a hype train beast currently. That will correct itself as shitcoins get beat out by real value.

pick pennies in front of the steamroller if you're a big boi, nobody cares and more power if you make it.

>>9281193
I want to believe this so badly

>>9281337
I don't want to sell my LINK. I want it to generate income that I can live off, while waiting for the ultimate moon mission.
>>9281378
>Initial investment: $500,000
>implying I would care about anything anymore if my 10k stinkers were worth $500k
If I wanted some cuckold ETF, I'd buy s&p 500 or ideally built my own portfolio. Stock market is overpriced as fuck, not touching it before at least a 30% correction.

>>9281193
its not happening man. i genuinely feel so sorry for a lot of you, i know you have a lot riding on this. i wish we could all make it, buts its clear most wont

>>9281543

Well its painfully obvious you won't. You've done nothing but spit out old FUD from November, and I actually believe you when you said you believed SIBOS was going to rocket the price. Of course you believed that.

You're the kind of person who's made me very, very well off. Thank you for being a lemming who's only window into the world is /biz/. Its people like you that allow people like me to make it.

>>9281543
>17 posts by this ID
hmmm

>>9281535
>I want it to generate income
this. it could drop below my buy in price and i wouldnt even bat an eye

>>9281563
>and I actually believe you when you said you believed SIBOS was going to rocket the price. Of course you believed that.


that wasn't even me you larping autist. god your such a dislikable cunt. btw anyone who has 'made it' doesnt spend time in this shithole and certainly doesnt have 32 posts on some shitcoin thread on a weekend lol. kill yourself, seriously

>>9281386
So stop trolling people into thinking it's going to be any different after main net partnership announcements.

>>9281570

Just read through his posts too. And he has the balls to say other people aren't going to make it kek

Sold LINK in a trough when all indicators show its oversold. Thinks he's a Chainlink "user" who should be coddled by the team. His only other holding is WAN, which I'm going to assume he probably picked up on May 3rd...

Real pro we got here lads.

its actually starting to get worried about how many deluded linkies there are.. and to the extent that they are deluded. people have their life savings in this shit. im not sure biz is going to be able to recover from link being 30 cents eoy

>>9281578

Again. Apples and oranges.

Logic isn't your strong suit. When did you even get into this game? Last year?

GUYS THIS IS EMBARASSING FUD
CAN YOU PLZ PUT A LITTLE MORE EFFORT INTO IT
I CANT EVEN ASSUME IT MIGHT BE LEGIT AT THIS POINT
FUCK
WE ALL WANNA ACCUMULATE SO FUCKING STEP UP YOUR GAME

>>9281608
i bought 12k WAN at ico and thank god because if i was just holding my link stack my portfolio would be fucked

>>9281573

Sorry about that, all you pajeets look alike to me.

>>9281617
>34 posts by this ID

>>9281619

Of course it would be. I would expect nothing more from a portfolio you managed after this thread.

Always remember: buy high, sell low.

>>9277911
>when you know

>>9281193
>$1000 EOY is just a meme gents.
Do you think it could get to $1000 eventually? maybe 5 years or smthing?

>>9281373
Fuck off larp

>>9281617
>Apples and oranges.
If you say so.

>>9281674

Oh it will for sure be $1000 eventually. I'd suspect 2020 is a fair bet for that.

Most projects built on Chainlink's network won't launch until 2019, but we'll start getting a taste of the ICOs planning to jump on board this year. By 2020 that fist cohort will have been running for a year just in time for SWIFT's DLT projects to start coming online.

Not to mention PSD2 is going to moonshot LINK on its own once banks have become compliant and can start to lean into blockchain integrations. PSD2 has already started but it'll also be more a 2019 thing for crypto than a 2018 thing.

>>9281060
But im like almost 5x my investment??

>>9281768

Ya I dunno what this guy's on about. I'm also 5x on LINK.

If you're losing money on LINK it says a lot more about your trading skills than it does about LINK. Also says a lot about the size of your stack and how its weighted if you're so locked down you're forced to sell a coin at a low in order to chase another moonshot you just read about on /biz/.

Here's an investment tip for you /biz/: cash out some crypto and buy some goddamn ritalin.

This coin has become the biggest legit memecoin out of /biz/.
Nobody can fud it because that would be taking the bait.
I don't even know who is serious anymore. At least people were serious 6 months ago.
Now it's just meming.

>>9279867
>this is your last chance to accumulate before mainnet

kek, been hearing the exact same shit every day for 8 months while hundreds of other coins have done a 100-500x. so delusional.

>>9282193
houndreds of coins have done a 100x-500x?

>>9279669
thank you jeez

>>9278665
No, that’s what regardless means. The extra letters you added in - because you’re a spaz - mean nothing at all.

>>9280585
>tfw can't tell if you're a troll or absolute newfag mongoloid brainlet

>>9280585
Kill yourself newfag

>>9278293
>>9278339

>>9278203
>Me no want think
>Me want MONEY!
Great strategy, good luck out there

>>9283095
nice cope, good luck out there

>>9278379
Link went over 13x since ICO, pretty decent gains if you ask me

>>9283127
and what is it now?

>>9278682
Holy shit dude call SWIFT, they have a multi year PoC they can throw out the window now that you said that!

>>9277818
Havent they said they wont? That their partners are free to announce that they're working with link but link wont announce who they're working with?

>>9283134
X5

>>9278339
Been in Link since the ICO. Quit this stupid fucking larping or I'll beat you to death with a red dildo. Fucking mongrel you dont know shit just like everyone who came before you.

CZ CEO of Binance in the ChainLink slack

>>9283396
Remember, Binance wants to create their dex this year. Chainlink can fit in there.

>>9283396
LINK confirmed for binance?

HOLY SHIT

>>9283434
Huge if big

>>9283434
top kek

>>9283434
>get my linkies stolen
>Link gets listed on Binance the very next day
>have to buy back in at a large premium compared to the day before

thx 4 reminding me

>>9283396
delet this sir

>>9279669
Without irregard

>>9277818
How does NXT have a higher market cap than LINK when nxt has been abandoned

>>9281816
This absolutely. Top kek.

>>9281260
>These "partners" are SmartContract's clients, and they leave it up to the clients to make any releases about working with Chainlink.
I was skeptical up until this. I believe you. It all finally makes sense. Thank you for helping a brainlet. All in with 15k LINK.

>>9280626
You're a MANIAC!