/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9278846
Seriously, fuck this guy and all his shady BS. All Bcash is good for is riding the pumps to increase your BTC stack. People who think bcash is going to take over are delusional.

>>9278920
stay mad corecuck

I'm Roger Ver, long time Bitcoin advocate and investor. Today I'm at the Mt. Gox World Headquarters in Tokyo, Japan. I had a nice chat with Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpeles about their current situation. He showed me multiple bank statements, as well as letters from banks and lawyers. I am sure that all the current withdrawal problems at Mt. Gox are being caused by the traditional banking system, not because of a lack of liquidity at Mt. Gox.

The traditional banking partners that Mt. Gox needs to work with are not able to keep up with the demands of the growing Bitcoin economy. The dozens of people who make up the Mt. Gox team are hard at work establishing additional banking partners that eventually will make dealing with Mt. Gox easier for all their customers around the world. For now, I hope everyone will continue working on Bitcoin projects that will help make the world a better place.

Jul 17, 2013

>>9278846
>>9278920
>Doesn't that durn Donald Drum-- I mean Roger Jihan CSW Ver just rustle your jimmies, fellow non-deplorable crypto enthusiasts? There's no way people like _this_ can win... r-right guys?

>>9278960
>Trying to somehow shoehorn the Gox collapse into an indictment of Bitcoin Cash.
I'm sure this narrative will start working for you guys any day now, corecuck.

>mfw 30yo boomer
>mfw i invested in the mtg cryptodream
>mfw RL cards are in a giant bullmarket rn
>mfw it never ends
>mfw i'm alrdy +500% in gainz since january

>feelsgoodman

Why didn't you invested in RL alrdy guys?

>>9279011
i also call literally everyone who disagrees with me corecuck
i find it's really a great way to get them to see the wisdom in my arguments.

>>9279172
>"Arguments"

>>9279214
were you not trying to make an argument?

>>9279238
I'm sure someone here would love to engage you in an argument, if you had one to offer.

>>9279279
>>9279214
>>9279011
>>9278993
Gas yourself.

>>9279279
ok pajeet, i guess english ins't your first language is it?

Reminder:
http://archive.is/bf1Ye

Accusing your enemy of that which you are guilty

>>9279431
>http://archive.is/bf1Ye
You'd have to be retarded to take what Adam said here literally.

>>9279447

>>9279469
Its obviously a metaphor. And its ironic you would accuse me of shilling (as the OP)
>Accusing your enemy of that which you are guilty
Right, you first.

>>9279469
kek

Lol how ironic that core CEO is ON RECORD saying he pays teams to "educate" people on segwit...

>>9279564
He isn't the CEO and he never said that. You're just another lying cunt.

>>9279483
>>9279589
To actually believe this you have to forget that Adam is a bumbling idiot who doesn't think before he comunicates (remember fucking tabs?)

Also:
https://twitter.com/adam3us?lang=en
>Co-Founder/CEO https://blockstream.com

>>9279618
>blockstream is core

>>9279483
>muh real bitcoin
>muh satoshis vision
>muh paid shills

>>9279415
Mmmm, delicious salt.
>>9279417
>Accuses obvious native speaker using colloquialisms of being streetshitter
>Can't even type properly
Pic related

>>9278846

corecucks BTFO

>>9279732
>making a memetic but factually inaccurate image to trick people.
>>9279730
Whatever you are racially, you're fucking trash.

>>9279589

Salty lying corecuck

>>9279431
>it is a metric, but I think that misses the bearer nature. run your own fullnode, keep your own keys, and the world can burn or go insane and you still have your bearer asset as sure as if it was a gold brick in a safe.
Top kek. I must have missed this one. Adam Back, ladies and gentlemen:
>"As long as you run a full node and keep your keys, you can contravene the miners."
FUCKING LOL
Pic related is Adam whenever he opens his mouth and talks about anything remotely outside his very narrow specialty.

>>9279633
Try to get a pull request that goes against Blockstreams vision merged into Bitcoin Core, never gonna happen, they're effectivally one and the same and you need some serious mental gymnastics not to see that.

>>9279794
51 non-core merges have already taken place this year.

>>9279794
>pull request that goes against Blockstreams vision

>>9279809
>51 non-core merges

Not even close to the point

>>9279751
Ahahahaha. You got an argument there, somewhere buddy?
>Pajeet
>Trash
>????
You realize that oozing salt and desperation is just hurting your cripplecoin, right?
>>9279809
Non-sequitur of the year right here, folks.

>>9279815
Oh? I missed the point when I totally wrecked your argument?

>>9279828
>folks
Who do you think is reading this thread? Its just us 3.

>>9279829
You're either a paid shill or you stole your carers phone again after you broke yours drooling on it.

>>9279836
>Nuh-uh I had up a deflection proof shield!

>>9279829
Woosh
>>9279831
>Dosn't even understand the 1, 10, 100% rule of message boards.
I love it when outsiders try and pretend that they are from here. Whoever is paying you to be here made a very bad investment.

BCASHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>>9279843
How many of those 51 merges fly in the face of Blockstreams vision?

>>9279852
>I know every detail of this rock I live under

>>9279858
No BlockStream employees have commit/merge powers.

>>9279858
https://medium.com/@whalecalls/fud-or-fact-blockstream-inc-is-the-main-force-behind-bitcoin-and-taken-over-160aed93c003

>>9279868
>How many of those 51 merges fly in the face of Blockstreams vision?

>>9279889
Ok first define their 'vision'

>>9279916
There is zero point in anyone taking part in the blocksize debate anymore. No one is changing their positions.

Pick your side, stick to it, and let's see who comes out on top.

>>9279860
>The chans are a rock full of evil trolls!
Spoken like a true newfag / shillfag.
>>9279868
Yeah, cause they all left or are not really employees, just "contractors."
>Attempt to access blockstream team page
>4 0 4 not found
Top kek.

>>9279937
Ok. I chose BTC the non-retarded version with all the adoption, and better security, and a larger base of compiled proof of work, and a higher price, and the original ticker, and virtually all the development, and almost a 10 year track record, and you get the picture...

Its more or less true that its worthless to argue about this anymore, but thats exactly what a shill who was trying to monopolize discourse would want/say. So fuck you, I will keep making these threads until BCH dies.

>>9279868
Sipa was still co-founder of Blockstream last I checked
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commits?author=sipa

>>9279882
Hey look I can throw biased conjecture around too
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/7lio87/debunking_blockstream_is_3_or_4_developers_out_of/

>>9279916
I'm not inventing the universe to show you a fucking apple pie.

>>9279941
>Attempt to access blockstream team page
>4 0 4 not found
Thank god for archives https://web.archive.org/web/20180107004140/blockstream.com/team

>>9279992
>I'm not inventing the universe to show you a fucking apple pie
Translation: "I'm a lazy cunt, why can't people just take my side even when I am too lazy to defend it myself?"

>>9279983
>I will keep making these threads until BCH dies.

>But not until BTG or BCD dies. I don't care about those because they are not a threat to my fantasy of Bitcoin Core maximalism.
Really makes you think.
Also:
>all the adoption
"Yes, let's just ignore all the merchants and services that have dropped Bitcoin Core out of frustration."
My fucking sides.

>>9280030
your fucking sides what?

>>9280013
If it wasn't true there would of been no reason for Bitcoin XT, Classic or Unlimited to fork.

>>9280043
And this guy calls me pajeet.
Ya lost, kid. Go home.

>>9280047
except the obvious financial gain, covert asicboost, opportunity to destabilize the entire cryptoeconomy for financial gain, and lets be honest, a difference of opinion.

>>9280058
>And this guy calls me pajeet
actually I think you will find that I never did that.
>that feel when my sides reach orbit when an oldfag who lives under the 4chan rock cant recognize even the most basic of troll

>>9280064
I'm talking about legacy forks of Bitcoin Core for BTC, not the BCH fork sweetie. Are you sure it's not past your bedtime?

>>9280082
If the software has the same consensus rules its not a bitcoin fork, its a software fork, and if so who cares?

>>9280091
>Try to get a pull request that goes against Blockstreams vision merged into Bitcoin Core

>If it wasn't true there would of been no reason for Bitcoin XT, Classic or Unlimited to fork.

>>9280103
>If the software has the same consensus rules its not a bitcoin fork
>who cares?

>>9280110
People trying to get pulls that upset Blockstream merged

>>9280121
Such as?

>>9280064
>Let me just throw out a bunch of unsubstantiated word salad that has nothing to do with the discussion. Then, just to sweeten the deal, I'll imply that bitcoin is so weak that a few conspiratorial actors could easily hurt it, so I must defend cripplecoin on a shitty message board.
>>9280121
It's admirable that you're still trying to engage this guy, but it is clear that he is either clueless or doing the Dr. Back semantics shuffle to try and get out of the discussion in a cloud of confusion. Really is amazing how intellectually shameless some people are.

>>9279983

ahahaa you can make them till the end of time or until Blockstream stops paying you, rajeet.

The fact of the matter is Bitcoin (BCH) is not going away no matter how many spammy non-arguments you shit up the world with.

>>9280146
>>9280141
taste my garlic you vampires

>>9280166
Look at those delicious hubs and spokes. Decentralicious.

>>9280166

Some of us aren't paid to be here, we come and go, Sanjit.

>>9280192
1. pick a name you fucking cretin. For the record my name is Cole
2. I do this because I hate you, not because I get anything for it.
>>9280190
whoops, that one is out of date

>>9280166
>Total capacity: 30k USD
>TFW you have to make an on-chain transaction to your 100% up-time hot-wallet node to get paid for anything under 3 dollars, and you better hope that you don't sell more than 10,000 units.
This is rapidly turning from mildly amusing to just embarrassing. You have strayed way too far away from your /r/bitcoin hugbox, brainlet.

>>9280212
"Now with bigger hubs!"

>>9280214
>brand new protocol
>still has more nodes and transactions than BCH
>>9280220
"I AM LEGALLY BLIND"

>>9280212

Cole is a faggots name, not an indian name, pajesh

I do this because I enjoy triggering corecucks and also because I feel I need to counter the corecuck/paid shill propaganda originating from Blockstream.

>>9280220
If It has like 500 """hubs""" its not centralized
>>9280232
We should trade numbers so we can keep arguing later.

>>9280212
Top kek, I wonder if there is some kind of correlation between the distribution of matter in galactic clusters and node connections in the LN. Look at the big ole black hole at the center.
Only someone so deprived of any adverse ideas due to overexposure to pic related could think that posting this shit here is not making you look even more retarded, Apu.

>>9280252
You cant even read a force-graph, and you think I look stupid?

>>9280261
>Implying the way the graph is drawn has anything to do with the obvious degree of centralization
And another swing and a miss. You really don't realize what you're doing here, do you? If you did, you would have stopped a long time ago.

>>9280285
You need a mirror
>gets offended when called an Indian name, turns around and uses it in the same thread
>Still cant see on the graph that there is no significant centralization
>Claiming that I look stupid when really its at least both of us at this point.
>Making a huge deal out of these things
BTW not going to stop lol

>>9280301
>BTW not going to stop lol
Good. You are a true credit to your crusade!