/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9128969
>is it true that ropstein is arriving next week

yeah but it won't do anything the price

>>9128969

>>9128991

but we'll be able to see all the companies using the chainlink network

You're a literal moron. Mobi will be $100 by EOY. Elementary introductions to special relativity often illustrate the differences between Galilean relativity and special relativity by posing a series of supposed "paradoxes". All paradoxes are, in reality, merely ill-posed or misunderstood problems, resulting from our unfamiliarity with velocities comparable to the speed of light. The remedy is to solve many problems in special relativity and to become familiar with its so-called counter-intuitive predictions. The geometrical approach to studying spacetime is considered one of the best methods for developing a modern intuition.

The twin paradox is a thought experiment involving identical twins, one of whom makes a journey into space in a high-speed rocket, returning home to find that the twin who remained on Earth has aged more. This result appears puzzling because each twin observes the other twin as moving, and so at first glance, it would appear that each should find the other to have aged less. The twin paradox sidesteps the justification for mutual time dilation presented above by avoiding the requirement for a third clock. Nevertheless, the twin paradox is not a true paradox because it is easily understood within the context of special relativity.

The impression that a paradox exists stems from a misunderstanding of what special relativity states. Special relativity does not declare all frames of reference to be equivalent, only inertial frames. The traveling twin's frame is not inertial during periods when she is accelerating. Furthermore, the difference between the twins is observationally detectable: the traveling twin needs to fire her rockets to be able to return home, while the stay-at-home twin does not.

Next stop ropsten, mobi pajiits left behind

>>9129053
Are you sure about that? Im not sure thats accurate.

>>9128969
Ropstain, actually. You're in the wrong universe, street shitter.

>>9129262
Meh

>>9129243

if companies that will be using chainlink want to test their smart contracts before mainnet, yes, they will be on there

>>9129333
Trips of truth

>>9128969

>>9128991
proof its happening next week?

>>9129053
It is accurate

>>9129071
this, sir

>>9129465

>>9129465
It's on critical trail you stupid street shitting little monkey.

>>9129731
>muh critical trail
that doesnt mean jack shit retard

>>9129333
Checked