/biz/ - Business & Finance

req will need to partner with tron

>>9119376
This unironically

>>9119376
I will sell all my 400k REQ stake if this happens. Who holds Tron deserves to lose all

150K comfy as fuck

>>9119368
>What the fuck will it take?

For the pre-sale whales that bought under 1 cent to either:

1. Drop dead

2. Get rid of the last of their stash of millions of tokens

3. Binance is a major pre-sale holder (probably own 50% of circulating supply) - they are the primary manipulators and price suppressors.

4. REQ enters into partnership with Tron, announce exit scam - pumps 15x instantly

People still think partnerships, news and technology means ANYTHING in cryptogambling?
lmao

Req button on Amazon.
Moon. Anything else, drop.

>>9119368
It will take the whales to decide that they've stolen enough REQ tokens from impatient, ragedumping simpletons.
Remember that thing Warren said about the stock market being a system to transfer money from the impatient to the patient? The big boys have all the time in the world.

>>9120060
It will in December if 2018 when the bottom drops out of all projects without a working mainnet and legitamite partnerships.

Like I said before, and I'll say again. There are 17 legitimate crypto projects in existence. REQ is one. I hope you're invested in REQ and a few of the other 16.

>>9120125
Is LINK one of them?

>>9119368
I'm not selling.
Never.
Ever.

>>9120213
Obviously

>>9120503
What else do you consider legit? My guesses would be Monero, BTC, ETH, and Nano. Just random of the projects that weren't already mentioned. What you working with?

>>9119368
my ids are just fucked lately

>>9119368
I understand deluded Linkies because it had the best LARP of all times, but Req bags seem heavy as fuck

>>9120213
Does LINK have a working mainnet, use case, method of exchange, partnership, and notoriety outside of 4chan and reddit?

You know the answer to that already, though.

I will say this, if and this is a big if, if LINK actually executed it’s plan before other decentralized or even centralized oracles begin to pick up, then it will be number 18. However, as it stands, the hands of time are moving quickly.

>>9120125
where are people getting this shit from? how will the bottom drop out? pls explain

>>9119368
We gomma replace paypal herp derp

>>9120589
>paypal concedes to request and shuts down its services
drops 80%

>>9119817
>Muh presale whales
Presale discount was 20%, people that bought in the post-ico dump (-40%) got it cheaper than the presale whales.
The notion that the top wallets were suppressing the price is easily debunked by the fact that the volume is always been shit. Simply there was not much buying pressure because of little marketing. Things are changing.
> Binance is a major pre-sale holder (probably own 50% of circulating supply) - they are the primary manipulators and price suppressors.
Bullshit.
>REQ enters into partnership with Tron, announce exit scam - pumps 15x instantly
This is probably true lol.

>>9120125
which are the other 16?

>>9119817
i'm always skeptical of the whale manipulation meme but I seriously cannot think of any other reason why the price is being held down. what the fuck

>>9120528
not one of these is legit, newfag

>>9120638
>>9120528
>>9120570

Not promising that all of these will hold indefinitely, but they’ll survive December 2018 and flourish in 2019.

You ready?
>REQ
>BTC
>ETH
>BCH (disgusting, I know)
>NEO
>NULS
>0x
>OMG
>ELA
>SPHTX
>ONT
>ICX (as long as Kim isn’t up to any underhanded nonsense that blows up in everyone’s face)
>BNB
>GAS
>TAU

I am happy to be in the position where I could help my anons for once. Pick a few that don’t obviously overlap with one another and hope that all goes well. I’m not a whale, but I did get lucky enough to catch wind of subtle hints that I missed back in 2009 on /g/ and March 2014 /biz/.

Take it all with a grain of salt, as these are just my personal opinions, but I’m invested in ETH, ICX, and REQ atm. I’ll be accumulating as much as possible over the next year.

>>9120732
It's for certain at this point. Two of the biggest partnerships in the whole space in PwC and Wikipedia, a working product with massive features incoming and it's place 101 on CMC. I just wish I knew it would be a shit performer so I could trade TRX and XVG and buy back in REQ with a much much larger stack.

>>9120887
>no VEN
don't fall for the memes my dude. Let me aware you

https://www.dnvgl.com/mystory/mystory-project.html

https://medium.com/@vechainofficial/introducing-assetlink-a-joint-supply-chain-management-application-of-xiamen-innov-corelink-and-4ce7d114f118


https://www.reddit.com/r/Vechain/wiki/index#wiki_7._who_is_currently_using_vechain.3F

>>9120634
>Presale discount was 20%, people that bought in the post-ico dump (-40%) got it cheaper than the presale whales.

You have no evidence for this.

Yet I have evidence because there was selling pressure even when the price was at 3 and 4 cents for a month after ICO.

That only means there are whales out there who could afford to sell for less than 3 cents, BECAUSE they purchased their tokens for less than 1 cent.

How do you think REQ secured a Binance listing?

They had to give Binance MILLIONS of tokens at steep, steep discount.

So unless you can prove that Binance paid RETAIL prices with some pathetic -20% discount for millions of coins, it's only logical to assume they got them for MUCH LESS.

>>9121152
keep us updated

>>9120887
what about XMR? privacy is good, no?

>>9120887
how will the bottom drop out?

>>9121152
There was selling pressure because everybody was fomoing in bitcoin for the forks bullrun, dumbass. It's the reason it dropped below ico price in the first place, two big presale buyers jumped ship when the bullrun started and all the pajeets panic sold. I was right there buying the bottom so i know yours for a fud.
Binance listing does not work like that btw, and if you remember they fucked up big time by doubling the deposited amount leading to another big dump, and they did not have the reqs to cover this (so your bullshit is disproved) and after fucking up those that sold the doubled coins they had to buy like 5 btc of req on the market to make it even. They do not own shit, and you do not know shit.

>>9121264

You make some good points anon, and I'll admit I'm just speculating and FUDing (I'm a little bitter REQ has not performed well despite gold-plated fundamentals), but I still suspect there are pre-sale whales who got their REQ privately for much less than the -20% ICO rate.

>>9120528
Lol

>>9119368
Hilarious (but true!)

>>9121264
Based reasonable anon

>>9121152
>Presale discount was 20%
>You have no evidence for this.
This is literally public knowledge holy shit the absolute state of REQ fudders

>>9121312
I think it's more likely autistic NEETs who got lucky in crypto and have a few milli REQ between them and unironically believe they should suppress the price to increase token burn kek.

>>9120887
you are a fucking idiot

>>9121312
In other projects maybe, but this team is too much into transparency and decentralization, it's their main drive, I do not believe that.

>>9121367
This could be sadly true, teen whales that literally have no idea of what they are doing are one of crypto biggest issue.
Their lack of understanding on why the buying pressure related to adoption makes irrelevant the actual number of burnt tokens is discomforting.

>>9121200
I apologize, add XMR to that list. It’s literally on my saved list.

Also, there is one more that I’m agnostic about. I don’t trust it yet, because it’s a literal 50/50 0 or moon. IOTA.

>>9121223
There’s going to be one more drop and then the legitimate projects that can afford to hold on will blossom afterwards, and major financial and institutional capital will move in. Our current recovery is temporary.

>>9119368
>What the fuck will it take?

gotta start taking those pills the doctor orderd senpai

>>9121367

I don't think this is plausible.

NEET investors are generally retarded and poorly informed. The burn mechanics are too complex to understand and calculate.

I think it's simple: this market is all about speculating on garbage. REQ is not complete vapor-ware trash like 90% of crypto projects.

When real adoption begins to happen this year and forward, I think we'll see some very welcome regulation, and the bottom-feeding pajeet shitcoins and their normie speculators will drop off the market.

>>9121428
where are you getting this? that is what im asking you.

>>9121349

Just because that's what they claim is not necessarily what they sold for.

Why would you take anyone's claims in this market at face value?

>>9120125
Is FUN another?

>>9121264
thanks, just bought 100k, but unironically.

>>9121428
what about RLC? Great team and pretty much never talked about on biz

>>9122187
>FUN

Haha, what do you think?