[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 5 KB, 80x80, logo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR] No.9090336 [Reply] [Original]

Better fill those bags anon.

https://www.swift.com/our-solutions/compliance-and-shared-services/swiftref

>> No.9090359

>>9090336
Holy fuck.

Delete this post immediately, I need another month. I hope the brainlet-barrier of understanding this will cause me to have free reign for another few weeks. Fuck

>> No.9090414

>>9090336
I don't understand, is this related to link?

>> No.9090417

please explain for a brainlet

>> No.9090442
File: 77 KB, 667x848, 1516190946502.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

let's get SchWIFTy bitches hrrrrhrrrrr ghhghghghaagh

>> No.9090443
File: 42 KB, 594x150, Screen Shot 2018-04-25 at 11.08.20 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>> No.9090488
File: 28 KB, 500x334, RACC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9090414
>>9090417
>>9090442
My FOMO has subsided, I see that I still have time.

>> No.9090489

>>9090414
no.

>> No.9090490

>>9090336
Thx
Bought 100k Swift

>> No.9090542

>>9090488
checked. i hope that's true

>> No.9090633
File: 92 KB, 1080x1080, 1523538823140.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9090336
is this related to LINK or not .

>> No.9090711
File: 184 KB, 1100x700, 1524473416218.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9090488
Checked. Middle-End of May, or begenning of June would be a fair guess.

>> No.9090861

>>9090633
it's not

>> No.9090894

MY LINKY IS ABOUT TO GET MORE STINKY

>> No.9090932

>>9090633
>https://www.swift.com/our-solutions/compliance-and-shared-services/swiftref
why the fuck would it be related to a video game. it's obvs for SWIFT coin.

>yes link

>> No.9091014

>>9090633
yes it is.

>> No.9091156

sirs dont bump this thread plese

>> No.9091201
File: 72 KB, 404x404, 1524352707151.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9090336

>> No.9091207

>>9091156
ok no bump

>> No.9091212

>>9091207
thank you sir!

>> No.9091300

>>9091212
anytime

>> No.9091422

>>9091207
>>9091212
>>9091300
unironic sage

>> No.9091509

>>9091422
but why? we didnt bump it or anything

>> No.9091529

>>9091422
i've tried to stop bumping sir!!

>> No.9091624
File: 2.51 MB, 500x500, 1524607450092.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>OH FUCK IT SAYS SWIFT, THAT MUST MEAN LINK 1000 EOY SOMEBODY PHONE BINANCE I NEED TO MARKET BUY RIGHT NOW

>> No.9091691

Delete this thread
NOW

>> No.9091719

this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink

>> No.9091729

sirs i require you to stop bumping !!!

>> No.9091746

>>9091624
This looks encouraging

>> No.9091755

>>9091719
this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlinkthis is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlinkthis is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink

FUCKING ITS NOT CHAINLINK LMAO STOP BEING DELUDED

>> No.9091761

>>9091624
actually did, no shame.

>> No.9091772

>>9090633
no

>> No.9091803

No mention of blockchain. SWIFT doesn't mean ChainLink you dumb fucks.

You all deserve to lose money.

>> No.9091854

How the fuck is this even related to LINK?

It's like going to McDonalds website and posting it here saying "ACCUMULATE"

>> No.9091893

>>9091803
We all know Sergey and company have been working jointly with Swift. They may not call it CL, but my guess is the system is part of their product.

>> No.9091900

Reminder
https://www.coindesk.com/swift-completes-blockchain-smart-contracts-trial/

>> No.9091906

>>9090336
This has nothing to do with chainlink you cucks. Chainlink isn't even working rn, while SWIFTRef is (they offer a trial too). Nice pump and dump

>> No.9091909

other posters are right, no mention of block-chain
It does look promising because it seems they are referring to the use of smartcontracts to streamline the cash transfer.

>> No.9092052

>>9091906
>Spoonfeed
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/chainlink/historical-data/?start=20180212&end=20180222
>Volume Spike, coincidence?

>Release dates of new docs
https://www.swift.com/our-solutions/compliance-and-shared-services/swiftref/swiftref-document-centre

>Enjoy

>> No.9092140

>>9092052
>delusion

SWIFT doesn’t rely on ChainLink. Stop stretching and thinking every bit of news from any source involves ChainLink.

>> No.9092233
File: 283 KB, 640x1136, IMG_2581.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9090336
Bad news buster

>> No.9092250

>>9092052
is there a private bank only network of chainedlinks up and running?

>> No.9092277

>>9092250
There is no network of ChainLinks

>> No.9092311
File: 101 KB, 796x1082, 1521573833014.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9090336
>Our team cross-references and validates all data
This is literally the worst news possible.
I believe in the network outside of swift usage, but when this gets out we are going to be in for a rocky fucking ride.

>> No.9092316

>>9092277
network is cheese i meant.

>> No.9092326

I can’t wait for December 31, 2018 and sub 50 cent Link. This will be so delicious.

>> No.9092349

>>9092140
no

>> No.9092365

Bump sirs

>> No.9092371

>>9092140

this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlinkthis is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlinkthis is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink this is not related to chainlink

>> No.9092383

>>9092311
Seriously, did no one read this? Not only is it not related to chainlink, it specifically excludes any possibility of chainlink in that system.
The data is vetted by a Swift team.
Totally trusted setup. Zero trustlessness.

>> No.9092386

>>9092349
Meme bags getting heavy now that SWIFT has their own Link-less project?

>> No.9092400

>>9092383
Exactly. I love it. Linkies can’t even tell that this is a huge turd in their face.

>> No.9092427

>>9092400
LMAO I'm not even meming, I hold 9k.
If someone with more than double digit IQ wants to tell me why this is good go right ahead, but to me that system is explicitly an end-to-end trusted setup.

>> No.9092428

>>9092386
very

>> No.9092431

1. Sergey has clones of himself should he die.
2. The Justice League will personally swoop down from heaven should a single bug be found during the launch.
3. 1000 EOY

>> No.9092433

>>9092383
Decent fud
They still need chainlink

>> No.9092467

>>9092383
it actually reads like severe fud if you ask me. basically no mention of stinky linky and seems to be private

>> No.9092479

>>9092433
>explicitly states they will use a trusted system of internal review

“But they still need to use muh links...r-right?”

I love it.

>> No.9092481
File: 129 KB, 1141x895, Reddit Trader Post Apr 25th - 1 of 2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9090336
I will just leave this here, followed by 2 more attachments.

1 of 3

>> No.9092498
File: 74 KB, 1016x824, Reddit Trader Post Apr 25th.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9092481
2 of 3

>> No.9092524

>>9092433
If I was fudding you would be dumping bags already:P (my fud is the best fud. gourmet shit).
Follow this link:
https://www.swift.com/our-solutions/compliance-and-shared-services/swiftref/swiftref-at-a-glance
Observe where it says "SwiftRef team"
-- that is where chainlink would go in the process.
And no, there is no reason to think this is some elaborate decoy.

>> No.9092528

>>9092427

why couldn't chainlink be used in conjunction with this to communicate with different blockchains?

>> No.9092529

>>9092479
Haven't kept up with the project lately cause of life stuff, but I bought a fat stack of LINK during presale last September. We rose from 9 cents to 50 cents in the span of a month, and then hovered around 40 cents for a good amount of time. BTC was 4500ish or thereabouts

it's been 7 fucking months and the price is exactly the same. Periodically I check /biz/ and see the obligatory, "Tonight!" threads, or just general charting threads. Why? What the fuck are you celebrating. With the exception of the temporary bubble, this shit has been trading in the same channel for nearly a goddamn year.

And what the fuck do we have? Still no medium updates. No marketing director as promised. All of the Assblaster posts have been proven LARPs. None of the secret developments all of these Sherlock holmes autists post about have come to fruition. Not one.

Woo we get ropsten next month. You just know there will be bugs and all sorts of complications. And what about adoption? No word from SWIFT. No word from anybody. *maybe* JNT will LOOK at it. Fucking docusign? Really? Yet some of you idiots still cling to the delusion that mainnet will go live and all of these banks will be diving right in. Bull fucking shit.

and it's not even as if LINK is the chosen one anymore. Oracles are popping up left and right. This team is severely outclassed.

How fucking long are we supposed to hold for? Most of us are in our 20s. You get what, maybe 15 years more of prime living? And we've already pissed damn near 10% of that away, waiting for absolutely nothing. Jesus fucking christ

>> No.9092535
File: 91 KB, 815x664, RedditLinkTrader - PSD2 post.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9092498
3 of 3
This one is the original post regarding PSD2 and Link several months back.

>> No.9092540
File: 267 KB, 750x972, 1524015158903.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9090414
>I don't understand
Of course you don't fucking brainlet.

>> No.9092581

>>9092524
>>9092479
Still weak fud
It doesn't matter what swift announces what it will do. When chainlink delivers, it's going to save Swift so much money they will switch to decentralized Oracle system. This is just their backup plan in case link doesn't deliver on time

>> No.9092611

>>9092581
I'd call you a brainlet, but that implies you have a brain, albeit a small one. I'm not sure you do.

>> No.9092647

This coupled with the price dumping. I love when Linkies get a taste of unadulterated reality.

I'm going to be so amused when hordes of normies outperform everyone here by buying XRP and LTC.

>> No.9092666
File: 6 KB, 249x237, 1520640818765s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9092581
>This is just their backup plan in case link doesn't deliver on time
the absolute state of linklets. A representative of Swift could hand deliver you a signed document stating that they are not using Link and will never use Link and you'd probably just tell the dude it's fud. you're a sub 60 IQ nigger, or you're larping like i usually do in link threads

>> No.9092667
File: 45 KB, 750x416, IMG_1681.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Someone fill me in on what I'm supposed to be reading? This video wasn't helpful at all? How's ChainLink related to this.

>> No.9092740
File: 35 KB, 766x276, Swift Info on Test.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9092666

>> No.9092753

>>9092667
LOL Chainlink ISN'T related, that's the point. SWIFT developed their own means of validating data...by themselves.

In other words: "Cool ChainLink concept Sergey...but yea, this is the real world and we are professionals at this."

Wonder if Link will drop below 30 cents by Saturday.

>> No.9092759

>>9090336
Thanks for sharing anon
How people dont get this i dont understand
The whole point of link is that it lets data controllers MONETIZE their data
You can't steal a data source because of post and call
What do bankers want when they're FORCED to open their APIs?
They want a network where they get paid either way
If they control the data they control the price
:. Link

>> No.9092779

>>9092759
>Banks forced to open APIs

lol.

>> No.9092782

>>9092740
doesn't say Link you faggit

>> No.9092786

>>9092753
Chainlink team has confirmed they are working with Swift and it is progressing well.

>> No.9092803
File: 98 KB, 1000x1000, linkcast.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9092528
>why couldn't chainlink be used in conjunction with this to communicate with different blockchains?
It's not a question of "why couldn't". This is a description of a system which does the same thing as chainlink/blockchain but without them. Make of that what you will.
>>9092647
The dumping is to do with BTC movement. I am actually doubtful that brainlets are able to realise that this is bad news. Perhaps they never will?
I'm still fairly comfy, linkpool collected 1k eth, the network WILL work. I'm just concerned what happens when Swift's absence can no longer be ignored. Cheap LINK I guess.
>>9092667
>How's ChainLink related to this.
You're almost there.

>> No.9092806

>>9092782
"Whether offered by Swift or third parties".

>> No.9092823

>>9092786
Oh yea? Why don't you document/cite that?

>> No.9092851

I get it now. SWIFT has created their own oracles and smartcontract.com helped them do it and ChainLink is left out to dry?...fuck.

>> No.9092862

https://youtu.be/DrlL5v78FtA
Start at 3:50

>> No.9092864

>>9092851
it's just on hyperledger instead of ethereum.

>> No.9092871
File: 33 KB, 1838x181, Swift Relationship.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9092851
Better FOMO up.

>> No.9092877

they want to be the center instead of a decentralized network ok ok ok ok ok are you surprised

>> No.9092905

>>9092871
assblaster is a larper though, nothing he writes should be taken seriously. just dump your shitcoin and buy EOS, or better yet tether up, you will be able to rebuy at 10 cents anyway.

>> No.9092913

>>9092871
you're a nigger for posting a biz larp. link is shit, swift isn't using it.

>> No.9092919

>>9092779
Is this news to you?

>> No.9092923

>>9092913
He was being sarcastic in reply to my post. Basically you guys are on the same page.

>> No.9092933

>>9092871
>Unironically posting assblaster quotes to contradict actual documents from Swift's own website
DESU I was kinda hoping someone would have a different perspective. But it looks like I'm right.

>> No.9093023

Well now that the SWIFT partnership is shot down, I can't wait to see all the others start to crumble. This is going to be a fun year of wojacks.

>> No.9093032

send euros, receive usd
O M G
M
G

>> No.9093041

>>9092529
Dump your bags faggot! You haven't DYOR and come here begging to know how long you have to HODL. No one is going to spoon feed you shit, so if you're that much of a limp wristed faggot that you're not rich 6 months after buying Chainlink you need to unironically eat a bullet.

>> No.9093069

>>9092647
>Buying xrp
>literal jew scam shekel with no finite supply.

Enjoy being poor.

>> No.9093092

>>9093069
XRP will bring more gains than Link will. Period.

I hope your memes are more valuable than money to you.

>> No.9093109

>>9093023
You have no fucking clue.

>> No.9093130

>>9093109
Still waiting on that citation from the team...

Oh wait, you don't just take what people say on biz as facts and invest money based off of it...?

>> No.9093170

>>9092851
Are you fucking dumb? Chainlink made their smart oracle except it was centralized and wanted to tailor it to make it decentralized. They have been working with them for years already. You guys are more fucking retarded then I thought. Chainlink is an enterprise solution and will be the biggest thing into the blockchain space since bitcoin. Maybe even bigger in a year or two. I would bet my entire life on it.

>> No.9093189
File: 430 KB, 680x680, sweetie.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9091803
>being this retarded

>> No.9093205

>>9093170
>more retarded THEN I thought

Bet your life on it and KYS in two years. Shoulda followed the normies and bought Ripple and Stellar.

>> No.9093240
File: 1.60 MB, 1075x1077, wtf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9090633
What the fuck am I looking at

>> No.9093263

>>9093240
That's what is called a clothes less women.
When will we start banning virgins?

>> No.9093285
File: 24 KB, 558x614, 1511569352140.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9093263
>lmao vergin xddd

>> No.9093295

Decentralized oracles are bigger than Swift.

Even if they landed a partnership with Swift, Swift would only be like 1% of Chain Link oracles.

>> No.9093299

I genuinely cannot believe that anyone here isi genuinely bearish on LINK at this point. Name one other project that has this much promising evidence of success. Even ETH didn't have this level, and I was probably less sure about it mooning than I am LINK.

>> No.9093316

>>9093205
>buying the jew coin like a good goy.
I already went all in you fuck. I will Buy two lambos next year. One for me and one for you. The one you'll never drive nigger because you were too dumb to realize it.

>> No.9093345

Are people actually affected by this stuff

>> No.9093368

>>9093316
Good luck with that buddy.

>> No.9093376

>>9093368
Are you FUDing or are you serious? Do you genuinely think LINK will not succeed? I just can't imagine, unless you've done zero reading on your own.

>> No.9093404

>>9093285
>>9093240
That doesn't look like a human though what is that for real what are we looking at here?

>> No.9093407

>>9093130
Anybody got a copy of the post Rory shared about the progress with Swift that they can share with this clueless fudder?

>> No.9093425

>>9093376
Have done plenty of reading. I don't fall for bull shit hype by a bunch of 20 year olds with minimal life experience and lotto-winning mentality, living in their parents' homes.

I'm invested in good projects with good teams.

>> No.9093446

>>9093407
Rory writes like a shitcoin PnDer I generally ignore him.

>> No.9093452

>>9093407
No but why do you care, they probably own link and if not then fuck them.

>> No.9093471

>>9093425
I'm so lost. The team is as solid as it gets. Look at the github commits. Look at the advisors for crying out loud...the former chief scientist for fucking RSA for fuck's sake!

>> No.9093474

>>9093425
there is no hype regarding the project other than this hell hole echo chamber you idiot.

>> No.9093477

>>9093425
Hey, tough guy! Would you spread my cheeks and dominate me?

>> No.9093490
File: 129 KB, 900x729, 1512330650860.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9093425
>good team
>bunch of scumbag executives who own more than half of the supply of a useless fucking token

>> No.9093498

Wow, convenient, none of the linkies can manifest tangible evidence of something. I've never seen that happen before. It's almost as though the project is completely enshrouded in BS and hype perpetuated by the aforementioned 20 year olds.

>> No.9093512

>>9093471
he already has LINK but cant buy anymore with his lunch money so he has to ask his mommy and resort to baseless fud

>> No.9093525

>>9090336
>>9092498
gg, we won.

>> No.9093527

Look, I know I can't get any of you to look at your collectible meme token with any objectivity...so good luck with your HODL. I'll be around to laugh and say "I told you so" EOY

>> No.9093560

>>9093527
Can you try? Seriously, try to convince me this is not the biggest project in all of crypto. I'm looking for reasons to not go all in at this point.

>> No.9093613
File: 64 KB, 640x472, smartcontracts.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9093560
he cant..

>> No.9093630

>>9093560

LINK is the god protocol.
>>8994932

>> No.9093635

>>9093560
You spend all your time "researching" crypto on Biz. That is the only reason you think ChainLink is a big deal. NO ONE is talking about this project elsewhere (and it isn't because biz is some augury of the future). The biggest projects in blockchain are ETH and hyperledger and there are other very interesting projects like ELF that are getting major interest. UNIRONICALLY XRP is infinitely more substantial than ChainLink right now. People here are just socially retarded and don't like things that have any semblance of popularity (hence why ChainLink is so "cool" because it can be touted as some BRILLIANT project that only the GENIUSES here know about, right?)

People here are not smart, they're just funny.

>> No.9093637

>>9093525
Clearly

>> No.9093641

>>9093041
lol

>> No.9093682
File: 16 KB, 337x163, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9093635
>biggest projects in blockchain are eth and hyperledger.

just stop.

>> No.9093683

>>9093630
See, people just throw around ridiculous posts like this, and people get excited about the "potential partnerships."

It is hype generation 101 and everyone here has fallen hook line and sinker.

I could create a new project that everyone would invest in here within 6 months.

>> No.9093706

>>9093683
your opinion should instantly be dismissed because of the fact you said that one of the biggest project in crypto is hyperledger. hyperledger is a joke.

>> No.9093715

>>9093635
Believe me or not, I actually have a master's in computer engineering with a focus on cryptography. I did my master's thesis on a blockchain related subject. I'm that guy that actually reads the whitepaper. If you're not FUD'ing, you either have a lack of comprehension skills, or you're genuinely just dumb.

If you think XRP is more substantial than LINK, I've got nothing for you. That doesn't even make sense.

>> No.9093718

>>9093635
Link isn't about IF ... it is all about WHEN.
Do yourself a favor, buy a stack and HODL.

>> No.9093749

>>9093715
I don’t care about your education. I work as a developer on an IBM-commissioned series of blockchain solutions using hyperledger and ETH. You know what we don’t need? ChainLink. We use our own oracles.

>> No.9093759

Hello there mr whales,

I was just wondering, how does it feel to know that you only have 2 months left to shake out the weak hands? How does it feel to accumulate a project with so many iron hands that it takes you this long to even gain only this little market share.
Don’t you get bored playing with yourself the whole day setting sell orders and buy orders and filling it yourself only to accumulate 100-200 linkies everytime?

Your time is ticking and I sincerely hope you enjoy the last two months, shaking out the weakhands is what I want you to do as well.

Be sure to do a test pump first to shake out swing traders before the real pump to singularity.

Sincerely

General Link marine

>> No.9093763

>>9093749
>We use our own oracles

And PayPal uses its own payment system -- but most people won't. How can you not realize this?

>> No.9093793
File: 41 KB, 1107x430, Mobi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9093763
sorry linklets. faster, cheaper, better. buy Mobi

>> No.9093795

>>9093763
What are you even trying to say?

>> No.9093800

>>9093749
Then why are you on a board that is full of people that believe in a different project running your mouth? What kind of an asshole are you? WTF are you here?

>> No.9093806

>>9093635

>chainlink isn't popular or perceived as important by all these normal and smart people "elsewhere" but all this other stuff is!

lol cope

>> No.9093807

>>9093795
that a proprietary solution or service does not necessarily mean its the most efficient or has the best performance.

>> No.9093827

>>9093800
You'd rather just have a bunch of people tell you you're making a PHENOMENAL INVESTMENT AND WILL BE RICH NEXT YEAR?

Why don't you live in reality occasionally?

>> No.9093836

>>9091803
>>9092140
>>9092277
>>9092326
>>9092386
>>9092400
>>9092479
>>9092581
>>9092611
>>9092647
>>9092753
>>9092779
>>9092823
>>9093023
>>9093092
>>9093130
>>9093205
>>9093368
>>9093425
>>9093498
>>9093527
>>9093635
>>9093683
>>9093749
>23 posts by this ID
Thanks just bought 100k

>> No.9093849

>>9093827
>you're making a PHENOMENAL INVESTMENT AND WILL BE RICH NEXT YEAR!
yeah, i know.

>> No.9093877

>>9093827
just tell me how much you need to finish accumulating your stack. maybe ill be nice and dump my bags on you once mainnet comes out.

>> No.9093882

>>9093827

>you're making a PHENOMENAL INVESTMENT AND WILL BE RICH NEXT YEAR

stop hitting yourself
stop hitting yourself

>> No.9093891
File: 50 KB, 474x400, 6C20B6D8-110E-43BF-B447-2D9E8582A48C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>9093749
>we use our own oracles.
No fucking shit. Chainlink isn’t out yet. I can’t fathom being this retarded.
>I work for IBM as a <x>
You’re a fucking clown.

>> No.9094043

>>9093795
The overwhelming majority do not reinvent the wheel. They pick up what works and they move forward. How do you think technology has progressed so fast in the past 20+ years?

>> No.9094100

>>9093613
https://www.zuora.com
https://pivotal.io/customers/corelogic
https://www.smartsheet.com
https://www.mulesoft.com/press-center/ipo-class-a-common-stock-price
https://www.jumpstartrecovery.com
https://www.wsj.com/articles/cryptocurrency-firms-investors-seek-exemption-from-sec-oversight-1524130200


Sure is. Interesting that JPM is the common underwriter of all these stock IPO's, which are known to be associated with CL.

Few other's to help further everyones research.

>> No.9094800

>>9093635
>elf
Lol