/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>8929110
He doesn't work for salesforce, he's a salesforce application developer. He develops applications on top of salesforce's dev platform. Much different.

>>8929130
much different. pajeet detected.

>>8929130
He still works for salesforce

>>8929130
>Doesn't work for Salesforce
>Only develops apps for Salesforce platform

Do you realize how retarded you sound? Do you need a Visa employee partnering with you to accept Visa on your website?

Your shit covered hands are showing.

>>8929130
>Abhinav

alright pajeet detected. dump this shit now

whether he works or not, we need the mainnet and the new marketing director to provoque the singularity

>>8929130
Still bullish as fuck.

>>8929130
perfectly illustrates the diff between Chainlink and Shitcoins.

Shitcoin: We have partnership' look at the sticker we put on skateboard.

Link: Silence: Developers of massive Companies make general appearances on Github.

>>8929379
This is exactly the reason why i' m in

>>8929199
No he takes the Salesforce software, and customizes it for specific businesses

Think of salesforce as a toolbox of generic things that all businesses could use to organize their leads, contracts, etc. This abhinav guy just builds on top

>>8929110
I think it's another Abhinav Gupta now.

Look at his followers https://github.com/abhinav?tab=followers

They all have uber links. So the guy on github may work for Uber.

>>8929438
Why are you explaining this to me...

>>8929438
Yeah man that isn't news at all. All these Devs who do work on company software for companies that have been connected to LINK by autists contributing to the github.
It's all just a massive coincidence.

link has 1 BILLION tokens.

most top coins have 10% of that supply.

>>8929447
Is this because he is working on a branch that is simply what chainlink forked from uber? Meaning he’s an uber dev, working on uber code, not chainlink at all.

>>8929516
>2018
>STILL caring about supply instead of only looking at market cap
Chainlink could 10x right now and still be only in position #19. The potential for growth is fucking huge.

>>8929510
Senior Project Manager on the Uber Engineering team follows him. Conor L Myhrvold

>>8929516
NO IT DOESNT
A SQUIRELL ATE 50K SO ITS 950MILLION AT MOST

>>8929551
*Sr. Program manager

https://www.linkedin.com/in/ubereng/

>>8929525
Yep. Why so why is it in the smartcontractkit owner section? Is my final question.

Could just be a wild goose chase

did anyone not notice this on Linkedin? He works for UBER

>>8929516
>what is ripple

>>8929110
fuck i need more link, how much fresh fiat should i put in tonight?

>>8929583

that's the point. it's a coin that's never going to get to even $5 because there's like 100 billion of them.

it's the #3 coin and worth 62 cents.

>>8929625
But think how much LINK will come off the market when used for staking.

14 million (we know) will be in nodes straight away thanks to Linkpool

>>8929110
Fake news, sage.

>>8929668

even if 100 million came off, that's still 900 million token supply. most coins making it to even $15 have 10% of that supply.

>>8929576
Who gives a flying fuck about some pajeet uber driver.

>>8929625
If LINK reaches the current Ripple market cap (and it will), then each LINK will be worth around $72. You can buy it now for $0.40. You don't think that's a good investment? You can literally multiply your money by 180x

>>8929696

i'm not saying it's not a good investment. i've got what i consider to be quite a few.

i'm just saying, 1 fucking billion tokens is a huge issue. as even if 10% will be staked.

>>8929696
Crypto as a whole is going to have at least 10 trillon marketcap in the next few years.

You're correct ripples current marketcap is extremely achievable by link.

>>8929692
>Uber driver
>Uber software engineer.
>being so retarded you don't know the difference

>>8929749
It's going to get locked up in nodes. Even if only 10% of the supply is locked in nodes early that number is only going to grow as link is used to pay nodes. A lot of that paid link will be restaked into the nodes because people will want to keep the % they are making off of each transaction consistent. Even if some is sold off back into the general pool there will be more and more LINK staked over time.

>>8929110
can someone explain what this github shit is, i can't navigate it

>>8929781
>>8929803
For instances say I'm staking 100,000k LINK. The node pool I'm in I'm getting 500 LINK per month. Which is 10% of the total amount of LINK my node pool makes per month. If I remove my 500 LINK and don't keep it in the node but the other people who made 4500 LINK keep it in the node next month.

Instead of receiving 10% of the LINK rewarded next month I only get 9.9% but this keeps happening every month eventually the amount of LINK I'm making goes down. I'm incentivzed to keep some of the LINK I've made in the node in order to continue to make more money.

>>8929625
>>8929691
Wish people didn't respond to this stuff as it's the most basic concept to understand. it's actually mind blowing though if this isn't b8.

>>8929803
>if only 10% in nodes

linkpool has said the number to stake is probably "low double, high triple" numbers. so let's just say 100,000LINK

10% of LINK staked would be 100 million. that's 1,000 nodes. so at BEST we can consider link supply 900 million. that's still a lot of fucking tokens.

>>8929886
This is such a shame. Holy shit. There's no way you're serious.

>>8929900

totally am. i know i'm probably missing something, but i can't figure it out. i know i'm the brainlet, but there's no coin $50+ with a supply like LINK.

>>8929625
1 billion vs 100 billion.
are you fucking kidding me or what.
also a shit load of tokens will be stuck of nodes. and we have no idea what sergey is doing the rest.

>>8929818
To give you a run down I an idiot who got everyone excited over someone I thought was a Salesforce guy. Turns out he is an Uber guy.

But... he is working on a branch in the chainlink fork section which is a wee bit promising at least.

https://github.com/smartcontractkit/zap/branches

End of the day I'm a massive faggot who got everyones hopes too high.

>>8929781
"""software engineer""". Big deal he knows how to use the sat nav in his fucking taxi.

>>8929924
The only thing you are missing is that we don't know how much Sergey would release. If he keeps the majority locked up then the price will be pushed higher.

>>8929924
Link could have 10 billion coins it wouldn't change the fact the total market cap is 100 million and a move to 1 Billion is 10x. The only thing that would change is the price per token but you'd still make the same % gain your money. Watch some of these video on investing.

https://youtu.be/fa-VZ-SDxgY
https://youtu.be/5lmHzAHbtzg
https://youtu.be/cppxO67e6eo

Watch these videos.

>>8929516
>not knowing about the upcoming coin burn

>>8929985
watching these now. thanks.

>>8929985
what are you trying to say with these vids? 1k link defeats the purpose of the token. Its supposed to be a cheap and effective token for whoever uses them.

>>8929900
can you explain your thought further? Telling someone no way bro you cant be this dumb hehe is a stupid fucking argument

>>8929985
P-E ratio doesnt apply to crypto.

the only thing you need to think about with BTC, LINK etc is the Nash equilibrium.

>>8930151
How many times do you brainlets need to be explained to that LINK has 18 DECIMAL PLACES.

>>8930151
Aren't you talking about a different subject?

It doesn't matter what price the token is to the user of the node, from what I've read

>>8930217
>18 DECIMAL PLACES.
nigger they have a high supply for that very reason

>>8930225
but it does though. I dont want to pay a lot to use that particular system. Especially something that is going to be used so often. Why would i pay 1k for a smart contract to turn on a light. How many lights turn on and off in one day? at the least two contracts. That means you will pay 2k to switch a light on and off

>>8930325
Why the fuck do you people assume you will need ! full LINK to pay for a smart contract? God fucking dammit, does no one on biz know anything about economics, or simply basic math at all?

>>8930325
1 8 D E C I M A L S

>>8930357
>1* full link

>>8929516
>what is marketcap
Reddit is the other way, brainlet

Mods should insta ban people who shit up threads with their nigger tier questions

>>8929110
still an erc223 token

How can one thread have so much autism and yet so many brainlets?

>>8930357
im not assuming that. I was making a very simple argument. I still haven't heard a good answer to high supply. Locking link up in nodes is not a good answer

>>8930394

tron has a 2.5 billion dollar market cap and is trading at 4 cents

This thread is stunning. How can so many people invest in crypto without understanding jack shit about what they're putting their money into?

>>8930422
>I still haven't heard a good answer to high supply
>after all the spoonfeeding in this thread
The absolute state of /biz/.

>>8930464
locking up link in nodes is not a good answer.

>>8930422
If link going to $72 at ripple's market cap isn't good enough for you, then please kys.

>>8930474
>>8930422
Where do these people come from?
Honestly, how did you find this site?

>>8929692
Please meme this receipt for me

>>8930499
ripple capped out at 3.00 in the last bull run. That's not the normal price, that's idoits rushing into the market. so again link getting past 5 dollars defeats the purpose. Just like ripple passing 5 dollars

>>8930550
so explain it to me. Lets have a discussion about it. Im open to be proven wrong.

>>8930585
No, >>8930573 >defeats the purpose
Obvious bait, just kys retard

If by any chance it wasn't bait, then leave this site and consider suicide

>>8930573
Fuck off nigga,
Cripples got 45 billion tokens, 90% of which are owned by 100 wallets to dump on your head faggot.

>>8930430
when it had a $140m mcap it was $0.002

>>8930599
let have a discussion on a discussion board. Stop flinging shit

>>8930151
>>8930170
I provided videos that would help the person who was confused that it doesn't matter what the supply is necessarily but the total market cap. I also provided links to videos that may help him understand overall concepts we are discussing. The first video is most relevant the others are just good videos and great basic knowledge to have. What I'm saying (I guess you forgot to read my post lol?) is that an increase from 100MM total market cap to 1 billion is 10x. You'll make the same % return on your money whether the said coin is 10 cents or $1. Do you understand? I'm not talking about link at all. The guy didn't understand that a 'high' coin price because there's a large supply isn't the method for figuring out whether something is undervalued or overvalued retrospectively.
>>8930422
A good argument to high supply? it's not about supply. LINK could have 10 Billion tokens. That just means each token would be 10 cents if it reached $1B market cap. If link has 1 billion tokens that means the price per token when it has a $1 billion dollar market cap would be $1 USD. do you understand that the % increase is still the same?

>>8930619
There is no discussion to be had, you don't understand the concept of market cap.
Maybe google some basic things about crypto first before trying to sound smart you dumb nigger.

lmao why? why does everyone bother replying to utter brainlets? the two asking about fucking marketcap of all things now ruined the thread, there's literally no one talking about OP's post. why do you fucking idiots need to be right, just ignore them holy fucking shit you know they are just fucking baiting. they dont need to be helped, this has been discussed again and again and again for fuck's sake

>>8929881
It is mind blowing that you can't accept reality. Chainlink could be a stunning success and will not go over $5-$10. You are the fucking brainlet here, unless you can somehow prove otherwise by elaborating on your "muh market cap" bullshit that strangely enough cannot be seen to make a difference in any othet fucking case. You absolute trenchbrains compare this to antshares when it has 10x the supply. It is simple fucking tokenomics. I guarentee you sit around here with shit in your pants harping on how link is going to be worth $100 or more any fucking time soon, I bet you believe the fucking larps too despite them all being proven larps. Let me clear this up. You are saying;
>stupid faggot. Link can easily be worth x (because market cap could theoretically be worth 10 trillion! Or more! We moon boys neo all over again we gonna make it haha lambos!)

So if you are gonna shit up legitinate insights with your garbage logic, at leadt admit that your retarded price predictions are predicated on the market cap for all crypto increasing to 5 trillion by the very least. Hmm, link realistically $10 in 2 years if EVERYTHING goes well. You are unironically dumb and gay.

>>8930619
you are asking EXTREMELY ELEMENTARY QUESTIONS so I doubt people are taking you serious. These are literally the most basic concepts to grasp and you're arguing with people about it so don't be surprised when they post a brainlet.png

>>8930647
To be fair, I created the OP and I'm coming round to the fact that it is almost totally irrelevant.

>>8930629
>>8930646
>>8930617
>>8930604
why bother? fucking idiots. look at what he said, "i'm open to be proven wrong" aka i want to keep talking shit. what's the fucking point of arguing with these idiots when you know it's simply bait? really? this is the brand new fucking fud, fucking market cap, holy fucking shit

>>8930666
high supply means low price. Thats pretty simple to right?

>>8930655
>supply
>tokenomics
>any of those being indicators of market cap valuation down the road
Another nigger detected

>>8929573
This is the most important question for LINK holders right now.
Yet we are arguing about retarded circulating supply FUD.
Please direct your autistic energies into investigating this instead.
If we have a fucking Salesforce dev working on Chainlink I’m doubling my holdings right fucking now. I’ll suck a hundred dicks for more LINK.
If it’s just an Uber dev working on Uber code, no dicks will be sucked.

>>8930666
not to mention everyone is hoping and dreaming for there to be a demand or another bull run

>>8930705
Fucking arguing with a nigger.

>>8930714
It's definitely an Uber dev.

Sorry.

>>8930673
You must be low on Soy now
Your testosterone is starting to take hold
You've become aggressive
But your still a faggot

>>8930707
Link will not be more than $10 even two years from now, and that is only if market cap for all crypto is 10 trillion. You are a fucking retard.

>>8930728
how so. My neighbor actually works in finance. I asked him about link. He said it looks promising but don't expect much because there's to many tokens. I keep forgetting im talking to 16 year old and people that fucked their lives up hoping to make it with this shit coin

>>8930725
Please give some examples of coins with a billion or more supply that are valued over $10. I'll wait. I will actually wait two years. Because I will still enjoy calling you a retarded faggot as much as I do right now.

>>8930762
Then why is he working on chainlinks fork? By mistake?
This thread is cancer, all the posters ITT should die. I may delete it.

>>8930802
we are saying the same shit. I dont think link we even make it past 5 dollars

>>8930786
>implying market cap means anything

you know its just price multiplied by supply.

>he thinks market cap is amount of money invested

>>8930846
>he thinks he isn't blatantly making a retard of himself
>he thinks he is addressing my point
>he "thinks"

>>8930786
That's only a 3.5B marketcap in 2020, TRON for christ sake was worth 15B 3 months ago, for a fucking chink scam whitepaper project.
In 2 years top 100 coins will have a min. market cap of 3.5B.
2 years ago Ripple was worth 1/100 of what it's worth today, Steallar was worth 1/500 of what it's worth today, so get the fuck out with your """"smart"""" predictions.

>>8930800
Do you understand that the high supply means absolutely nothing. If LINK is super cheap and running nodes is super profitable there's no stopping people with putting tons of money in and creating their own nodes buying up the supply. If LINK is 3 dollars there's nothing stopping some millionaire coming and going oh shit I can make a fuck ton of money doing nothing with this let me just buy 500k and run a node.

>>8930807
I don't think he is working in Chainlinks fork, it just looks like it with GitHubs ridiculous layout.

>>8929962
This

>>8930935
so node staking is the only argument? a rich guy buying up tokens to run nodes. That would create a demand that would drive up the price per token. Which would then make the operating costs to much

>>8930921
You literally just admitted that in the best case scenario link will be $5-$10 in two years, which is what I'm saying, and then called me a retard. Eat shit deluded faggots.

>>8930991
Now you are trying too hard

>>8930629
Thank you fren

I hate biz and the fact you guys respond to obvious bait posts. You fucking idiots always wanna be "right"

>>8931052
hows this

1k EOY we made it guys im going to fuck trannys in Thailand

>>8930936
Ok thanks.
I can’t delete the thread because it’s too old.
Bunch of idiots arguing. Link will be $1000 EOY, everyone knows this. Sage.

>>8931016
>You literally just admitted
Where?

You said that it will be $10 at most if EVERYTHING goes well. To which I replied that even chink scams have 15 B market cap in 2018 with total crypto valuation under 1 trillion.
If EVERYTHING goes well, that means that LINK will be working with banks, insurances, all that and you're suggesting that a valuation for such network is only at $3.5 billion kek.

Good job on being retarded AND illiterate.

Any good Econ authors or books y’all recommend that follow the crypto model? Reading on Gold and silver perhaps ?

>>8931096
>>8931094
hahah like fucking clockwork. How much are you getting paid to post shill threads? dont tell me you do dit for free lol

>>8931107
You stupid faggot. This is a speculative market. Not only does mere $5 link depend on a speculative bull run for BTC, it also depends on speculative faggots pouring into link the same way they poured into tron and ripple. I will gladly call you a dumb faggot for the coming years as you eat shit

>>8931171
>This is a speculative market.
Yes and this is why I said that A FUCKING PROJECT THAT WORKS WITH WESTERN FINANCIAL INSTITUTION AND NOT SOME CHINK SHIT WILL BE VALUED WAY HIGHER IN A SPECULATIVE MARKET YOU FUCKING SUBHUMAN.

Learn to fucking read you shitstain.

>>8929110
umm that is zap which is an uber product and he is an uber dev...what the fuck are you speculating?

>>8931198
What you said was hopefully link will receive the same speculative interest as a shit coin. In which case it will not be worth more than $5-$10 in a 24 month timeframe. I will laugh especially heartily when mainnet drops and you realize thst every bit of link that goes into enterprise hands will either be given for free or below ICO price. Mainnet won't moon link ovet ATH, and we will be lucky to see a pump to $1 that will then bleed because anons with brains know that you need to accumulate as much link as possible to make a good return because it is never going to be worth $50, $100 etc. price that is relentlessly shilled to keep you faggots with small bags around. I am positive I hold more link to you and take great joy in your delusion, as it is so strong I can both lay out the truth for you while also utilizing you as a useful idiot to spread unwarranted claims that link is going to some absurd price.

>>8929162
the developer who doesnt work for salesforce is a pajeet too idiot

>>8931266
Rajit its shit time lets go!

Link threads are a joke. Constant fighting between fudders holding large amounts, actual brainlets being fooled and deceived by the former, and link holders taking the fud bait.

>>8931266
I used Ripple and Stellar as an example in my previous posts because they also target traditional finance AND they're still not implemented while Ripple hit $140 billion at one point.

You were mentioning the best case scenario for ChainLink and 3.5 billion for a best case scenario is laughable, especially taking into consideration that the market cap will be in multi-trillions.

And yes I know that institutions won't be buying LINK on the free market, jesus christ we're talking about speculative value and whatever profit nodes will bring and the overall network effect that we cannot predict at this point - but the best case scenario could potentially mean $100 which would be, get this, only 1/4 worth of the Ripple's highest valuation of $140 billion in 2017 (so we're not even counting the total increase in cap). I rest my fucking case.

>>8931350
the increase of total crypto mcap*

>>8931350
>>8931370
just fucking stop. Pls

>>8931391
Shut the fuck up Rajesh, learn what market cap means and learn some elementary math you street shitting monkey.

>>8929556
T.T for that guy

>>8931443
how about you learn when you are getting scammed. You are not a rational person. I feel bad for you. Stop listening to 1k eoy brainwashing. Walk away from the computer and go outside for a bit you need it

>>8931266

i'm starting to understand. damn.

sirs pls buy mobius is very good coin not scam make you rich yes

>>8931473
I dont need 1k, I need $30-40 and I'm set for life which is easily attainable as described in my previous post.
Thanks for your concern though, stay poor.

>>8929379
Im sure that the stickers on the skateboard came from the companies themselves

>>8931266
Your argument style is literally just name calling and rapidly changing your arguments. First, it was:
>hurrr huge supply
And you got dispelled. Now it is:
>hurr banks are going to dump on everyone
And pretending like you own a lot of LINK, just to get under everyones skin. This is a last resort because you have no argument to make anymore. People like you need to unironically kill yourself, anon. There's a reason you're sad and lonely.

>>8931591
You must have a lot riding on this

what lower supply coins are you guys in?

i feel stupid i didn't put this together until now. i remember it was the main thing talked about with ripple now that i look at it.

>>8930021
will this really happen?

>>8929110
I have 1m link I don’t post often because you faggots are dumb.

But over $1 link defeats the purpose. It will be $3 tops in an absolute bull market where eth reaches $3000

>>8929939
I think he asked how to use the website.
Not for you to dump what you wanted to say on a random comment because youre not only stupid but insecure as well

>>8931591
Iv'e tried, you can't argue with the FUDsters and the pajeets and baljeets that eat this shit up.

it is the Lament of the Linkless.

>>8931747
>t. Guy with no link but maybe like 10 eth at best

>>8931651
He didn’t get dispelled. He got called an idiot and no one explained anythingg

Im new here, what does link do?

>>8931684
Grats you have a brain.

>>8931946
Okay, I'll explain why circulating supply doesn't matter.

Johnny has 10$ to spend on shitcoins. Suzie has 20$ to spend on shitcoins.
Johnny buys 5 shitcoins priced at 2$ each. Suzie the next week buys those 5 shitcoins from johnny at 4$ a piece. Johnny made 10$. Suzie spent 20$

Johnny buys 10 poopcoins priced at 1$ each. Suzie the next week buys those 10 poopcoins from johnny at 2$ a piece. Johnny made 10$. Suzie spent 20$
How are y'all not getting this?

>>8931718
I'm convinced it's a possibility, yes. I can't find the source at the moment.

>>8932028
Your assuming the value is going to continue up. Which will not happen when you have more supply then demand

>>8932097
hahahahahahahahahahahah oh man this is sad

>>8932143
Am I taking crazy pills?


There is nownfucking way it is economically valuable for someone to pay 1k per token

>>8932185
What part of "speculating" do you not understand?

>>8931951
Gives you a 50lb cock.

>>8932251
He doesn't understand anything, he's literally braindead and cannot comprehend basic concepts that have been explained to him 10 times in this thread alone.

>>8932185
LINK can be broken down into 18 decimal places. Each of those is a divider of 10. 1 LINK = $1,000. .1 LINK = $100. .01 LINK = $10, .001 LINK = $1, .0001 LINK = $.10, .00001 LINK = $.01, .000001 LINK = $.001, until you get to the smallest fraction which is valued at $.00000000000001. You still think LINK can't reach $1,000/token, knowing that even at that number the smallest divisible value of LINK is a microscopic amount of fiat? Theoretically LINK can go as high as will make sense for the expenditure of a single unit, meaning that tiniest fraction probably being worth at minimal $.01 USD, meaning each LINK being worth more money than is on the entire planet. Of course that won't happen because the market won't allow it to, but from a pure financial use perspective it's not outside of the realm of possibility/reality. Supply & demand and real world use case will determine the price of a single LINK token, and $1,000 is well within the realm of possibilities since circulating supply is likely to drop dramatically once staking is a thing.

>>8932326
that means that link is wort even less then. If a high supply shitcoin can be broken down even further then were is does the value come from

>>8931350
Linky's will move the goal post and praise the $5 valuation two years from now

>>8931651
>banks dumping
This is how I know you are actually a retard and probably underage(so you should leave)
If you don't realize that anons sell the top and then buy the dip perpetually then I don't even understand how you got here

>>8929886
1000 nodes... on which Blockchain? You do realize every node contains data. Surely you don’t think only 1000 nodes will power the chainlink network. They need multiple nodes for each type of data validation. 1billion might not even be enough.

>>8932541
>1billion might not even be enough.
now this is a fucking answer.

>>8932541
The reason i keep saying $5-$10 will take years is because it is going to take this long for tulhe network to mature.
Kudos to the retard who kept replying to me and was so clueless he thought I was talking about banks when I said anons accumulate as the price bleeds. The stinky linky meme is real, fucking sad

>>8932367
Stinky pajeet.

>>8932593
2020 mass adoption of smart contracts.

Also, go to B3i website, their talking about saving 30%. You guys have to be blind if you don’t think companies will adopt almost instantly with 30% savings.

>>8932623
>he posted that image again

where does this come from?

>>8932593
>going to take this long for tulhe network to mature.
>crypto is not a speculative market
There are only a handful of mature networks in this space and on the other hand there are tons of networks valued billions of dollars without any real life adoption.

There is this huge double standard against ChainLink, FUDers are going all out on this one and you can spot their pathetic attempts from a mile away.

>>8932651
https://www.capgemini.com/consulting-de/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2017/08/smart_contracts_paper_long_0.pdf

I rather trust this financial report done by professionals then auts playing a guessing game with no insider knowledge

>>8932727
>done by professionals
you are smart. Glad someone else here wants more then memes and 1k eoy

>>8931344
>Constant fighting between fudders holding large amounts, actual brainlets being fooled and deceived by the former, and link holders taking the fud bait.
this

>>8932885
https://b3i.tech/home.html

Watch the video, it’s not chainlink, it could be, I don’t know. But 30% savings. If you go to any company and tell them you can save them 30% they will Knight you instantly. Companies will cut anything / corners to save a few dollars, never mind millions. How will smartcontracts do this? That’s another question I don’t have the answers to, expect a significant number of job cuts though.

>>8932532
>Proves my point and doesn't even have a rebuttal
k thanks

>>8933094
>https://b3i.tech/home.html
where can i go to get actual link discussion? reddit seems to be way better 4chan nowadays but its way to slow

>>8932097
Holy shit im so done. Look, when you invest money you want a good ROI. If I put 10$ into a project, I hope to take out more. It's all relative to my initial investment. I don't give a single fuck if that's from a coin that went from .00001¢ to 10¢ (high supply) or a coin that went from $100 to $1,000,000 (low supply)

Don't breed

>>8932885
I want you to die in an elephant stampede on your third favorite shitting street in Bombay this May.

>>8933193
whats wrong buddy?

>>8933104
t. Underage still missed the point ugly virgin with less link than me

>>8933171
When he was larping?

>>8929110
daily reminder that LINK is actually an Ethereum erc223 token

>>8934051
thanks for the reminder

>>8930208
>Nash equilibrium.
you are taking poker way to seriously bro. you just have to use your gut and know when to shove on the bubble.
>>8931120
i would study micro and macro economics.

>>8934342
Rothbard's Man Economy and State is good

>>8929939
props for owning up to it

>>8929556
how does 1,000,000,000 - 50,000= 950,000,000???

>>8934342
Heard a lot of people here dislike traditional macro micro studies

someone please make a pajeet gupta uber meme with fat sergey in the back of a riksha holding a mcdonalds bag

This is still good news, no? ChainLink has so many use cases it'd be hard to not find one for Uber. I think its good that theyre bringing more people on to refine the product.

>>8931266
You dumb ass .. you think those node operators are going to work for free. Get an effing clue and stfu..

>>8935157
Cute. So cute. Keep holding out for that dream son.

>>8931651
OmiseGo skateboard stickers? That fucking skateboard is shopped! Look at the board and his hand

>>8931171
Fuck you baiting brainlet.

Hope you die, your Mother eats shit and you burn in a fucking hole.

>>8932367
It means your Brain is smaller than my 3 year old bro’s Dick you fAgg