[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 101 KB, 640x480, u9ZrVGMzCvDVDepmLp9KDtFE.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8674002 No.8674002 [Reply] [Original]

ITT no debating. This is already established fact.

>> No.8674060

Idiot
Duplicitous
Ignored
Temporary

>> No.8674278

>>8674002
EOS will skyrocket soon..
praise Dan

>> No.8674303

>>8674002
Both are good projects anon and both are undervalued. EOS will release sooner, so I'm 80% on EOS, but I might move some into ADA later this year.

>> No.8674324

Fuck you EOShillers are just on fire today!

>> No.8674337

>>8674324
EOSfudders are on fire too.

>> No.8674900

>>8674002

He put that on his own Twitter, what a fucking autist

>> No.8674959
File: 8 KB, 249x249, 1519140555669.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8674959

>>8674002

>I AM A GENIUS

His whole twitter was just shit talking about Charles Hoskinson, this dude is so insecure

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ltORkYAdVk

>> No.8674988

>>8674337
There's seriously no EOS fudders, only rational people. The level of paid shilling and delusion for EOS is coming close to Link levels, and it's just as ridiculous, so of fucking course some people some people will point and say "what the fuck"?

>> No.8675021

>>8674900
>He put that on his own Twitter, what a fucking autist

sauce?

>> No.8675030

>>8675021
I doubt he really did, that would be ridiculous.

>> No.8675069

>>8674988
> There's seriously no EOS fudders
>>8674634
Lmao
EOS is actually a good project although the community is a bit pushy sometimes (nothing wrong with being excited). DYOR

>> No.8675161

Currently vaporware and would still be a 21 node centralized piece of shit if it actually existed.

No ty keep your pedovaporware

>> No.8675165

>>8675069
These are not lies though. Isn't it pretty much established that he did what he's accused of, and that he said what he did in that interview? We might have different definitions, but I don't consider legitimate criticisms as FUD.

>> No.8675193
File: 34 KB, 1005x929, 1517172623414.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8675193

>>8674002
The truth.

>> No.8675247

>>8675165
How is it a legitimate criticism of EOS if that person doesn't work there anymore and was only involved in money raising?
https://medium.com/eosio/dear-john-oliver-6aa5ac5fff26
Find some criticism of the project itself. If the only thing you can find is Brock Pierce, it's a good sign

>> No.8675582

>>8675247
What the fuck? You're the one who brought it up.

>> No.8675646

The EOS project sounds pretty legit in a lot of ways (obv. decentralization isn't one of them). The token, however, is absolutely a scam. Like how many people who "invested" in EOS have even read the faqs on eos.io where it clearly lays out that the ERC20 EOS token serves only to provide block.one an income stream, and that it will be up to other companies/groups to launch actual EOS-software platforms and decide whether they feel like importing people's ERC20 EOS tokens into their system?