/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>8546065
The rancid stagnation of my bags? Yep.

>>8546065
can't feel shit captain

>>8546073
> Is up 22% this month against eth
> Bags
Um sweetie

>>8546073
its actually the best of all my bags

>>8546076
try again

think i might stop wagecucking if req hits a dollar

>>8546174

5 bucks for me.

>>8546174
>>8546180
>can stop wage cucking in single digits
have fun with you lambos, i'd have to hope for a $100 moon shot

What the fuck is this creepy lookin thing

>>8546065
It's called "God's touch".

Everyone with 5 digits in REQ will make it before 2021.

>>8546065
DO YOU SMELL WHAT THE REQ IS COOKING?

I've got some Req, but if only one of my token gets burned I will market sell eveything immediately.

>>8546271
Your tokens are all going to get burned, you should market sell now

They will confirm partnership with LINK, pic related

>>8546313
Yes. But the partnership they are announcing is a non-crypto company. So it's not LINK.

I believe the LINK-REQ partnership will come after mainnet of both LINK and REQ are both out.

>>8546313
link is the better token since they arent burned at random

>>8546188
you'll get there one day anon

>bought 10k link a month ago
>4k have been burned since
it hurts bros. How can you hodl a coin that just burns in your wallet? Hoping the rest will not disappear so quickly

>>8546373
I bought 10k sub 6 cents

>>8546380
hope none of that gets burned

>>8546401
don't you know anon? they don't burn coins bought under 6 cents

>>8546373
>he doesn't have the new trezor with price lock and burn guard

is this a meme or do they really burn random peoples tokens?

>>8546434
only if you're dumb enough to keep them in a wallet without burn guard or burn guard plus

>>8546434
Meme

>>8546434
it's a meme
do you think any dev would do that? Especially one that actually seems legitimate

>>8546434
Split your holdings into 1 REQ wallets to be safe

>>8546434
the burning isn't random, the bogs decide whose tokens get burned

>>8546500
they only burn yours if you answer
don't pick up any calls from France anons

Guys do your coins get burned if you keep them on binance? I'm legitimately concerned, what kind of company burns random fucking coins???

>>8546525
The kind of company that answers to a higher authority

>>8546525

Binance wallets have burn-gate plus, meaning the coins in them are actually more prone to burning. This was a controversial decision, but it was decided on as a way to encourage holding in an off-exchange wallet to insulate the coin price..

>>8546525
Only if one of the binance wallets gets designated as burn wallet for the day, REQ holders will share the 5% burn proportionate to their holdings.

>>8546582
But imagine the FOMO once normies realize that a significant portion of circulating supply was burned. It's worth the risk, you just have to keep it split in a lot of wallets.

>>8546188
If REQ hits 2$ I'll have 1MM USD (total in crypto)

>>8546560
Makes sense. I think it's risky as fuck to hold REQ at this point but the thrill itself is worth it. I'm planning on creating 20k wallets and sending 1 REQ to each wallet just so that I can decrease the chances of my REQ getting burnt. Plus the more wallets there are, the less likely we'll get burnt, I encourage everyone to do the same

>>8546349
I don't recall seeing them saying it was a non-crypto company. If the partnership is some trivial no-name company, price will tank, regardless of mainnet. Price will probably dump after mainnet anyway, unless the partnership is a large well-known company.

>>8546632
They say it is a company with YCombinator connection and every Cryptocompany within YCombinator already has a partnership with REQ so it has to be a non-crypto company by deduction.

>>8546694
Coinbase is a ycombinator company, they dont have a partnership with request

Anons the odds are low that its coinbase but it is a YCombinator startup so there is a chance. I personally think REQ would already be through he roof if it was because those Coinbase fags cant help but inside trade. Will it dump a bit with the news - absolutely- crypto is full of stupid fucks who follow old made up WallStreet terminology.

>>8547365
By saying cryptocompany, one would think along the lines of Kyber or Ripio. Not a motherfucking Coinbase. If it's a partnership with Coinbase, we're going to a fucking Andromeda.

>>8546694
Where did they say it was a company with a Ycombinator connection? Asking seriously, I can't recall them saying it.

feel this *unzips dick*

>>8547599
Because it was on /Biz you stupid fuck.

>>8547632
Thanks, just sold 100k

>>8546694
This is not true. There's another really los key project, called Ink Protocol. Their team is Y Combinator backed and They have a working product in Listia.con

That can be the partnership, which as it states right now, is underwhelming. Keep the feet on the ground.

>>8548145
God damn autocorrect. Low key project and the site is Listia.com

>>8547619
your dick has a zipper?

>>8548164
Cought el mexicano !
>Los Caramba !!

>>8546065
if the partnerships was any hot they would have released it during the latest pump

Word around the campfire is Overstock.com going to have a Request button.

>>8546444
Superkek

Honestly, I think it's going to be some literally who start-up for the partnership, since crypto-crypto transactions aren't really usable in e-commerce.

I'm holding out for the fiat-to-fiat transactions on the Request protocol, if they can pull it off, we're literally millionaires.

>>8548177

How fucking new are you?

>meme team 6 reporting for duty

>>8549768
This coin will hit $100 and it's completely possible EoY or early to mid 2019.

Just hang in there

>>8548897

They hired a chief strategy officer to time the announcement. Im sure they know when the best time is.

>>8549768
>>8548951

I honestly think it could be coinbase. It makes the most sense.

>>8549914

This delusional meme prediction needs to end. It won't touch $100 until 2022.

$1-3 EOY

>>8549992
>$100 in 2022
Wew lad, I'd hodl.

>$1-3 EOY
That's my estimate if the market keeps this boring.

If crypto goes past the 1 trillion market cap, REQ could be $4-$8

If REQ gains any major partnerships/adoption, $10-$15. Anything past that is deluded for 2018.

>>8549992
>>8550027
In a recovering market with successful products and partnerships this is FUD

$100

>>8550062

Do you realize how many req hodlers from ico will sell off and rebuy even if it reaches $25-50 EOY?

You're f'n delusional.

>>8550062
Man, I think it can reach $100. Just not this year. Unless we get unbelievable achievements (like the Coinbase commerce rumours and any major marketplaces or accounting stuff).

I know people said in Jan 2017 that $1k Ether was a joke, but it's kinda hard to picture that. Besides, crypto is different now.

>>8550151
>there is a magical price point where every single ICO holder will market sell at the same time

>>8550211
>Doesn't remembered it happened to Eth at 60 usd

>>8550474
Speak English, rajesh.

>>8546359
this

>>8546616
i was under the impression the way they wrote the code it would target smaller wallets first

>>8546373
lol, you must be some kind of pathetic virgin if yours are getting burnt at that rate
I'm a Chad and only 3 of mine have gotten burned out of 7k

>>8546616
This is a very creative idea, I will do the same. thanks

REQlet here

Let's keep it real, anons. Even $5 is an awesome price target for EOY. That's 5x the ATH.
Honestly, I'll be happy for anything in the $2-$5 range. I can't see this going anywhere higher than this.

A more conservative estimate would be $1.5 EOY if sideways market remains for the rest of the year.

$10 is delusional, even though REQ is my favorite holding.

>>8551675
suck start a shotgun

Was daytrading and missed my buy point last 5 days ago, and then REQ recovered extremely well. Will it go down again or should I set a buy order around 2600 sats?

>>8551716
Next stop 3150 sats. I'm sorry.

>>8546434
Are you really this retarded?

>>8551675
>$10 is delusional
You should really research what the fuck you're buying before clicking the green button, anon. Just saying.

>>8552365
What makes you think REQ could hit $10 EOY?

>>8546359
this has to be bait

got 1 btc I want to spend on req, but bought 0,4 of it for about 12K in december, should I wait now till btc rises and then buy req or just shit on my loss and go all in req? help me biz I'm frustrated

>>8552960
>Parterships
>Fiat to fiat
>42 fucking teams building apps on top of REQ
>Each one those apps will burn REQ tokens
>Burning itself
>The normie potential

>>8553342
As some anon said, doing anything but HOLDing with REQ right now is gambling. There's partnerships and the mainnet release incoming. Personally, I'd use half of it now and the rest once it dumps a little/pumps a little.

>>8553398
That's the smartest way to go. So far it's my strategy right now.

It's crazy that people will go along with shit projects without any legitimacy, but Req a legitimate project with a big team and y-combinator partnership gets so much shit.

$5 eoy is highly likely
$100+ in 3 or 5 years is obvious.

>>8546065
Oh, I feel it anon

>>8553471
>but Req a legitimate project with a big team and y-combinator partnership gets so much shit
That's actually a bullish sign. The more idiots are trying to FUD this down, the more I know something big is coming.

What are your realistic price predictions for REQ and why?

>>8553575

40 cents by Friday.

ITT: Telegram pajeet shills


REQ is literally a dead end, just look at the volume nobody gives a shit about this piece of garbage coin with no liquidity. Enjoy your pajeet bags if you're delusional enough to buy this pajeet shit.


>TOKEN BURN SIR VERY GOOD SIR PLZ BUY REQUEST NETWORK ON BINANCE SIR PAYPAL 2.0 SIR

>>8553594
>he bought at $1.20 and sold at 15c
Kek no wonder your a salty fuck

>>8553594
Low volume, can mean no one wants to sell it.
I bet you're looking for a cheaper req entry point.

>>8553594
You forgot that Chad will never buy a mocha latte with it because it's too creepy for stacy to use, and that venmo will blow them out of the water with their crypto hot swaps in Q2.

>>8553594
Thanks for trying to keep the price down so we can accumulate, anon. But you DO realize this board has 0 influence in the market... right?

>>8551675
delusional! you are the same guy who kept telling everyone that all the money was already made when btc hit 3$. goddamn go in the corner for the rest of the day and then kys.

...is it starting? We broke highs from a week ago and we're holding strong there right now. Rocket primed and fueling?

>>8546231
You consider 1M as making it?

>>8546694
It is Cirqle, screenshot this

What's the short term news for req, something happening this week?

>>8554656
1M is enough to never work for someone else again. You have plenty of time to do other shit like reselling, starting a business, getting your life and living area together to the place you want it to be.

1M gives you all the time you need to figure out where to continue going in life. Cash half out, leave the other half in crypto, and if you truly believe it's the future, having $500,000 in it will guarantee you in 5 - 10 years as well.

>>8554689
Cirqle is probably one of them, although they stated that "there should be results soon" from their Y Combinator backing.

That implies the partnership was obtained specifically because of their connections. Cirqle looks like they just randomly reached out.

If dubs partnership will be coinbase

>>8555193
fail, partnership is mcdonalds

>>8555210

Fail, as if partnership with the worlds largest fast food chain worth $36billion wouldn't be better.

Hope youre right, anon

BMW partnership

>>8554121
Hope not, I sold this afternoon hoping to pick up again on the dip because my entry point was around .00002774, which was rather high for where it was at. Hoping it goes back down to the .00002580s or less again before the rocket so I can get in again. I think it will, we still have five days left before news hits.

BUMPER

>>8555265
>sold DURING the pricing-in when the partnership and mainnet can drop at ANY moment
we don't have 5 days before news hits, they explicitly said the partnership announcement can come at any moment, not in the biweekly update

>>8546065
All I can feel is Request Network being LOCKED

>>8555419
To be fair, it was entirely my fault. I was trying to set a stop-loss, the exchange had me put in my auth code, and I failed to notice that the sale price had reverted to the ask instead of what I'd put in before I had clicked sell the first time.

Still sold higher than what I bought in for, at least, but I won't pretend I'm not disappointed.

>>8555419

checking back in 5 mins to see if Coinbase partnership announced

>>8546444
Lulz

bump

>>8555244
dubs confirm

>>8555757
Didn't even notice.

Looks like partnership is either Coinbase or McDonalds

guys the partnership is probably with "generic crypto shitcoin #329487"
>b-but they said it's non crypto
they're lying

>>8546065
I feel it deep in my angus rn desu.

>>8546434
yeah but only if you keep them in the sun or in a very dry places
I keep mine in the basement next to a bucket of water so I don't have to worry about them

I'm thinking it's either a Steam partnership or overstock considering the info we have.

>>8546077
everything is up against eth

>>8556173
REQ would be fucking perfect for Steam crypto payments integration, not happening tho

>>8556184
So that is how you mine ETH. kek

>>8546560
fucking burn-gate plus was the worst idea ever. i lost 5%..

Burn Guard 1.0 isn't good enough to stop this burn
need AT LEAST Burn Guard 2.0 Gold Edition