/biz/ - Business & Finance

All ya'll neck bear faggots already know....

1000 EOY.

Fuck off soyboi holding 45 link.

Real niggas know

Real neckbeards know

But yall bitch ass soybois finna sell at 10 pesos

fuck you. fuck this board. finna kms unless link giveth me 10000000000000 dollars

Migo!!!!!

JUST: $2

Conservative: $5

Realistic: $10

Optimistic: $25

"LINK pulls a NEO": $40

>>8471335

Vechain: $400-$600
BTC: 18-25k
Eth: $600-$800

>>8471356
thoughts on ETH?

>>8471356
Why would BTC hit a new ATH while ether still sits at $600

>>8471152
5-20 USD

>>8471391
because ICOs are dumping eth not btc

>>8471418
>because ICOs are dumping eth not btc

...what?

>>8471152
$1000.

>>8471406
>tfw even if it only hits $5 EOY, I'll still have enough for me to fuck prostys in thailand for a month

Feels fucking good

>>8471441
"Companies" that did ICOs are dumping the ETH they got from people. ETH pumped from people buying it for ICOs. What goes up, must come down, and it's now a race to the bottom.

LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be paid in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA...

I think this year will be slow for ETH b/c of the ICO uncertainty and dumping of unsuccessful ico's / eos dumping happening with other tokens.
It's probably not even that big of a deal but represents a change of sentiment more than anything, ETH will probably recover to ATH next yr.

BTC $1000 EOY
ETH $1000 EOY
LINK $1000 EOY

>>8471486
This FUD pasta is too obvious in it's repetition, so it will actually encourage people to buy. Can you please just shut the fuck up until I get my tax return?

>>8471152
$0.20

>>8471482
>"Companies" (you mean startups?) stupid enough to just sell at the bottom
>posts boomerponzilogic.png
lol you're right, ETH and ERC20 tokens are a fraud, hardly any coins using ERC20 anymore.

>>8471335
This.

>>8471152
Dragonchain 10$

>>8471554
Hey, they are going to have to fund their ongoing operations somehow. Or exit scam. Either way that's selling pressure on Etherium, only question is how much.

>>8471535
They can't all be 1000$ EOY simultaneousl brainlet

>>8471152
18$ eoy

>>8472332
You fucking idiot anything can be anything

>>8471391
It won't. He's retarded. If anything ETH will surpass BTC this year.

link 1000$ eoy

>>8472357
would literally cum in my pants if this actually happened

>>8471152
Realistic:
>$0.46

Optymistic:
>everything higher

Sergey keep eating burgers:
>180 satoshi

>>8471152
$3000

>>8472622
dubs confirm

>>8471486
Why even bother posting if you're not going to update your pasta? This shit was already disproven, node operators will only be paid with link. This all came straight from Sergey himself.

>>8472677
He doesn't care if it's accurate he just wants replies.

>>8471335
>JUST: $0.50
>Conservative: $1
>Realistic: $2
>Optimistic: $4
>"LINK pulls a NEO": $10
Realistic predictions, we are in a bear market faggot

I heard $1k EOY is an agreed conservative estimate

>>8473380
1k is sure
5k if it pulls a neo

Selling 200 at $500 and the final 200 at $900. I'm hopeful but I don't see $1000 happening until 2019 and unfortunately I have to sell before then.

>>8473646
You bought 60 dollars worth of LINK? not going to make it sorry

What's the highest you guys ever see LINK realistically going? What's the '1 BTC = 1M' but for LINK?

>>8471152
0.0000000001 BTC
Crypto is dead.

>>8473668
If Link turned into crazy shit like this he would have $280000 from 400 links. Of course it will never happend, there is a reason why it's only shilled here

>>8473698
Well, if it pulls an ethereum (80B MC) or loads of new fiat makes the market cap rise to several trillion, I'd say that $200 would where it gets to.

For $1000 LINK to actually be a thing, I'd guess the market cap would have to hit at least 7 trillion.

Assuming LINK tops out at 5% Market dominance (reasonable if it really does what it says), LINK increases by around $150 for every trillion in the market.

If we go ultra conservative and give LINK a 1% dominance rate (like NEO currently), we can see that LINK increases by about $28-30 per trillion.

I know this post is automatically long but my point is that if sergey delivers on his promises and we see a bullrun to 1 trillion this year, we are guaranteed $30 per link and maybe more if chainlink goes viral or something.

>>8471535
:Balanced:

Mainnet+SWIFT+bull market

= $7 to $10

If more partnerships roll in you are looking at $20-$50

It's all timing right now, hoping mainnet/beta releases before bull market comes out

>>8471152
I hold an advanced degree in cryptoeconomics and I can tell you without a doubt it'll be between $5-100 EOY

>>8474872
GET OUT OF HERE WITH YOUR FUD

$1000 is fanciful but $500 is 100% guaranteed by EOY. Screencap this.

riddle me this:
when mainnet launches and sergey hands out his tokens, 700 mio will be in circulation. linkpool will do 100k token nodes but so many aren't needed for a node.
we will see 700 nodes if they have 10k tokens on average.
looking at oraclize's prices (1ct per request) and claims of having over 2000 requests per node (which is likely exaggerated already) for an average 10k node we will get:
>$7000 in staking rewards a year
>a price of 7$ per link at a roi of 10%
each node doing 2k requests per day nets us 1.4mio requests per day. a lot.
even getting to this many will be tough within the next 2 years or so.
It's all guesstimation but what it comes down to is this:
$7 per link would be an optimistic value until we surpass the 1.4mio requests which requires adoption levels reached no sooner than 2020
>pic related, kiddos

>>8475298
kek, I'd have over $5,000,000. I highly doubt it.

>>8475316
One major bank confirms Chainlink usage, and the price shoots up way beyond $7.
You're retarded if you think Chainlink will be priced purely based on objective usage.
Do the math on the objective usage of Bitcoin. Go ahead.

Go suck your thumb.

BTC 14000
Eth 600

>>8471152
$4 and I'm good