/biz/ - Business & Finance

>who can’t afford proper coins?

what did he mean by this?

LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.

>>8413608
LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.

>>8414349
>next ETH nice FUD.
We all know LINK will be bigger then ETH in three years.

LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA

>>8413608
>Stinky linkies can’t give good answers about this shitcoin solves anything beyond:
>Muh oracle
That's because that's the only thing it's designed to do dummy.

>>8414349
>LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>>muh next ETH
>Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
>Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)
>Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA
>>8414374
>>8414388
LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA

>>8414433
>LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>>muh next ETH
>Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
>Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)
>Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
>LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh ne

>>8413608
>coin

>>8414433
>LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>>muh next ETH
>Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
>Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)
>Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
>LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh

>>8413608
>That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>>8414332
>>8414349
Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao>>8414433
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)
>>8414402
Muh oracle>>8414387
LINK is intrinsically worthless>>8414374
>>8414349
LINK is basically useless
if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team)>>8414387
>>>muh next ETH

>>8414433
>>8414446
>>8414456
>>8414464
This is without a doubt the most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life

>>8414433
>>8414446
>>8414456
>>8414464 (You)
This is without a doubt the most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life
>>8414474
LINK aims to do

>>8414474
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
>>>8414456
>>>8414464
>This is without a doubt the most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life
LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.>>8414488
>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
>>>8414456
>>>8414464 (You)
>This is without a doubt the most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life
>>>8414474
>LINK aims to do
LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.

>>8414433
>>8414446
>>8414456 (You)
>>8414464
This is without a doubt the most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life

>>
Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)12:00:56 No.8414488▶

>>8414433
>>8414446
>>8414456 (You)
>>8414464 (You)
This is without a doubt the most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life
>>8414474
LINK aims to do

>>8414509
>Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)12:00:56 No.8414488▶
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
>>>8414456 (You)
>>>8414464 (You)
>This is without a doubt the most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life
>>>8414474
>LINK aims to do
>>8414509
>56 (You)
>>>8414464
>This is without a doubt the most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life
>>>
>Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)12:00:56 No.8414488▶
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.>>8414488
>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You) (You)
>>>8414456

>>8414433
>>8414446
>>8414456 (You)
>>8414464 (You)
This is without a doubt the most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life

>>
Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)12:00:56 No.8414488▶

>>8414433
>>8414446
>>8414456 (You)
>>8414464 (You) (You)
This is without a doubt the most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life
>>8414474
LINK aims to do>>8414509
>>8414500
>>8414488
>>8414474
>>8414464
>>8414456
HAHA
>Node operators
>cryptographically fact

>>8414521
LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be paid in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
>>8414509 (You)
>56 (You)
>>>8414464
>This is without a doubt the most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life
>>>
>Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)12:00:56 No.8414488▶
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.>>8414488
>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You) (You)
>>>8414456 (You)

just stopping by for the shitshow
linkies are universally despised, and it warms my heart to see them in despair

>>8414540
>>>
>Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)12:00:56 No.8414488▶
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
>>>8414456 (You)
>>8414545
>e most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life
>>>>
>>Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)12:00:56 No.8414488▶
>>>>8414433
>>>>8414446 (You) (You)
>Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
>Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)
ims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data froims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data fro

>>8414509 (You)
>56 (You)
>>>8414464 (You)
>This is without a doubt the most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life
>>>
>Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)12:00:56 No.8414488▶
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.>>8414488 (You)
>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You) (You)
>>>8414456 (You)>>8414545
>Anonymous (ID: Cpt+Inwg) 03/18/18(Sun)23:04:42 No.8414545▶
Anonymous (ID: Cpt+Inwg) 03/18/18(Sun)23:04:42 No.8414545▶
>basically useless

>>8414554
>t stopping by for the shitshow
>es are universally despised, and it warms my hea
>>8414554
>just stopping by for the shitshow
>li
>>8414554
>d it warms my heart to see them in despair
>>8414560
>>Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)12:00:56 No.8414488▶
>>>>8414433
>>>>8414446 (You) (You)
>>>>8414456 (You)
>>>8414545
>>e most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life
>>8414560
>ptographically signing the data froims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data fro
>>>
>Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)13:06:16 No.8414561▶
> >>8414509 (You)
> >56 (You)
> >>>8414464 (You)
> >This is without a doubt the most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life
> >>>
> >Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)12:00:56 No.8414488▶
> >>>8414433

>>8414509 (You) (You)
>56 (You)
>>>8414464 (You)
>This is without a doubt the most desperate FUD I've ever seen in my life
>>>
>Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)12:00:56 No.8414488▶
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Can you imagine the average no-coiner? Especially the ones on r/buttcoin. I just think that it doesn't make sense that they consider a ~70% drop from ATH to be the losses of everyone in crypto because it's retarded to assume that everyone bought that high. Opportunity cost, yes, but then you can only imagine that these guys started fudding bitcoin and crypto in general some years ago, looking back at the post history of the average no-coiner. Much sadder is when you see that some of them post on r/investing or r/entrepreneur, probably spending a lot of time there, trying so hard to come up with ways to make money when he could've just bought in. Even the ones who only started being salty

>cryptographically
>stinker

linkies are universally despised, and it warms my heart to see them in despair

>>8414433
>>8414446
>>8414456 (You)
>>8414464
>>8414584
>>8414572
>>8414561
>>8414560
>>8414545
>>8414540
>>8414521
>>8414433
>>8414446
>>8414456 (You)
>>8414464 (You)
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE STOP IT STOP IT STOP IT YOU'RE KILLING LIIIIIIINK
FUCKFUCKFUCKFUCK REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>
Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)12:00:56 No.8414488▶

>>8414446
>LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>>muh next ETH
>Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
>Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)
>Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
>LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh ne

>>8414630
>>8414446
>LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>>muh next ETH
>Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
>Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)
>Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
>LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh nig

>>8414616
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
>>>8414456 (You)
>>>8414464
>>>8414584
>>>8414572 (You)
>>>8414561
>>>8414560 (You)
>>>8414545
>>>8414540
>>>8414521 (You)
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
>>>8414456 (You)
>>>8414464 (You)
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE STOP IT STOP IT STOP IT YOU'RE KILLING LIIIIIIINK
>FUCKFUCKFUCKFUCK REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>>
>Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)12:00:56 No.8414488▶
>>8414616
>E KILLING LIIIIIIINK
>FUCKFUCKFUCKFUCK
>>8414616
>>8414630
>cents (3.5x ICO)
>Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)
>Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
>>LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can
>>8414630
>AHA.

>>8414616
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
>>>8414456 (You)
>>>8414464 (You)
>>>8414584
>>>8414572 (You)
>>>8414561 (You)
>>>8414560 (You)
>>>8414545
>>>8414540 (You)
>>>8414521 (You)
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
>>>8414456 (You)
>>>8414464 (You) (You)
>>8414616
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
>>>8414456 (You)
>>>8414464 (You)
>>>8414584
>>>8414572 (You)
>>>8414561 (You)
>>>8414560 (You)
>>>8414545
>>>8414540 (You)
>>>8414521 (You)
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
>>>8414456 (You)
>>>8414464 (You) (You)
>>8414616
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
>>>8414456 (You)
>>>8414464 (You)
>>>8414584
>>>8414572 (You)
>>>8414561 (You)
>>>8414560 (You)
>>>8414545
>>>8414540 (You)
>>>8414521 (You)
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
>>>8414456 (You)
>>>8414464 (You) (You)
>>8414616
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
>>>8414456 (You)
>>>8414464 (You)
>>>8414584
>>>8414572 (You)
>>>8414561 (You)
>>>8414560 (You)
>>>8414545
>>>8414540 (You)
>>>8414521 (You)
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
>>>8414456 (You)
>>>8414464 (You) (You)
>>8414616
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
>>>8414456 (You)
>>>8414464 (You)
>>>8414584
>>>8414572 (You)
>>>8414561 (You)
>>>8414560 (You)
>>>8414545
>>>8414540 (You)
>>>8414521 (You)
>>>8414433
>>>8414446 (You)
>>>8414456 (You)
>>>8414464 (You) (You)
>muh

Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
>LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh nigger
>>8414630
>cents (3.5x ICO)
>Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)
>Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
>>LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can
>>8414630
>AHA.

>>8414456 (You) (You)
>>8414464 (You)
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE STOP IT STOP IT STOP IT YOU'RE KILLING LIIIIIIINK
FUCKFUCKFUCKFUCK REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>
Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)12:00:56 No.8414488▶

>>
Anonymous (ID: g/chyMX8) 03/18/18(Sun)12:11:11 No.8414615▶>>8414631

>>8414568 (You)
yeah I have more satoshis than you insecure faggot. sorry, I was just addressing that this place is a dump now, mainly because of people like you

This is clearly a FUD bot gone awry. A good indication that the singularity is upon us. Sell at your own peril

>>8413608
>>8414349
>>8414374
>>8414388
>>8414433
>>8414446
>>8414456
>>8414464
>>8414500
>>8414509
>>8414521
>>8414540
>>8414545
>>8414554
>>8414560
>>8414561
>>8414572
>>8414584
>>8414630

Kill yourselves you IP hopping Pajeets

This is clearly a FUD bot gone awry. A good indication that the singularity is upon us. Sell at your own peril
>>8414630
>AHA.

>>8414456 (You) (You) (You)
>>8414464 (You)
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE STOP IT STOP IT STOP IT YOU'RE KILLING LIIIIIIINK
FUCKFUCKFUCKFUCK REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>
Anonymous (ID: 6KCJgZsu) 03/18/18(Sun)12:00:56 No.8414488▶

>>
Anonymous (ID: g/chyMX8) 03/18/18(Sun)12:11:11 No.8414615▶>>8414631 →

>>8414568 → (You)
yeah I have more satoshis than you insecure faggot. sorry, I was just addressing that this place is a dump now, mainly because of people like you

>>
Anonymous (ID: keWiA/WK) 03/18/18(Sun)12:18:16 No.8414682▶

This is clearly a FUD bot gone awry. A good indication that the singularity is upon us. Sell at your own peril

This is the best the nolinks can do. Literally their last resort.

>>8413608
>LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>>muh next ETH
>Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
>Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)
>Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.
LINK is intrinsically worthless. Node operators can be payed in existing cryptocurrencies. Just look at the testnet right now, it only accepts ETH instead of LINK lmao. It means that ETH can easily be substituted for it, that is, if someone wants to fork the token to accept ETH (an established cryptocurrency instead of some fucking ERC20 token made with a two-man team), LINK is basically useless. That is besides the fact that everything LINK aims to do can be easily done by cryptographically signing the data from the API source.
>muh next ETH

Link, 5 months in: 35 cents (3.5x ICO)
Ethereum, 5 months in: $5.50 (17x ICO)

Uh oh, pissed stinker incoming HAHA.

I don't trust neither my weak hands, nor you, but I believe in Sergey.

I believe that being balls deep into banking partnerships he won't pull an exit scam. I believe that ppl who invested millions into LINK see the big picture I can't comprehend.
I see that most link haters think it is just a meme coin you should avoid (while ignoring that all top10 except for monero and ethereum are meme coins), while I am partly the person behind theese memes.

I'm not done cumulatin and I could have made better decisions while trading, but now that I have broken even with what I had back in September I choose to go all in on LINK and lock that shit in a ledger I have just bought to prevent panic selling.

I have learnt my lesson with daytrading: patience is key. If it takes Sergey years to bring up the beast to massacre all the jews and salvage all the neets, I am willing to hold

I'm actually worried that the LINK FUD pasta is getting stale.

>>8414864
(You)

>>8413608
You're right anon. I'm just a retarded stinky linky bagholder. I'm too stupid to find the sell button anymore, so I guess I'll just hodl.

>>8415051
You just need to make a video shilling link for Sergey to reenable your sell button.