/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>8114749
Before, last time it went up to 0.9 i think

Just don't be a nolinker when the singularity happens
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4gDfl90GC0

>>8114749
Before,
no rumours about what'll be said, it's all a surprise, good news will pump it.

link doesn't dump after conferences like other coins

Idiots chainlink wont be mentioned its about smart contracts killing lawyers. General talk

>>8114749
dont buy link its a fucking meme, buy omg

No chance of dumpin, my friend. 60 cents is the hard floor. People are anticipatin' huge things.

dont buy it at all

>>8114877
How can you know?

>>8114793
>that video
fucking genius

>>8114749
Hey. Are you guys professional gas lighters, or are these products actually worth anything?
And I’m only asking because I’m curious. I think I finally understand it, just looking for your guidance.

Don’t fall for a literal meme for fuck’s sake.

>>8114749
the code is shit. it's basically a websocket wrapper. that's it. no scalability, no sign of improvement. golang is a fisher price language

https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink

>>8114877
chainlink was mentioned at the last conference

>>8114749
Wait. It's going to be sibos 2.0. I expect a dump to 20 cents at the minimum.

Doesn't really matter. Anything under $10 is cheap, anything under $1 is basically stealing

>>8114985
Well, I'm dead fucking serious personally. I've been researching ChainLink like a mad autist for months now and I am not kidding you when I say my biggest fear is that I won't get enough in time.

Don't know what else to tell you.

I thought the conference is the 17th?

I get my bonus on the 14th so I’m gonna be mad if I miss it at the bogs pump it before I can buy any

>>8115091
https://schedule.sxsw.com/2018/events/PP80326
Sergey's speak is 14th of march

Sold my REQ for it even though mainnet is soon. Just too risky with Sergey tweeting + conference.

>>8114877
> So genius Mr nazarov, how exactly will smart contracts kill lawyers?
>We are working on this cool project called chainlink. Its a decentralized oracle system (insert genius)

Whale here, buy on the 15th. we are dumping 30 mins after sergey speaks, heed this warning. Buy back in around $0.35, which we should hit within 4-6 hours afterward

>>8115214
Thx bro

>>8115214
I may have no choice but to do exactly this so I hope you're not bamboozling me cause this is comforting

>>8115199
Really hoping for something like live feed like at the super conference . Shit was exciting :3

I am confident that it will dump back to at least 40 cents.

>>8114877
"SmartContract CEO, Sergey Nazarov will be presenting at SXSW on March 14th, 2018. The panel focuses on how smart contracts and ChainLink oracles will revolutionize the way legal agreements between parties are reached."

https://chainlinknodes.com/smartcontract-ceo-sergey-nazarov-speak-sxsw/

>>8114972
He's half right, it's a panel on getting rid of lawyers, but I can't imagine how they'll get through the discussion without mentioning chainlink.
https://schedule.sxsw.com/2018/events/PP80326

>>8114985
I got to 10k last night and I'm not planning on selling for at least 2 years. By contrast, I wouldn't make that kind of statement about any other coin outside the top 10

>>8115287
No reason whatsoever to think this, except irrational hate of LINKstas.

>>8115057
Sibos2 is already happenin.
This gonna be devcon: a conference market won't react to

Chainlink will dump 38.43% like Vechain

looking for help trying to remember more basic LINK research

>>8115282

>>8115359
Except LINK is a good coin with an actual use, unlike hype beast "lookit all muh partnerships" vechain

>>8115398
Ye, and crypto is an efficient market with perfectly logical investor.

its the best buy right now

>>8115322
What a click bait seminar title. No way is Sergey going to stand up there and unironically tell a crowd of people that smart contracts will replace lawyers. He's not going to alienate the old money we're banking on to give us our singularity, r-right?

>>8114749

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ruk-CrnBZK4

>video posted in 2010

G...GUYS???

>>8114877
Wrong. Look at this, written by Tom Gosner (DocuSign founder): https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/smart-contracts-deals-without-lawyers-tom-gonser/
>Where will the data come from to connect smart contracts to the data they need to make decisions? How will we know we can rely on these data sources?
>Do smart contracts require a decentralized "trust-less" block chain to operate? Or can these same contracts be built on ‘trusted’ networks?
He says "blockchain" but he means oracle. SERGEY WILL ABSOLUTELY BE TALKING ABOUT CHAINLINK. He is there to discuss decentralised oracles, and how that all fits in to getting rid of lawyers.

>>8115562
Just to emphasise my point, Gosner's post also says
>Finally, we’ll hear from Sergey Nasarov, CEO of Smartcontract.com about the importance of oracles to get data in and out of smart contracts securely.
That explicitly states that the purpose of Sergey being there is to talk about decentralised oracles. I would be highly surprised if he didn't mention LINK, when he is there to talk about the importance of decentralised oracles for smart contracts.

>>8115497
S H A D I L A Y

>>8114993
> no scalability

>>8115562
sounds like docusign is going to announce their own blockchain to feed data to smart contracts. good find.

>>8114793
I literally had to watch this five times in a row.

>>8115562
>>8115616
tom doesn't have anything to do with docusign anymore. he stepped away from the company.

>>8115674
I don't think there will be any announcements because it's a panel. I don't think people make announcements at panel discussions. Maybe I'm wrong. However, Gosner says in that post that smart contracts will be
>Highly secure, managed using encryption and digital signature technology
So I'm quite sure that DocuSign wants in on smart contracts. Combined with the fact that Sergey was hinting at being involved with "e-signature" companies in an interview he gave, I'm 99% sure that Docusign and SmartContract.com are working together already.

But you'd be wrong thinking that docusign is going to "announce their own blockchain". That doesn't make sense, why would they need a blockchain for e-signatures??

>>8115497
P R A I S E
R
A
I
S
E

>>8115497
>im trying to cop a deal make a million +
> Lets lift it open to the chainlink trust

>>8114877

>>8115710
He's still qualified to talk about how e-signatures and smart contracts could be combined. And I'm sure he must have some idea about the future direction of the industry.

Anyway, my original point was I think Sergey will be shilling LINK again.

>>8114993
says the 50k LINK holder

>>8115710
>>8115843
And actually he's a Board Member for Docusign, I just checked!

>>8115888
Checked the checkers check

https://www.docusign.com/company/leadership#board-of-directors

there's our boy Tom Gosner

>>8116050
Check out this interview with him from last year.
https://www.geekwire.com/2017/docusign-founder-tom-gonser-future-digital-identity-potential-ipo-seattle-vs-san-francisco/

>Gosner: What I do at Seven Peaks is focus on new and innovative companies in spaces that I know. If you look at the digital transformation bubble and everything from what DocuSign does, there’s lots of branches from that. ... For me, from an investment opportunity perspective, it’s natural to be looking at who’s inventing these new things, whether that’s identity technology, identity management, the innovations on blockchain technology, smart contracts, payments — those are all areas that I’m pretty familiar with. It’s kind of natural to be looking at those markets and those companies and also looking at this from a DocuSign strategy perspective, so they fit together pretty well.

>GeekWire: What’s your role at DocuSign these days?

>Tom Gonser: “I’m on the board, so pretty active in that regard. I spent quite a bit of time just talking long term strategy with the CEO and a lot of the execs. I’m still pretty connected to a lot of people in the company

Read between the lines, it sounds a lot like he's got his fingers in the LINK pie

>>8115467
It will be even bester tomorrow and at 30% discount in a week

>>8116050
>>8116253
and
> In order for a contract to be smart, it has to get data from the outside world. It can get that from people when they fill out forms, but if you think about contracts becoming truly smart, there needs to be a way that it can get triggers from things to know that clauses need to be energized or payments need to be made, etc.

He's talking about oracles/LINK in April 2017

Are you not entertained? Are you not entertained? Is this not why you are here?

> tfw a whales put a 7 btc buy wall to stop LINK from reverse singularity

>>8116323

>>8114869
>tfw buy at 7700 sats during bitcoin superconference
>now at 5300 sats
>at least it never dumped

quick /biz/ how do i buy sinky linkies
I will suck your cock or at least refer you but please, i must be part of this meme.

>>8116526
It dumped quite a bit actually, got pumped allot aswell tho but it seems to hover around the 60 to 85cents range all the fucking time.

>>8116526
>tfw went all in at 7050 and can't buy any dips

>>8116535
lurk moar

>>8116339
hahahahah

you poor, sad, idiot

>>8116535
dyor

>>8116650
>>8116589
at least tell me where to start

>>8116535
Get ether from coinbase, kraken, gemini, my local bitcoins, whatever it takes.


Then send that to binance and exchange ether for link tokens. If binance is closed for registration try huoboi. Alternatively if you're feeling brave, as it sounds like you're new, and have your own wallet, use IDEX.

>>8116526
> tfw sold @ 5100 before the pump
> tfw fomoed in on the pump
> tfw need 4200 LINK to restore your stack
I done fucked up, guyz

>>8116763
you shouldn't have sold the bottom of a no-volume dump

this is being manipulated by 1 guy and he will get rekt when a real whale buys all his sell walls

>>8116855
I thought I had more time to cumulate, but the price just went up and never went down.

I also did not expect a conference pump thiat early

>>8116535
Buy ETH from coinbase, send to binance. Buy link on binance.

>>8116915
why spoonfeed him

>>8116991
Done accumulating and wanna get that referral money lol. Will post my code if OP feels like being cool

>>8115214
You absolute nigger. Go larp a fucking cock down your throat while you are at it.

>>8114917
exactly why it will dump. There is no docusign partnership, Gonser and Sergey are merely sitting on the same board.
https://schedule.sxsw.com/2018/events/PP80326

Is 7k linkies good enough for the singularity?

>>8116763

Are you me? Almost exactly the same number lmfao

>>8117405
Maybe in like 3 years.

>>8115872
Kek. so much this.
Everyone link hodler has a PhD in Link Fudding.

>>8117125
Ha just watch

>>8117336
>https://schedule.sxsw.com/2018/events/PP80326
no shit, but the docusign guy will def endorse linky

>>8114793
one of the best pastas

>>8114993
dont care, will never sell. but whats wrong with fisher price anyway?

>>8114749
Ask yourself some simple questions, how many motherfuckers will be buying specifically in anticipation of this conference in order to sell at the peak? The answer is A LOT. So if you miss the peak which you will then you will get fucked

You buy before, inbetween and after.... this way you can only be right.

>>8119780
well now is the bottom so how fucked can you really get? what if there's good news?

>>8115214
That's what everyone said last time and the price went up like 15 cents.

>>8119848
If there's good news it'll be pumped before the news. Trading is not regulated. LINK'S uncle, friends, brother in law and all his stuff are waiting to dump on you

>>8119956
well, let them dump, I'll hold and dump on financial institutions in a couple years

>>8120000
checked

>>8120000

>>8120000
checked. dumping on goldman sachs in a couple years

>>8116763
>when you day trade away $4.2MM

>>8114993
>golang is a fisher price language
so should we just all program in assembly or obscure dead languages like cobol? would that meet your definition of a l33t coder language?

>>8114993

>golang is a fisher price language

As a software eng and a stinky link; fucking kek.

>>8114793
holy fuck, that was quality pasta m8. Please delete though as i am still accumulating, k thankx bye.

>>8114793
this meme has gotten way out of hand

>>8120000

AHAHAHAHA
>2017 "LINK will be $10 by January"
>January 2018 "$1 by February guys"
>February 2018 "it will break $0.80 by March"
>March 2018 "we have to wait for financial institutions in a couple years"
...
....
....
>Year 2025 "We will make it, now that the institution are in, LINK will surely moon to $10"

AHAHAHA, deluded linkies

>>8119780
>how many motherfuckers will be buying specifically in anticipation of this conference in order to sell at the peak? The answer is A LOT.
nobody outside biz even fucking knows about LINK, much less about SXSW
nobody will be doing this retard

What do you think is going to happen at the conference? It's very likely nothing.
Bitcoin is also destroying all alts right now and that's not going to stop anytime soon.

>>8122290

sad but true

>>8117696
im just glad i have no idea what the high-tech FUDs mean so i just skate along without even having to think

>>8120213
I mean I need 4200 sat LINK to go back to my ath stack

So far I bought in 5400-5100 range for an average of 5300

Even though LINK is dumpin now I can't hope it to reach 4200
Also, funnily enough all I had to after selling @ 5100 was nothing, and I failed at it once again.
I couldn't wait 3 weeks to just buy my linkies back today
Now I have to trade this shit again. Damn, I hate myself

seriously though OP, im about to start my daily LINK meditation. heres my routine:

first, i collect fibres for my "nest", i go around my 1 bedroom apartment (i can see my toilet from my kitchen, its really neat) on my hands and knees and collect fibres. its best to use a dog grooming glove for this if you have one handy. i collect about a couple of handfuls of dog hair, pubic hair and that sort of thing, you really want to get into those corners and get the dust. luckily i started balding some time ago so i have heaps of hair that falls out just laying around ripe for the picking. ive started asking the other neighbours in my block to give me the dust from their vacuum cleaners and you can get ALL kinds of fibres from that and best of all its free. youd be surprised what people will throw away.

after ive collected the materials, i form it into a rough bagel shape (yes, im jewish) and you pat it all down so that its nice and compacted. you DONT want this stuff getting up your nostrils (mine are huge). after that is finished i sit cross-legged in the nest and do about 30-45 minutes of primal screaming. its really simple, you just inhale as far as you can and scream as loud as you can until you cant any more, then repeat. my guilty pleasure is to pretend that im screaming at arnold schwarzenegger or werner von braun when really i should be focussing on LINK. i just cant help myself heh. by the end of it you get really dizzy, but that might just be because i have high blood pressure. considering it only takes about an hour im still flabbergasted when i hear that people dont meditate every day.

>>8122426
just hold it nigga.

>>8122477
But I want a nice divisivle by 5k number of linkies, not this sub 10k shit stack

>>8114869
Sibos was meant to result in a pump to $5 right? Instead it bled all the way down to 1000 sats, literally a 90% drop from the ath

>>8114749
You seriously didn't actually buy Link did you? Its a sick joke that biz likes to play on newfags. Ask yourself why no one talks about Link besides 4chan? Reddit absolutely hates this project and there was a thread earlier where they rightfully were calling this shit a scam. I don't want to see you lose anymore money so sell and buy something useful like TRAC.

>>8122290
big if true

>>8122646
Sibos was too soon. LINK wasn't developed enough yet. But now with the simplified main net already out, LINK is in prime position for organic growth. we will NOT be dumping any time soon.

>>8115214
>whale
>talking in dollars and cents when there is no USD pairing
>not a larp

>>8122780
kek

This project have a lot of momentum

>>8122724
So you are the whale that dump SIBOS

>>8115888
witnessed and I also believe there will be Tesla/autopilot related news and how smart contracts will affect the insurance side of things as well.

>>8116499
the kek is strong in this thread

>>8116575
Rough

>>8122397
You shouldn't admit to things like that brainlet

>>8122441
you are a MANIAC

>>8114993
The question is not about whether Golang is good, it is why did they switch from a working product on ruby to building the same thing in Golang. They could have taken those months and made more adapters. So think about it, why Golang?

>>8123008
>They could have taken those months and made more adapters
it takes a couple hours to make an adapter.
>So think about it, why Golang?
because it's a highly respected language and widely used for enterprise level software and allows for the kind of scalability the LINK network wants to have

>>8122954
ignorance is bliss anon. by admitting im a brainlet i limit my options to holding and holding only. my hands are the only thing that matters with LINK. im not going to be one of these turds who tries to swing trade and gets wiped out repeatedly

>>8123039
Why Golang specifically. There are many enterprise languages but they were talking about Golang since February of 2017. That means they had to have Golang specifically for a specific purpose for over a year. What is it?

>>8123185
hyperledger is in golang

>>8123209
winrar

>>8123209
Yeah, that is what I think is the reason as well. They are switching to Golang to achieve greater interoperability with hyperledger. Seems like a big bet of six months of development time if you just are hoping that hyperledger would use you. Unless they already have customers waiting on hyperledger and Golang is required to provide the level of service that they have committed to.

Is there any other explanation that I haven't thought of?

>>8123185
it had somethin to do with hyperledger

plus i think i saw that golang is shite post somewhere else so...

>>8123250
could be that they (sergey, steve) are retarded. seems pretty reasonable des

>>8120213
>when someone bought a pizza for 70 million dollars a few years ago

>>8114993
>GOlang
>no exception handling
>no generics

Top fucking KEK.

>>8115497
Wtf its happening again

>>8115497
>>8115777
I have seen such a meme magic power before, in 2016 and the world changed after it... Shall kek be praised

>>8115497
Meme magik, kek and esoteric digits.