/biz/ - Business & Finance

Nano is dead and useless
REQ is a great idea and project, but if the team cant code for shit its ultimately useless
CHAIN LINK is the future. Oracles are the future.

>>7906116
proof they cant code?

>>7906116
REQ main-net is coming out very soon. Hence the pump. CHINK conference is March 14th, I think. Unless there's something sooner for CHINK that I've missed, then REQ would be a better hold into this slight dip.

>>7906150
outsourcing to India

>>7906078
REQ main-net coming soon and it's not priced in yet... get in here IMO

>>7906182
I will be going in LINK. I just came out of LINK but I want to increase my LINK position before the actual announcements. I expect, like LINK normally does, that there will be a slow market until the next conference. Like you said, REQ main-net will be coming out soon, so some gains can be had there. It can't really get lower for that.

>>7906214
REQ news will come prior to LINK and I am 90 percent sure REQ will go up before LINK.

They may not have a working product before, but their marketing is so much better. They have a better business understanding and more appeal to normies as well.

>>7906166
Retarded fud that they already addressed. Of course they're starting a call to action, they're building a fucking platform.

It would be like complaining that Ethereum didn't build all of these erc20s themselves because they can't code.

>>7906473
I've been holding LINK for a fucking long time, but I have come to the conclusion that I need more. I expected more growth and activity, but I don't ave enough. Like you said, REQ news is sooner, probably. But with Sergey Tweeting? Gives me worry.

>>7906166
sir many good code in india. india add best exchange for req now. many good incomes. profits so good. please adress fud

REQ mainnet launch is imminent - you would be foolish to not hop on this train while it's still at a 70% dip from ATH. this is a highly professional team that consistently outperforms its own roadmap, plus it has one of the largest communities for a project of its market capitalization. at the bare minimum this is going back to the same price as LINK, like it was at the start of the year. at that point you can decide whether you want to swap for LINK, diversify, or just keep holding.

i'm personally not even considering touching my 100k bag until 2019. even $5-10 is undervalued for a project of REQ's caliber.

>>7906752
Prove you've got 100k

>>7906789
100k is chump change compared to some of my friends' stacks. some of them have 1M+. hint: they see the potential, they're not selling either.

>>7906752
i wont sell my 18k before 2k19 too. i guess even 10k can retire in the next two years

>>7906166
kek

>>7906836
You could have edited that, but I will assume it's true. I agree with you on potential. If I went with REQ or VEN when I went with LINK before, I would be better off. However, I personally think LINK has a larger potential. I just don't have enough to make anything off it. Like you said, REQ's main-net is imminent. I truly wish it the best of luck.

Do you have any news on the main-net. Monday a reasonable date?

>>7906836
why would have anyone spent tens of thousands of dolars to buy REQ many moons ago when it only cost a couple of cents? The project was vapourware at that time.

>>7906925
high risk high reward

>>7906078

>>7906166
The funniest thing about this is that India is basically keeping the coin at 30 cents or above by increasing the daily volume. REQ is the most traded coin on Koinex (India's largest and most trusted exchange at the moment).

>>7906943
ehh hard to believe, but if they actually have that much REQ, good for them.

>>7906078
commie coin inc.

>>7906989
There's a couple of people on biz that have 700k-1.1 mil LINK. It's not out of reason.

>>7906901
i think most people are expecting the mainnet within the next month, but for them to announce the launch date in their next update (march 2).

when people read that the team is ahead of schedule from their roadmap (yet again), the price will jump significantly. i expect it go back to the top 50 temporarily. there will likely be a strong pullback, as there always is with any news-related pump, but it will then be followed by slow and steady gains leading up to the actual launch.

parabolic, NEO/TRX/XRB-tier gains won't come until a full list of partners are announced, however

>>7906901
monday is too soon. itll be around the 20th if anything. The soonest i could see is next friday

>>7906925
the folks i know with 1M+ REQ got into the ICO. i did not participate in the ICO, i actually initially bought below ICO price during the whole binance double-crediting fiasco (you guys remember when that happened? fucking hilarious). sold a bunch at 75 cents, and finally made it to an even 100k after riding the last LINK pump

>>7906925
i forgot to add, the ppl i know with huge stacks from ICO were mostly convinced by the YC backing. decent amount of research made them conclude it was a safe 2-3x minimum. was 20x at the peak, so they weren't wrong.

REQ never appeared as vaporware to those who did their research

>>7907376
it seems that no one does their own research anymore

>>7907319
>>7907376
Thanks for the information. Very thoughtful.

I think nano will win in the end because it has a cute name and cool apps

You have to view it from the normie perspective

IF YOU SERIOUSLY BELIEVE IN THIS SIT DOWN AND RECORD YOURSELF SAYING WHY YOU BELIEVE IN CHAINLINK. THEN SEND IT TO A FAMILY MEMBER AND THEY WILL TELL YOU JUST HOW FUCKING DELUSIONAL YOU ALL ARE.