/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>7831100
what does it meeeaaaannnnn?

>>7831214
Do you think that
>whales are accumulating
Or are they dumping? Info is provided in pic and intended to provoke a discussion here.

>>7831267
are they planning on buying high to sell low???

>>7831381
If they're smart, anon.

>>7831393
Kek

Overall, there are more wallets increasing in LINK than decreasing, in the last 7 days.

Seriously though does anyone have any idea about wallet #45? The ones which have many many transactions in/out that go to many different wallets. Looks a bit like an exchange but with way fewer transactions. Could my node test idea make any sense?

>>7831635
>#45
sorry, I meant #43.

a couple of the top 100 wallets receive link from #43, but it's not labelled as an exchange...

keep the info beans coming.

>>7831635

I'm interested in the discussion with smarter anons than me. could be shadow partners distributing link across a team. could be testing nodes.

I'll bump your thread again out of curiosity

>>7831768
SOMEONE SMART COME EXPLAIN THIS NOW

bump for interest

>>7831768
#32 https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xfdb16996831753d5331ff813c29a93c76834a0ad
this one sends and receives a lot from multiple addresses

#43 is here https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x0681d8db095565fe8a346fa0277bffde9c0edbbf

he sends LINK to #58 (https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x05ee546c1a62f90d7acbffd6d846c9c54c7cf94c)),
#68
(https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0xe52d58f7403011e12cadab46a9f3e0619d780662)),
and probably others I didn't notice.

Inspect these, any ideas?

>>7831635
i cant remember off the top of my head but i did track a top wallet that sent link to a bunch of other wallets that held an even 19k each. there was another one that had the same thing that sent link to wallets that were in the neighborhood of 30k even if i remember correctly

imagine how that guy who bought 800k link yesterday at 7150 sats must feel now

>>7831941
If he bought that much he might be intending on staking it in a node in future. So he probably feels fine.

>>7831941
He's probably not going to look at it for a year so he DGAF

Dude likely was just happy there was enough volume to finally be able to buy 800k without clearing the entire sellbook out and driving the price up 50%.

>>7831100
Split between wallets for nodes. I have just under 100k in 4 wallets. If one gets hacked I hopefully will be fine etc.

>>7831931
OK so my first observation is that wallet 43 has an order of magnitude less transactions in total than the Binance and Etherdelta ones. This indicates to me that 43 is not actually an exchange, because the volume is a lot less.
He only had transactions 1788 total, and only existed for 43 days... do the exchanges have babby wallets like this?

He started with 900,000 43 days ago, bought from binance, and has 969,000 now - so maybe he's somehow accumulating through trading in a complex manner?

>>7832074
exchanges have cold and hot storage - so yes. This also helps prevent large hacks etc.

>>7832053
Perhaps, but this guy is splitting it between probably 10s if not 100s of wallets, and they're not even amounts. just look at his transactions https://etherscan.io/token/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?a=0x0681d8db095565fe8a346fa0277bffde9c0edbbf

>>7832102
If you look at his transactions out, they usually end up in small babby wallets. If this was an exchange, this would mean those transactions are moving to binance user's wallets on binance. I highly doubt that every one of them is holding and not selling/trading, you know how ADHD people are with coins. seems like they all just hold.

Monitoring

#2 wallet dumped 8million on binance 13 days ago
>muh exit scam

#2 wallet actually received 250k from
0xa5b0ff6fe20d1a9dffb190365c3978c82de82837 79 days ago

he received a fuck tonne of link from x0466a804c880cd5f225486a5d0f556be25b6fcc8
which is another wallet that also received from #43


so 43 sends to x0466...
who sends link to 0xa5...
who sends to #2
who sends to binance...

am i thinking over this too much?

>>7832375
>am i thinking over this too much?
no, keep going

>>7832375
No, I'm following you anon, it's interesting

>>7832423
Is the #2 wallet Sergey? Or one of the advisors or something?
Why was it receiving funds from anyone at all, ever? Why would they need to buy from an exchange, if they're literally the founders of ChainLink? that's odd
if 43 is an exchange then the transfer to x0466 would be the user's binance wallet, then 0xa5 would be non-exchange wallet like MEW? so these transactions could mean #2 was buying from an exchange, but it makes no sense why they would do that

Is it someone splitting funds across several wallets because of paranoia over safety? Seems unlikely because he sends bizarre amounts with decimal places.

what is happening

>>7832375
what % of top 100 are insiders?

why would insiders move around link?

who is incentivized to buy large quantities?

who is incentivzed to sell?

how do you prep for a launch?

why must I feel like dat? why must I chase the cat?

>>7832680
OK ignore what I just said. #2 wallet buys from Binance all the time. Who is it tho?

I want to know what is going on with 43 aaah

>>7832729
OK, I think 43 is Binance, but another babby wallet.
Some of the transfers OUT, these new wallets, when they buy more LINK, do so from Binance wallets. They are small wallets.
So mystery of 43 is solved.
There are a few more like that, let's assume they're exchanges.

>>7832701
>what % of top 100 are insiders?
I hope it's a lot, anon.

>>7832680

>Is it someone splitting funds across several wallets because of paranoia over safety?

This is possible. I'm strongly considering breaking my LINK stack into 20% chunks just so my eggs aren't all in one basket.

>>7832812
I appreciate your investigation anon

if there are currently 350M link in the wild, what % is held by these top wallets?

>>7832812
I was looking at some of the wallets around me (250-300) and it was a mix. Some have been holding for 100 days plus & just have 1 translation. Some have been buying recently. & Surprisingly, a fair amount have sold some of their stack recently

>>7832074
>>7831931

Actually his first transaction ever was receiving 1,000,000,000 TRX and it´s still its largest holding. But that's not the only interesting thing, have you checked the comments of the address?

>>7832844
How big would each chunk be?

>>7833071
the plot thickens...

plz share comments

>>7833157

30k.

>>7833170
Why do you think splitting your stack like that would be safer? Just so that everything isnt under a single private key? I've not considered splitting .y stack cause then that's just an extra private key I have to think about securing. Isn't it better if everything is under 1 address? It's not going anywhere as long as you've got your key.

>>7833071
>>7833167
Comments are funny. Looks like an exchange, people crying about making mistakes in their transactions

pastebin.com

upload there OP

>>7833020
you can see it here
https://etherscan.io/token/tokenholderchart/0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca?range=10

The Top 10 holders collectively own 76.38% (763,840,716.07 Tokens) of ChainLink Token

Tokens Total Supply: 1,000,000,000.00 Tokens | Total Token Holders: 19344

>>7833058
I don't know if those are the big institutional players we're hoping for, how many LINK?

>>7833071
>But that's not the only interesting thing, have you checked the comments of the address?
No, can you explain?
How do you view the other tokens they have?

>>7833304
>Isn't it better if everything is under 1 address? It's not going anywhere as long as you've got your key.
Only if you have hardware or paper wallet. I wouldn't trust some firefox addon with milions of dollars worth tokens

>>7833339
Ah, I'll do that next time. Sorry, retard here

>>7833333
bunch of retards, funny. must be an exchange

>>7833304

Security is never perfect. Even just splitting a stack onto say, 3 ledgers would provide less chance of losing it all.

>>7833333
BOI
What u did
Wasted get, that could have fuelled LINKs mars mission >:(

>>7833383
Only 19,344 of us...we can change the world

>>7833071
>>7833167
>>7833333

Exactly, it appears to be a fairly recent binance wallet that operates trough smart contract, However we would have to ask every person that commented there what exactly happened to be able to discern if they lost their tokens by mistake or if it's something else.

Look at the comments for wallet #2. fucking kek. pajeets and someone needing sex reassignment surgery.

I am now going to check comments of a these big wallets, fukin lol

>>7831100
pretty sure AB was referring to CoinMetro

>>7833511
forgot pic

>>7833405
>>7833467
I have a trezor & ledger, Im using trezor & mew at the moment. It works fine. If you have 20k crypto plus, you should get a hardware wallet.

>>7832844
>>7833304

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFXnZSg4uFg

Just learn how to set up an Offline Wallet with MyEtherWallet or get a ledger wallet.

>>7833471
Not wasted, witnessed in yet another link thread. the amount of didgets link is getting right now is not normal anon.

>>7833517
explain?

Pic related is Binance wallet, everyone got scammed and followed the transaction, where coins were sold on Binance. Haaaa

>>7832844
I put 100 Links each in 20 different paper wallets as security against my own weak hands. The other half of my stack is in my main wallet. But some of the paper wallets are in some places they will never be found, lol. I buried one 3 miles out in the woods, there's a few in my attic, and a few taped on the underside of different drawers. Thinking about doing more in different denominations too

>>7833779
im close that stage but with my 4 ledgers lol

>>7833779
what are transaction fees?

>>7833940
What is throw 0.01 Eth in each, Alex? If I use a wallet, it will be drained. Plus these are long holds, and by then, that 0.01 ETH might be a bit more than pocket change

Could this have anything to do with me buying 1 link today = $1000eoy

>>7834191
I can give you a prediction for the EOY price, as long as you give me the following:

>how many nodes are there?
>what is the average staking amount of each node?
>what is the buy pressure for new nodes?
>how much LINK is being committed to smart contract execution?
>how much LINK is performing liquid transactional work within the ecosystem?
>how far along is adoption?
>how hot is the speculative frenzy at the moment?
>is linkpool operational and successful?

Just get back to me with all of those, and I can give you an EOY prediction that isn't a piece of shit pulled directly from my ass.

>>7831931
#68 is my wallet
Don't have control over any of the other addresses.

>>7834383
cheers
guess it was binance after all

>>7831100
Hi! few things to start off with =] 1. yes I added you because you're a autistic, 'tis an awesome thing to see! 2. I'm Brian. 3. Don't be intimidated, but I'm not a stereotypical investor. If anything, I'll be the one on the blockchain!

>>7832053
thanks just hacked 100k

>>7833568
I only have $7k and nano ledger it's still worth it for just 99$

>>7834466
Nice dubs

>>7833544
fucking hell this irritates me

>>7834644

y-you too

>>7832729
>>7832680
wallet 2 is binances cold wallet. goddamn thats basic guys

>>7834955
Took a while for someone to tell them

>>7833483
That's 19k wallets, right? Probably significantly less people. Fuck though 70% controlled by top 10 wallets, is that normal for a token?

>>7835863

>circulating supply
>there’s a billion coins linkbro

>>7834524
I chortled

>>7836296
That's still 20% of total -- if they don't accumulate any more