/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>7711657
Why thank you, just sold one hundred of these

If it even hits $2 I'd be surprised. The devs aren't working on it anymore, last commit was 5 months ago.

>>7711718

This has been completely accurate in the last though about ETH and other coins. Why are you mad? Because someone smacked you with reality by giving a realistic price prediction that was something other than

>DUUURRR 1000 KAY END OF WEEK!

>>7711657
thanks just sold 100k link and bought 100k mobius

>>7711737

They're working on it in a private repi. No doubt LINK will be released and progressively amount to a successfuul product, but the price is not going to breach $10 literally ever. Best case scenario in 7 years it still won't

>>7711657
Walletinvestor predicts purely on current TA trends and doesn't account for anything else such as FA. So no its not even likely accurate and actually their predictions change signififcantly from month to month.

>>7711775

>he thinks because his shitcoin won't hit unrealistic prices that the only alternative is to buy another meme coin as a joke

Nope

R I P STUPID LINKIES

>>7711813
Well fuck, just sold my mobius and bought tron then, happy?

>>7711737
Not sure how you would know that. Do you have access to their private repo?

>>7711657
It says they make their price prediction just on ta. They dont take fundamental analysis in to account.

>>7711657
I mean, that's actually gigantic.Might actually buy in, gotta sell my lumens tho.

>Will ChainLink price fall/drop?
>No
That's where you are wrong

>>7711856

>a 4x is gigantic for crypto

Lmao, enjoy those bags

>>7711844

T-technical a-analysis i-is bullshit... t-they didn't even use this other bullshit metric! DEBUNKED! R-right guys? $1000 end of planck frame!

I agree with ypu that Link is going nowhere but is says that ripple will hit $2 eoy and it already hit 3 in december

Save yourselves a lot of pain, buy ARK

>>7711906
Dude, if I buy 10k bucks of it and get 30k bucks from it extra, how is that a bad investment? Retard.

>>7712050

It's not lmao. You're forgetting this board thinks the price is realistically going to four fucking digits... even three

>>7711938

Yeah because the bubble inflated things way above normal growth range. It will take BTC all year to get back to 20k

>>7711657
HAHAHAHAHahaa what is this shit?
t. 50k link holder

>>7711657
>thinks markets are that predictable

Fucking brainlets

>>7712163

A realistic price prediction based on something other than autistic memes and cultish psychophants constantly parroting 'DYOR' and 'it's in the white paper' whenever someone debunks their shitcoins future

>>7712176

They are. It's how smart people make money kiddo

>>7712267

If LINK hits 2 USD I'll be a millionaire after taxes. Pretty comfy desu.

>>7712267
>realistic price prediction
>crypto

Kill yourself brainlet.

>Use the same TA to measure potential future growth of company A, that has already launched its marketing campaign, and company B, that has not yet launched its marketing campaign
>Ignore all factors that plays into the increase of token prices

Here's Omisego. They're predicting $42, which is even less of an increase than LINK. But everyone with half a brain knows that OmiseGo is more than likely to surpass $42.

https://walletinvestor.com/forecast/omisego-prediction

Here's Stellar. Up from $0.40 to $0.60 in a year. Wow!
https://walletinvestor.com/forecast/stellar-lumens-prediction

Find any project you're currently holding, and you'll find these retarded estimates based on TA.

>>7712317

And the rest of this board will be fucked by missing every other moon mission.

So you admit the price expectations are inflated and you're misleading nubiz?

>>7712338

Yeah, realistic in the sense it's not overvaluing it by hundreds of fucking dollars retard

wow. much data. such analysis. wow

>>7711813
>>7711906
So, what are you holding?

Rasputin Online Coin? Because that'll have a +1000% increase according to their TA.
B3Coin? Really need to stock up on that. Another +1000% increase.

>>7712111
Well no one should be that silly.

>>7712387

All in Mobius and Confido

>>7712339
Stellar is not a comfy hold tho.

>>7712339

I unironically believe both of those predictions though. Makes more sense then everything mooning.

>>7712428
I think it's a shitcoin, and I sold ages ago. But it'll be above $0.60 by EOY, unless the entire cryptomarket were to shit the bed entirely, which isn't what their TA is based on.

>>7712418
Come on dude, you had a good thing going and then you ruined it.

>>7712449
Go all-in on Bitconnect.

According to their TA, you should have a +1000% increase within 3 months.

Anyone who uses that site unironically needs to neck themselves.

>>7712527

Lmao right.

>>7712527
>everything at 1000% in a year
Does this mean literally everyone on /biz/ is going to lamboland?

>>7711657
Are you the same guy, who said that there is no way Trump can be president?

>>7711792
>>7711841
Bitcoin uses a public repo; private repos are for people with ALOT to hide. In this case the Link emperor wishes to hide that he has no clothes

>>7711769
This does not take into account potential hype through partnerships and adoption.
You're the one who is pic related if you think this is accurate in any way.

>>7712568

no?

going by average i don't think many here has much above 1k invested

>>7712339
>>7712527
Only a complete braindead retard would look at these """"predictions"""" and think they make any sense.
They take the average price and then draw a straight line with very conserative growth that mimics traditional stock gains.

>>7712621

>Linkies admit their meme coin is dependent on a hypetrain miracle

Sounds really promising kiddo

BITCONNEEEEECT!

>>7712659
You're actually acoustic if you think coins grow naturally due to graphs and other mumbo jumbo magical TA shit. You need external influence, working product and partnerships.
When Nintendo announced the Switch, what happened to their stock price? Go figure it out and come back, faggot.

https://walletinvestor.com/forecast/tether-prediction

LOL what a bunch of retards

>>7711769
I bought 10k link at the last dip (average price was .47 cents). I would be very happy with 2.38 dollars per link tbqhwusenpai

>>7712368
Ugggh...the cringe is so strong..
20xx$ eoy is realistic price prediction? Come on man, I want it to moon as any other faggot here, but shiddisridicioulus

>>7712527
It wouldn't shock me if bcc did a +1000%. It's fucking retarded to put any money into it, but it already happened once.

>Will ChainLink hit 5 USD in a year?
>Not within a year ( see above).

Rekt

Does anyone have any of their predictions from years ago when btc was under 100

>>7711841
The repo is public. https://github.com/smartcontractkit/LinkToken

>>7711657
>b-b-but muh $100 EOY

>>7711657
Completely unrealistic. LINK would be lucky to break $1 this year. TA is fake.

>>7711657
You know this simply takes TA into account without considering anything about the tech? Everything on there that was released during the crash says it will go to 0.