/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>6890733
i hope it fails for the simple reason that i daytraded my 1300 link down to 850.

>>6890764
>I'm a retard therefore the project should fail

>>6890733
did they have sex? be honest

>>6890821
On one hand id like to think Sergey doesn't consort with Jews
On the other hand it may be Jews that drive LINKs success

>>6890821
No

>>6890733
But when is this conference happening?

>>6890931
Anon it's right there on bitcoinsuperconference.com
It's not even a hard address to remember

>>6890931
16 feb

>>6890733
Deutsche Bank has estimated the by 2027, 10% of the total GDP of the entire world will be run on the blockchain. So if Chainlink is successful and still around by then, you really think we will only see $1,000/LINK? Really?

Let me tell you this: It is all about how strong hands you have if you want to make it with LINK. You want to sell in 1-2 years when it hits 50-100? Fine. But don't forget that the full potential hasn't even been reached by the slightest.

>>6890733
Best way to get my hands on some link?

>>6891049
src on those numbers, captain shillpants? coz i smell some bullshit.

>>6891049
>Deutsche Bank has estimated the by 2027, 10% of the total GDP of the entire world will be run on the blockchain.
Bitcoin at 4 millions. Can you imagine? Even people with a single shitty bitcoin will make it

>>6890821
Very likely.
>>6890733
You are right son, your eyes are now open to the Price Singularity.

>>6890764
Buy more and hodl the stink is too precious to day trade, go scalp the idiots on trx

>>6891143
Here you go Mr.Bean. Do you want me to help you read it too?

https://www.finextra.com/finextra-downloads/newsdocs/cio_insights_reflections_-_cryptocurrencies_and_blockchains_-_emea_-_client_ready.pdf

Should I just buy 10k link and see where it goes?

>>6891049
$50 means institutions want to adopt it, which means it will go at least to $1000 barring catastrophe.

You retards act like ChainLink patented decentralized oracles, any other more competent team can release their own oracle and actually work on it, enjoy your abandonware funny token

>>6891210
Probably one million in couple years

>>6890733
>if link is actually implemented
>if
Anon I have some news fr you...

>>6891319
That couldn't happen out of nowhere. Not if they want it to be decentralized. If that happened we'd have the chance to put some eggs in that basket just in case

>>6891383
Consider Bitcoin and how widely used it is. It's not. It's a method of transfer or a preservation of wealth sure, but it's use cases are slim to none. Bitcoin has commanded more than a 300b market cap before. Even if link loses swift if it gets any use at all were seeing $100+ minimum

>>6891319
You retards act like Google patented search engines, any other more competent team can release their own search engine and actually work on it, enjoy your abandonware funny google stock.


You retards act like Facebook patented social media, any other more competent team can release their own social media and actually work on it, enjoy your abandonware funny facebook stock.

You retards act like Apple patented smartphones and tablets, any other more competent team can release their own smartphone and tablet and actually work on it, enjoy your abandonware funny apple stock.

>>6891082
binance

>>6891319
See:
>>6891534

Sure, this could be the wrong investment. I can't see the future any more than those who invested in Google. They just saw potential and took a calculated risk.

Nobody reasonable would say they KNOW that ChainLink will be huge, just that after weighing their options and doing research they decided that they believe LINK has the highest probability of being huge.

This isn't so fucking hard to understand lol

>>6891481
I know where bitcoins github is and it was open since day 1. Where's chainlinks? Only two alternatives:
a. they are not working on it and you're being scammed
b. they dare not release it and you're being scammed

>>6891661

>>6891727
c. SWIFT wants that shit for themselves because they've been working with Sergay since 2015 and nolinkers are about to get blown the fuck out

>>6891900

>hurrrr he says investing has risks what a brainlet hurrrrrrrrrrr

what a fucking waste of some perfectly good dubs

Tell me about the singularity

>>6891901
That's what I don't get though. Even IF chainlink isn't the longest con, why would Swift come and buy link on the open market? And given that they won't, what value does link have? Its the exact same mess as XRP - no one who wants it will ever buy it from us

>>6890733
O hope all links get dumped on

>>6891997
Your understanding of Chsinlink is fundumentally flawed

>>6891997

>>6891204
This document is rather exciting. Bullish!

>>6892236
fuck off

>>6892285
Never change, biz.

>>6890821
His dick is so big that they are having sex in this picture.

>only 300b market cap
>to hit $1000/LINK
muh nigga

>>6890821
Sergey is pure

>>6891997

Reasons LINK is different from XRP:

1. It doesn't have an outrageous market cap
2. It's actually decentralized unlike Cripple
3. LINK focuses on smart contracts - XRP does not

Also, I feel the need to mention that I know everyone has a hardon for SWIFT and all but that is far from the only application for ChainLink.

>>6890821
Right after sibos

$50 by May
$200 EOY 2018
$700 EOY 2019
$1500 EOY 2020

>>6891146
What makes you think bitcoin value will go up? No one will hold that shitcoin any more so its value could be $1,000 even if the market grows.

>>6892623
100$ by may but other than that i agree

>>6891996
>the btc ball and chain
gets me every time

>>6891319
>You retards act like Microsoft patented spreadsheet software like Excel. Most companies use Jim’s Spreadsheet workshop program nowadays anyways

>>6892560
Where's this photo, Germany?

>>6892623
Plz let it be. My daughter needs an education. I'm fucking poor.

>>6892544
Kek saved can’t fucking wait for the singularity so I can shitpost my stinky linky folder.

>>6892774

Not sure but I agree that it looks like Germany.

>>6891661
>Nobody reasonable would say they KNOW that ChainLink will be huge
have you not been lurking since ico? have you not read the whitepaper?

>>6890733
itt deluded linked holding worthless bags since the ShadowSpork

>>6892944

I have read the whitepaper. I agree that I think it will be huge, but you never know. However I do believe it enough that I'm all in.

>>6893028
:D

>>6893008
spork got me..........FUCK YOU

>>6892560
>bothering to correct brainlets comparing LINK to XRP