/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>6685353
> he doesn’t know

More importantly, can someone explain to me how oracles are at all useful when it's physically impossible to have data confidentiality?

>Why distributed oracles don’t ensure confidentiality. Confidentiality is fun-
damentally hard to achieve in any oracle system. If an oracle has a blockchain front
end such as a smart contract, then any queries to the oracle will be publicly vis-
ible. Queries can be encrypted on-chain and decrypted by the oracle service, but
then the oracle service itself will see them. Even heavyweight tools such as secure
multiparty computation, which permits computation over encrypted data, can’t solve this problem given existing infrastructure. (See, e.g.,[11] for an application-oriented perspective.) At some point a server needs to send a query to a target data source server. Thus it must see the query, irrespective of whatever confidentiality the query previously enjoyed. It will also see the response to the query.

LINK would require adapters for communication to the blockchain, Aeternity would need to be almost completely rewritten for every blockchain.

>>6685555
with those quads do you mind to elaborate what OP doesn´t seem to know?

Jason Parser is working with ChainLink
> graduated summer cum lord from MIT with a 5.0 GPA in science
> 200 IQ
> created jason parsers, named after himself

>>6685655
intel SGX, thats how

/thread

Do you guys realize there is VERY little demand for decentralized oracles?

>>6685845
That is like saying ”there is VERY little demand for smart contracts and ICOs” in 2015 when Ethereum was cheap af.

>>6685655
data confidentiality is done by enigma protocol, that's for private smart contracts.

>>6685845
Because there currently isn’t a decentralized oracle mainnet up. It’s like saying there were no demand for cars when everyone was riding around on horses

>>6685918

The funny thing is though, technically he's right; there's very little demand for decentralized oracles.

This is the curse of the brainlet, the IYI, and the rational skeptic. They'd rather win an argument than actually win.

>>6685353
> Chainlink
> we gonna serve you whatever blockchain tou are using
> Aeternity
> we provide you with means to create your own oracle you can use only on our platform

>>6686067
You know how I know you have an IQ below average intelligence?
You're probably one of those degeneratrs who thinks you can just plug in and ply Oracles intro ethereum
But then again, you probably own more link than me you cheeky kunt

>>6685353
Just look at hte logos

> twisted benis
> edgy cube

Which one looks more successful to you?

>>6686067
There's no way the best use of the blockchain for an insurance company is to timestamp shit. The demand does exist, it's just that smartcontracts so far are only considered for so much.

>>6685655

>>6685353
im dumping all my link for it the moment it gets on a reliable exchange

>>6686713
That post in the screenshot is a 10/10 post. Thanks anon