/biz/ - Business & Finance

They are brainlets

it's a well kept secret. Only institutional investors and /biz/ are in on it.

The project could fail to deliver, then your investment is worth nothing.

I’m all in.

>basing decisions on unit price of coin
Ishygddt

I appreciate the constant reassurance from biz, its a tough hold

>>6674115
damn, you know your shit.
I appreciate the research you've put into this, and thank you for sharing it. I hope others seriously consider your warning

because I bought at $1.30 and now im jaded

>>6674196

It's the easiest hold in crypto, wtf are you talking about.

>>6674115
>>The project could fail to deliver, then your investment is worth nothing.
>In development since 2014
>Funded implementation of PoC

Meanwhile, top 20 coins that have nothing to show. Fuck out of here.

>>6674248
I would say Savage but this is pretty much pasta now.

>>6673991
Been hearing this since it was $.50 cents almost half a year ago. I know its a meme at this point but cmon

>>6674295
You're right, all of those things guarantee it will not fail to deliver.

>>6673991
Name one real world case for smart contracts that's better than an actual contract enforced by lawyers and courts.

Anyone may reply to this.

Big bangs and institutional investors hired /biz to go all cult-like on this coin so it scares everyone else away. Totally worked but it's going to make a few of us here rich too when it explodes.

posting high resolution LINK logo
please use this in the future
thanks ;)

Gonna go all in on this after ICX moons, what's a good average price to buy at? What's been its ATH. When and why is it set to moon?

>>6674448
Thats crisp af anon

>>6674448

>>6674435

>name something where automating a process and reducing all of its costs will be desirable

Can't think of any. Sorry.

>>6674435
>Name one real world case for smart contracts that's better than an actual contract enforced by lawyers and courts.
>Anyone may reply to this.
Thank you for your permission for me to reply to your comment.
One real use case of smart contracts is to go fuck yourself and do your own research.
Check out SWIFT extensive research in blockchain tech (DLTs) and that should give you a good start.

>>6674512

Saved to my fap folder

>>6674448
The subtle off-white coloring....

>>6674578
...The tasteful thickness of it
Omg it even solves the oracle problem

Just picked up 51 LINK during dip

Get on my level faggots

>>6673991
It could go up a lot or it could go down a little

>>6674437
>And the non believers wept at the feet of the illuminated stinky linkys

>>6674317
>6 months for an investment coming to fruition is a long time

just lol...oh i bet you "missed out on ALL those x100000 moon missions" because you always go all-in on something and get mad when it doesn't moon within three days.

>>6674689

>>6674778
I picked up 500 fag. Nobody cares. It's never enough

>>6674435
Contracts that decentralize the unbanked, forcing them to become aggressively banked with settlements occuring faster than lightspeed. Lawyers couldn't possibly handle that.

>>6673991
sorry mate, I liked link a while ago, but I knew the moon wasn't coming soon. I made amazing returns with stellar and vechain and ICX, and now link isn't liquid enough for me. Too many /biz bros have too much coins there never selling. I'm not gonna push the price up 20 cents just so I can get in with a good investment and then watch it drop. There's other fish in the sea, best of luck.

>>6675117
5K here and i still fucking think i dont have enough to make it

waiting for a good dip t

>>6675260
Nigger, this IS the dip.

>>6675188
20k is minimum to make it

I still need 4k

>>6674778
>>6675117
>>6675188
>picked up 9K to add to my stack this dip

We gonna make it even the lil fish

LIFTOFF WHEN

>>6675463
Soon, sir

>>6675260
>>6675317
So would now be a good time to buy in? Looking to buy link for the first time

They need a better logo desu

Shit looks like a 7th grader designed it

Rebrand when?

Link is my only hold right now, at a measly 400ish tokens. I'm waiting for the tether implosion to crash the prices with no survivors before investing more however. Also considering BAT, XLM, and IOTA when I have more fiat to throw around.

>>6675557
this is to keep the normies away so the insiders can accumulate more

>>6674282

It amazes me people still manage to lose money on LINK.

I'm all green baby. You'll never shake me.

>>6675602
Then they should get rid of it saying CHAIN LINK right on it

Make it as ambiguous as possible so people don't even know what they're looking at

Like XRB for example, if I was a normie and saw that hexagon, I'd have no idea what the fuck it is

>>6674578
>>6674689
I honestly don't get people who say LINK has an ugly logo. It's so goddamn crisp.

>>6674435

Lawyers are weaselly cucks. Smart contracts are not.

Boom. Lawyered.

Where can I invest in LINK?

>>6675720
no where, fuck off

>>6675677
nice,
so how long you been on reddit?

Has there been any news from this company recently? Their CEO or their twitter hasn't posted anything in months. The news on their website doesn't have anything in several months, their github doesn't have any recent updates. Is this coin dead? Not trying to FUD, but want to do my research before buying in.

>>6675181
I agree. I am 100% into link atm. But, I feel that since most of crypto is a momentum game, and link lacks volume because of everyone holding, It may take time for it to moon .

this coin will be $1000 EOY

>>6675768
you know this coin is actually a meme right?

it's like doge, project has been dead for a while but it's /biz/'s favorite meme coin so there's always threads about it

>>6674448
HOW the FUCK does it know?

>>6675788

Just wait until SXSW in March. The price won't come back down again after that, and the volume won't just be a flash in the pan.

LINK has managed to stay mostly under the radar with limited press, terrible branding, and no attempts at keeping people updated. Even SIBOS barely put it in the radar, because most people who aren't total fucking nerds were too busy watching the set fall apart at SWELL. SXSW will be LINK's launch party into normie world, and it will make the price singularity meme a reality.

>>6675916
>SXSW
what is that?

Also, people claiming link to go higher than $100, that puts it at a mcap of about 35Billion, which implies that its going to be a top 4 coin.
I feel like the story is there but for normies to pump this up, it needs to start coming into the limelight when normies come back to crypto. Right now, I feel that the crash may have pushed away a lot of stupid money which is important for mooning.

>>6675747
I got it you big dick. Fuck..

>>6674448

Look at that subtle off-white coloring.

The tasteful thickness of it.

Oh, my God. It even has a padlock.

>>6676096
>Also, people claiming link to go higher than $100, that puts it at a mcap of about 35Billion, which implies that its going to be a top 4 coin.
It hurts my head everytime when i read shit like this

>>6676110
Welcome.

You passed the test and made it

Congratulations, just don't sell or you'll regret it for the rest of your days

>>6674171
its very low cap for its potential, its one of the only coins i can think of that has a high chance of going 100x over the next few years. when it catches on it will be a moon mission for the history books.

>>6675510
100% yes, look how flat its been today, breakout imminent

>>6676096

SXSW is a music conference in Austin in March that also includes digital/interactive speakers at it. Sergey is speaking alongside the founder of Docusign about blockchains getting rid of lawyers, and the current CEO of Docusign is speaking separately also at SXSW. This will be the first time normies are attentively paying attention to LINK, and being shown the possibilities it enables. Its also very likely a clear sign Sergey has been cooking something up with Docusign.

LINK will be a top 5 coin easily. The market for data is enormous, and Chainlink is the only one solving that problem in a way that could feasibly become the standard. Blockchain tech is still so early its like we're watching very early protocol specs get released, and being given the chance to buy into them. LINK is like buying into the HTTP of blockchains. Its growth potential is nearly limitless.

>>6676185
Is there a higher res version of this for my tablet wallpaper?

>>6675716
Elgin? Is that you?

>>6676339
Don't think so

Here's a high res of the original image, someone would have to shop Sergay's fat face on to it

>>6676327
Very interesting. How do you keep track of this news though? Their social media accounts are like a graveyard.

>>6673991
Today marks the first time since opening my Binance account that i dont hold any LINK. Sold it to increase my REQ stack. Regretting it now... plus I feel sorta... naked?

>>6676185
So whats the allure of LINK? What makes it promising?

>>6676495
Never going to make it with those weak hands

>>6676096
LINK will be a top 5 coin with a 350 billion market cap

>>6676495
I bought some REQ during the dip yesterday, but I'm still sitting on my link. Are you considering selling REQ tomorrow after/before the news?

>>6676500
It's been explained so many times but since you got repeating integers I'll shed a little light on it

Basically it solves the Oracle problem.

What's the Oracle problem?
Blockchain networks like Ethereum are good already, they can use smartcontracts and stuff, cool fine. But they can't get external data, any information not already on the Eth network they can't make smartcontracts with

LINK aims to solve that and kind of acts as a bridge to the "real" world so you can get all kinds of data from financial sectors to gambling sites to sports sites, whatever.

It can also work with any blockchain, not just Eth's

>>6676500

Lurk more

>>6676472

You're not wrong. LINK is a weird project when you're first getting into it, because you really need to dig and read between the lines, and sadly /biz/ is the best source of LINK news... while also being the absolute worst source of LINK news.

Their EOY Medium post says they have a marketing hire in the works, so hopefully we'll see more updates in the future. For now you're stuck googling around for references to the founders, or to the parent company "SmartContract" (which is so wonderfully vague you'll get more false positives than real hits).

Just to catch you up on updates that are probably now hard to bump into:

- new dev hires
- Go rewrite is progressing, with release expected this quarter
- mainnet following community feedback, likely Q2/3
- new marketing hire in the works, likely on board by mainnet at the latest
- Sergey is speaking at the SuperBitcoinConference in February
- Sergey is speaking at SXSW in March
- Chainlink is partnered with zeppelin_os, and will be the default kernel level oracle, will be used in the kernel level scheduler, and also for the zeppelin_os marketplace (this partnership is one you should really research. it should put your mind at ease about holding IMO)
- Chainlink is likely to be used for SWIFT's bond payments, and successfully finished a PoC for it toward the end of 2017. that system will have milestones in 2018 and 2019, but likely won't be operational until 2020

>>6675181
you can just put a buy order there you fuck

>>6676153
>implying no new money will enter the crypto market ever again for the rest of time

>>6676607
Thanks. Just bought.

>>6676500
When the system is launched you will be able to pay in crypto anywhere with any debit or credit card without needing anything else. Every bank in the world will run on LINK.

>>6676654
Mainnet is coming in April. SWIFT has announced a test run in 35 banks from April to October.

>>6674448

Thank You! You don't by chance have a cutout hi-res version where each side is straight on from a 2d perspective???

>>6676891
Source pls

>>6673991
>It's not even a buck

Are you a fucking moron or are you trying to trick other morons?

>>6676960

Seconded. I haven't heard tell of April mainnet, or 35 banks running on it. There was the bond payment PoC last year that ran roughly through that time frame. Anon may be referring to SWIFT's gpi initiative with the 35 banks, but that likely doesn't involve LINK at all.

sawss

>>6676960
jesus mother of christ why are some asian girls so inhumanly hot

>>6676577
I did some research to refute an anon who said "REQ always dumps on friday"

Date, trending, price @ 11a Friday, price @ 11p Friday:
1/12- decreasing, 5620 -> 5335 (-285)
1/5- bottom, 4087 -> 6448 (+2361, incl ATH)
12/29- flat, 2175 -> 2557 (+382)
12/22- increasing, 1735 -> 1924 (+189)
12/15- flat, 1478 -> 1471 (-7)
12/8- flat, 648 -> 765 (+117)
12/1- flat, 605 -> 591 (-14)

Conclusion is that this coin doesn't follow the Sell the News rule, which is neat. Some of the period's best gains were had on fridays when the bi-monthly comes out.

I'm holding, it's my end game

>>6676997
Just sold my Cindicator i brought at .02c & picked up 2000 more Link
So alot less than a buck for me
Feels good mane

>>6677080
I really hope you don't judge how cheap a coin is by its actual USD price per each.

>>6676654
Nice summary looking forward to this.

>>6677107
I count in Nazarovs

>>6676960
Yesterday there was a thread about it. It was a paper from SWIFT about testing a decentralized oracle network with 35 banks in April 2018 and they rush it, because they are losing to the competition.

I'm retarded for not saving it. I'm sure some linkies have it.

Isn't it amazing that fucking /biz/ found LINK.

Out of all the motherfucking shitty fucking coins we found the damn diamond.

>>6677077
Interesting to have actual stats, thank you anon. I'll keep hodling for a while too, but my gut feeling tells me that link will be the better project long term. Both seem very solid though.

>>6677661
Totally agree, link is amazing. Both link and req are incredibly ambitious and if they work out they'll work big time

>>6676327

I live in Austin and I've been to sxsw many times. It really depends on how big of a "table" that sergey gets. There are hundreds of different companies and musicians there, so just because a company goes to sxsw doesn't mean shit in it of itself. it is a good thing for marketing but it really depends on how well he can market it there among many other distractions

>>6677629

It's not amazing at all. In between the retards /biz/ is fuelled by a powerful engine room of autists.

>>6678146
He's on a panel with the founder of DocuSign, talking about how smart contracts will eliminate lawyers in real estate.

He's gonna get a one on one for sure bro.

>>6676960
>>6677008
>>6677551
I got you, brothers.

>>6678541

Ya that's what I thought they were referring to... and it doesn't include LINK. Sorry to burst your bubbles.

Nostro/gpi != LINK partnership. Just because it says SWIFT and ISO 20022 doesn't mean its speaking about LINK.

But im already All In.
I only have 2000 Link but still...

>>6676442
Maybe when I get my new comp thanks anyways dude

>>6678541

Also, that April->November is referring to the PoCs that ran from April 2017-> November 2017....

this is an old af doc.

>>6678929
>this is an old af doc.
Says "January 2018" on the bottom of every page. Idiot.

>>6678777
>Interim report Sibos
Guess who was speaking at SIBOS 2017?

What about the speech Sergey is about to give? Does anyone know when he will speak and about what?

>>6679316
>>6679390

>>6679252

thats the publication date you dingus

>>6679390
He will speak at February 17, at the bitcoin superconference, together with his partners, then at March 14 at SXSW

I say he will announce the testnet launch and confirm JP Morgan partnership in February.

>>6679415
Exactly. It's from this week.

>>6673991
bc I'm already all in on the most meme'd coin of all time how could I lose? I am listening to /biz/ afterall

>>6675716
Lawyers are human beings in the court of law

You are not

Boom Person'd

we got listed on huobi

>>6673991
Im 95% in LINK

>>6679857
MAIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNEEETTTTTTTT!!!!!

>>6679481

yes , talking about what happened in the past man. we dont have any clear info on swift's 2018 activities except they're interested but need the tech to mature.

>>6674778
> 8900 LINK before NY
> failtrade it to 5662 LINK
> restore back to 8350 LINK during this dip
I feel much better now

Link will literally be the paypal of crypto

From the telegram

how many linkies do i realistically need to make it? currently at 3.5k

>>6680552
50k is enough for sure

>>6680195
>>6680428
Isn't this huge? Link getting listed on another exchange strikes me as massive considering the lack of publicity.

>>6680327

Here you go dumbass

https://www.swift.com/resource/swift-gpi-presentation

>>6680689

Meant to call

>>6680317

>>6680608
u got a price prediction ?

Just found some good shit linkies. Posting it soon before I buy cause I like you all.

>>6680753

trying to pull realistic numbers out of my ass , id say 5 dollars by may 1st. $35 by eoy. unless sergey knocks it out of the park at these conferences, and people finally determine it's worth their time, in which case 30 by may 1st and 70 by eoy.

Link is bound to dip, sell now and rebuy near .00070000

>>6673991
because of the shadow fork....

>>6681503
proof?
just a meme

>>6681594
just a meme, LINK will 100x easy

>>6681594
The wallets with two versions of link

>>6681503
Jason Parser? He’s Rory’s dad. He’s got a problem with Sergey because when Rory and Sergey were friends when they were younger, Sergey used to raid the cupboards and eat everything in the house. It cost Jason Parser a lot of money to replace all the food Sergey used to eat. The final straw was when Sergey was staying at Rory’s one night and stole his car when they were 15 to sneak out to a McDonald’s drivethru. Rory’s dad Jason thinks Sergey is a bad influence on his son and does anything he can to stop them being friends or working together. Why do you think we haven’t heard from Sergey in so long? Jason Parser has been staying with Rory and Sergey has been in hiding shitting his pants.

>>6676153
I don't see the problem.

>>6681613
LNK and LINK? they are different.
post the wallets plz

>>6681624
Thanks, sold 100k

>>6681965
No, LINK and LINK
https://etherscan.io/address/0x98c63b7b319dfbdf3d811530f2ab9dfe4983af9d#tokentxns

>>6673991
>Puts all eggs in one basket
>snake finds basket eats all eggs
>now you starve

>>6676339
here you go anon

>>6675188
6.2k here. We're never going to make it

>>6682316
delet this

>>6682179
>>6682179
This "fork" happened an hour after the original link was created, I don't get it

It really is a shame this scam token has such a cool logo.

>>6682392
5242 LINK FIRST SERGEANT here... Gonna make it.


https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/8e8e640a-fb84-4b5b-9bdc-02fbc4a742f0

>>6682220
What is reasoning by analogy?

>>6682466
fixed it

>>6682489
its the cube of saturn. Did /biz buy the true illuminati coin and not even fucking see it?

>>6682512
every other coin is the cube of saturn

>>6674363
The point was that Chainlink is one of the cryptos that is most likely to deliver, considering the age and industry exposure of the project.
Meaning it's extremely undervalued at its current market cap ranking.

Don't be a brainlet. Don't do it.

>>6674778
this guy

what colour lambo are you getting?

>>6674317
>Been hearing this since it was $.50 cents almost half a year ago.
1) three months =/= "almost half a year"
2) see pic. You're never gonna make it.

Aeternity already has link beat. Their mainnet is coming online soon and they run decentralized oracles on their own network. No erc 20 shit token needed. Get just'd boys.

>>6675914
Because oracles.

>>6682469
That's how forks work. You pick an ETH block for the current state of tokens you wish to duplicate. In this case they picked it early enough for the token to be registered on the blockchain without being scattered through the pre-sale to the public.

>>6682664
looks gay
>literally has the same logo as mobius
>pajeet coin
>normies will love it

>>6680624
Its very huge and a sign of good things to come.

>>6676891
>>6676960
>>6677551
>>6678541
This is about GPI, and it's unrelated to Chainlink.
The PoC they're talking about in this GPI context involved Hyperledger Fabric.

But if it's any consolation; a few weeks ago Swift listed the Chainlink PoC right alongside GPI as one of the key examples of ISO 20022 implementation.
See pic. In the red box is Chainlink's PoC (just compare to the Sibos listing).
This was published after Sibos, btw.

>>6682664
1) Why do bizlets continue to think every single market is only going to have ONE company playing ball? That's legitimately fucking retard level thinking.

2) Aeternity claims they incorporate decentralized oracles for the Aeternity blockchain. ChainLink's premise is that it connects decentralized oracles to ANY blockchain, starting with ETH, BTC, and Hyperledger. You think Aeternity is going to overtake ETC over night? Let's see if Aeternity goes ANYWHERE first.

>>6673991
link = etherium 2016!! Top five coin eoa 2018

>>6682814
shoo shoo pajeet

>>6682493
Sergeant here. Looking to be promoted in next couple of weeks sir.

>>6682740
Is this bad news for my normal link?
I haven't seen any btc or eth forks do as well as the OG

>>6680689
See >>6682798

Whenever you see GPI or "nostro" mentioned by a Swift publication, it is NOT related to Chainlink.
Not directly anyway, and not at this time.

I can never tell if you guys are serious.

>>6682664
>hey run decentralized oracles on their own network
>No erc 20 shit token needed

But they do use a token, right?
If not, how do they incentivize the network?

And is Aeternity blockchain-agnostic? Or are people required to use the Aeternity blockchain?

I'm 99.9999999% certain I'm not going to get a response, even though the guy only posted 12 minutes before this reply.

>>6682747
https://www.aeternity.com
>Pajeet coin

Literally no pajeet on team. Only attractive white and russian team members. Tons of team members. How many droes link have? Oh thats right 2 or 3.

>>6682886
That's just because you haven't done your research. Admit it.

I like LINK, I own LINK.

But someone explain to me why the fuck it's going up nonstop right now, drastically outpacing ETH & BTC, and most other shitcoins. I predict a 20%+ correction within the next day or two. This run is absolutely uncalled for.

>>6682807
Except considering that aeternity is a blockchain that does oracles irs potential market cap is ethereum marketcap+chainlink marketcap

>>6683047
wrong

>>6683064
Nice argument there ;)

>>6683032
im guessing people are accumulating to dump on huobi buyers

>>6683047
Sure. So is the coin I just made up in my head, buttfuckcoin. Actually it's bigger. It's a blockchain which does oracles and for every 10 buttfuckcoins you mine, a 10/10 prostitute comes to your house and lets you buttfuck her.

My blockchain protocol has the same adoption as Aeternity, and we'll catch up to ETH very quickly because of our unique premise.

Again, let's see if Aeternity gets anywhere at all. If they do, it'll be over a year from now, at which point ETH and ChainLink might already have captured the majority of major partnership opportunities.

>>6683032
This exact scenario wasn't predicted by another anon now was it? ASSBLASTER PLEASE RETURN.

>>6682923
It will operate within all blochains like chainlink but unlike chainlink aeternity can optimize its blockchain from the ground up specifically for their own needs instead of requiring to search for one not optimized for decentralized oracles.

>>6683032
New exchange listing

>>6683032
At this very stage (i.e. even before the initial network release), Link should have already been in the top 20 or top 10 by market cap.
The raw potential and industry exposure are that good.

So it's very funny to hear you panic about Link going from rank 100 to rank 93 over the past two days.

>>6683122
Aeternities main net is going to be up in a few months meanwhile chainlijnk has yet to make their initial implementation. The buttrape is coming.

>>6683152
>It will operate within all blochains like chainlink but unlike chainlink aeternity can optimize its blockchain from the ground up
You're contradicting yourself.
Does Aeternity operate "within all blockchains" or does it use its own blockchain "from the ground up"?

>[Chainlink is required] to search for [a blockchain] not optimized for decentralized oracles
What blockchain are you talking about here, specifically?

Oh, and PLEEAAASE keep responding.
Please please please please pretty please.

I used this link to get free IOS Tokens: https://t.iost.io/?c=qUrveDHh

>>6683214
Even if they launch main net in a few months, think about the actual trajectory of the protocol. Plenty of protocol's have main nets up right now, they are all minimally 1 year behind ETH in terms of growth.

So now we're 1.5 years behind. If Aeternity is legitimately THE BEST THING EVER to happen to blockchain, they might still be able to compete. Otherwise, too little, too late. Once any of these other players start seeing real world adoption, the market share is going to get eaten the fuck up. Tiny fries will have to pick at the bits. Nobody will give a shit about a blockchain with decentralized oracles which nobody uses.

>>6683152
Just in case you don't reply: you're basically proving that you have no idea what you're talking about.
You said Chainlink has to search for a blockchain "not optimized for decentralized oracles", which makes absolutely zero sense because the decentralized oracles are not tied to any blockchain AT ALL.
They exist as a standalone network that will be able to connect to any and all blockchains and DLTs that exist now and will exist in the future, simply by means of adapters.

>>6683111
Well, it has been running since before the news, though the last spike may have been a result. Still, it doesn't trade on Huobi for 2 days. If this keeps up it'll dump hard when it hits. Meh.

>>6683251
Aeternity operates within its own blockchain but can communicate with other blockchains just like chainlink. Chainlink has to decide on a blockchain that best fits their needs. You think 7 transactions per second and a lag ridden high fees netrwork like etherium is gonna be able to scale to meet the demands of banks? Kek If eth can't fix their scalability problem link can't be adopted unless they change which blockchain they operate under. Also the link erc20 token will forever be tied to etherium. Aeternity is building their blockchain from the ground up to support decentralized oracles smart contracts and the transfer of data from the real world to the blockchain and it's gonna be huge.

>>6683386
Not sure it will mate ;)

>>6683328
You're forgetting one major detail. Other smart contract blockchains can't get real world adoption without decentralized oracles. Boom swoop comes in aeternity which allows real world adoption and bam chainlink does in a fire with most other blochchains.

>>6683439
Where are you getting this from? All I found was a claim that it'd be able to connect outside entities to its own blockchain. Not interconnect blockchains or that its oracles will work with other blockchains. Source for that please?

>>6683439
Chainlink can move to any blockchain dumbass, kek

>>6683384
Sorry. Insert the word "potentially" between "for one" and "not optimised". Basicly, chainlink has to pick between available blockchains. Aeternity will make the best blockchain specspecforiufically for their oracles already. No hoping for an already existing blockchain perfect for chainlink which may bot exist. And Aeternity can communicate with other blockchains the same way chainlink can.

>>6683439
>Aeternity operates within its own blockchain but can communicate with other blockchains just like chainlink.
So in other words, the Aeternity blockchain isn't needed?

>You think 7 transactions per second and a lag ridden high fees netrwork like etherium is gonna be able to scale to meet the demands of banks?
Once again for the brain cells in the back: Chainlink will work with ANY blockchain.
Pic related, it's from the white paper.

In case you haven't noticed, banks are brewing up their own blockchains and DLTs all over the place. Swift for instance is a founding member of Hyperledger.
The client decides what blockchain/DLT the contract will use.

>Also the link erc20 token will forever be tied to etherium.
Sure.
But you do realize that the token is only the currency of the system, right?
And even if ETH shits the bed, Chainlink could simply mint new tokens on another platform and airdrop them to replace the ERC20 tokens.

>Aeternity is building their blockchain from the ground up to support decentralized oracles smart contracts and the transfer of data from the real world to the blockchain and it's gonna be huge.
But the Aeternity blockchain isn't needed, right?
If users want to use Aeternity oracles but a different blockchain, they can do that, right?

>>6683628
Specifically*

>>6683628
>Insert the word "potentially" between "for one" and "not optimised".
Still doesn't make sense.
There is no "one"; Chainlink will work with ALL blockchains.

>chainlink has to pick between available blockchains
The clients choose.
Banks for instance are making their own blockchains and DLTs.

>Aeternity will make the best blockchain specspecforiufically for their oracles already.
Good luck convincing the banks to use the aeternity blockchain instead of their own.

This is exactly why Chainlink is such a beast; it will work with ANY blockchain.

LINK HAS NOW MOVED UP TO 90.

FOMO IN MOTHERFUCKERS.

WATCH THIS MOON THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS.

>>6681594
This meme is already old. FUD somewhere else buddy!

>>6673991
Too much FUD and shilling I don’t want to touch it

>>6683638

>>6682849
I would buy link if it was black and red

Town crier is centralized look in to it.

>>6682612

Matte Black. Might have to get a used lambo tho, my stack is 7.5k

>>6683868
you should buy shadowlink then

>>6683836
HOW HAS AETERNITY MANAGED TO CREATE SUCH A PIECE OF SHIT YEARS AFTER LINK LMAO!

>>6683918
And?
Town Crier and SGX are there as options to be used by those that want them.
They are not integral to the function of Chainlink, at all.

>>6675677
> chainlink logo is literally a hexagon

brainlet

>buying Chainlink Legacy

topkek

brainlet here
what's a good place to get link?

>>6684309
do everybody a favor and learn how to ask google before you ask /biz/.

you're welcome, faggot

>>6684349
rude! but you are right.
reading about it thanks anon

>>6676096
Well that's assuming the marketcap of the entire market doesn't go up, and I think we may be headed to a trillion soonish

>>6684432
kill yourself

This is a scam coin being pumped by pajeet discord.

>>6684890
>Well that's assuming the marketcap of the entire market doesn't go up

For the entire market to go up, more money needs to be pumped into the crypto market. There isnt enough price momentum to drive the retarded returns we've seen so far. I too think a trillion is a reasonable estimate by EOY.

>>6676654
Nice dude

Need more Posts like this

Or else just need more memes, thatNs also ok

>>6685353

Explain this?

>>6674435
Every single one of them?
Lawyers are expensive, corrupt kikes

>>6685472
Already explained on this thread brainlet

Can someone post the link box unfolded template so I can print some out at work?

Would love to make a red one too, like the Jedi link and the sith link XD

>>6684086

>>6683928
>Matte Black
Absolutely based. I'm tossing up between matte black and matte silver.

>going all in on link

>>6674248
He is right tho. Some other way your link investment might tank if is the whole market crash before chainlink moons, which seems very likely. Link is going to raise up agan if Sergey delivers but with a market crash, it might take years.

>>6685801
>He is right tho.
>"hurrdurr if it doesn't work out then that is bad"
Thanks, genius.

>>6685672

>>6676327
>This will be the first time normies are attentively paying attention to LINK, and being shown the possibilities it enables. Its also very likely a clear sign Sergey has been cooking something up with Docusign.
I'm willing to bet 100% no mention of Link and just talks about the tech. Sirgay isn't a hype guy. Don't set urself up for dissapointment.

>>6673991
>b-but there's no use for oracles

>>6678146
>There are hundreds of different companies and musicians there, so just because a company goes to sxsw doesn't mean shit in it of itself. it is a good thing for marketing but it really depends on how well he can market it there among many other distractions
This. my band was a sxsw. didn't matter for shit.

>>6673991
So guys what are your price prediction eoy?

>>6686090
Dubs confirm $420, check em

>>6686090
Minimum 20$, probably around 40-50$

>>6686144
Nice

>>6686144
Thanks, just bought 420k

>>6686144
I keep seeing this meme magic happen a lot with Link.. Nice!

>>6686144
praise kek

>>6674551
Kek

>>6683512
>most other blochchains
sure kid

>>6686144
>>6686455
>>6686544
Acknowledged.

>>6686711
>>6686688
Secondary acknowledgement.

>>6686144
>>6686544
Confirmed

>>6682533
Nice!

>>6682664
I turned $175 into $10000 with the aeternity ICO

I don't get paid until fucking March, need this shit to dip again before mainnet or i'll never make it.
the frustration is unreal.

>>6688148
How much do you have?

>>6688177
2.2k

press F


Aiming to get 10k, or as close to it as realistically possible. Then put it into cold storage, hodl for two years.

>>6674115
Nice I'll have to tell that to my wife's sons

WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

DO NOT UNDER ESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT! ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT!

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO REACH $1,000 EASILY!
HOLD THAT THOUGHT AND VISUALIZE IT IN YOUR MIND EVERYDAY AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE STARTING NOW AND IT WILL MANIFEST INTO REALITY. DO IT! I'M NOT JOKING!

VISUALIZE AS OFTEN AND AS DETAILED AS POSSIBLE!

>>6688444
I was going to say you sound like the LTC Whalebro who said $1500 EOY, when it fucking tanked.

Then I checked em.

It is written.

>>6678896
Feel bad for you bro

60k here and I'm still feeling like i don't have enough

>>6689015
Lol try 100 here. Poor faggot is poor.

Is the dip over yet?
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH

Been holding onto 3000 LINK since day 1.

Fight me, faggot.

>>6682316
Anton delivers! Nice work bro!
>>6682507

I like this community,

>>inb4 fag gay

Love you guys though

>>6674301
It's been pasta for weeks dude, where've you been

Guys I now have enough Linkies I think I need to move to MEW.. I set one up, think I understand it.. but I don’t understand how MEW knows what tokens are sent to it? Why doesn’t it need to generate an address for each token? I’m just scared they’re going to disappear I want to understand

>>6690272

Please be bait.

>>6690272
Ok faggot MEW accepts all ERC20 tokens. Once you have "logged in" to your wallet, look at the right side of the screen and click on "load tokens". It will show all of the tokens that MEW has on there by default. You can still add any ERC20 token by clicking "add token". You do not need to generate any other addresses you fucking idiot.

>>6690272
Open your wallet, look bottom right for something that says "show all tokens" or something like that, it would explain it better. They're all ERC-20.

Going to buy shadowlink when it comes out. Hahahahaha

>>6690434
haha nice 1

>>6690511
This.

>>6690364
>>6690388
Thanks goys

>>6683122
Lmfao, solid tech, well-written white-paper, great team, guaranteed 10x with Buttfuckcoin

>>6683439
Besides who wants to compete for blockchain space with titans of industry like Cryptokitties?

>>6690318
>>6690272

nope this is /biz/ now. The level of delusion and stupidity is equivalent to r/ripple now but that will pump link to $10 and beyond so they can make a little money off their 2k stacks so I'm not complaining.

>>6682664

but is it agnostic?

I still remember when I first bought LINK when it hit binance. I had 6K of them and thought I did a good job. Now I see everyone with 50K, 60K, 100K...what the fuck is going on?

>>6673991
Can you cash out whenever? If so, sure I will invest.

Chainlink Moon mission in progress
>>6691252
>>6691252